Krink brake from the business end - Page 2

AR-15 » Rifles, Uppers, Lowers, Barrels, and more

AR Sponsor:

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Krink brake from the business end (Page 2 of 2)

Posted: 7/28/2005 10:47:59 AM EDT

[#1]

I believe it is Tweak, thanks!

Posted: 7/28/2005 4:21:43 PM EDT

[#2]

Are there any benefits to the Krink on a longer barreled carbine? Does it either negatively or positively effect accuracy?

Thanks
Rich

Posted: 7/28/2005 6:10:27 PM EDT

[#3]

I haven't done any accuracy testing with it, but you shouldn't see a loss in accuracy as long as it's installed correctly and isn't loose. As for effectiveness on longer barrels, you would see some benefit but not a drastic change as on a shorter barrel.
J

Posted: 7/28/2005 11:23:40 PM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:
I believe it is Tweak, thanks!

I must have missed the tech part.

Posted: 7/28/2005 11:35:34 PM EDT

[#5]

tag

Posted: 7/29/2005 12:06:51 AM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe it is Tweak, thanks!

I must have missed the tech part.

Feel free to browse back through and hit the tech parts you missed.

J

Posted: 7/29/2005 12:58:35 AM EDT

[#7]

Ah, found the tech part.

Thanks HM, I wasn't familar with that term, a quite useful one.

Quoted:
the property of gain.

Posted: 7/29/2005 6:44:22 AM EDT

[#8]

Glad to help.

Yep, just like a beam antenna does only with db's of sound instesad of db's of rf energy. Concentrating it in one direction.

The Bulgy style attachments seem to concentrate the noise in the forward direction and lessen it proportionally in the others, particularly the rear.

So in total, the noise is the same, it is simply biased to the front which does not affect the operator whereas a true can actually internalizes and reduces the noise by expanding, baffeling and cooling the exhaust gasses.

It would not be hard for manufacturers to use a meter to make measurements for their devices and make comparitive gain plots for them so one device can be compared to another like is done for antenna's.

Posted: 7/29/2005 11:07:16 PM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
Glad to help.

Yep, just like a beam antenna does only with db's of sound instesad of db's of rf energy. Concentrating it in one direction.

The Bulgy style attachments seem to concentrate the noise in the forward direction and lessen it proportionally in the others, particularly the rear.

So in total, the noise is the same, it is simply biased to the front which does not affect the operator whereas a true can actually internalizes and reduces the noise by expanding, baffeling and cooling the exhaust gasses.

It would not be hard for manufacturers to use a meter to make measurements for their devices and make comparitive gain plots for them so one device can be compared to another like is done for antenna's.

No it certainly wouldn't. Something that would be reasonable to see in a 'tech forum' I would think.

Hence Tweak's laconic comment

Posted: 7/30/2005 2:46:12 AM EDT

[#10]

Yes, Google was my friend on that term HM.

That's one for the notebook.

Posted: 7/30/2005 10:35:09 AM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:

I met John Noveske last weekend at the 10-8-sponsored training and he is a really good guy and a good Christian too.

Good info, on both accounts.

Posted: 8/1/2005 4:07:36 PM EDT

[#12]

tag.

Posted: 8/1/2005 6:44:48 PM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:
Quoted:
that is not a break, or even a flash hider..........those are more in line as a booster, in helping cycle a AK with a short barrel. putting one on a AR, isn't going to do anything, except to make it look different
Actually, someone posted their experience with this brake and it does a whole lot more than just make an AR "look different".

Here's the thread: Noveske Krinkov Flash Hider (pic and thoughts)

Thanks for the link.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Krink brake from the business end (Page 2 of 2)

AR-15 » Rifles, Uppers, Lowers, Barrels, and more

AR Sponsor:

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us