User Panel
Posted: 4/23/2024 3:38:15 PM EDT
I heard from some buddies at the airport a dc-4 that was fully loaded hauling fuel to rural Alaska went down near the airport in Fairbanks, I can’t find it on flight radar though, does anyone have the premium version to backtrack it? Should be under Everts air fuel. They’re good guys over there I hope everyone made it but it doesn’t sound good.
|
|
|
Sure it's a DC-4? According to Wikipedia there are only a few still flying, none of which are in Alaska.
Whatever the bird, I hope the crew is ok. ETA: I stand corrected. |
|
"As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
|
Was an alaska air fuel DC 4, went down near rosie creek exit, on the baks of the tanana, so far no crew survived, the fire is contained
|
|
|
Solid first post
|
|
|
Sucks to hear!!!!
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By alaskan_9974: I heard from some buddies at the airport a dc-4 that was fully loaded hauling fuel to rural Alaska went down near the airport in Fairbanks, I can’t find it on flight radar though, does anyone have the premium version to backtrack it? Should be under Everts air fuel. They’re good guys over there I hope everyone made it but it doesn’t sound good. View Quote I have the premium FlightRadar and can back track it if you can give me a tail number or an approximate time that it went down. ETA: Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
'The horse is made ready for battle, but victory rests with the LORD' - Proverbs 21:31
|
Happiness is the greatest agent of purification
Bikini Bottoms underneath, but the boys hearts still skip a beat, when them girls shimmy off, them old cut offs |
“[TR/Airport Alert 3 (Incident)] Douglas C-54D Skymaster crash and fire in the area of Kallenberg Rd. Alaska State Troopers, Fairbanks Airport Fire, Chena Goldstream Fire, and Ester Fire on scene. 2 Souls unknown status. DNR unable to respond to Brush fire”
|
|
'The horse is made ready for battle, but victory rests with the LORD' - Proverbs 21:31
|
Looks like they tried to come back. I don’t think they have recorders and there’s not many people out there. Hope someone saw what happened
ETA news link. Possibly blew up in air News link |
|
|
Damn old airplanes. It should be criminal that lawyers and regulators make it necessary to keep these airplanes operating long past their prime. But economics make upgrading.
|
|
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of US (1743 - 1826) LGBTQ - Let's Get Biden To Quit |
damn, that’s sad.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Imyeet: Was an alaska air fuel DC 4, went down near rosie creek exit, on the baks of the tanana, so far no crew survived, the fire is contained View Quote That sucks. Pumped fuel from that plane when it was a Brooks plane as well as many a load from Everts DC-6/C-47’s. I feel for those families involved. I used to grouse hunt that area a bit. |
|
|
What are the odds that today I spent my morning coffee time reading about Florida Air Cargo who operates 3 DC3s out of Opa Locka and this happens?
I know DC3 vs DC4, but I was in awe that someone still operates 80 year old cargo planes that served in WW2. RIP to the crew. |
|
Capitalism: God's way of determining who is smart, and who is poor.
|
Prayers for the crew and family. Has to be terrible, life changing event.
|
|
|
601 601 601 601 601 601 601 601 601 601 601 601
WA, USA
|
Originally built as a Douglas C-54D-1-DC Skymaster
USAAF Serial Number 42-72442 Manufacturers serial number 10547 To the RAF as Skymaster I KL977 as part of Lend-Lease To the US Navy in 1946 as R5D-3 BUNO 91994 as part of Reverse Lend-Lease Redesignated C-54Q in 1962 To Aero Union Corporation, Chico, CA with FAA N-Number N6229 December 1974 Assigned a new FAA N-Number N76AU To Aero Flite Inc, Kingman, AZ with new FAA N-Number N3054V October 2001 To Brooks Fuel Inc, Fairbanks, AK May 2012 To Alaska Air Fuel Inc, Palmer, AK October 2013 To Alaska Air Fuel Inc, Palmer, AK with new FAA N-Number N3054V June 2020 You can see it here https://www.flickr.com/photos/keith_burton/53346567061/in/photolist-Zh5Udh-2ph46PB as a firebomber with Aero Union, N76AU in 1986. You can see it here https://www.flickr.com/photos/keith_burton/37594355800/in/photolist-Zh5Udh-2ph46PB painted in WWII Euro markings in 1998. Aero Union was trying to sell it on the warbird market. |
Grab a fence post, hold it tight, womp your partner with all your might, hit him in the shin, hit him in the head, hit him again the critter ain't dead!
|
An old plane in my hometown crashing. Not exactly news.
