User Panel
Posted: 3/14/2024 3:00:37 PM EDT
Which is a more reliable engine and why? I'm in the market for a different jeep. I know the 3.6 has more power. Thanks
|
|
|
prob similar with reliability. Each one has it's issues that will require a lot of money to fix. Burning oil on 3.8 and valve issues on 3.6
|
|
|
Some older 3.6l pentastar engines had issues with casting sand not being cleaned out properly, those issues should have been long corrected though.
|
|
|
3.6L is better but it's far from problem free, especially 2012-2014.
I just sold my 2012 off as it was just a matter of time before another valve issue happened and it's now outside of Jeep's extended 10-year warranty. The general belief is that the 3.6L was more reliable and a better engine due to that and more power. While the 3.6L has valve and rocker problems, the 3.8L had oil consumption and manifold cracking issues and they seemed to happen more often than the 3.6L's issues do. |
|
|
Some Jeep people believe the 3.8 is more reliable but power sucks. The 3.6 has more power but is less reliable.
I haven't owned either so am not speaking from experience. Just repeating what I've been told. My Jeep has a 4.0 |
|
"It behooves every man to remember that the work of the critic is of altogether secondary importance, and that, in the end, progress is accomplished by the man who does things."
Theodore Roosevelt |
Originally Posted By ColtRifle: Some Jeep people believe the 3.8 is more reliable but power sucks. The 3.6 has more power but is less reliable. I haven't owned either so am not speaking from experience. Just repeating what I've been told. My Jeep has a 4.0 View Quote |
|
DAV lifetime member
NRA Patriot Life Benefactor |
Depends on when the 3.6 was made. Later 3.6L engines have the bugs worked out and make almost 300 HP.
|
|
"According to Argonne National Laboratory, it takes 100 pounds of battery in an EV to go a distance achieved by only one pound of gasoline in an ICE vehicle"
|
Originally Posted By _DR: Depends on when the 3.6 was made. Later 3.6L engines have the bugs worked out and make almost 300 HP. View Quote While I do believe the engine is better than is was, not sure the bugs are really worked out. Main one I’m aware of is the oil cooler/filter assembly. Luckily, it’s easy to find the all aluminum one to replace the factory garbage one. But, as far as I know FCA is still using the plastic oil cooler assemblies in the 3.6. Honestly, it’s a decent engine from what I understand but still with a few flaws. |
|
"It behooves every man to remember that the work of the critic is of altogether secondary importance, and that, in the end, progress is accomplished by the man who does things."
Theodore Roosevelt |
Dunno about the 3.6, when I got my jeep, I specifically looked at only the 3.8's.
Less computer bullshit, and easier to rip out when I get around to repowering. |
|
|
Hemi
|
|
|
I’ve owned both. The 3.6 was way more enjoyable to drive but the 3.8 doesn’t make enough power to hurt its self. I have seen 3.8s pushing 300k miles
|
|
|
3.6 pentastar engine
Oil Pump Oil Cooler/filter housing lifter/valves water outlet housing/thermostat Plastic cooling system fittings. |
|
Patriots are ordinary men who rise up to do extraordinary things in troubled times.
Pro-abortion is the radical idea that an innocent life is the only one worth taking. |
I have not heard much about the oil pump itself being problematic in the 3.6 engines.
I have owned a 2015 JKU with the 3.6 for almost 7 years now and it has nearly 130,000 miles on it. I specifically wanted the 3.6 because the additional power and the 5 speed automatic transmission makes driving much more enjoyable. I kind of wanted to avoid the 2012 and 2013 model years as the first couple of years of the 3.6 in the JK had casting issues with at least one of the cylinder heads. Outside of that, in my experience, the 3 main Achilles heels of the 3.6 are:
|
|
|
Anyone that bought a 3.8 just as a toy I'm interested if you were disappointed.
Wife and I miss having a Jeep, considering looking for used first gen JK 4 doors. Not a daily driver. |
|
|
I had an 08 unlimited with the 3.8 and the only issues I ever had was a water pump and driver side exhaust manifold cracked.
That being said I always told myself my next one will have the 3.6 just for more power, but truthfully if your just driving it the 3.8 worked. |
|
|
I’ve driven both back to back since I had to fix both for a customer. 3.8 is just a plain dog. Like it had no power what so ever. Get the 3.6 and it if ever comes down to it, just get it fixed.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Ivan1: I’ve driven both back to back since I had to fix both for a customer. 3.8 is just a plain dog. Like it had no power what so ever. Get the 3.6 and it if ever comes down to it, just get it fixed. View Quote My 4.0 is a dog too considering the displacement. But it still puts a smile on my face when I drive it. |
|
"It behooves every man to remember that the work of the critic is of altogether secondary importance, and that, in the end, progress is accomplished by the man who does things."
Theodore Roosevelt |
My exes dads 2018 Wrangler (even when new) smelled of coolant, think it was the 3.8
I loved the old 4.0 |
|
|
I have a 2016 3.6.
