User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
SD, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:16:52 PM EDT
Anytime a 2A conversation lasts long enough, some ass-clown inevitably brings up the tried-and-true "do you think civilians should be able to own nuclear weapons?" argument. Are they actually banned, though? I remember reading an article in Small Arms Review magazine about 40mm HE rounds, and how they are legal, although regulated as a DD, and a big time rigmarole to buy and use, you'd have a hard time convincing some producer to sell you one. That recently got me thinking about nuclear weapons. What if they aren't actually banned, but you could never convince a nuke manufacturer to sell you one? Is there any law, in any U.S. state that outright banned the ownership of a nuclear fission or fusion warhead?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:20:28 PM EDT
[#1]
Maybe you can Form 4 one.
|
|
|
|
ND, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:21:29 PM EDT
[#2]
IIRC the term "bear" is anything a person can carry. So suitcase nukes is yes. Tzar Bomba is no. But I also firmly believe 6 is the correct answer in the IQ thread, not 3.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:21:57 PM EDT
[#3]
There are commercial nuclear weapons manufacturers?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:22:40 PM EDT
[#4]
No. Who do you think manufactures nukes? It's civilian companies.
The manufacture and storage of them are extremely cost prohibitive. |
|
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:22:44 PM EDT
[#5]
I’m not aware of any actual laws prohibiting them. I also can’t think of any facility that manufactures them that isn’t government owned and therefore would not sell you one.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:22:58 PM EDT
[#6]
I don't think you are allowed to own plutonium or highly enriched uranium. Though I don't know what the specific law would be.
You can own depleted uranium. But I think it's kinda spendy. Other natural forms of uranium are also legal for purchase all the way up to yellowcake. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:31:00 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Hesperus: I don't think you are allowed to own plutonium or highly enriched uranium. Though I don't know what the specific law would be. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:31:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11boomboom]
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Hesperus: I don't think you are allowed to own plutonium or highly enriched uranium. Though I don't know what the specific law would be. You can own depleted uranium. But I think it's kinda spendy. Other natural forms of uranium are also legal for purchase all the way up to yellowcake. I think the nuke stuff is controlled by the Department of Energy, but the weapons portions are a mix of BATFE and Energy Department laws/regs. The BATFE importation stuff I found categorized nuclear weapons as Category 16 for importation, but I gave up digging through the regs for CONUS stuff. |
|
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:32:16 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Hesperus: I don't think you are allowed to own plutonium or highly enriched uranium. Though I don't know what the specific law would be. You can own depleted uranium. But I think it's kinda spendy. Other natural forms of uranium are also legal for purchase all the way up to yellowcake. At the risk of ending up on a watchlist I google “plutonium for sale” and found this. https://engineeredlabs.com/products/plutonium-element-cube-trinitite-sample Seems to be something that can be purchased freely. Not sure if there’s any laws governing how much one can posses though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:32:31 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 11boomboom: The manufacture and storage of them are extremely cost prohibitive. All that |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:45:28 PM EDT
[#11]
If I recall correctly, the possession of nuclear materials requires a license from the DoE. As a Destructive Device, the nuclear weapon would need to be registered on the NFRTR, and I believe that the possession of explosives also requires a license from the ATF.
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:46:13 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By OscarD: At the risk of ending up on a watchlist I google “plutonium for sale” and found this. https://engineeredlabs.com/products/plutonium-element-cube-trinitite-sample Seems to be something that can be purchased freely. Not sure if there’s any laws governing how much one can posses though. That's not plutonium. Trinitite is sand that got glassed in a nuclear bomb test. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:46:42 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kraquine: All that Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kraquine: Originally Posted By 11boomboom: The manufacture and storage of them are extremely cost prohibitive. All that Cost prohibitive for now, but technology is always improving.  Futurama NRA Arms Control As for the owning plutonium thing. Again it's not something I've researched too much. But there was a company called Luciteria which sold samples of nearly every element on the periodic table up to uranium. But uranium was where they stopped. I think their centimeter size cube of depleted uranium was really pricey. Though they did sell smaller chunks for as little as $9. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:46:49 PM EDT
[#14]
I'd love to see Elon Musk file a form 4 for a hydrogen bomb. He's enough of a troll and Bond villian to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:50:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Hesperus]
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AR4U: I'd love to see Elon Musk file a form 4 for a hydrogen bomb. He's enough of a troll and Bond villian to do it. Starship would be big enough to have Tzar Bomba MIRVs if it was suitably equipped.  House Atreides atomic warheads [DUNE PART TWO] Nothing says, "don't fuck with me." Quite like the ability to deliver 480 megatons of boom to eight separate targets. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:51:08 PM EDT
[#16]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:52:04 PM EDT
[#17]
At some point, once we become a space faring species, and are mining asteroids and moons and shit, civilians, or civilian companies are going to need to be able to buy, or produce nuclear explosive.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:52:52 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By DaveJRSC: If I recall correctly, the possession of nuclear materials requires a license from the DoE. As a Destructive Device, the nuclear weapon would need to be registered on the NFRTR, and I believe that the possession of explosives also requires a license from the ATF. Based on this, I see several different licenses from the USNRC (United States Nuclear Regulation Commission) to possess varying types of material and references in my searches to nukes being classified as destructive devices under the NFA and weapons of mass destruction under some other laws. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:52:57 PM EDT
[#19]
Isn't SNM possesion verboten?