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By wingsnthings: Damn old airplanes. It should be criminal that lawyers and regulators make it necessary to keep these airplanes operating long past their prime. But economics make upgrading. View Quote Plus there are always villages that get missed or cannot get full by barge. There have been skyvans,sherpas,air tractors,caravans,beavers and other small planes flying fuel. Not very efficient way of hauling fuel. Hercs will only go to the bigger runways and lynden is busier than shit. |
|
|
|
|
Celebrating the remains of the Second Amendment one Fine Firearm at a Time. RIP: Our most beloved Larry the Barfly
|
Originally Posted By wingsnthings: Damn old airplanes. It should be criminal that lawyers and regulators make it necessary to keep these airplanes operating long past their prime. But economics make upgrading. View Quote What is criminal about it? The maintenance requirements are the same for any aircraft doing this work regardless of age. What, specifically, is "their prime"? |
|
|
RIP to the crew, and condolences to the families.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By wesr228: Man, thanks for the info, but this is such an oddly specific First Post. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By wesr228: Originally Posted By Imyeet: Was an alaska air fuel DC 4, went down near rosie creek exit, on the baks of the tanana, so far no crew survived, the fire is contained Man, thanks for the info, but this is such an oddly specific First Post. Join date, post count, no EE rating either. |
|
|
Sad in more ways than one.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not Retired, I'm a Professional Grandpa!
|
Originally Posted By MudEagle: What is criminal about it? The maintenance requirements are the same for any aircraft doing this work regardless of age. What, specifically, is "their prime"? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By MudEagle: Originally Posted By wingsnthings: Damn old airplanes. It should be criminal that lawyers and regulators make it necessary to keep these airplanes operating long past their prime. But economics make upgrading. What is criminal about it? The maintenance requirements are the same for any aircraft doing this work regardless of age. What, specifically, is "their prime"? While they have the same requirements, I can't imagine trying to keep a fleet of WW2 planes in revenue service. It's hard enough getting parts for old jets with the weight of the Air Force supporting them. |
|
|
Prayers for crew and family.
We had a C54 here are Elizabeth City NC airport for the last 4-5 months. I hear she was enroute to somewhere and declared IFE having lost an engine. She sat at the south end of the runway until last week when several mechs arrived and swapped out the stbd inboard engine. Test flight came back, fueled, gone. |
|
|
why, oh why GOD WAS I BORN IN CALIFORNIA..
AK, USA
|
|
RIP Tamurand a damn fine Rhodesian Ridgeback 02-09-14
RIP Kaya, an equally fine Yellow Lab 06-08-2015 RIP Millie the Destroyer, AKA ShitTrumpet, WCCorgi 12-21-2015 NORCAL CALLSIGN: YODEL Happy to be in ALASKA! |
From another thread with video:
Originally Posted By uafgrad: A DC4 used to transport fuel/cargo crashed today in Fairbanks, Alaska Unfortunately, it sounds like the two on board were lost There is actually video of the plane flying and it appears that one of the engines explodes and then the plane tilts hard and goes down With 4 engines, would the loss of a single engine be so catastrophic typically? Link to the video, I can't figure out how to post it View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: While they have the same requirements, I can't imagine trying to keep a fleet of WW2 planes in revenue service. It's hard enough getting parts for old jets with the weight of the Air Force supporting them. View Quote The Everts mothball yard is acres and acres of airframes, parts, etc, on top of the dozens of airframes on the tarmac just in Fairbanks alone. |
|
|
Originally Posted By NorthPolar: The Everts mothball yard is acres and acres of airframes, parts, etc, on top of the dozens of airframes on the tarmac just in Fairbanks alone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By NorthPolar: Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: While they have the same requirements, I can't imagine trying to keep a fleet of WW2 planes in revenue service. It's hard enough getting parts for old jets with the weight of the Air Force supporting them. The Everts mothball yard is acres and acres of airframes, parts, etc, on top of the dozens of airframes on the tarmac just in Fairbanks alone. Not only is there a good supply of used parts. Most people would shit if they knew how many NOS parts are still out there for WW2 and Korean war era prop aircraft. |
|
|
“ Well, it feels like someone took a rubber band and snapped it right on the edge of your anus.” -JThompson
|
