User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:03:58 PM EDT
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:05:47 PM EDT
[#1]
The smoking gun!!
|
|
|
CA, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:07:13 PM EDT
[#2]
Wow, they straight said that shit!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:07:59 PM EDT
[#3]
Two weeks!
|
|
|
|
WV, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:20:07 PM EDT
[#4]
Quick! Someone write a strongly worded letter!
|
|
|
IA, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:21:59 PM EDT
[#5]
This is how much power they wield. The Dems.
This, and they hired the most incompetent DAs to press charges and tie Trump up. ALL the while they get away with it. They are showing us how weak and little we are by having incompetent run away with this sham trial. The media is in the same boat. |
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:23:59 PM EDT
[#6]
She can't speak to the trial because no-one wrote the answer down for her in her binder.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:27:22 PM EDT
[#7]
They can do what they want with zero repercussion.
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:27:49 PM EDT
[#8]
So mistrial?
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:36:13 PM EDT
[#9]
What difference does it make what that idiot says. Obviously, it's all about the election. They do it anyway.
Personally, I'm looking forward to seeing the perp-walks when payback time comes. In the past, there was an unspoken agreement not to prosecute people after they left office. Obviously, the Democrats are asking to change this tradition, and I hope the Republicans Dish it up for them. Not that I think they actually will, of course... |
|
|
LA, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:47:13 PM EDT
[#10]
No surprises. And no consequences. They are above the law.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:52:11 PM EDT
[#11]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:54:37 PM EDT
[#12]
Originally Posted By Chokey:
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:55:26 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Morlawn66]
[#13]
And so it goes , if you can't see what things are you are blind . Anarcho - Tyranny at it's finest for the prole class .
Per boy George Stephanopoulos, " The Deep State is packed with Patriots ". Truly wtf and projection out of his ass . |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:58:12 PM EDT
[#14]
‘…we have been spurned with contempt from the foot of the throne.’
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 5:59:49 PM EDT
[#15]
In before our creepy lawyer backflips and pretzel twirls to say it's all normal and makes sense
|
|
|
|
CA, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:00:02 PM EDT
[#16]
Ahhhh..... even Stevie Wonder saw this coming.... WH communists finally admitting all of this nonsense against Trump is politically motivated, I am surprised and shocked.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:03:20 PM EDT
[#17]
Call her to the stand, without a notebook she would be lost, and actually have to tell the truth under oath.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:06:10 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fosters: So mistrial? Yeah right |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:08:47 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By olivers_AR: Call her to the stand, without a notebook she would be lost, and actually have to tell the truth under oath. And do you honestly think she would tell the truth?? Pick one... "I misspoke" "The audio was not correct" "That was taken out of context" "What I meant to say was..." "There was confusion regarding the question" |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:11:44 PM EDT
[#20]
Some of yall need to understand that she was trying to prevent a Hatch Act violation...again.
|
|
|
|
SGP
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:19:23 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By fosters: So mistrial? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:21:37 PM EDT
[#22]
We got em now
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:21:52 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Skydivesnake: In before our creepy lawyer backflips and pretzel twirls to say it's all normal and makes sense Instead of just reading a clickbait thread title, did you listen to the actual clip? What exactly was the question she was responding to, and what was saying is related to the 2024 election? |
|
|
|
SC, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:32:40 PM EDT
[#24]
That means it was going to come out and they had to get ahead of it!
Election interference anyone? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:41:13 PM EDT
[#25]
I really can't stand that Cabbage Patch DIE hire.
