Galil ARM with a CHF barrel.

Clone of the Finnish RK 62, please!

Inspirational wikipedia article.

How about a somewhat modified (and easier to put together development wise) version of that, that would ultimately be even cooler.

A G43 sized lower that takes a Micro Dagger upper, and is the (exactly) 0.1 inch wider that it would have to be to accommodate G26 mags (and thus any other standard size Glock mag).     The micro slides are already done and shipping, so the only new development would be the frame molds (hopefully you could use either the full size or micro trigger group), possibly some work with the mag release since the whole thing would be thinner than a standard 'full size' or 'compact'.

A1/A2 premium uppers with CHF barrels: 11.5", 14.5", 16", and 20". Not pencil barrels and add midlengths.



Attached File


Oh and a PSA Sabre uppers 13.7 and 14.5" with a CHF barrel instead of stainless, also option of not pinned and welded to have our own muzzle device pinned and welded.

An M14/M1A.
These Rifles should not be as expensive as they are. The polytech/norinco M308's that used to be able to be brought in were where all M14 rifles should be as a starting point. Why not make a furnitureless model as well, for those that want to use a chassis and bring the cost down even more.
It's just ridficulous that these rifles cost what they do and it would be awesome if PSA could take over that niche. Not to mention springfield's politics.

Another idea would be to copy the Al-Kadiseh variant of an SVD. the whole idea was to copy the dragunov but with sheet metal parts and AK iron sights and such to make it way cheaper to produce. Since PSA has experience with stamped sheet metal and AK's/parts, its not much of a stretch to think they might be able to do it?

Anyone suggest a .22lr Micro dagger in short and long config with or without threaded barrels?

Take a bite out of the Mark series pistols.

Ambi lowers with full ambi controls. Not just the selector switch, bolt catch and magazine release too. This should become industry standard. And ambi charging handles.

Colored anodizing.

A line of PSA suppressors and muzzle devices, that fit SureFire QD mounting specs. Even if the rest of the can design is different, still using the Surefire pattern mounting. So a PSA can will fit a SF flash hider and a SF can will fit a PSA qd flash hider.

EOTechs that take 18350 or CR123.

FIFY

Yeah that too.

H&R T223

Can you guys make a clone of Federal's 62gr. FUSION MSR? This is loaded a tad bit hotter than the standard .223 loading.

@Jman_JJE @PalmettoStateArmory

Make a semi M60, please.

Since you’re doing the STG 44, I’d like to see the Bren LMG that uses a common cartridge and a common magazine. Loved that gun in call of duty.

So half a million in tooling for a gun you might sell 2 a month?

Sound legit.

This, and a magazine capacity of over ten.  If KelTec can get their P17 to run I know PSA can produce a better gun (certainly better looking and feeling, LOL).  Beat Advantage Arms to the punch!

Just price it under $1,500.00 and make it up on volume.    I'll buy at least 6 at that price.  I do wonder what the actual price point would be on such a beast.  If you really could get production going for half a mil and you made $1,000 on each, you wouldn't have to sell but 500 to break even on the machinery.  Obviously, there are additional expenses in assembly, QC, etc.  But an semi M60 would be tits.

Another vote for the 43-wide frame.


A frame, G43 height with it's own 10rd flush fit metal magazines that also took the longer 15rd magazines.  And completely cross compatible with Micro Dagger/G48/G43X/G43 slides?

Well .... That'd be something very, very nice.



I still say G26 legnth Dagger frames, no cutting to make a G26L copy

Make a mini M1 Garand in 5.56 with a 10rd en-block clip.

“Mp7” that takes Glock magazines and chambered in 9mm.

While that would be cool, I would imagine that people would just buy a mini-14 instead

But...it would make us happy

For real, though...PSA/H&R really needs to produce a belt fed of some sort. Make belt feds commonplace for civilians, even if semi auto. I would vote a MAG 58 or RPD clone

For me - I have 4 items.

1) Barrel Profile.  The A2 profile is pretty much accepted to be a dated profile that adds bulk and mass for no benefit.  There are numerous other much better profiles out there.  I think PSA should revisit settling on a new default company barrel profile, and ditch the A2.  My own suggestion is to look at the FAXON Gunner Profile - though really almost anything is better than A2.

2) AR10 to SFAR.  You own DPMS, their Gen2 was basically the same as Rugers SFAR that's the hot topic right now.  I think you should re-enter the more efficient modernized .308 class market of the SFAR approach; it's time.

