User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
USA
|
Posted: 2/20/2015 9:04:27 PM EDT
[Last Edit: mtrmble]
[#1]
in for 4
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/20/2015 9:50:49 PM EDT
[#2]
In for 2.
|
|
|
|
CA, USA
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 12:37:56 AM EDT
[#3]
In for 2.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 2:29:37 AM EDT
[#4]
I'm in!!
|
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 9:52:53 AM EDT
[#5]
in for 2 of them
|
|
|
DEU
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 10:29:06 AM EDT
[#6]
I'm in for 2
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 11:17:18 AM EDT
[#7]
10 days left and we need 53 more commitments... almost half way there!
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 11:41:07 AM EDT
[#8]
I'm in for 2
|
|
|
ID, USA
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 2:31:06 PM EDT
[#9]
I'm in for 2.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 3:09:54 PM EDT
[#10]
In for 2
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 5:13:47 PM EDT
[#11]
I'm in.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/21/2015 6:30:04 PM EDT
[#12]
I'm in for 2 please.
Bigfeet |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/22/2015 11:17:01 AM EDT
[#13]
I'm in for 4 plates.
thanks for the email yesterday! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/22/2015 3:17:00 PM EDT
[#14]
I'm in for two.
|
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 2/22/2015 5:55:08 PM EDT
[#15]
In for 2.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/22/2015 6:56:19 PM EDT
[#16]
I'm in for two.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/22/2015 8:04:15 PM EDT
[#17]
In for 6.
|
|
|
|
AK, USA
|
Posted: 2/22/2015 11:28:17 PM EDT
[#18]
In for 4
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 2/23/2015 2:28:30 AM EDT
[#19]
In for 2.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2015 9:02:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: piggly_wiggly]
[#20]
41 commitments to go in 8 days and we go live!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2015 9:16:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: GIR-101]
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
41 commitments to go in 8 days and we go live! Are you counting each set as a commitment, or each individual? I figure it's by individual, just figured I'd ask since several folks are in for 4 or more It's in the OP, reading is fundamental 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2015 10:36:36 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GIR-101:
Are you counting each set as a commitment, or each individual? I figure it's by individual, just figured I'd ask since several folks are in for 4 or more Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GIR-101:
Originally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
41 commitments to go in 8 days and we go live! Are you counting each set as a commitment, or each individual? I figure it's by individual, just figured I'd ask since several folks are in for 4 or more This is explained in the OP: "As with our previous GBs, in order for this GB to activate, we need a minimum of 100 members to post "I'm in" commitments on this thread IN THE NEXT 15 DAYS." |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2015 11:10:34 PM EDT
[#23]
I'm in for 4
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2015 11:10:59 PM EDT
[#24]
Any idea on when this buy will go through? or when it expires? basically I'm in for 2 if i'll be charged anytime after March 1, so if you can chime in on timing Piggly i'd appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/23/2015 11:14:39 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
This is explained in the OP: "As with our previous GBs, in order for this GB to activate, we need a minimum of 100 members to post "I'm in" commitments on this thread IN THE NEXT 15 DAYS." Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
Originally Posted By GIR-101:
Originally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
41 commitments to go in 8 days and we go live! Are you counting each set as a commitment, or each individual? I figure it's by individual, just figured I'd ask since several folks are in for 4 or more This is explained in the OP: "As with our previous GBs, in order for this GB to activate, we need a minimum of 100 members to post "I'm in" commitments on this thread IN THE NEXT 15 DAYS." My bad, reading is crucial
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 1:27:13 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
41 commitments to go in 8 days and we go live! Not now chief, I"m in the zone! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 3:14:51 AM EDT
[#27]
In for 4 plates.
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 4:16:28 AM EDT
[#28]
I'm cross posting this here since there hasn't been a response from P_W in the thread in the tactical gear forum. This will affect the total numbers some as I, and probably a few other tank icon holding members, legally cannot send a copy of a military ID.