At least Little Red Lyinghood was a bit nicer to look at. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:41:40 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eolian: That means it was going to come out and they had to get ahead of it! Election interference anyone? Wrong. The new handbook says election interference can only be committed by conservatives . |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 6:59:55 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Instead of just reading a clickbait thread title, did you listen to the actual clip? What exactly was the question she was responding to, and what was saying is related to the 2024 election? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:06:16 PM EDT
[#28]
And she stretches out her insurmountable lead as number 1 in the ranking for dumbest ever Whitehouse press secretary.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:12:43 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Deadtired: I did. Question was asked in the context of the Speaker of the House going to Trump's trial. She said she could not speak to the Speaker's actions, and that "this" was related to the '24 election. Either the trial was related to the '24 election, or the Speaker's visit to the trial was related to the '24 election. At the very least the Speaker went to the trial as a campaign stop. Correct. I mean, even I think this Stormy Daniels trial is bullshit, and politically motivated. But the clear inference in her comment was that the speaker’s presence at the trial was related to the 2024 election, not an admission from the WH that the trial itself was. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:18:17 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By olivers_AR: Call her to the stand, without a notebook she would be lost, and actually have to tell the truth under oath. She would still lie. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:23:19 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Correct. I mean, even I think this Stormy Daniels trial is bullshit, and politically motivated. But the clear inference in her comment was that the speaker’s presence at the trial was related to the 2024 election, not an admission from the WH that the trial itself was. So the worst possible interpretation of her words is still true then, even if you could interpret them in a different way ? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:23:52 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Correct. I mean, even I think this Stormy Daniels trial is bullshit, and politically motivated. But the clear inference in her comment was that the speaker's presence at the trial was related to the 2024 election, not an admission from the WH that the trial itself was. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:27:02 PM EDT
[Last Edit: artburg]
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rocketboy42: Wow, they straight said that shit! Well before 2020 Joe said "We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics." |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:27:31 PM EDT
[#34]
I think it's hilarious that the two trials that actually had some level of possible substance are gone now because the dems just can't help being so crooked that any judge that didn't want to beclown himself professionally had to let them go. Turns out that using Soros money to hire DEI morons to professional positions is a bad plan.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:28:19 PM EDT
[#35]
Originally Posted By Chokey:
Well no shit Sherlock. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:29:22 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By osprey21: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/766/IMG-6646-3192475.jpg I laughed so damn hard at that. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:31:17 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Skydivesnake: So the worst possible interpretation of her words is still true then, even if you could interpret them in a different way ? It’s not an interpretation. It’s what she was saying. She was asked about the speaker’s presence at the trial, and that is what she was commenting on. Be better than the clickbait. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:33:26 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rubik: What difference does it make what that idiot says. Obviously, it's all about the election. They do it anyway. Personally, I'm looking forward to seeing the perp-walks when payback time comes. In the past, there was an unspoken agreement not to prosecute people after they left office. Obviously, the Democrats are asking to change this tradition, and I hope the Republicans Dish it up for them. Not that I think they actually will, of course... “Turnabout is fair play when the shoe is on the other foot” is something certain members of the GOP have quietly done very well at times |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:35:35 PM EDT
[#39]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:35:48 PM EDT
[#40]
At this point its just designed to be a mockery of the american people. They put an obvious retard to herp and derp their way through all the questions as an F U to anyone who thinks the government could be held accountable or questioned
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:39:25 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: It’s not an interpretation. It’s what she was saying. She was asked about the speaker’s presence at the trial, and that is what she was commenting on. Be better than the clickbait. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By Skydivesnake: So the worst possible interpretation of her words is still true then, even if you could interpret them in a different way ? It’s not an interpretation. It’s what she was saying. She was asked about the speaker’s presence at the trial, and that is what she was commenting on. Be better than the clickbait. There are two ways to interpret what she said, and you are in agreement that both interpretations are correct, irrespective of which one she actually meant. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:41:04 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By osprey21: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/766/IMG-6646-3192475.jpg Gross, it’s covered in shit. |
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:43:44 PM EDT
[#43]
I believe Hillary is behind this trial. Lanny Davis is involved.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:44:01 PM EDT
[#44]
That's just brazen- and exceptionally confident.
|
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:45:19 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Rocketboy42: Wow, they straight said that shit! Why wouldn't they? They won their Revolution. They don't have to hide shit anymore |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:47:13 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Skydivesnake: There are two ways to interpret what she said, and you are in agreement that both interpretations are correct, irrespective of which one she actually meant. lol, no there aren’t. She was responding to a question about the speaker’s presence at the trial, not the trial itself. Look, I’m in agreement the trial is bullshit. But be that as it may, the video is not a WH Press Secretary admission of what the OP is implying with the thread title. It’s misleading at best, but it slides by because lots of people won’t listen to an actual video, or read an actual linked article. And now for the next 2 months the trial threads will be filled with posters believing the WH has already admitted something they never did. |
|
|
|
IL, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:47:28 PM EDT
[#47]
Not a fan of her, but that comment sounds more about her not being able to use her position to talk about a presidential candidate during an election season as it's a violation of the Hatch Act rather than her knowing the trial is about the election.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 7:58:08 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By M4-AK: I believe Hillary is behind this trial. Lanny Davis is involved. When anyone from the Clinton Crime Family is involved you know it stinks to high heaven. Is Lanny representing him for free or is there a hidden dem donor footing the bill? |
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 8:02:03 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By BrayD: Not a fan of her, but that comment sounds more about her not being able to use her position to talk about a presidential candidate during an election season as it's a violation of the Hatch Act rather than her knowing the trial is about the election. Sorry that's not how GD works, you are supposed to not read or watch anything, just react to the clickbait thread title and say things like "Civil War 2, lawfare, communists"etc |
|
|
NY, USA
|
Posted: 5/14/2024 8:02:54 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Cypher15: And? Whatre you going to do? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Cypher15: Originally Posted By Chokey:
It’s written that our founding fathers had some ideas… |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
