Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 3
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 1:59:00 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Halberdier:

Good link. Looks like the information above is correct. And also looks like we consume roughly 90% of what we produce, leaving only 2 million or so barrels for net export.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Halberdier:

Good link. Looks like the information above is correct. And also looks like we consume roughly 90% of what we produce, leaving only 2 million or so barrels for net export.

The top 10 oil producers and share of total world oil production in 2023

Country: Million barrels per day/Share of world total
United States: 21.91/22%
Saudi Arabia: 11.13/11%
Russia: 10.75/11%
Canada: 5.76/6%
China: 5.26/5%
Iraq: 4.42/4%
Brazil 4.28/4%
United Arab Emirates: 4.16/4%
Iran: 3.99/4%
Kuwait: 2.91/3%
Total top 10: 74.59/73%
World total: 101.81

1 Oil includes crude oil, all other petroleum liquids, and biofuels.
2 Production includes domestic production of crude oil, all other petroleum liquids, and biofuels and refinery processing gain.
3 Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Statistics, Total oil (petroleum and other liquids) production, as of April 11, 2024



Here is some great data on Imports/exports.

https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/imports-and-exports.php

The United States became a total petroleum net exporter in 2020
In 2020, the United States became a net exporter of petroleum for the first time since at least 1949.1 In 2022, total petroleum exports were about 9.52 million barrels per day (b/d) and total petroleum imports were about 8.33 million b/d, making the United States an annual net total petroleum exporter for the third year in a row. Total petroleum net exports were about 1.19 million b/d in 2022. Also in 2022, the United States produced2 about 20.08 million b/d of petroleum and consumed3 about 20.01 million b/d. Although U.S. annual total petroleum exports were greater than total petroleum imports in 2020, 2021, and 2022, the United States still imported some crude oil and petroleum products from other countries to help to supply domestic demand for petroleum and to supply international markets.

The United States remained a net crude oil importer in 2022, importing about 6.28 million b/d of crude oil and exporting about 3.58 million b/d. Some of the crude oil that the U.S. imports is refined by U.S. refineries into petroleum products—such as gasoline, heating oil, diesel fuel, and jet fuel—that the U.S. later exports. Also, some of imported petroleum may be stored and later exported
.


Link Posted: 4/16/2024 2:07:53 PM EDT
[Last Edit: CMiller] [#2]
It's pretty funny how so many people haven't yet realized that MAGA Media is feeding you BS narratives all day every day and happily monetizing your ignorance.

Newsflash -- The government, including the president, does very little to influence oil production compared to The Market.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 2:09:09 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Duck_Hunt] [#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CMiller:
It's pretty funny how so many people haven't yet realized that MAGA Media is feeding you BS narratives all day every day and happily monetizing your ignorance.
View Quote



Ayup. Just as swooned and misled as the left.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 2:12:52 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By live-free-or-die:


That isn't how global markets work and it isn't how oil refining/distillation works.

All oil is traded on a global market and is sold to the highest bidder. In addition, oil refineries are finely tuned to work with a single type of oil.

The US refineries have been shifting to lighter oils like those produced domestically but it is a slow process and no one wants a refinery offline.


https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=41653

ETA: An easier explanation https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/america-produces-enough-oil-to-meet-its-needs-so-why-do-we-import-crude
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By live-free-or-die:
Originally Posted By delemorte:
If there is all this oil why is fuel so GD expensive? Are they not selling that shit domestic or something?


That isn't how global markets work and it isn't how oil refining/distillation works.

All oil is traded on a global market and is sold to the highest bidder. In addition, oil refineries are finely tuned to work with a single type of oil.

The US refineries have been shifting to lighter oils like those produced domestically but it is a slow process and no one wants a refinery offline.


https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=41653

ETA: An easier explanation https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/america-produces-enough-oil-to-meet-its-needs-so-why-do-we-import-crude
In general, our refineries are setup to refine oil from the middle east.  To refine oil produced in the US, we have to send it to Mexico, then it's set back to the US as gas.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 2:49:56 PM EDT
[#5]
Free market, blah blah blah, but I really wish it were never legal to export strategic products/elements.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 2:58:54 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bikedamon:


The SPR is to oil as the ethanol subsidy is to corn.  Political optics.
View Quote


Corn prices would be 30%+ lower without the ethanol scam.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:10:01 PM EDT
[#7]
LIES, same as when we were told this with Idiot Trump!
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:20:26 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CMiller:
It's pretty funny how so many people haven't yet realized that MAGA Media is feeding you BS narratives all day every day and happily monetizing your ignorance.

Newsflash -- The government, including the president, does very little to influence oil production compared to The Market.
View Quote

Perhaps not immediate production, but production in the long run has been affected.

Biden halted leasing in ANWR.
He paused leasing on federal lands and off-shore.
He slowed down the approval of drilling permits - almost doubling the time it takes to get approved.
 

Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:24:52 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CMiller:
It's pretty funny how so many people haven't yet realized that MAGA Media is feeding you BS narratives all day every day and happily monetizing your ignorance.

Newsflash -- The government, including the president, does very little to influence oil production compared to The Market.
View Quote

Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:28:13 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bikedamon:


Thsi topic has been covered so many times in GD that I have to think the guys who still spout off ignorantly about it are just playing dumb at this point.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bikedamon:
Originally Posted By live-free-or-die:
Originally Posted By delemorte:
If there is all this oil why is fuel so GD expensive? Are they not selling that shit domestic or something?


That isn't how global markets work and it isn't how oil refining/distillation works.

All oil is traded on a global market and is sold to the highest bidder. In addition, oil refineries are finely tuned to work with a single type of oil.

The US refineries have been shifting to lighter oils like those produced domestically but it is a slow process and no one wants a refinery offline.


https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=41653


Thsi topic has been covered so many times in GD that I have to think the guys who still spout off ignorantly about it are just playing dumb at this point.


I agree. It's like ignorance is bliss at this point.

