He puts a lot of the stuff regarding UFO/UAP in a concise packet.

His statements really have panties in a wad in GD.  He was quite prophetic with this bit:  "I bought into everything they said and believed with all my heart, and if somebody told me otherwise they were a bad/wrong person" (Paraphrased from first few minutes of his interview)

The polarization is complete - somebody expressing an opinion different than your own is an enemy.  That is how we've become so divided.

I've said this before but back in the 80s, people would go to a bar and politics could be mentioned and they'd argue but still buy beers.  Later they'd get in fights, now they don't even go to the same bar and vandalize the hangouts of the "enemy".   The "Religion and politics aren't mentioned in polite company" along with "Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me" have been lost to the history book of what made civilization function smoothly.

The GD crowd go so far as to say this reflects badly on Trump, since Tucker covers a lot of Trump news, if he talks about UFOs and conspiracy theories turning out to be actual conspiracies as time goes on, he's off the rails loony and that means Trump is too.   They never stop and think that they might be the ones without all the information if their education is entirely from what is shown to them instead of what they seek to learn about.  

The MSM and what is essentially the "leftists religion" have these really strong feelings and anger and acting on it and they don't know why, but they have a LOT of conviction that people that think differently need to be punished one way or another, they need a name to attack and a label to attack them with, then they make a chant and riot over it without being able to articulate the actual issue at hand.

We've all had to come to that realization sooner or later (hopefully).   It takes a lot of self reflection and really sucks to truly admit you believed a lot of lies swallowed whole and have strong opinions and you're not sure where exactly they came from.  When you start reading independent data and seeing the amount of stuff you were directly lied to about, and the extent of those lies, it makes you question everything you know and you need to go back to first principles and primary sources to decide what you really believe.  We don't need to have an opinion on every pop topic, we can be undecided on things we do not have enough information about.  

A large portion of the population doesn't think that is allowed, you either love or hate something and there's no undecided, even when it comes to things that do not effect you and you have zero control over.  Like cheering for a football team or a war.  Your attitude isn't going to change the outcome, neither will insulting or attacking somebody else who doesn't share your opinion.

Divided we fall.   Direct correlation with how fast the US has deteriorated and the divisions and labels thrown around.  The labels came first in the 90s for 'hate crimes' (before any happened) and people laughed at the concepts, same as all the different pronouns for sexes 15 years ago, now they're realities and people argue over what they should be called instead of deciding what they do have in common and can work together to improve.

The fact that he mentioned someone from AATIP was who told him is why people think it was Elizondo.

This thread as well  Stuff from Gary Nolan regarding materials and different dimension/spiritual aspects and Diane Pasulka and Jacques Vallee for hardcore "woo woo" areas of the UAP phenomenon that scares people away because it's so foreign and not something you can touch/taste/see, only feel, like Telepathy components and the astral projection stuff which can't be videotaped and shared.