Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 3/7/2024 6:30:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: sbhaven]
Another CT firearms related bill introduced today.

HB-5448 An Act Concerning Security of Certain Election Workers and Election-Related Locations

Raised Bill (doc)

Public Hearing 03/13

Statement of Purpose:

To (1) allow certain election workers to request that their residential addresses be exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, (2) establish a criminal prohibition on the possession of a firearm or deadly weapon within one thousand feet of certain election-related locations, and (3) establish a criminal prohibition on, and a civil cause of action for, threatening or harassing
View Quote

See the following new statute language being proposed. Appears to ban possession of a firearm or deadly weapon within 1,000 feet of a polling place, if not licensed or privileged to do so.

Sec. 2. (NEW) (Effective July 1, 2024) (a) A person is guilty of possession of a weapon near an elections site when, knowing that such person is not licensed or privileged to do so, such person possesses a firearm or deadly weapon, as defined in section 53a-3 of the general statutes, within one thousand feet of any (1) polling place on the day of an election, primary or referendum, (2) location designated for the conduct of early voting during the period of early voting prior to an election or primary, (3) location designated for same-day election registration on the day of a regular election, (4) central location designated for the counting of absentee ballots, early voting ballots or same-day election registration ballots at an election, primary or referendum, as applicable, (5) place where a recanvass is being conducted, or (6) drop box designated for the deposit of absentee ballots during the period beginning on the first day of issuance of absentee voting sets and ending at the close of the polls at an election, primary or referendum.

(b) The provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to the otherwise lawful possession of a firearm by a peace officer, as defined in subdivision (9) of section 53a-3 of the general statutes, while engaged in the performance of such peace officer's official duties.

(c) Possession of a weapon near an elections site is a class D felony.
View Quote
Link Posted: 3/8/2024 8:21:58 PM EDT
[#1]
Link Posted: 3/8/2024 10:33:45 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Andrapos:
I'd like to see what the State's definition of "privileged" to do so is.
View Quote

Yes that "is not licensed or privileged to do so" language is a bit vague. What exactly does that mean in the legal context? Does that mean someone who lives within 1,000 feet can walk out of their house with their long gun to take to the range on voting day, or not? I'd assume so but who knows what the intention actually is with that specific language.
Link Posted: 3/9/2024 1:00:20 AM EDT
[#3]
My polling place is less that 1000ft from the main road - does that mean I can't drive by on RT66 on election day or time period early voting drop off is in session?
Link Posted: 3/9/2024 12:07:41 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JeepinMaxx:
My polling place is less that 1000ft from the main road
View Quote

Mine is under 1,000 feet away in a frigging school. Guess I'm screwed on election days. /s
Link Posted: 3/9/2024 1:47:15 PM EDT
[#5]
and soon everywhere will be a polling place.
Link Posted: 3/9/2024 2:00:37 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JAD] [#6]
In city where I live, two of the polling locations are literally located within apartment buildings. Another polling place has a multi-lane limited access numbered highway that is without question within 1000 feet. City Hall, which is where the ballot drop box has typically been located (and which is also likely an early voting site), is less than 1000 feet from a densely populated urban residential area (including at least 2 recently constructed apartment buildings), a downtown business district that includes multiple banks, and 2 different multi-lane limited access numbered highways. Yet another polling place is clearly within 1000 feet of yet another busy business district and densely populated area. The covered area would appear to include about 3 or 4 banks (depending on some specific measurements), and a storefront FFL.

While general election polling places are well publicized, I'm not sure if early voting locations will be. For example, the city I live in has yet to publish where early voting locations will be- even though the early voting period is less than 3 weeks away. The tool that the SOS office links to doesn't have that information either.