Had a rocker arm bearing go at 105k miles. It started ticking as i left on a 4500 mile trip. It made it through the trip, but did kill the cam lobe. Replaced that cam and all the rockers. All the other rockers were fine. If I had fixed it as soon as i heard the click, im pretty sure i could have saved the $300 cam. Oem radiators suck and will leak just enough to smell. Went through 2 factory ones, but the $70 china one works great. Plastic oil filter housing leaked at 102k. Replaced with a metal one. Had the oem stat stick open, replaced with a orielly one and had higher temps under load issues. Shop diagnosed it as just the temp sensor, but it turned out the cheap replacement plastic housing had distorted and kept it from fully opening. These are more problems than any other modern car I have owned. No engineerings defects, just shitty parts QC. |
|
|
Endeavor to Persevere
|
I have no idea if this is a good mod or a pointless one but found this video looking for something else and thought of this thread. Makes sense it could benefit the engine.
STOP Dry Starting your Pentastar 3.6!! Cartridge Filter draining out VS oil retention after installing Baxter Performance Device. |
|
"It behooves every man to remember that the work of the critic is of altogether secondary importance, and that, in the end, progress is accomplished by the man who does things."
Theodore Roosevelt |
Damn, reading this thread makes me think I've been really lucky.
I've had the vans in order with the 4.0, 3.8, now the 3.6, and I've never had engine trouble from any of them. The 3.6 just passed over 200k miles on it. I do the oil changes myself and I know to be careful with the filter cap, though. Maybe it's because I drive them like minivans, though |
|
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a 10mm at your side, kid.”
|
Hmmm, none of you guys with the 3.8 had any fuel injector issues? I owned a 2008 from new and had four injectors fail over the 12 years I had it. Been driving a low mileage 3.6L I stumbled on and traded for couple years back.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Ivan1: I’ve driven both back to back since I had to fix both for a customer. 3.8 is just a plain dog. Like it had no power what so ever. Get the 3.6 and it if ever comes down to it, just get it fixed. View Quote Get rid of the craptacular oem power cables, and the 3.8 is a whole different kettle of fish. Makes any of the gimmicky pedal modifiers redundant. It's still a low horsepower engine with the torque range way too high in the RPM band, but at least it runs right. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Orrin: Hmmm, none of you guys with the 3.8 had any fuel injector issues? I owned a 2008 from new and had four injectors fail over the 12 years I had it. Been driving a low mileage 3.6L I stumbled on and traded for couple years back. View Quote My early '07 is still going on the original injectors, 132k miles. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By elmidgeto: Get rid of the craptacular oem power cables, and the 3.8 is a whole different kettle of fish. Makes any of the gimmicky pedal modifiers redundant. It's still a low horsepower engine with the torque range way too high in the RPM band, but at least it runs right. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By elmidgeto: Originally Posted By Ivan1: I’ve driven both back to back since I had to fix both for a customer. 3.8 is just a plain dog. Like it had no power what so ever. Get the 3.6 and it if ever comes down to it, just get it fixed. Get rid of the craptacular oem power cables, and the 3.8 is a whole different kettle of fish. Makes any of the gimmicky pedal modifiers redundant. It's still a low horsepower engine with the torque range way too high in the RPM band, but at least it runs right. Not sure what you mean by "power cables" in this context? I drove a friend's 3.8 JK, since you mentioned the pedal modifier, the impression I got when driving it was the OEM throttle curve was very lethargic. Would drive me absolutely nuts if I owned it. |
|
"You can't tourniquet a taint, folks." - Andrew Branca
|
Originally Posted By JackRebney: Not sure what you mean by "power cables" in this context? I drove a friend's 3.8 JK, since you mentioned the pedal modifier, the impression I got when driving it was the OEM throttle curve was very lethargic. Would drive me absolutely nuts if I owned it. View Quote The cables from the battery to the fuse block, battery to the starter, alternator to battery, replacement fusible link, engine to frame ground, battery negative to body ground. I also added an alternator ground o battery negative, and a couple short pieces to run dual batteries in parallel. The OEM wiring is 10ga, the new cables I put in were 1/0, probably overkill but it wasn't that much more than 2ga, and still cheaper than the OEM harness. If I knew how much better that the Jeep would run afterwards, I'd have done it a lot sooner, rather than waiting for the alternator to go out and start zorching all the ground switched electronics. |
|
|
I've had 8 trouble free years with my 2016. I think that's the 3.6?
|
|
|
The 3.6 is a very good motor that had some early production issues. Once those were sorted out it's been a very reliable engine. It also makes good power, definitely preferable to the 3.8 which was a decent motor for it's time all things considered.
|
|
|
We put over 90k miles on our 2017 JKU. I don’t even know what engine it had, if that gives you an accurate indication of how reliable it was. We sold it last year and my wife wants to get another.
|
|
10/22/14 I stand with Canada
|
If you are going to look at something old enough to have the 3.8, just go a bit older with a TJ and get the 4.0L straight 6.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.