Or they just put everyone on ignore that makes them uncomfortable and threatens their ignorance.

Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:51:04 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Cacinok:

Perhaps not immediate production, but production in the long run has been affected.

Biden halted leasing in ANWR.
He paused leasing on federal lands and off-shore.
He slowed down the approval of drilling permits - almost doubling the time it takes to get approved.
 

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Cacinok:
Originally Posted By CMiller:
It's pretty funny how so many people haven't yet realized that MAGA Media is feeding you BS narratives all day every day and happily monetizing your ignorance.

Newsflash -- The government, including the president, does very little to influence oil production compared to The Market.

Perhaps not immediate production, but production in the long run has been affected.

Biden halted leasing in ANWR.
He paused leasing on federal lands and off-shore.
He slowed down the approval of drilling permits - almost doubling the time it takes to get approved.
 


My understanding is that all of that affects activity many years in the future, and regardless it's a very small segment of the total market.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:55:51 PM EDT
[#12]
Russia is in a state of war with export restrictions placed on it and vital pieces of energy infrastructured damaged or outright destroyed.

U.S. and Saudi relations are at a record low due to Joe Biden's personal insults and allegations made regarding the Crown Prince, MBS.   I don't think U.S. and Saudi relations have ever been this bad and as a consequence Saudi Arabia has denied multiple U.S. requests to increase oil production. So, their low output is intentional.

So yes, U.S. oil production is higher right now, but that's a bit like being valedictorian of your summer school.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:56:07 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CMiller:
It's pretty funny how so many people haven't yet realized that MAGA Media is feeding you BS narratives all day every day and happily monetizing your ignorance.

Newsflash -- The government, including the president, does very little to influence oil production compared to The Market.
View Quote


Yet willful ignorance will persist.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:03:03 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Waldo] [#14]
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:03:58 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bikedamon:


The Saudi government has some of the highest domestic gasoline subsidies in the world.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bikedamon:
Originally Posted By JKH62:
Gasoline is around $1.36 a gallon in Saudi Arabia......


The Saudi government has some of the highest domestic gasoline subsidies in the world.


I saw a presentation about 15 years ago saying that the Saudi break even price was something like $100 a barrel because it was the only thing that allowed their welfare society.

Apparently it was still profitable for the Sheikhs as it kept the commoners from overthrowing them.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:05:33 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Cacinok:
In general, our refineries are setup to refine oil from the middle east.  To refine oil produced in the US, we have to send it to Mexico, then it's set back to the US as gas.
View Quote

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:21:04 PM EDT
[#17]
Demand is up, reserves are gone.. Simple.

But what the political spin is that it's corporate greed. They are blaming inflation on corporate greed.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:27:33 PM EDT
[#18]
I don't believe the report.  If we are producing so much, how come our strategic oil reserves are so very low?
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:28:27 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Genin:
I don't believe the report.  If we are producing so much, how come our strategic oil reserves are so very low?
View Quote



Why would we take oil off the market in an already expensive situation?
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:33:45 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Shooter66] [#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:



Why would we take oil off the market in an already expensive situation?
View Quote

Because the SPR is the most important oil in the world….duh!  

Yes that was sarcasm. Don’t shoot me.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:38:38 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Cacinok:

Perhaps not immediate production, but production in the long run has been affected.

Biden halted leasing in ANWR.
He paused leasing on federal lands and off-shore.
He slowed down the approval of drilling permits - almost doubling the time it takes to get approved.
 

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Cacinok:
Originally Posted By CMiller:
It's pretty funny how so many people haven't yet realized that MAGA Media is feeding you BS narratives all day every day and happily monetizing your ignorance.

Newsflash -- The government, including the president, does very little to influence oil production compared to The Market.

Perhaps not immediate production, but production in the long run has been affected.

Biden halted leasing in ANWR.
He paused leasing on federal lands and off-shore.
He slowed down the approval of drilling permits - almost doubling the time it takes to get approved.
 



Another factor that the government had a direct effect on is oil transportation cost.  IIRC, on his first day in Office Biden shut down the keystone pipeline. Pipelines move oil at a much lower cost than trains, and particularly trucks. So, the cost of transport oil from the field to the refinery is far higher now than it was when Biden took office. That is contributing noticeably to inflation, because so many things have a transportation component to their cost. Including the stuff you buy from Amazon.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 5:22:19 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Foxtrot08] [#22]
Alright. I'm exhausted from several hours of meetings today. And more tomorrow.  Yay management meetings. So this might be a little shorter than I hoped. But, alas this is what you get.



SPR:

The SPR is, currently, pretty useless and a political tool at best. The government should get out of managing it, sell it off and let private companies utilize it for storage.  It was an idea in the 1970's, was built in the 1980's.  The idea was, at that time, the US was going to become completely dependent on foreign oil.  During the late 1980's and early 1990's we were down to the 4m BDP of domestic production - a far cry from what we are doing now. It was a theory that the US was going to "Run out of oil" - so we had to have several days of oil in reserve in case of war.

We currently produce the lions share of what we use, our hat (Canada) and the pants to the south (Mexico, Central america, South america) produce the rest of it.  We don't need it anymore.  We're much more secure producing our own oil, than having anyone else produce oil for us. Easy as that.  Not only that, private storage has increased by approximately 1 BILLION barrels and continues to increase every year. I had another thread on this a bit ago, you fucks dig it up. Stop talking about the SPR.  The private sector does everything better than the government. Let the private sector manage it, we're not going to run out of oil anytime soon. Having strategic production around the US is a lot more war proof, than having a few sites that could easily be cut off from refineries.  

The bottle neck is and will be refineries. Because they're too expensive to let sit idle.  That's basic economic fundamentals.


Keystone XL - Aka KXL.

