AR15.Com Archives
 Do you notice a change with different lots of powder?
D-RAS03  [Team Member]
4/2/2012 9:45:41 PM
I know your supposed to re workup a load with new lots and I always do. But I have noticed when reworking a load that I always end up with the same powder charge. How much of a variance have you guys noticed? Thanks
Him  [Member]
4/2/2012 10:13:57 PM
Aren't canister powders, by definition, supposed to be uniform?
D-RAS03  [Team Member]
4/2/2012 10:24:15 PM
Originally Posted By Him:
Aren't canister powders, by definition, supposed to be uniform?


From what I heard when they make a new lot of powder the ingredients could vary a little bit. I would think its impossible to have the same exactly burn rate from lot to lot. But I really have no idea.
Bowhntr6pt  [Team Member]
4/2/2012 10:26:35 PM
I never have.
dryflash3  [Moderator]
4/2/2012 11:10:40 PM
I have never had a problem. Most of my loads are .5 to 1 grain below listed max.

With full bore max loads, I would drop back a grain and work back up.
We-rBorg  [Member]
4/3/2012 2:21:52 AM
It depends on the powder, Varget has changed several time that I'm aware of, same with others.
'Borg
RegionRat  [Team Member]
4/3/2012 3:06:11 AM
It can happen, but generally the better powders are not that variable from lot to lot.
Rocket2Mars  [Member]
4/3/2012 8:58:59 AM
My experience is IMR 4320 will vary from lot to lot.
bfoosh06  [Member]
4/3/2012 9:25:31 AM
I have seen it on older lots of powder ( 15- 20 years ago ). I think it is good practice to follow the re-work it advise. I suspect that newer production powder has much less lot to lot variance. One other scenario would be , getting a lot that is eventully recalled.
7zero1  [Team Member]
4/3/2012 9:38:44 AM
Originally Posted By We-rBorg:
It depends on the powder, Varget has changed several time that I'm aware of, same with others.
'Borg


Sir, my answer to the Op's question is the same as yours, ie: it depends on the powder. When I use IMR 4895 I used to chronograph my initial loads from a new lot of powder. When the chronograph data showed no significant changes in velocities I stopped working up loads with that powder. I found the same true for IMR 4064, VV N540, and VV N140. Load testing I did with Varget showed significant variations in velocity from lot to lot so I always work up charges with that powder when I have a new lot. Most AA stick rifle powders have a similar lot to lot variation. Mostly due to the lot to lot variation I avoid powders that exhibit such characteristics. JMHO, 7zero1.

LexDiamonds  [Member]
4/3/2012 12:31:06 PM
Some may frown upon this, but I treat my powders like whiskey- ie, I blend them. Same powder only of course.

As I buy more of a given powder, I will mix together old and new lots then put them back into the original containers. In my opinion, this smooths out any lot to lot inconsistancies and I can use the same load data.
REL1203  [Member]
4/3/2012 1:19:59 PM
Originally Posted By LexDiamonds:
Some may frown upon this, but I treat my powders like whiskey- ie, I blend them. Same powder only of course.

As I buy more of a given powder, I will mix together old and new lots then put them back into the original containers. In my opinion, this smooths out any lot to lot inconsistancies and I can use the same load data.


I am not gonna lie, i have been known to do this from time to time as well. I recently purchased a big 8lb jug of W231, which still has plenty of room empty at the top, and i had 2 small 1lb bottles that I hated storing next to the big jug, so i mixed them all together, shook them up real well, and loaded a few rounds at .2 below what i normall load, and then a few at my normal load, tested, and results were the same and then i feel OK doing mass loads. I am not saying its OK to do with all powders, just in the few times I have done it, it worked for me with the mass blending.

CBR900  [Member]
4/3/2012 1:23:47 PM
Yes - at least with my favorite pistol powder: Solo 1000

(can also be used in Shotguns)

OTOH, I chrono my loads carefully and I use very small amounts under heavy bullets. Differences in lots are apparent under these circumstances. Others might not notice at all.
D-RAS03  [Team Member]
4/3/2012 2:06:55 PM
Maybe should of said this in the OP but the powder is Reloder 15. I have found it to be incredibly consistent.
REL1203  [Member]
4/3/2012 3:08:13 PM
Originally Posted By D-RAS03:
Maybe should of said this in the OP but the powder is Reloder 15. I have found it to be incredibly consistent.


As i said in 2 post above yours, i did the same thing with RL15 when I got a big jug, had 1.5lbs of smaller, i poured them in, mixed up, and did a very small batch of 1g lower and and then was good to go with my full power 44.0gr RL15 under a 168g Amax in 308 with Win Brass :). Like i said, most people probably wouldnt do this, but it seemed to work out fine for me, so just use your own caution.
WholeBunches  [Member]
4/3/2012 11:07:32 PM
When I was reloading 9mm subsonic for suppressor use with an Uzi, I found that with Bullseye I had to use a different amount with each lot in order to get the same average velocity. However, the powder charges only had to vary by 0.1gr from the lot of powder I initially started with.

AeroE  [Moderator]
4/3/2012 11:25:40 PM
Alliant gunpowders bear watching, especially Reloder 19 and 21. Reloder 15 was very uniform through many bottles, then I got one that is way off the tracks.

REX gunpowder has remarkable variation from lot to lot. I think I've loaded with three different bushing sizes to throw the same weight of REX-1 from different lots.