Quote History Originally Posted By UV18:
You either support rights restoration or you don't.
View Quote
This is where we can apply a little common sense (I hate that term these days). I don't believe murderers, rapists, or child predators deserve redemption; they should never be release back into society nor should they be a burden on the taxpayer for a life sentence.
A lot of domestic abuse, gang shit, youthful activities involving violence and even assault are from younger people who are in the wrong environment and haven't developed the maturity to control their actions or make smart decision in life. IF, big IF, they are incarcerated and given the chance to serve their sentence and demonstrate their ability to assimilate back into a society of law and order, their suspension of personal liberties should last as long as their probation...which should be no less than 5-10 years to prove their ability to remain a good citizen (which I doubt most will).
The Constitution is for US Citizens, you forfeit your citizenship when you harm others in society. Once you serve your debt to society, your citizenship status should be restored automatically if the individual can avoid their felonious lifestyle for a period of probation.
I know nothing about his case and have zero interest in it, but if this rapper kid served his time and kept his record clean after his release (how likely?), why shouldn't he be allowed to own a firearm? I'm sure he's able to freely exercise his 1A rights, and I bet there's nothing stopping him from voting. I know it's hard to defend someone like this knowing the rates of recidivism, but if we actually focused on facts of their charges to fully prosecute criminal behavior and the punishment matched the crime and progressed at a geometric rate for recidivism to the point "three strikes" meant life in prison or immediate death, less 2A proponents would argue against the defendant.
ROCK6