The KXL was and never will be built. When it was first proposed, Alberta was continuing massive gains in production of Oil sands. This has since fallen off for several reasons - mostly, it's tragically expensive. And it's very hard to refine crude, so it needs to go to the gulf coast. That are set up to refine heavy sour crude. It also needs to be cut along the way with light sweet crude - which, is what we primarily produce in the US. Some of our 'crude exports' are simply that - exporting light sweet crude to Canada, so they can actually export the tar they produce, so that we can, once again, refine it in the US.  Refinery complexity is a thing. Light sweet crude is good at making fuels but not always good at making other things. Such as asphalt, plastics, lubricants, chemicals, etc.  That is why the refinery complexity index is a thing.  If we simply only refined our crude - we would make less variations of products, which would drive the cost up of those products we can no longer produce.   So it's better to maintain some imports - particularly from the countries I mentioned.  We do not really import ME crude much anymore, because it's too expensive (Shipping) and because it's extremely similar to what we produce in a lot of ways - so lack of need.  

The KXL also had 4 years to build ~18 miles of pipeline. They didn't do it. Why didn't they do it? Because it wasn't needed. It needed approximately ~900k BPD throughput to become financially viable. It was going to have a max capacity of ~1.2M BPD capacity.  When initially proposed, it had ~700k BDP commitment to capacity. The rest could be spot toll throughput to get closer to it's maximum capacity.  With expansions of other lines - Enbridge, trans mountain, etc.  The commitment capacity fell from 700k BPD, to >300k BPD.  It was no longer financially viable to construct this line. On top of that, Alberta's production levels plateaued due to cost of production and the fall off of oil prices at the time. Once oil settled in at >$100/bbl - it was no longer going to be built. So it became a political football. Which, people are still tossing around to this day. So again, much like the SPR, stop.  It's not needed, it would be a financial hole for someone to build even if it WAS approved, that would never make money.

Our oil production:

Yes, the federal government royalties on public grounds doubled under Biden. Yes, Permitting time has taken longer. But only about 25% of our production happens on federal land. The rest happens in private land. Meaning, shit owned by you and I.    Yes, shitheads like NY and CA are taking rights from Land owners and just flat out banning drilling from happening.  Yes, Biden is a shithead for delaying permitting on LNG export facilities.    HOWEVER.   The oil industry is very resilient.  Thus, why if you compare the inflation of a dollar, to oil - Oil prices are below inflation. Significantly.   Our oil production in the US can probably cap out around 15M BPD - but there's no real demand for that right now.  Our rig count could currently double, if we wanted to.  Right now though, the US is the Swing supplier for the globe.  We're the only country that can fairly easily increase production and decrease production by millions of barrels. SA, the UAE, etc. Ended large investment projects because of global competition.  Where it would take SA 5 years and billions of dollars to increase their max capacity from ~12m BPD, to 13m BPD, we went from ~10.5m BPD, to 13m BPD in about a year.  Just, easier for us.  That's a huge advantage. There is also huge capacity coming online in South American countries and other non-OPEC countries that is further putting pressure on OPEC countries.  See BP's purchase of Hess.  

So how do these OPEC+ Countries react? Quotas. They're a cartel. Simply put, they reduce output - as they're national controlled oil companies. They just say "Stop producing more oil."  And... they do. By knocking global production off line, global prices go up. Pretty easy. As I said, Russia has fallen off about ~1.5M BPD, this I said was going to happen about 2 years ago. It's speculated to continue to decrease a bit more? We shall see. I don't think it will get into the 8m BPD reduction, but, I can see it falling off a bit more.  SA and other OPEC countries have cut millions of barrels a day of capacity to the global markets. Why? To keep prices high.

High margins? Or high volume?

It's a business. Currently OPEC+ is going with higher margins, lower volumes. It swings here or there.  So to continue this spike in prices - so we don't have a 2010-2012 super cycle - the US oil production has stepped up to the plate as the swing producer, formally replacing SA as the primary swing producer in the world.






The oil market goes up and goes down. Right now we're on an upward swing.  But, currently, it's a good thing for the US Economy.  The down side is, how much debt we have. But I don't have enough time to get into that whole shitshow of a conversation.



Anymore questions?


Edit:

SA-RU Oil war / Covid is another topic.  But I need to go home.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 5:43:44 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Alright. I'm exhausted from several hours of meetings today. And more tomorrow.  Yay management meetings. So this might be a little shorter than I hoped. But, alas this is what you get.



SPR:

The SPR is, currently, pretty useless and a political tool at best. The government should get out of managing it, sell it off and let private companies utilize it for storage.  It was an idea in the 1970's, was built in the 1980's.  The idea was, at that time, the US was going to become completely dependent on foreign oil.  During the late 1980's and early 1990's we were down to the 4m BDP of domestic production - a far cry from what we are doing now. It was a theory that the US was going to "Run out of oil" - so we had to have several days of oil in reserve in case of war.

We currently produce the lions share of what we use, our hat (Canada) and the pants to the south (Mexico, Central america, South america) produce the rest of it.  We don't need it anymore.  We're much more secure producing our own oil, than having anyone else produce oil for us. Easy as that.  Not only that, private storage has increased by approximately 1 BILLION barrels and continues to increase every year. I had another thread on this a bit ago, you fucks dig it up. Stop talking about the SPR.  The private sector does everything better than the government. Let the private sector manage it, we're not going to run out of oil anytime soon. Having strategic production around the US is a lot more war proof, than having a few sites that could easily be cut off from refineries.  

The bottle neck is and will be refineries. Because they're too expensive to let sit idle.  That's basic economic fundamentals.


Keystone XL - Aka KXL.

The KXL was and never will be built. When it was first proposed, Alberta was continuing massive gains in production of Oil sands. This has since fallen off for several reasons - mostly, it's tragically expensive. And it's very hard to refine crude, so it needs to go to the gulf coast. That are set up to refine heavy sour crude. It also needs to be cut along the way with light sweet crude - which, is what we primarily produce in the US. Some of our 'crude exports' are simply that - exporting light sweet crude to Canada, so they can actually export the tar they produce, so that we can, once again, refine it in the US.  Refinery complexity is a thing. Light sweet crude is good at making fuels but not always good at making other things. Such as asphalt, plastics, lubricants, chemicals, etc.  That is why the refinery complexity index is a thing.  If we simply only refined our crude - we would make less variations of products, which would drive the cost up of those products we can no longer produce.   So it's better to maintain some imports - particularly from the countries I mentioned.  We do not really import ME crude much anymore, because it's too expensive (Shipping) and because it's extremely similar to what we produce in a lot of ways - so lack of need.  

