User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
OR, USA
|
Posted: 3/26/2024 6:15:40 PM EDT
I am about out of 178 ELD's and am wondering about switching to the 168s. I trust Hornady G7 data and it looks like they actually might be a better choice for the .308. I am not a competitor but do enjoy plinking at our 1400 yard Gong range. Maybe Rob01 can help me out? I have followed all your advice on the 175 and 178's. I have lots of WW, Federal and BH brass.
|
|
|
WV, USA
|
Posted: 3/26/2024 7:22:40 PM EDT
[#1]
I have had good results to 1000 with the 168s from my 24" Satern barrel. IIRC I didnt need any more adjustments than I was already using
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/26/2024 7:39:54 PM EDT
[#2]
Originally Posted By QCB: I am about out of 178 ELD's and am wondering about switching to the 168s. I trust Hornady G7 data and it looks like they actually might be a better choice for the .308. I am not a competitor but do enjoy plinking at our 1400 yard Gong range. Maybe Rob01 can help me out? I have followed all your advice on the 175 and 178's. I have lots of WW, Federal and BH brass. Yup can help with that. The 168 ELD-M is an excellent choice. You can get them going at 2700+ and they have a good BC as well. I have shot them to 1250 yards in matches and they performed great. I don't think you would be disappointed in the 168s compared to the 178s. That said though if you have a load in your rifle with the 178 then why change? |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 12:39:55 AM EDT
[#3]
I love them. I get 2610 from a 16 inch barrel amd IMR 4064. I pushed a less accurate load to 2750 same gun.
I have shot them to 1200 with great results. |
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 1:02:22 AM EDT
[#4]
Thanks guys for prompt response.
I was thinking of switching because the 168's will probably shoot a little bit flatter and maybe have a bit less recoil. I dont know if 0.5 or 0.6 mil is worth the trouble of working up a new load though. The 175 and 178's have done well with Varget, RL-15 and CFE223. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2024 9:03:48 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By QCB: Thanks guys for prompt response. I was thinking of switching because the 168's will probably shoot a little bit flatter and maybe have a bit less recoil. I dont know if 0.5 or 0.6 mil is worth the trouble of working up a new load though. The 175 and 178's have done well with Varget, RL-15 and CFE223. It shouldn't take much of a load work up. Load them about .020" off lands and I would start with your 178 load and should have a load within 30-50 rounds of testing. I only use Varget in my .308 and it was pretty easy to get a load with the 168s. You could always buy one box and give them a try. |
|
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 3/28/2024 1:43:20 PM EDT
[#6]
Thanks Rob.
I am using 43.5 gr Varget now in WW cases. About 2640 fps in my 20 inch 1-10. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2024 2:26:28 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By QCB: Thanks Rob. I am using 43.5 gr Varget now in WW cases. About 2640 fps in my 20 inch 1-10. Yeah that should be a good starting point. My load is 44.1grns of Varget in Hornady brass and a little more in my BH brass which is basically WW. |
|
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