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:53:22 PM EDT
[Last Edit: PeepEater]
[#20]
Major issue is lawful transport and storage. I don't know how one would articulate that it isn't a clear and present danger to merely have a live nuke outside of nation state level security and property ownership.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:53:26 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By HRoark87: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/451403/1000002461-3206649.jpg Thereitis.gif |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:54:01 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PeepEater: Major issue is lawful transport and storage. I don't know how one would articulate that it isn't a clear and present danger to merely have a love nuke outside of nation state level security and property ownership. "love nuke" 
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:55:22 PM EDT
[#23]
If post 34 was used to start this thread I wonder what post 35 will be.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:57:43 PM EDT
[Last Edit: PROFESSORCHAOS]
[#24]
I suppose someone could try to make one and see what kind of charges they end up with. I bet they'll come up with something.
 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 10:58:46 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By OscarD: At the risk of ending up on a watchlist I google “plutonium for sale” and found this. https://engineeredlabs.com/products/plutonium-element-cube-trinitite-sample Seems to be something that can be purchased freely. Not sure if there’s any laws governing how much one can posses though. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By OscarD: Originally Posted By Hesperus: I don't think you are allowed to own plutonium or highly enriched uranium. Though I don't know what the specific law would be. You can own depleted uranium. But I think it's kinda spendy. Other natural forms of uranium are also legal for purchase all the way up to yellowcake. At the risk of ending up on a watchlist I google “plutonium for sale” and found this. https://engineeredlabs.com/products/plutonium-element-cube-trinitite-sample Seems to be something that can be purchased freely. Not sure if there’s any laws governing how much one can posses though. Just call Hillary. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:02:58 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PeepEater: Major issue is lawful transport and storage. I don't know how one would articulate that it isn't a clear and present danger to merely have a live nuke outside of nation state level security and property ownership. Anyone who has such a weapon without a nation state to hold responsible for it, would be viewed as an unacceptable hazard. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:03:18 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PROFESSORCHAOS: I suppose someone could try to make one and see what kind of charges they end up with. I bet they'll come up with something. Maybe... Maybe not...  The Story of the Radioactive Boy Scout |
|
|
|
OH, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:05:47 PM EDT
[#28]
Assuming you gathered and refined enough of your own uranium ore, a gun-type device probably wouldn't violate any (many?) laws. It's just chemistry, geometry, and a cannon.
|
|
|
MD, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:06:08 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 11boomboom: No. Who do you think manufactures nukes? It's civilian companies. The manufacture and storage of them are extremely cost prohibitive. Sandia, Pantex, Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos make warheads and are are US Gov entities. The delivery systems are contractor made. |
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:08:16 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CTM1: If post 34 was used to start this thread I wonder what post 35 will be. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:09:57 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kanati: This is the real crux of the matter. Anyone who has such a weapon without a nation state to hold responsible for it, would be viewed as an unacceptable hazard. Oops my ND gave your grandkids cancer three states over. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:10:15 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11boomboom]
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Element94: Sandia, Pantex, Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos make warheads and are are US Gov entities. The delivery systems are contractor made. Those are ran by private companies. Take Los Alamos as an example: Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) A national laboratory managed by Triad National Security, LLC, a private company, and operated by the University of California, LANL is responsible for designing and developing nuclear warheads Same as the ammunition plants the Gov uses. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:10:46 PM EDT
[#33]
Wait. You guys don't have a nuke?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:14:47 PM EDT
[#34]
42 USC 2122: Prohibitions governing atomic weapons
(a) It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 2121 of this title, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to modify the provisions of section 2051(a) or 2131 of this title. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:17:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: FireMissionDivision]
[#35]
Yes:
The term ‘‘source material’’ means (1) uranium, thorium, or any other material which is determined by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of section 61 to be source material; or (2) ores containing one or more of the foregoing materials, in such concentration as the Commission may by regulation determine from time to time... The term ‘‘special nuclear material’’ means (1) plutonium, uranium enriched in the isotope 233 or in the isotope 235, and any other material which the Commission, pursuant to the provisions of section 51, determines to be special nuclear material, but does not include source material; or (2) any material artificially enriched by any of the foregoing, but does not include source material... Unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by the Commission, which the Commission is authorized to issue pursuant to section 53, no person may transfer or receive in interstate commerce, transfer, deliver, acquire, own, possess, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any special nuclear materials... Unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by the Commission, which the Commission is hereby authorized to issue, no person may transfer or receive in interstate commerce, transfer, deliver, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any source material after removal from its place of deposit in nature, except that licenses shall not be required for quantities of source material which, in the opinion of the Commission, are unimportant... ...special nuclear material shall be distributed only on terms, as may be established by rule of the Commission, such that no user will be permitted to construct an atomic weapon... It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 91, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:18:42 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AR4U: I'd love to see Elon Musk file a form 4 for a hydrogen bomb. He's enough of a troll and Bond villian to do it. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:23:32 PM EDT
[#37]
There's an answer to this and it's useful to know because it's the rebuttal to anti gun trolls who bring up tanks, artillery or nuclear weapons and then say why not assault rifles too.
