Here's the timestamps from the info box, I hopped to a few of them and there IS definitely new info in here laid out - The anecdote at 1:36 regarding extremely good looking girl in Vegas covers "alien" as human masquerade which trails onto the next 20 minutes:

He (Curt/TOE) mentioned doing less UFO/UAP centered stuff in the Pasulka interview as well.  He said he had one or two more  but was taking a break from it.   He said his channel has grown immensely with UFO interested, but many of those are also a problem for his more traditional long term viewers.  I liked when he was interviewing the guy with the high IQ and actually talking about theories of everything that eventually led him to this paranormal and then UAP path, but it's not an endpoint, just a data point.

Some seem to go off the rails a bit and put people off.  Point to where the evidence/primary sources are instead of a complete story without a name to even look up to see the entirety of info available.  

It's something he can dabble around the edges of with the paranormal, which must be part of the 'everything' theory unless you pigeonhole it as "simulation" and move on, but then there's nothing to think about.  I suspect it's like GD coming in here as some of us can live in both spaces without having to correct everybody who doesn't agree, while other have to make sure they have their point of view honored and other points of view are not allowed.   So I can understand him not wanting to do more UFO stuff unless it's at the intellectual/paranormal level as the Pasulka interview was, angels and demons and the like, rather than "Alien in Vegas" with no further details (which the story had very little of to start with).

The issue is when very fringe things are mentioned about and the guy talks about seeing aliens without describing what was different about them or any information to back up the claim, he appears to be a crazy loon rambling on and everything else he said in that interview is immediately discounted as BS  too.   Hurts the topic instead of helping it, possibly intentionally.

Similar to the media pushing "Assault Rifle!!!" in any shooting, no matter what was used, then 2 weeks later putting a correction at the bottom of an inside page for what weapon was used.   They make things true and false by simply ignoring what has been disclosed and continuing to mock the subject instead.    The majority of the population thinks it's all BS.  

People say they know the MSM lies, but still get most all of their info from it (rest from osmosis of plot lines in their favorite TV shows and ads shown).  They have no idea of the scale of lying by omission the MSM is complicit in.  several 24/7 news networks and all of them cover the same 15 stories over and over every day, which are follow-ups to 13 of the same 15 stories they covered the day before with 2 new minor topics added, so nothing ever appears to change and everybody assumes things are hunky dory.  Until they go shopping or have to pay to have something fixed.   We've always been at war with Eurasia, some insane mash up of Brave New World and Idiocracy with a bit of Fahrenheit 451, 1984, and Atlas Shrugged tossed in.