I don't see how anyone, like Buffalo Airways, don't switch to feeder airline turboprops that have been/or can be converted to freight use. And not that shit show old Electra, more modern aircraft like ATRs and Dash 8s. Fucking old ass tail dragging DC-3 and Commandos: hard to load, limited parts, AVGAS sucking, difficult to start in cold, etc.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Goodn: Not only is there a good supply of used parts. Most people would shit if they knew how many NOS parts are still out there for WW2 and Korean war era prop aircraft. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Goodn: Originally Posted By NorthPolar: Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: While they have the same requirements, I can't imagine trying to keep a fleet of WW2 planes in revenue service. It's hard enough getting parts for old jets with the weight of the Air Force supporting them. The Everts mothball yard is acres and acres of airframes, parts, etc, on top of the dozens of airframes on the tarmac just in Fairbanks alone. Not only is there a good supply of used parts. Most people would shit if they knew how many NOS parts are still out there for WW2 and Korean war era prop aircraft. I stand by my statement. |
|
|
Originally Posted By junker46: I don't see how anyone, like Buffalo Airways, don't switch to feeder airline turboprops that have been/or can be converted to freight use. And not that shit show old Electra, more modern aircraft like ATRs and Dash 8s. Fucking old ass tail dragging DC-3 and Commandos: hard to load, limited parts, AVGAS sucking, difficult to start in cold, etc. View Quote Colder operating temperatures, short airfields, and shitty runways w/ ingestible pebbles have a vote too. |
|
The sun shines on every dog's ass once in a while.
|
Originally Posted By Sierra5: Engine blew and it inverted into the ground. https://www.reddit.com/r/aviation/comments/1cbmlc3/moment_an_engine_explodes_on_doomed_dc4_flight/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button View Quote Damn, that’s horrible |
|
|
Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: I stand by my statement. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: Originally Posted By Goodn: Originally Posted By NorthPolar: Originally Posted By SmilingBandit: While they have the same requirements, I can't imagine trying to keep a fleet of WW2 planes in revenue service. It's hard enough getting parts for old jets with the weight of the Air Force supporting them. The Everts mothball yard is acres and acres of airframes, parts, etc, on top of the dozens of airframes on the tarmac just in Fairbanks alone. Not only is there a good supply of used parts. Most people would shit if they knew how many NOS parts are still out there for WW2 and Korean war era prop aircraft. I stand by my statement. I didn't say what I said to argue with you. I said what I said from experience. Most people would shit if they knew the amount of parts still available for the WW2 era planes. The amount parts were cranked out of factories during the war was mind boggling. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Sierra5: Engine blew and it inverted into the ground. https://www.reddit.com/r/aviation/comments/1cbmlc3/moment_an_engine_explodes_on_doomed_dc4_flight/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button View Quote Amazing. |
|
If the truth makes you uncomfortable, don't blame the truth. Blame the lie that made you comfortable. -James Ng Uni
|
|
Originally Posted By junker46: I don't see how anyone, like Buffalo Airways, don't switch to feeder airline turboprops that have been/or can be converted to freight use. And not that shit show old Electra, more modern aircraft like ATRs and Dash 8s. Fucking old ass tail dragging DC-3 and Commandos: hard to load, limited parts, AVGAS sucking, difficult to start in cold, etc. View Quote So you want them to operate aircraft that have known icing issues and have been scrubbed from most US service in icing areas? Aircraft that are not designed for unimproved fields and they would require either trend monitoring to keep from the overhaul schedule OR just eating the overhaul costs. A lot of issues when what you have is paid for and working just fine. |
|
He who covers his sins will not prosper,
But whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy. |
Originally Posted By UV18: So you want them to operate aircraft that have known icing issues and have been scrubbed from most US service in icing areas? Aircraft that are not designed for unimproved fields and they would require either trend monitoring to keep from the overhaul schedule OR just eating the overhaul costs. A lot of issues when what you have is paid for and working just fine. View Quote The fields up here are nothing like what’s in the states. Even the best of them are nothing to look at. The older planes were built for these types of runways. By lower 48 standards many would be considered unimproved. My insurance even for runway only planes is written as off airport, my insurance only considered paved runways in the larger cities as actual airports from their risk perspective. |
|
|
I watched the brief Reddit video of the engine explosion and subsequent crash.