The KXL also had 4 years to build ~18 miles of pipeline. They didn't do it. Why didn't they do it? Because it wasn't needed. It needed approximately ~900k BPD throughput to become financially viable. It was going to have a max capacity of ~1.2M BPD capacity.  When initially proposed, it had ~700k BDP commitment to capacity. The rest could be spot toll throughput to get closer to it's maximum capacity.  With expansions of other lines - Enbridge, trans mountain, etc.  The commitment capacity fell from 700k BPD, to >300k BPD.  It was no longer financially viable to construct this line. On top of that, Alberta's production levels plateaued due to cost of production and the fall off of oil prices at the time. Once oil settled in at >$100/bbl - it was no longer going to be built. So it became a political football. Which, people are still tossing around to this day. So again, much like the SPR, stop.  It's not needed, it would be a financial hole for someone to build even if it WAS approved, that would never make money.

Our oil production:

Yes, the federal government royalties on public grounds doubled under Biden. Yes, Permitting time has taken longer. But only about 25% of our production happens on federal land. The rest happens in private land. Meaning, shit owned by you and I.    Yes, shitheads like NY and CA are taking rights from Land owners and just flat out banning drilling from happening.  Yes, Biden is a shithead for delaying permitting on LNG export facilities.    HOWEVER.   The oil industry is very resilient.  Thus, why if you compare the inflation of a dollar, to oil - Oil prices are below inflation. Significantly.   Our oil production in the US can probably cap out around 15M BPD - but there's no real demand for that right now.  Our rig count could currently double, if we wanted to.  Right now though, the US is the Swing supplier for the globe.  We're the only country that can fairly easily increase production and decrease production by millions of barrels. SA, the UAE, etc. Ended large investment projects because of global competition.  Where it would take SA 5 years and billions of dollars to increase their max capacity from ~12m BPD, to 13m BPD, we went from ~10.5m BPD, to 13m BPD in about a year.  Just, easier for us.  That's a huge advantage. There is also huge capacity coming online in South American countries and other non-OPEC countries that is further putting pressure on OPEC countries.  See BP's purchase of Hess.  

So how do these OPEC+ Countries react? Quotas. They're a cartel. Simply put, they reduce output - as they're national controlled oil companies. They just say "Stop producing more oil."  And... they do. By knocking global production off line, global prices go up. Pretty easy. As I said, Russia has fallen off about ~1.5M BPD, this I said was going to happen about 2 years ago. It's speculated to continue to decrease a bit more? We shall see. I don't think it will get into the 8m BPD reduction, but, I can see it falling off a bit more.  SA and other OPEC countries have cut millions of barrels a day of capacity to the global markets. Why? To keep prices high.

High margins? Or high volume?

It's a business. Currently OPEC+ is going with higher margins, lower volumes. It swings here or there.  So to continue this spike in prices - so we don't have a 2010-2012 super cycle - the US oil production has stepped up to the plate as the swing producer, formally replacing SA as the primary swing producer in the world.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/B643C93B-B226-4C7C-8749-051596ED00F3-2663325.jpg

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/oilsupplychart-2617895.png


The oil market goes up and goes down. Right now we're on an upward swing.  But, currently, it's a good thing for the US Economy.  The down side is, how much debt we have. But I don't have enough time to get into that whole shitshow of a conversation.



Anymore questions?


Edit:

SA-RU Oil war / Covid is another topic.  But I need to go home.
View Quote


GD can’t scream “10% for the big guy” when people like you ejaculate facts on their faces like that.

Thread over.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 5:56:19 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mickdog13:


GD can't scream "10% for the big guy" when people like you ejaculate facts on their faces like that.

Thread over.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mickdog13:
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Alright. I'm exhausted from several hours of meetings today. And more tomorrow.  Yay management meetings. So this might be a little shorter than I hoped. But, alas this is what you get.



SPR:

The SPR is, currently, pretty useless and a political tool at best. The government should get out of managing it, sell it off and let private companies utilize it for storage.  It was an idea in the 1970's, was built in the 1980's.  The idea was, at that time, the US was going to become completely dependent on foreign oil.  During the late 1980's and early 1990's we were down to the 4m BDP of domestic production - a far cry from what we are doing now. It was a theory that the US was going to "Run out of oil" - so we had to have several days of oil in reserve in case of war.

We currently produce the lions share of what we use, our hat (Canada) and the pants to the south (Mexico, Central america, South america) produce the rest of it.  We don't need it anymore.  We're much more secure producing our own oil, than having anyone else produce oil for us. Easy as that.  Not only that, private storage has increased by approximately 1 BILLION barrels and continues to increase every year. I had another thread on this a bit ago, you fucks dig it up. Stop talking about the SPR.  The private sector does everything better than the government. Let the private sector manage it, we're not going to run out of oil anytime soon. Having strategic production around the US is a lot more war proof, than having a few sites that could easily be cut off from refineries.  

The bottle neck is and will be refineries. Because they're too expensive to let sit idle.  That's basic economic fundamentals.


Keystone XL - Aka KXL.

