User Panel
Posted: 4/20/2024 1:00:51 AM EDT
Which one would you pick.
|
|
|
Need more info. I have a glx 2x and I love it. but they have different missions and purposes.
|
|
|
Vortex I cannot stand the chevron reticle.
|
|
I know you can feel it let it in people will still hate you in the end.
So hate back, plan the attack then they will realize they cannot crack the mind of a fucking maniac. The voice inside you always wins your grave's been dug so lie in it. |
What are you planning to do with the optic?
|
|
|
LPVO vs 2X Prism?
This isn’t even like comparing apples & oranges… it’s like boomerangs & anvils. What’s your intended use? |
|
|
Recently got a 13.7 first AR. I want it to be a general / do mostly all. I have mostly indoor 25 yard ranges. I have some long range shooting ranges near me about less than a hour and a half. I am willing to drive for training.
It will be a bedside princess for home defense, but I will most likely use a pistol before I get the rifle. But whichever is closest to me is what I will grab. I am a firm believer on, “better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.” I like both optics. I am just not sure which one to get first. Eventually I will have both optics. Plan on getting a few more rifles. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Shadow123: Recently got a 13.7 first AR. I want it to be a general / do mostly all. I have mostly indoor 25 yard ranges. I have some long range shooting ranges near me about less than a hour and a half. I am willing to drive for training. It will be a bedside princess for home defense, but I will most likely use a pistol before I get the rifle. But whichever is closest to me is what I will grab. I am a firm believer on, “better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.” I like both optics. I am just not sure which one to get first. Eventually I will have both optics. Plan on getting a few more rifles. View Quote Neither optic sound like a good option for you. |
|
Your painted rifle is ugly, but I’m uglier, so send it to me and I’ll make it look good!
|
For your current needs, red dot and magnifier. For your second rifle, LPVO (IMO).
|
|
|
I have a 12.5 and 13.9 both wear a viper pst gen 2 1-6.
I have an astigmatism and debated the same thing you are. |
|
|
The Glx 2x acts like a reddot magnifier combo. Has just enough mag for distance work and not too much to where you can't use it close up. Get rid of the mount and grab an American Defense or Midwest Industries mini Acog mount and rock on with the short barrel. Much lighter than an LPVO and daylight bright. Save the LPVO for a longer barrel.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Claytonhoneyberry: Neither optic sound like a good option for you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Claytonhoneyberry: Originally Posted By Shadow123: Recently got a 13.7 first AR. I want it to be a general / do mostly all. I have mostly indoor 25 yard ranges. I have some long range shooting ranges near me about less than a hour and a half. I am willing to drive for training. It will be a bedside princess for home defense, but I will most likely use a pistol before I get the rifle. But whichever is closest to me is what I will grab. I am a firm believer on, “better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.” I like both optics. I am just not sure which one to get first. Eventually I will have both optics. Plan on getting a few more rifles. Neither optic sound like a good option for you. Agreed. My dedicated HD carbines have red dots. |
|
|
The GLX 2X works quite well as an occluded sight with the illumination on and an objective cap like the Butler Creek.
I haven't put one through the ringer to test durability but I can say that after owning a lot of optics, the 2X is it's own beast and seems to fit the bill as a very good general purpose optic. |
|
|
|
I have this scenario in my head that if the world where to end. I should have a lpvo and a piggyback reddot, because I won't know what I will be dealing against. So I must be prepared. Am I overthinking this and should come back to reality.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Shadow123: I have this scenario in my head that if the world where to end. I should have a lpvo and a piggyback reddot, because I won't know what I will be dealing against. So I must be prepared. Am I overthinking this and should come back to reality. View Quote If you’re going to use the red dot for 1X, why place priority on the LPVO? If you’re only using it for magnification I’d actually say that’s where they do worst at. From low light gathering to super tight eye boxes, why not a prism or MPVO at that point. I was an early adopter of LPVO’s and sang their praises. I still have one on my 308 AR. I just don’t like red dot magnifiers much at all. On a 5.56 general purpose rifle I want light, simple, fast, and durable within the realistic range of the cartridge. After 20 years and close to a hundred different configurations, I narrowed mine down to this. (3X ACOG with piggy back RMR.) Attached File |
|
https://instagram.com/_odiegreen_?igshid=OGQ5ZDc2ODk2ZA==
|
Originally Posted By Shadow123: I have this scenario in my head that if the world where to end. I should have a lpvo and a piggyback reddot, because I won't know what I will be dealing against. So I must be prepared. Am I overthinking this and should come back to reality. View Quote for a 13.7? it can't shoot far enough to get much value out of something more powerful than a prism. that said, a magnified thermal is the true bleeding edge of optics. an offset dot for close range would round it out well. but you'd be better served by an AR10 at that point. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Shackleford_R: for a 13.7? it can't shoot far enough to get much value out of something more powerful than a prism. that said, a magnified thermal is the true bleeding edge of optics. an offset dot for close range would round it out well. but you'd be better served by an AR10 at that point. View Quote I disagree. My 13.9 velocities rival 14.5. 400 to 500 yds 1-6 should rock. Plus the benefit of target ID. My vipers at 1x handle cqb easily. |
|
|
We're happy to see continued excitement for the GLx 2X! If anyone has any questions feel free to ask and we'll do our best to answer them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Strikefirst: Never said it was. View Quote remember when i said "it can't shoot far enough to get much value out of something more powerful than a prism."? in response, you presented a 1-6 LPVO as an example of something which would counter the notion that an optic more powerful than a prism is not worthwhile. in other words, any optic contrary to my statement would necessarily have to be more powerful than a prism. so did you just not understand my original comment, or did you change your mind? |
|
|
Pst is way more flexible and does everything the glx does but better . But it’s a pig
|
|
|
|
|
A GLX 4x is not currently one of our Discovery products, but never say never.
|
|
|
We are currently only offering the ACSS CQB M5 for the GLx 2X
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.