Originally Posted By K1rodeoboater: Originally Posted By NavyIS2: Originally Posted By NoMoAMMO: What would you accept in lie of a .mil ID since we are not suppose to scan/copy/email those? I was wondering the same thing. What about a copy of our official orders? Yeah I realized that too. Generally speaking when I've told companies that I cannot give them a copy of my .mil ID because that's illegal to do They either ask an email from my .mil account, or send a copy of my most recent LES, or a copy of my ERB. For Army at least, the new enterprise email system formats it so if you're .mil it's in there before the @ sign, and if you're a contractor it'll be .civ before the @ sign. Regardless....P_W you may want to push to update your policy dated 13JAN2011 as it's in direct violation of Title 18, US Code Part I, Chapter 33, Section 701 which is punishable by fines and or imprisonment for up to 6 months. This isn't a recent change nor are we making this stuff up, http://www.army.mil/article/28452/photocopying-military-cac-ids-a-violation-of-federal-law/, and that's dated 07OCT2009 which pre-dates SKD's policy by a little over a year. In short if you want verification of active military service to purchase armor you'll have to accept some other form of certifying credentials. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 6:39:55 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By K1rodeoboater:
I'm cross posting this here since there hasn't been a response from P_W in the thread in the tactical gear forum. This will affect the total numbers some as I, and probably a few other tank icon holding members, legally cannot send a copy of a military ID. Originally Posted By K1rodeoboater:
Originally Posted By NavyIS2:
Originally Posted By NoMoAMMO:
What would you accept in lie of a .mil ID since we are not suppose to scan/copy/email those? I was wondering the same thing. What about a copy of our official orders? Yeah I realized that too. Generally speaking when I've told companies that I cannot give them a copy of my .mil ID because that's illegal to do They either ask an email from my .mil account, or send a copy of my most recent LES, or a copy of my ERB. For Army at least, the new enterprise email system formats it so if you're .mil it's in there before the @ sign, and if you're a contractor it'll be .civ before the @ sign. Regardless....P_W you may want to push to update your policy dated 13JAN2011 as it's in direct violation of Title 18, US Code Part I, Chapter 33, Section 701 which is punishable by fines and or imprisonment for up to 6 months. This isn't a recent change nor are we making this stuff up, http://www.army.mil/article/28452/photocopying-military-cac-ids-a-violation-of-federal-law/, and that's dated 07OCT2009 which pre-dates SKD's policy by a little over a year. In short if you want verification of active military service to purchase armor you'll have to accept some other form of certifying credentials. while I have said I'm in, and want to get these plates so badly, I have been debating on how to verify my active status with you guys. As the above points out, sending a copy of our cac isnt exactly allowed. I feel as verification from a .mil email should be fine. Whatever you guys decide, just please keep it within the legal bounds of what us active guys can legally do. I dont need COMMs coming down and locking out my account because I'm wrongfully sending PII(Personally identifiable information). |
|
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 12:52:12 PM EDT
[#30]
In for 2
|
|
|
OH, USA
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 3:27:58 PM EDT
[#31]
I'm in for two...let me know when this is a done deal and how to pay...
furn1408 |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 5:23:30 PM EDT
[#32]
I'm in for six.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 6:09:07 PM EDT
[#33]
In for 2
|
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 2/24/2015 10:45:20 PM EDT
[#34]
I am in for 2. Six rocks!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 6:25:09 AM EDT
[#35]
I'm in for 2!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 10:20:46 AM EDT
[#36]
In, 2
|
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 10:37:25 AM EDT
[#37]
Originally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
premium LTC 6”x6” polyethylene side plate that are made to stop 7.62 Nato and weigh just 1 lb each? We know these aren't rated for .223/5.56, but since we had a couple samples, I decided to sacrifice one for some unofficial, non-scientific testing involving a 16" AR15 and 3 types factory ammo I had on hand. Here are some results: I am in for two, but would like clarification on this. You say made to stop 7.62 nato, but then that they are not rated for 5.56? Do these have a level rating? I would like to see these stop the evil tank armor defeating depleted uranium core M855.. 
|
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 12:35:34 PM EDT
[#38]
As a active FD Officer/EMS I would like to get 2 if any are left. Does FD I.D. work or do I need a letter? A few more of the FD guys are trying to find funds for a Active Shooter/SHTF rig as well. And my Team expired last week, I will be back soon. I have been off for rotator cuff surgery and did not pay up this year.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 7:44:14 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By K1rodeoboater:
I'm cross posting this here since there hasn't been a response from P_W in the thread in the tactical gear forum. This will affect the total numbers some as I, and probably a few other tank icon holding members, legally cannot send a copy of a military ID. Originally Posted By K1rodeoboater:
Originally Posted By NavyIS2:
Originally Posted By NoMoAMMO:
What would you accept in lie of a .mil ID since we are not suppose to scan/copy/email those? I was wondering the same thing. What about a copy of our official orders? Yeah I realized that too. Generally speaking when I've told companies that I cannot give them a copy of my .mil ID because that's illegal to do They either ask an email from my .mil account, or send a copy of my most recent LES, or a copy of my ERB. For Army at least, the new enterprise email system formats it so if you're .mil it's in there before the @ sign, and if you're a contractor it'll be .civ before the @ sign. Regardless....P_W you may want to push to update your policy dated 13JAN2011 as it's in direct violation of Title 18, US Code Part I, Chapter 33, Section 701 which is punishable by fines and or imprisonment for up to 6 months. This isn't a recent change nor are we making this stuff up, http://www.army.mil/article/28452/photocopying-military-cac-ids-a-violation-of-federal-law/, and that's dated 07OCT2009 which pre-dates SKD's policy by a little over a year. In short if you want verification of active military service to purchase armor you'll have to accept some other form of certifying credentials. I appreciate the concern over the ID issue. If you IM me directly, I’ll provide you with an alternate means to verify your active duty status, as I’ve done in the past for others who have asked. Anyone uncomfortable with any part of our LE/Mil purchase policy can always opt to send us the civilian paperwork requirements. Please refrain from further discussions regarding our policy on this thread, and contact me directly. Only active duty military members will receive alternate options for verification, so if you are not active duty military please do not IM me about your particular ID/employment situation- I will not reply. Thank you- p_w |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 7:45:35 PM EDT
[Last Edit: piggly_wiggly]
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By zoe17:
As a active FD Officer/EMS I would like to get 2 if any are left. Does FD I.D. work or do I need a letter? A few more of the FD guys are trying to find funds for a Active Shooter/SHTF rig as well. And my Team expired last week, I will be back soon. I have been off for rotator cuff surgery and did not pay up this year. IM sent. Your inbox is full... please clear it out and IM me. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 8:34:33 PM EDT
[#41]
in for 2
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 11:29:52 PM EDT
[#42]
In for 4
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2015 11:41:01 PM EDT
[#43]
In for 2
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2015 12:45:15 AM EDT
[#44]
In for 2.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2015 9:43:29 AM EDT
[#45]
5 days left and we still need 26 more commitments!
