Originally Posted By JamesTheScot:
GWACS should be cancelled by the industry.

But dude needs to take himself down off the cross.  Comments about quick detach slings existing in the civil war don’t matter. Your QD socket is either patented or it isn’t.  Every bit of factual info could have been conveyed in about 5 minutes.

Originally Posted By HeavyMetal:



I bet it would be expired by now anyways.

Originally Posted By Everrest:  KE Arms Sued: What GWACS Armory Doesn't Want You To Know -- A Lawyer Explains
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2-_7juyp8w

Originally Posted By floridacop:  Ian and Karl are both linking to the lawyers video and telling people to support KE Arms by buying their products.  Curious is Ian or Karl are refusing any of their portion of the proceeds from the sales of the lowers to kick that money towards the legal bills or are they still pocketing their portion?

Forgotten Weapons
6 hours ago
Quick update on KE Arms: They are pushing to fulfill all the orders that have come in to help support the legal fun - thank you to everyone! If you didn't see this before, you can best support KE and the WWSD project by checking out KE Arms' web site and buying something from them. Please do keep in mind that they are only 3 people currently filling orders, and ATF chose this week to audit them - so shipping will take longer than planned. Here's KE's full statement on the status:

------
The response from the 2A in supporting us in our legal battle has been substantial in volume, and humbling.  We have fought this battle in silence for almost 2.5 years, and it is heartening to have the support of the community in this fight.

We wanted to update everyone on order statuses, lead times, and the most effective way to communicate with us.

Today a routine ATF audit was begun that is expected to take most of the week.  We will not be shipping firearms while this is in process.

There are only 3 of us currently working to fill the hundreds of orders that have come in.  We are trying to hire more people to ship orders faster, but it has been difficult in the current job market.  Prior to this surge we were quoting a 1-3 week lead time.  It may now be 3-5 weeks depending on what you ordered.

Patches have sold out of inventory-More are in process with our vendor but it will be 3-4 weeks for them to start shipping

Shot Glasses have sold out of inventory-More are on our schedule to machine, material is inbound.

Lower/Rifle Orders:  If you or your dealer sent the FFL to [email protected] with your order number in the subject line, you do not need to do anything else.  We do not provide confirmations of FFL received as they come in (we receive dozens daily).  If we don’t have your FFL when your order is ready to ship, we will contact you again then.

If you need to contact us, please e-mail rather than call.  Answering phone calls takes our limited staff away from filling orders.  Answering e-mails in batches during time blocks is a more efficient use of our man power.

Thank you for your patience, understanding, and support.

Sincerely,

The KE Arms Team

Originally Posted By Everrest:
Did An Anti-Gun Gun Company (GWACS) Hide Evidence In Their Lawsuit Against KE Arms?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEXTp-l90BU

Originally Posted By Everrest:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18722264/gwacs-armory-llc-v-ke-arms-llc/#entry-188

GWACS reply.

OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan Defendant Brownells Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 118)
and Defendants Russell Phagan and Sinistral Shooting Technologies, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 120) are granted.
Brownells, Inc., Russell Phagan, and Sinistral Shooting Technologies, Inc. are terminated as a parties. Plaintiff's Motion for Order Dismissing Claims against Defendant Shawn Nealon with Prejudice (Dkt. # 113) is granted, and GWACS claims against Nealon are dismissed with prejudice.
Nealon is terminated as a party. Defendant KE Arms, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 117) is granted in part and denied in part.
Counterclaim Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment & Brief in Support (Dkt. # 121) is granted in part and denied in part.
Defendants' Motion for Spoliation Sanctions (Dkt. # 177) is denied.
Defendant Shawn Nealon's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 119) is moot.
The pretrial conference set for March 1, 2023 and the jury trial set for March 20, 2023 are STRICKEN.
Final joint proposed pretrial order to be submitted (not filed) no later than March 31, 2023. The pretrial conference is reset for April 5, 2023 at 10:00 a.m, and the jury trial is reset for April 17, 2023 at 9:15 a.m.
This matter is set for an additional settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Christine Little on March 3, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.
Settlement conference statements to be submitted to Judge Little (not filed) no later than March 1, 2023 ; setting/resetting scheduling order date(s): ( Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/31/2023, Pretrial Conference set for 4/5/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan, Jury Trial set for 4/17/2023 at 09:15 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan);
terminating party Russell Phagan (an individual), Sinistral Shooting Technologies, LLC (an Arizona limited liability company ), Brownells, Inc. (an Iowa corporation) and Shawn Nealon (an individual) ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s):
( Settlement Conference set for 3/3/2023 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Christine D Little, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/31/2023, Pretrial Conference set for 4/5/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan, Jury Trial set for 4/17/2023 at 09:15 AM before Judge Claire V Eagan);
granting 113 Motion to Dismiss Party; granting in part and denying in part 117 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 118 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 119 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 120 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 121 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 177 Motion for Sanctions (Re: 113 MOTION to Dismiss Party Shawn Nealon, 117 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 118 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 119 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 120 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 121 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 177 MOTION for Sanctions ) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/23/2023)

Originally Posted By backbencher:

You can find his anti-ARFCOM post a few further down.

Originally Posted By HeavyMetal:
I wish Russel would post back in this thread and expound on this.