3) More in line with the JJE Enterprises goal of arming and maintaining the arms and usage of the American - I think the company should expand from just manufacturing ammo, to also manufacturing gunpowder.  Understood this is no small ask - but IMHO, the single greatest pinch-point to the American continuing to shoot, is gunpowder - the magic that makes it all work.  The number of domestic manufacturer locations of gunpowder in America today is basically St. Marks in Florida; and as far as I can tell, that one location is basically about it.  Everything else is imported, and as such, subject to the pleasure and the whims of the executive branch.  This is a big deal, and we need an additional fabrication facility - and preferably one that values the American people.  

4) Related to the above, the single most critical limiting factor now continues to be ammo.  You literally cannot overshoot on this, and so any plans for expansion of capacity should just be auto-approved.  As always, continue to do so safely, as an industrial incident is something to avoid at all costs.  But whatever your capacity is now, if you increased it by an order of magnitude, it still wouldn't be enough.

I celebrate and enjoy the initiative to manufacture classics.  Such as the STG-44 project.  My only request is to not over-prioritize those over more core focus while doing so.  IMHO, the above 4 should be prioritized as much closer to the core focus of the company and the company mission statement.  With that in mind - SVD!!  A side project building an SVD has my interest very high.  Please make it aesthetically as close to the classic as possible.  And if there's a 6.5CM option with magazines that still look like the classic - I'm a buyer.

On a final note - I can't overstate how impressed I am with PSA and the company leadership, both as a customer, personally from my direct interactions, and professionally, as a business development professional.  PSA is an organization I'm proud to say I buy from, and have had pleasure to talk to.  Keep up the fantastic work gents!

Belt fed that uses ar fcg would be awesome with an frt or super safety

Absolutely. And the links need to be cheap. Like dirt cheap and sold by the case. And throw a magnetic sweeper in the box while you are at it.

How about a bottom-eject shotgun with a magazine tube that allows you to switch barrels and capacities as easily as the Mossberg 500's & Remington 870's - not barrels like the Ithaca 37 or Browning BPS.

FULL ambidextrous controls on the AR platform.

M14/M1A upscaled to chamber .30-06.  Basically a new-era BAR or Colt Monitor, but half the weight, with 20-rnd mags under $50.  Ambi controls would be nice too.

Double-stack 1911 and/or .45ACP Dagger.


Agree with previous posters about ammo/powder.

Since y’all are experimenting so much with the JAKL platform already, I’d love to see one chambered in 12 gauge that takes Mossberg’s 590M magazines for higher capacity

A Ciener style belt fed A1 upper and pre-cut lower @mike_nds

Beltfed AR uppers in 5.56 and .308

The .308 Jakl...but in 6.5 Creedmoor with a 20" barrel.

416 height clone uppers that take standard DI guts but HK handguards.

And before someone with a 6.4” tall Unity mount asks why, because I’m poor and can’t afford a real one.

I disagree for a couple reasons.

First is that you get the historical element but with a cartridge that's readily available and significantly cheaper. I have an original M1, and if I could get a 3/4 scale version that shot .223 for $1200-1500 I'd do it in a heartbeat.

Second is that with an unthreaded muzzle it should be 50 state legal. California is a huge market all by itself, and while I hope the various state level awbs get struck down soon,  I don’t really expect them to. If limited to 10rds I'd honestly take an M1 style enblock clip over a normal magazine.

PSA Stiletto: 12+1 Pocket Pistol in the 7.65 PSA cartridge. A Ruger LCP size/weight pistol, that holds 12+1 of a new PSA designed cartridge that can actually reach 12"+ penetration with expansion.

Federal released their 30 Super Carry a few years ago, and it was a huge blunder - they tried to create a 9mm competitor, a mistake as everyone loves 9mm.

Yet the basic logic of a high cap, .32 caliber subcompact pistol is very valid - if it were a .380 competitor. Whereas everyone loves 9mm and is resistant to change, everyone thinks .380 sucks and would be open to something better coming along.

Enter 7.65 PSA. A rimless .32, case lengthened from 17mm to 19mm, running at higher pressures now possible due to modern locked breach actions.

--> 85gr XTP @ 1050fps from a 2.75" barrel.