If you're on the fence, now is the time to pull the trigger. If you've got friends who want in, make sure they're ARFCOM members and that they're on this thread
REMEMBER, ONLY THOSE COMMITTED ON THIS THREAD WILL BE ALLOWED TO ORDER THIS DEAL. IF THIS GOES LIVE, AND WE HAVE ANY PLATES LEFT OVER, THEY GO ON SKDTAC.COM AT A MUCH HIGHER PRICE. NO STRAGGLERS OR LATE-COMERS WILL BE ALLOWED IN. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2015 9:56:18 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sixtyfive:
I am in for two, but would like clarification on this. You say made to stop 7.62 nato, but then that they are not rated for 5.56? Do these have a level rating? I would like to see these stop the evil tank armor defeating depleted uranium core M855.. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sixtyfive:
Originally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
premium LTC 6”x6” polyethylene side plate that are made to stop 7.62 Nato and weigh just 1 lb each? We know these aren't rated for .223/5.56, but since we had a couple samples, I decided to sacrifice one for some unofficial, non-scientific testing involving a 16" AR15 and 3 types factory ammo I had on hand. Here are some results: I am in for two, but would like clarification on this. You say made to stop 7.62 nato, but then that they are not rated for 5.56? Do these have a level rating? I would like to see these stop the evil tank armor defeating depleted uranium core M855.. Yes, this was tested by the manufacturer to stop 7.62 NATO. It was not tested/rated for 5.56, which is generally a harder threat to stop than 7.62 when it comes to personal armor. Side plates, like helmets, do not have official NIJ ratings. Any mention of threat levels are given by manufacturers to say they will stop similar threats, but due to the size (and in the case of the helmets, shape), you can't test them the same way you can regular plates with regards to back face deformation and edge shots. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2015 10:28:46 AM EDT
[#47]
Work with TAG's plate carrier?
And what are ID requirements? Sorry, on metro and browsing this is difficult |
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 2/26/2015 11:07:18 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
Yes, this was tested by the manufacturer to stop 7.62 NATO. It was not tested/rated for 5.56, which is generally a harder threat to stop than 7.62 when it comes to personal armor. Side plates, like helmets, do not have official NIJ ratings. Any mention of threat levels are given by manufacturers to say they will stop similar threats, but due to the size (and in the case of the helmets, shape), you can't test them the same way you can regular plates with regards to back face deformation and edge shots. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
Originally Posted By sixtyfive:
Originally Posted By piggly_wiggly:
premium LTC 6”x6” polyethylene side plate that are made to stop 7.62 Nato and weigh just 1 lb each? We know these aren't rated for .223/5.56, but since we had a couple samples, I decided to sacrifice one for some unofficial, non-scientific testing involving a 16" AR15 and 3 types factory ammo I had on hand. Here are some results: I am in for two, but would like clarification on this. You say made to stop 7.62 nato, but then that they are not rated for 5.56? Do these have a level rating? I would like to see these stop the evil tank armor defeating depleted uranium core M855.. Yes, this was tested by the manufacturer to stop 7.62 NATO. It was not tested/rated for 5.56, which is generally a harder threat to stop than 7.62 when it comes to personal armor. Side plates, like helmets, do not have official NIJ ratings. Any mention of threat levels are given by manufacturers to say they will stop similar threats, but due to the size (and in the case of the helmets, shape), you can't test them the same way you can regular plates with regards to back face deformation and edge shots. Thank you for the info, I can say that I learned something today! I am still in for 2. |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 2/26/2015 11:33:43 AM EDT
[#49]
I'm in for 2!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/26/2015 1:36:34 PM EDT
[#50]
I'm in for two
|
|
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