In the 1939 Miller decision the Supreme Court described a militia as a light infantry primarily focused on civil defense. The court found 2A anticipates civilians being called up for the common defense, bearing the type of arms that would be in common use by such a militia. The court noticed that the Constitution elsewhere discussed "troops" that are answerable to the President and concluded that things like heavy weapons were reserved to troops (artillery, etc). Therefore 2A covers any kind of small arms that a militia might have, but not the crew served heavy weapons that are presumably reserved to "troops". |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:26:42 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 1975: Maybe you can Form 4 one. Ok, someone needs to try this. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:27:11 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11boomboom]
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FireMissionDivision: Nope: The term ‘‘source material’’ means (1) uranium, thorium, or any other material which is determined by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of section 61 to be source material; or (2) ores containing one or more of the foregoing materials, in such concentration as the Commission may by regulation determine from time to time... The term ‘‘special nuclear material’’ means (1) plutonium, uranium enriched in the isotope 233 or in the isotope 235, and any other material which the Commission, pursuant to the provisions of section 51, determines to be special nuclear material, but does not include source material; or (2) any material artificially enriched by any of the foregoing, but does not include source material... Unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by the Commission, which the Commission is authorized to issue pursuant to section 53, no person may transfer or receive in interstate commerce, transfer, deliver, acquire, own, possess, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any special nuclear materials... Unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by the Commission, which the Commission is hereby authorized to issue, no person may transfer or receive in interstate commerce, transfer, deliver, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any source material after removal from its place of deposit in nature, except that licenses shall not be required for quantities of source material which, in the opinion of the Commission, are unimportant... ...special nuclear material shall be distributed only on terms, as may be established by rule of the Commission, such that no user will be permitted to construct an atomic weapon... It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 91, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FireMissionDivision: Nope: The term ‘‘source material’’ means (1) uranium, thorium, or any other material which is determined by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of section 61 to be source material; or (2) ores containing one or more of the foregoing materials, in such concentration as the Commission may by regulation determine from time to time... The term ‘‘special nuclear material’’ means (1) plutonium, uranium enriched in the isotope 233 or in the isotope 235, and any other material which the Commission, pursuant to the provisions of section 51, determines to be special nuclear material, but does not include source material; or (2) any material artificially enriched by any of the foregoing, but does not include source material... Unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by the Commission, which the Commission is authorized to issue pursuant to section 53, no person may transfer or receive in interstate commerce, transfer, deliver, acquire, own, possess, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any special nuclear materials... Unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by the Commission, which the Commission is hereby authorized to issue, no person may transfer or receive in interstate commerce, transfer, deliver, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any source material after removal from its place of deposit in nature, except that licenses shall not be required for quantities of source material which, in the opinion of the Commission, are unimportant... ...special nuclear material shall be distributed only on terms, as may be established by rule of the Commission, such that no user will be permitted to construct an atomic weapon... It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 91, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. All of those say UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY A GENERAL OR SPECIFIC LICENSE, so yes. ETA: Saw you changed it. Originally Posted By FireMissionDivision: Yes: The term ‘‘source material’’ means (1) uranium, thorium, or any other material which is determined by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of section 61 to be source material; or (2) ores containing one or more of the foregoing materials, in such concentration as the Commission may by regulation determine from time to time... The term ‘‘special nuclear material’’ means (1) plutonium, uranium enriched in the isotope 233 or in the isotope 235, and any other material which the Commission, pursuant to the provisions of section 51, determines to be special nuclear material, but does not include source material; or (2) any material artificially enriched by any of the foregoing, but does not include source material... Unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by the Commission, which the Commission is authorized to issue pursuant to section 53, no person may transfer or receive in interstate commerce, transfer, deliver, acquire, own, possess, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any special nuclear materials... Unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by the Commission, which the Commission is hereby authorized to issue, no person may transfer or receive in interstate commerce, transfer, deliver, receive possession of or title to, or import into or export from the United States any source material after removal from its place of deposit in nature, except that licenses shall not be required for quantities of source material which, in the opinion of the Commission, are unimportant... ...special nuclear material shall be distributed only on terms, as may be established by rule of the Commission, such that no user will be permitted to construct an atomic weapon... It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 91, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. Originally Posted By KitBuilder: 42 USC 2122: Prohibitions governing atomic weapons (a) It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 2121 of this title, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to modify the provisions of section 2051(a) or 2131 of this title. The last statement says AND THREATEN TO USE so also still a yes. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:29:40 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Hesperus: I don't think you are allowed to own plutonium or highly enriched uranium. Though I don't know what the specific law would be. You can own depleted uranium. But I think it's kinda spendy. Other natural forms of uranium are also legal for purchase all the way up to yellowcake. just roll your own, nuclear boyscout style. I mean fuck your house, your neighborhood etc. But go be awesome. |
|
|
|
MN, USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:29:56 PM EDT
[#41]
Op is glowing already...