Brassfetcher has already established this through his .32 NAA experiments as one of the very few loads that can hit 12"+ pen with expansion from a pocket pistol. The 85gr .312 projectile offers better sectional density then the 90gr .355 of a .380, while the XTP provides controlled, limited expansion. The 7.65 PSA would duplicate these ballistics in a straightwall, high cap cartridge.



The Ruger LCP Max holds 10+1 .380. With the PSA Stilletto built around the 7.65 PSA, it will both be able to hold 12+1 flush, while also having a slightly thinner grip then the .380 double stack, making for both a higher capacity and more concealable pocket pistol.

This would totally upend Rugers current dominance in the pocket pistol market, and also because PSA would make the 7.65 PSA cartridge, it would be a win for Vertical integration.

In terms of sales, the Stiletto would really be the Goldilocks CCW pistol for most folks. 14oz loaded, 13 rounds, 12" penetration, fits in the pocket. (I know I sure as hell want to buy one.)

Later, PSA could expand the Stiletto lineup to full size, slimline pistols holding 20+1 in 7.65 PSA, marketed to the recoil sensitive, as it would offer much less recoil then 9mm guns. Another market that is currently lacking...

I think this is a money maker
Just sell it stripped

BAR

The X57 got me thinking about the PDW concept. I’m not really interested in adding another caliber to what I already have so I’m not too interested in adding 5.7.

However, that overall gun package in a 9mm would be something that I would be very interested in. I know the Glock mags would be the most logical magazines, but if it could have a more vertical (90 degree) grip that could accept Scorpion mags that would not only be great capacity, it would be aesthetically pleasing. Not too sure if this is even possible based on the magazine geometry, but a grip fed, Scorpion mag PDW would be amazing.

Glock mag X57 would be a hit, and pair well with the Dagger series.

Agreed, especially coming from my Glock owner. It will be the most logical. I’m just going for aesthetics and capacity more than anything else. My eye twitches when I see extended magazines at a rearward rake. Plus Scorpion mags are cheap and reliable.

Would kill for a 12” and p/w 13.7” 6.5 Grendel JAKL upper.

I'd put money on something Flux(ish) being a better option if you are going 9mm.  The challenge would be avoiding patent infringement even though theirs is currently designed for the Sig chassis system (they're supposedly reworking their original Glock version).  A complete gun would probably be fine since I very seriously doubt most people buying a Flux, or any of the Sig chassis guns, are changing them around- especially if you could come in under Flux's price point which is a barrier to some (not to mention availability).  

The other option would be a chassis system like the B&T USW series but made to fit the Dagger.  I can't imagine B&T sells enough of them in the US that they wouldn't be open to discussing selling a manufacturing license for the Dagger (and Rock).  There's also their TP series- if the trigger could be improved since that seems to be most people's complaint about them- behind their prices of course (I'd love to have one, but definitely not >$2000 worth of love )


The comments on powders are definitely valid, as are primers.  I know PSA is set(ting) up to make primers to go with their ammo so I could definitely see that being worthwhile.  Here's hoping everything goes safely with that endeavor.  Not trying to sound snarky at all, but there's no room for any QC issues in that department like PSA has had with some other projects.  We've seen several well established plants have industrial safety accidents in the last couple of years.  

Please install the Sabre Claw two stage trigger in standalone Sabre lowers.

Make a version of the Vuk with an extended handguard to the gasblock

Please give the Vuk an AK bayonet lug

Cheap SKS, please.

Something along this line of older Italian rimfires.

Dagger slide configurator. Instead of having however many different versions of the slides (or in addition) give us the option to customize the slide we're after.

Any ETA for the Ranch Rifle sights?  I have two Gens1s waiting (5.56 and 7.62x51)…

Sabre CHF Block 2 uppers, please.

Grease Gun

Sabre M4A2 - a take on what an optimized M4 would look like if NGSW was abandoned and the M4A1 was upgraded to M4A2. Basically like a further developed URG-I.

-Fully Ambi lower with flared magwell
-Mil grade MLOK handguard
-14.5" CHF/CL barrel, midlength, with optimum taper profile
-Warcomp as P&W
-Bolt with some sort of superior coating

I have been constantly refreshing Psa website for the sabre upper 14.5 with the Geislee rail and jmac keymo break. I have been relentless checking every hour for 1 month. Still have none in stock is there anyone who know how long Psa takes to re stock this upper? I already bought the lower thinking it wouldn’t be long lol the sku numbers are 51655152064, 516551628691,516551628974. Any help or info is appreciated! @psa