The KXL was and never will be built. When it was first proposed, Alberta was continuing massive gains in production of Oil sands. This has since fallen off for several reasons - mostly, it's tragically expensive. And it's very hard to refine crude, so it needs to go to the gulf coast. That are set up to refine heavy sour crude. It also needs to be cut along the way with light sweet crude - which, is what we primarily produce in the US. Some of our 'crude exports' are simply that - exporting light sweet crude to Canada, so they can actually export the tar they produce, so that we can, once again, refine it in the US.  Refinery complexity is a thing. Light sweet crude is good at making fuels but not always good at making other things. Such as asphalt, plastics, lubricants, chemicals, etc.  That is why the refinery complexity index is a thing.  If we simply only refined our crude - we would make less variations of products, which would drive the cost up of those products we can no longer produce.   So it's better to maintain some imports - particularly from the countries I mentioned.  We do not really import ME crude much anymore, because it's too expensive (Shipping) and because it's extremely similar to what we produce in a lot of ways - so lack of need.  

The KXL also had 4 years to build ~18 miles of pipeline. They didn't do it. Why didn't they do it? Because it wasn't needed. It needed approximately ~900k BPD throughput to become financially viable. It was going to have a max capacity of ~1.2M BPD capacity.  When initially proposed, it had ~700k BDP commitment to capacity. The rest could be spot toll throughput to get closer to it's maximum capacity.  With expansions of other lines - Enbridge, trans mountain, etc.  The commitment capacity fell from 700k BPD, to >300k BPD.  It was no longer financially viable to construct this line. On top of that, Alberta's production levels plateaued due to cost of production and the fall off of oil prices at the time. Once oil settled in at >$100/bbl - it was no longer going to be built. So it became a political football. Which, people are still tossing around to this day. So again, much like the SPR, stop.  It's not needed, it would be a financial hole for someone to build even if it WAS approved, that would never make money.

Our oil production:

Yes, the federal government royalties on public grounds doubled under Biden. Yes, Permitting time has taken longer. But only about 25% of our production happens on federal land. The rest happens in private land. Meaning, shit owned by you and I.    Yes, shitheads like NY and CA are taking rights from Land owners and just flat out banning drilling from happening.  Yes, Biden is a shithead for delaying permitting on LNG export facilities.    HOWEVER.   The oil industry is very resilient.  Thus, why if you compare the inflation of a dollar, to oil - Oil prices are below inflation. Significantly.   Our oil production in the US can probably cap out around 15M BPD - but there's no real demand for that right now.  Our rig count could currently double, if we wanted to.  Right now though, the US is the Swing supplier for the globe.  We're the only country that can fairly easily increase production and decrease production by millions of barrels. SA, the UAE, etc. Ended large investment projects because of global competition.  Where it would take SA 5 years and billions of dollars to increase their max capacity from ~12m BPD, to 13m BPD, we went from ~10.5m BPD, to 13m BPD in about a year.  Just, easier for us.  That's a huge advantage. There is also huge capacity coming online in South American countries and other non-OPEC countries that is further putting pressure on OPEC countries.  See BP's purchase of Hess.  

So how do these OPEC+ Countries react? Quotas. They're a cartel. Simply put, they reduce output - as they're national controlled oil companies. They just say "Stop producing more oil."  And... they do. By knocking global production off line, global prices go up. Pretty easy. As I said, Russia has fallen off about ~1.5M BPD, this I said was going to happen about 2 years ago. It's speculated to continue to decrease a bit more? We shall see. I don't think it will get into the 8m BPD reduction, but, I can see it falling off a bit more.  SA and other OPEC countries have cut millions of barrels a day of capacity to the global markets. Why? To keep prices high.

High margins? Or high volume?

It's a business. Currently OPEC+ is going with higher margins, lower volumes. It swings here or there.  So to continue this spike in prices - so we don't have a 2010-2012 super cycle - the US oil production has stepped up to the plate as the swing producer, formally replacing SA as the primary swing producer in the world.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/B643C93B-B226-4C7C-8749-051596ED00F3-2663325.jpg

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/oilsupplychart-2617895.png


The oil market goes up and goes down. Right now we're on an upward swing.  But, currently, it's a good thing for the US Economy.  The down side is, how much debt we have. But I don't have enough time to get into that whole shitshow of a conversation.



Anymore questions?


Edit:

SA-RU Oil war / Covid is another topic.  But I need to go home.


GD can't scream "10% for the big guy" when people like you ejaculate facts on their faces like that.

Thread over.
Well said
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 5:59:07 PM EDT
[#25]
Yea but we’re not even at peak, imagine if we were peak, lower domestic prices and supply our allies and have their dollars flow here vs Iran and Russia.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:00:55 PM EDT
[#26]
Yet we are not replenishing the stratigic petroleum reserves
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:05:58 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:



It's more complicated than that.


Literally. It's called Complexity Index. Or, technically the Nelson Complexity Index.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Originally Posted By RIP-Yataski:
Domestic refineries aren't optimized to process domestic oil, but rather foreign oil. Foreign refineries aren't optimized to process foreign oil, but rather domestic oil...



...or so I read in GD some while ago



It's more complicated than that.


Literally. It's called Complexity Index. Or, technically the Nelson Complexity Index.


Figured it was, lol...



...just read up on the NCI ever-so quickly. Sounds like a way to rate the ability of a refinery to process oil at all (many) levels of the process & whether its worth investing in them if they are low number-of-process facilities.

Did the USofA not produce (refine) any complex stuff (high NCI) such as lubes & aromatics (whatever those are) but foreigners did?
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:06:41 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:


The SPR is useless.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Originally Posted By Paul:
Originally Posted By staringback05:
Where's the *

We emptied our Strategic Fuel Reserves and now need to refill them.

We've kept the SFR in case of war, tensions in the middle east, or an explosive scandal breaks on Biden.


The SPR is useless.


Wouldn't be if I had access to it ...
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:15:10 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Sigh.

It’s like I predicted this… 2? Years ago.


Also this thread is fresh.  And the comments in it already gold.


https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/IMG_3534-3055384.jpg
View Quote


I figured out a couple of oil/gas threads back that it is not worth my keystrokes to reply to any other posts in these threads.

I’ll just sit back here in my corner with my popcorn.


Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:16:54 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mickdog13:


GD can’t scream “10% for the big guy” when people like you ejaculate facts on their faces like that.