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:34:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: FireMissionDivision]
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 11boomboom: All of those say UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY A GENERAL OR SPECIFIC LICENSE, so yes. ETA: Saw you changed it. The last statement says AND THREATEN TO USE so also still a yes. Only the possession of nuclear material itself is subject to licensing, and it says the commission can't license anyone to build a weapon. It then specifically prohibits nuclear weapons except under the provisions of [the section which allows the US government to make/possess/etc. nuclear weapons]. Mere "possession" is listed earlier in the last line; "possess and use" is an additional prohibition. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:36:53 PM EDT
[#43]
They are made by private companies.
Probably pay a tax stamp, comply with NRC and various international treaties... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:37:05 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By KitBuilder: 42 USC 2122: Prohibitions governing atomic weapons (a) It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 2121 of this title, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to modify the provisions of section 2051(a) or 2131 of this title. It says "person". Doesn't say shit about a trust... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:38:37 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By OscarD: Hahaha I was going to look and see how much yellowcake uranium costs (I have zero desire to buy any, I’m just curious). Then the thought crossed my mind that I don’t want to end up on another list. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By OscarD: Originally Posted By Hesperus: I don't think you are allowed to own plutonium or highly enriched uranium. Though I don't know what the specific law would be. You can own depleted uranium. But I think it's kinda spendy. Other natural forms of uranium are also legal for purchase all the way up to yellowcake. At the risk of ending up on a watchlist I google “plutonium for sale” and found this. https://engineeredlabs.com/products/plutonium-element-cube-trinitite-sample Seems to be something that can be purchased freely. Not sure if there’s any laws governing how much one can posses though. Hahaha I was going to look and see how much yellowcake uranium costs (I have zero desire to buy any, I’m just curious). Then the thought crossed my mind that I don’t want to end up on another list. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:38:55 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By FireMissionDivision: Only the possession of nuclear material itself is subject to licensing, and it says the commission can't license anyone to build a weapon. It then specifically prohibits nuclear weapons except under the provisions of [the section which allows the US government to make/possess/etc. nuclear weapons]. Mere "possession" is listed earlier in the last line; "possess and use" is an additional prohibition. Do you have a number or link to that provision? I'd like to check it out. When I checked the USNRC site, it didn't specify the entities that could apply for the different licenses, just the definitions of what those licenses were. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:40:03 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Lomshek: There are commercial nuclear weapons manufacturers? pakistan..... france lol |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:40:24 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 11boomboom]
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By just-mike: It says "person". Doesn't say shit about a trust... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By just-mike: Originally Posted By KitBuilder: 42 USC 2122: Prohibitions governing atomic weapons (a) It shall be unlawful, except as provided in section 2121 of this title, for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to modify the provisions of section 2051(a) or 2131 of this title. It says "person". Doesn't say shit about a trust... The entire statement is predicated on the AND THREATEN TO USE. That would mean that as long as you aren't threatening to use it, you could theoretically have/build it, unless there are other regulations outside of this one. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:44:34 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Harlikwin: just roll your own, nuclear boyscout style. I mean fuck your house, your neighborhood etc. But go be awesome. Not the first time someone has tried to talk me into doing that and I suspect it won't be the last. But as entertaining as it might be. I don't think my body would react well to a serious spike in background ionizing radiation. As it is I think it's a small miracle that I survived several years of partial liver failure without getting some horrible chronic illness. Or who knows, maybe I did? |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 5/5/2024 11:50:22 PM EDT
[#50]
Lab equipment and 3d printer go brrrrr
|
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