I’m not an aviator, so I’m a bit perplexed why an engine malfunction could cause a crash. Could the malfunction/explosion be violent enough to sever control linkages, rendering the plane uncontrollable? Certainly a sad outcome for the families of the crew, a couple blokes doing their job. |
|
Knight of Blunder - Fogo '21
|
Originally Posted By alaskan_9974: That was quick. Something was happening prior since they already declared before this happened, engine must’ve taken out control cables when it went. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By alaskan_9974: Originally Posted By jwb211: Damn, that’s horrible That was quick. Something was happening prior since they already declared before this happened, engine must’ve taken out control cables when it went. From the way it went over immediately my guess is they already had a problem with the other engine on that side, and were pushing the left outboard hard. It grenaded and they were screwed. |
|
"It is a political convention. The criminals will be on the inside." -ParityError
|
Originally Posted By Scott_S: I watched the brief Reddit video of the engine explosion and subsequent crash. I’m not an aviator, so I’m a bit perplexed why an engine malfunction could cause a crash. Could the malfunction/explosion be violent enough to sever control linkages, rendering the plane uncontrollable? Certainly a sad outcome for the families of the crew, a couple blokes doing their job. View Quote Having zero experience wrenching on C-54s, my gut says no. I would expect the flight control cables to run along the rear spar and not be near the engine, but that's obviously a guess. |
|
|
Originally Posted By UV18: So you want them to operate aircraft that have known icing issues and have been scrubbed from most US service in icing areas? Aircraft that are not designed for unimproved fields and they would require either trend monitoring to keep from the overhaul schedule OR just eating the overhaul costs. A lot of issues when what you have is paid for and working just fine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By UV18: Originally Posted By junker46: I don't see how anyone, like Buffalo Airways, don't switch to feeder airline turboprops that have been/or can be converted to freight use. And not that shit show old Electra, more modern aircraft like ATRs and Dash 8s. Fucking old ass tail dragging DC-3 and Commandos: hard to load, limited parts, AVGAS sucking, difficult to start in cold, etc. So you want them to operate aircraft that have known icing issues and have been scrubbed from most US service in icing areas? Aircraft that are not designed for unimproved fields and they would require either trend monitoring to keep from the overhaul schedule OR just eating the overhaul costs. A lot of issues when what you have is paid for and working just fine. DC-3, Bush Air Cargo, Alaska Take off from Sleetmute, AK Typical Landing In Nanwalek, AK Landing in Nanwalek, AK |
|
|
Originally Posted By UV18: So you want them to operate aircraft that have known icing issues and have been scrubbed from most US service in icing areas? Aircraft that are not designed for unimproved fields and they would require either trend monitoring to keep from the overhaul schedule OR just eating the overhaul costs. A lot of issues when what you have is paid for and working just fine. View Quote Okay, so there are no commercially viable rough/short field tubroprop freighters in the world, and the WW2 reciprocals will forever fly those routes. Let me make a note of that. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By akcaribouhunter: Some of it is weight and tire size. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By akcaribouhunter: Originally Posted By junker46: Okay, so there are no commercially viable rough/short field tubroprop freighters in the world, and the WW2 reciprocals will forever fly those routes. Let me make a note of that. Bigger issue is that the manufacturing industry isn't what it was 50 years ago, and AK is a niche market. Undoubtedly a better brush transport *could* be built, but ain't nobody wanna spend the money to develop an entire type for it. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.