Thread over.
View Quote

You are assuming that they will read it or research anything about oil production and refining themselves.  He has pretty much said all of that before yet here we are.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:18:17 PM EDT
[#31]
I work in “Production Enhancement”  for one of the largest oil field services companies in the world in the Permian Basin. Over the last couple years, technology and efficiency has grown leaps and bounds for shale oil and gas. Especially in the electric frac fleet. With the onset or simul, trimul, quad frac soon, and continuous pumping, petroleum recovery has gone up and cost has gone down. It’s a game of efficiency. North American Land operations lead the world in this.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:19:34 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mickdog13:


GD can’t scream “10% for the big guy” when people like you ejaculate facts on their faces like that.

Thread over.
View Quote


Same guys who screamed that the spotted owl was responsible for killing the US logging industry.... when in reality, it was mainly due to the cheap Canadian lumber.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:28:32 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RIP-Yataski:


Figured it was, lol...



...just read up on the NCI ever-so quickly. Sounds like a way to rate the ability of a refinery to process oil at all (many) levels of the process & whether its worth investing in them if they are low number-of-process facilities.

Did the USofA not produce (refine) any complex stuff (high NCI) such as lubes & aromatics (whatever those are) but foreigners did?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RIP-Yataski:
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Originally Posted By RIP-Yataski:
Domestic refineries aren't optimized to process domestic oil, but rather foreign oil. Foreign refineries aren't optimized to process foreign oil, but rather domestic oil...



...or so I read in GD some while ago



It's more complicated than that.


Literally. It's called Complexity Index. Or, technically the Nelson Complexity Index.


Figured it was, lol...



...just read up on the NCI ever-so quickly. Sounds like a way to rate the ability of a refinery to process oil at all (many) levels of the process & whether its worth investing in them if they are low number-of-process facilities.

Did the USofA not produce (refine) any complex stuff (high NCI) such as lubes & aromatics (whatever those are) but foreigners did?



We have some of the most complex refineries in the world.  We produce a ton of base stocks. Aeromatics are your “tanes” - butane, propane, solvents, etc.

There’s a report every year done by the O&G journal. But runs $2000 or so to get a copy.  I don’t have one floating around to scan either.

More complex refineries are (usually) more productive, thus more profitable.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:41:33 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By whiskerz:
Yet we are not replenishing the stratigic petroleum reserves
View Quote


You best keep reading...
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:47:37 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:



We have some of the most complex refineries in the world.  We produce a ton of base stocks. Aeromatics are your “tanes” - butane, propane, solvents, etc.

There’s a report every year done by the O&G journal. But runs $2000 or so to get a copy.  I don’t have one floating around to scan either.

More complex refineries are (usually) more productive, thus more profitable.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Originally Posted By RIP-Yataski:
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Originally Posted By RIP-Yataski:
Domestic refineries aren't optimized to process domestic oil, but rather foreign oil. Foreign refineries aren't optimized to process foreign oil, but rather domestic oil...



...or so I read in GD some while ago



It's more complicated than that.


Literally. It's called Complexity Index. Or, technically the Nelson Complexity Index.


Figured it was, lol...



...just read up on the NCI ever-so quickly. Sounds like a way to rate the ability of a refinery to process oil at all (many) levels of the process & whether its worth investing in them if they are low number-of-process facilities.

Did the USofA not produce (refine) any complex stuff (high NCI) such as lubes & aromatics (whatever those are) but foreigners did?



We have some of the most complex refineries in the world.  We produce a ton of base stocks. Aeromatics are your “tanes” - butane, propane, solvents, etc.

There’s a report every year done by the O&G journal. But runs $2000 or so to get a copy.  I don’t have one floating around to scan either.

More complex refineries are (usually) more productive, thus more profitable.


10-4. Appreciate your insights & knowledge.

Seems a fickle business, oil is. Based on a previous post of yours, its extremely expensive to build & operate a refinery. Its also extremely expensive to suck the stuff out of the ground...



...and we all wonder why petrol prices at the pump are so much. I'll take a higher cost (for domestic) as long as it comes with more security (availability and supply chain stuff) vs foreign products
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:00:42 PM EDT
[#36]
Opec cut production, Russia must sell on the black market, prices rose. The only way for the US to maintain high levels of production is for the price of oil to remain relatively high. The Saudis can pump it out of the ground for less than 10 USD per bbl. US producers need at least 45 USD per bbl to even break even.  It's the market, not the politicians. If we have a global recession and oil plummets. The US producers are going to get hammered, again.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:05:39 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Foxtrot08] [#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By FE2O3_2Al:
Opec cut production, Russia must sell on the black market, prices rose. The only way for the US to maintain high levels of production is for the price of oil to remain relatively high. The Saudis can pump it out of the ground for less than 10 USD per bbl. US producers need at least 45 USD per bbl to even break even.  It's the market, not the politicians. If we have a global recession and oil plummets. The US producers are going to get hammered, again.
View Quote



SA’s “break even” point is actually in the mid ~$80/bbl. Because they fund their country off it.  It moves depending on their yearly budget. And their volume.  So again the volume vs price argument.  The higher the price, the lower the volume they need to ship, to meet their annual budget needs.


Their production cost has been rising. Because they have to inject so much sea water to keep pressures up. It’s probably now <$25 / bbl.  Back over a decade ago it was north of $16.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:12:58 PM EDT
[#38]
I still think it's dumb we're producing shale oil so fast we have to flare gas when there's still cheaper conventional oil available.

I get it keeps prices a little lower, good for Biden, but still.

Foxtrot might change my mind, I dunno.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:14:37 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By delemorte:
If there is all this oil why is fuel so GD expensive? Are they not selling that shit domestic or something?
View Quote

Speculation and war jitters.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:17:41 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By K2QB3:
I still think it's dumb we're producing shale oil so fast we have to flare gas when there's still cheaper conventional oil available.

I get it keeps prices a little lower, good for Biden, but still.

Foxtrot might change my mind, I dunno.
View Quote



I agree, flaring is wasteful. But, pipelines to get it to market are expensive.

It’s a catch 22 when NG is >$2. Just no money in it currently.

Maybe as we (hopefully) expand LNG exports and build more NG power plants.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:21:01 PM EDT
[Last Edit: ArmyInfantryVet] [#41]
Also Oil is a globally traded commodity. So it doesn't matter if the USA is the safest place in the world. The rest of the world's situation is priced into the oil market, that we abide by.

To expand on my previous post... the Houthis shutting down the Suez and Panama Canal greatly reducing traffic because of record low water levels.

War in Ukraine.....

so many factors
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:21:10 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArmyInfantryVet:

Speculation and war jitters.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArmyInfantryVet:
Originally Posted By delemorte:
If there is all this oil why is fuel so GD expensive? Are they not selling that shit domestic or something?

Speculation and war jitters.


It's just straight up inflation IMO.

I was happy to find $3 diesel for the decade before Covid.

Diesel is $3.59 now. So 20% higher.

What isn't 20% higher than in 2019?
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:24:53 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:



SA’s “break even” point is actually in the mid ~$80/bbl. Because they fund their country off it.  It moves depending on their yearly budget. And their volume.  So again the volume vs price argument.  The higher the price, the lower the volume they need to ship, to meet their annual budget needs.


Their production cost has been rising. Because they have to inject so much sea water to keep pressures up. It’s probably now <$25 / bbl.  Back over a decade ago it was north of $16.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Originally Posted By FE2O3_2Al:
Opec cut production, Russia must sell on the black market, prices rose. The only way for the US to maintain high levels of production is for the price of oil to remain relatively high. The Saudis can pump it out of the ground for less than 10 USD per bbl. US producers need at least 45 USD per bbl to even break even.  It's the market, not the politicians. If we have a global recession and oil plummets. The US producers are going to get hammered, again.



SA’s “break even” point is actually in the mid ~$80/bbl. Because they fund their country off it.  It moves depending on their yearly budget. And their volume.  So again the volume vs price argument.  The higher the price, the lower the volume they need to ship, to meet their annual budget needs.


Their production cost has been rising. Because they have to inject so much sea water to keep pressures up. It’s probably now <$25 / bbl.  Back over a decade ago it was north of $16.


So they pump ocean deep into the earth to 'bubble up' the oil? Do they do that also so that Dubai doesn't just sink into the earth...
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:28:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Shooter66] [#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By K2QB3:
I still think it's dumb we're producing shale oil so fast we have to flare gas when there's still cheaper conventional oil available.

I get it keeps prices a little lower, good for Biden, but still.

Foxtrot might change my mind, I dunno.
View Quote

Where is this cheaper conventional oil that can replace what shale is doing?  Is there no gas in that formation?  Gas and oil come hand in hand out this way for the most part so if you drill for oil the gas has to go somewhere.  Some is used in the gas lift systems to get the oil out of the ground, a lot gets sold and sent down pipelines but there is no place for ALL of it to go at this point and the price sucks.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:30:42 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Halberdier:

I'm looking for it, too.

10% production growth during Biden's term? That just sounds wrong.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Halberdier:
Originally Posted By staringback05:
Where's the *

I'm looking for it, too.

10% production growth during Biden's term? That just sounds wrong.


He’s trying to mitigate oil price spikes for the election.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:34:05 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By delemorte:
If there is all this oil why is fuel so GD expensive? Are they not selling that shit domestic or something?
View Quote

Houses, cars, and food are 50% more and you expect gas prices to be the same?
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:48:56 PM EDT
[#47]
@FoxTrot08

We have two aromatics departments.  An Aromatics West and an Aromatics East.

East has 8 units:
1.  A catalytic reformer
2.  Hydrosulferization unit 1 (light)
3.  Hydrosulferization unit 2 (heavy)
4.  Distillate hydrotreater
5.  Szorb unit (removes sulfur from the FCC gasoline)
6.  Heavy cat naphtha hydrotreater
7.  Cat naphtha splitter
8.  Hydro-cracker flasher

West:

1.  Catalytic reformer
2.  Steam methane reformer
3.  Gasoline hydrotreater
4.  Hydro cracker unit
5.  Ultra low sulfur diesel
6.  Hydrogen plant 1
7.  Hydrogen plant 2

There have been a few posts in this thread commenting on how pricey it is to run a refinery.

The department I was in at the end of 2017 consisted primarily of a crude distillation unit and a delayed coker unit.  The crude unit had a fire.  It provided the feedstock to the DCU.  Both units were down for a month.  The crude unit might  have been processing 60,000 barrels of raw crude per day.  The DCU might have been taking in about 18,000 barrels of “pitch” per day.  

So at the end of 2018, the #3 guy in the refinery came to talk to us with his spreadsheet.  He said for the month we were down it was a “lost profit opportunity”  of $6,000,000 .  It doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to figure out that’s an LPO of $200,000 per day.

Profit!

After all the miscellaneous expenses like wages/salary and the electrical bill has been taken out.



Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:55:38 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Shooter66:

Where is this cheaper conventional oil that can replace what shale is doing?  Is there no gas in that formation?  Gas and oil come hand in hand out this way for the most part so if you drill for oil the gas has to go somewhere.  Some is used in the gas lift systems to get the oil out of the ground, a lot gets sold and sent down pipelines but there is no place for ALL of it to go at this point and the price sucks.
View Quote


Wherever they're producing conventionally?

I'm saying we don't have to exploit shale so fast that there's nowhere for all the gas to go except to flare it.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 7:59:37 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Halberdier:

I'm looking for it, too.

10% production growth during Biden's term? That just sounds wrong.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Halberdier:
Originally Posted By staringback05:
Where's the *

I'm looking for it, too.

10% production growth during Biden's term? That just sounds wrong.


It's an election year.

They know high gas prices will kill them in the polls.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 8:02:14 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mickdog13:


GD can’t scream “10% for the big guy” when people like you ejaculate facts on their faces like that.

Thread over.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mickdog13:
Originally Posted By Foxtrot08:
Alright. I'm exhausted from several hours of meetings today. And more tomorrow.  Yay management meetings. So this might be a little shorter than I hoped. But, alas this is what you get.



SPR:

The SPR is, currently, pretty useless and a political tool at best. The government should get out of managing it, sell it off and let private companies utilize it for storage.  It was an idea in the 1970's, was built in the 1980's.  The idea was, at that time, the US was going to become completely dependent on foreign oil.  During the late 1980's and early 1990's we were down to the 4m BDP of domestic production - a far cry from what we are doing now. It was a theory that the US was going to "Run out of oil" - so we had to have several days of oil in reserve in case of war.

We currently produce the lions share of what we use, our hat (Canada) and the pants to the south (Mexico, Central america, South america) produce the rest of it.  We don't need it anymore.  We're much more secure producing our own oil, than having anyone else produce oil for us. Easy as that.  Not only that, private storage has increased by approximately 1 BILLION barrels and continues to increase every year. I had another thread on this a bit ago, you fucks dig it up. Stop talking about the SPR.  The private sector does everything better than the government. Let the private sector manage it, we're not going to run out of oil anytime soon. Having strategic production around the US is a lot more war proof, than having a few sites that could easily be cut off from refineries.  

The bottle neck is and will be refineries. Because they're too expensive to let sit idle.  That's basic economic fundamentals.


Keystone XL - Aka KXL.

The KXL was and never will be built. When it was first proposed, Alberta was continuing massive gains in production of Oil sands. This has since fallen off for several reasons - mostly, it's tragically expensive. And it's very hard to refine crude, so it needs to go to the gulf coast. That are set up to refine heavy sour crude. It also needs to be cut along the way with light sweet crude - which, is what we primarily produce in the US. Some of our 'crude exports' are simply that - exporting light sweet crude to Canada, so they can actually export the tar they produce, so that we can, once again, refine it in the US.  Refinery complexity is a thing. Light sweet crude is good at making fuels but not always good at making other things. Such as asphalt, plastics, lubricants, chemicals, etc.  That is why the refinery complexity index is a thing.  If we simply only refined our crude - we would make less variations of products, which would drive the cost up of those products we can no longer produce.   So it's better to maintain some imports - particularly from the countries I mentioned.  We do not really import ME crude much anymore, because it's too expensive (Shipping) and because it's extremely similar to what we produce in a lot of ways - so lack of need.  

The KXL also had 4 years to build ~18 miles of pipeline. They didn't do it. Why didn't they do it? Because it wasn't needed. It needed approximately ~900k BPD throughput to become financially viable. It was going to have a max capacity of ~1.2M BPD capacity.  When initially proposed, it had ~700k BDP commitment to capacity. The rest could be spot toll throughput to get closer to it's maximum capacity.  With expansions of other lines - Enbridge, trans mountain, etc.  The commitment capacity fell from 700k BPD, to >300k BPD.  It was no longer financially viable to construct this line. On top of that, Alberta's production levels plateaued due to cost of production and the fall off of oil prices at the time. Once oil settled in at >$100/bbl - it was no longer going to be built. So it became a political football. Which, people are still tossing around to this day. So again, much like the SPR, stop.  It's not needed, it would be a financial hole for someone to build even if it WAS approved, that would never make money.

Our oil production:

Yes, the federal government royalties on public grounds doubled under Biden. Yes, Permitting time has taken longer. But only about 25% of our production happens on federal land. The rest happens in private land. Meaning, shit owned by you and I.    Yes, shitheads like NY and CA are taking rights from Land owners and just flat out banning drilling from happening.  Yes, Biden is a shithead for delaying permitting on LNG export facilities.    HOWEVER.   The oil industry is very resilient.  Thus, why if you compare the inflation of a dollar, to oil - Oil prices are below inflation. Significantly.   Our oil production in the US can probably cap out around 15M BPD - but there's no real demand for that right now.  Our rig count could currently double, if we wanted to.  Right now though, the US is the Swing supplier for the globe.  We're the only country that can fairly easily increase production and decrease production by millions of barrels. SA, the UAE, etc. Ended large investment projects because of global competition.  Where it would take SA 5 years and billions of dollars to increase their max capacity from ~12m BPD, to 13m BPD, we went from ~10.5m BPD, to 13m BPD in about a year.  Just, easier for us.  That's a huge advantage. There is also huge capacity coming online in South American countries and other non-OPEC countries that is further putting pressure on OPEC countries.  See BP's purchase of Hess.  

So how do these OPEC+ Countries react? Quotas. They're a cartel. Simply put, they reduce output - as they're national controlled oil companies. They just say "Stop producing more oil."  And... they do. By knocking global production off line, global prices go up. Pretty easy. As I said, Russia has fallen off about ~1.5M BPD, this I said was going to happen about 2 years ago. It's speculated to continue to decrease a bit more? We shall see. I don't think it will get into the 8m BPD reduction, but, I can see it falling off a bit more.  SA and other OPEC countries have cut millions of barrels a day of capacity to the global markets. Why? To keep prices high.

High margins? Or high volume?

It's a business. Currently OPEC+ is going with higher margins, lower volumes. It swings here or there.  So to continue this spike in prices - so we don't have a 2010-2012 super cycle - the US oil production has stepped up to the plate as the swing producer, formally replacing SA as the primary swing producer in the world.

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/B643C93B-B226-4C7C-8749-051596ED00F3-2663325.jpg

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/148484/oilsupplychart-2617895.png


The oil market goes up and goes down. Right now we're on an upward swing.  But, currently, it's a good thing for the US Economy.  The down side is, how much debt we have. But I don't have enough time to get into that whole shitshow of a conversation.



Anymore questions?


Edit:

SA-RU Oil war / Covid is another topic.  But I need to go home.


GD can’t scream “10% for the big guy” when people like you ejaculate facts on their faces like that.

Thread over.


Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top