This could be a major hinderance on both the fundamental incorporated rights of concealed carry outside the home as well as maintaining a firearm (or other weapon) within the home. This would be especially disenfranchising to individuals who currently legally own guns but do not have a permit to carry (since the steps needed to comply would effectively leave them having to transfer away their gun and unable to get it back). In the case of some other deadly weapons that people may currently own, it would also create a disenfranchising situation since many of those implements can not be legally carried  or transported outside the home/ fixed place of business by a typical person and would thus effectively need to either be effectively destroyed in order to comply (or potentially surrendered to the police via a house call).
Link Posted: 3/9/2024 3:09:03 PM EDT
[#7]
Feels like they lifted this idea from the fed gun free school zone language. But in this case they don't indicate storing the gun unloaded and locked up when transiting on public roads within the 1,000 foot zone. Nor do they specifically exempt private property.
Link Posted: 3/12/2024 10:29:06 AM EDT
[#8]
Reminder, public hearing on this bill is tommarrow. From CCDL:

Polling Places to be Gun Free Zones!

HB5448 - AN ACT CONCERNING SECURITY OF CERTAIN ELECTION WORKERS AND ELECTIONS-RELATED LOCATIONS

Lawmakers in Hartford have decided you do not need to protect yourself if you are within 1,000 feet of a polling location. We have to act fast as the deadline for submitting testimony is TODAY!

Opposing this bill is important for a variety of reasons:

1,000 feet is almost ¼ mile and could easily create felons out of unsuspecting and otherwise law-abiding gun owners.
If polling locations and the 1,000-foot radius around them are deemed dangerous, the state is only creating potential victims by disarming citizens.
This “sensitive location” ban is widely controversial and likely unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision.
You need to ACT NOW and let the Government Administrations and Elections Committee know that we will not allow them to impede on our right to carry a firearm.

Those interested in testifying in person or via zoom must register before 3:00pm using this link.

Everyone needs to take 5 minutes out of your day TODAY and submit testimony here by choosing hearing date 3/13/2024 11:00AM and selecting bill HB05448 - AAC AN ACT CONCERNING SECURITY OF CERTAIN ELECTION WORKERS AND ELECTIONS-RELATED LOCATIONS.

We also need members to contact legislators on the Government Administrations and Elections Committee individually as well.

Link Posted: 3/20/2024 1:08:51 PM EDT
[#9]
CCDL's Holly Sullivan on Bearing Arms' Cam & Co discussing this bill. She rightly points out that due to the 1,000 foot exclusion rule could place large swaths of CT off limits to guns due to polling locations, drop boxes, counting locations, etc and do it over days/weeks due to CT's early voting.

Connecticut Bill a Direct Attack on the Right to Carry
Link Posted: 3/20/2024 7:33:50 PM EDT
[#10]
CCDL Testimony Highlights: Holly Sullivan, 3/13/24 Carry in Polling Places


On Wednesday March 13th, Government Administration and Elections Committee held a public hearing on proposed House Bill No. 5448 - a bill to ban the carry of firearms within 1,000 feet of a polling location, ballot box, vote counting centers, and more.

In less than 24 hours, CCDL members managed to submit over 500 letters of written testimony opposing this measure, sending a strong message to their representatives and members of the committee. This is an incredible response contrasted to the 20 people who support the bill. More than 15 CCDL members testified at the bill’s public hearing to express the frustrations of our 44,000 members.

Watch as CCDL President Holly Sullivan defends our position against section 2 of H.B. 5448.
Link Posted: 3/23/2024 5:17:08 AM EDT
[#11]
This bill received a Joint Favorable Substitute vote to move it out of the committee. This means some portion of the bill was changed. The new substitute bill hasn't been publicly posted to the bill's web page yet. Will add it when it is posted.
https://cga.ct.gov/asp/cgabillstatus/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&bill_num=HB-5448

Bill History
3/22/2024 (GAE) Joint Favorable Substitute

Committee Actions
GAE Vote Tally Sheet-A
GAE Vote Tally Sheet (Joint Favorable Substitute)
Link Posted: 4/8/2024 11:16:46 AM EDT
[#12]
Per CCDL (from their monthly meeting email notice):

Thank you to everyone who has submitted testimony on proposed House Bill No. 5448 - AN ACT CONCERNING SECURITY OF CERTAIN ELECTION WORKERS AND ELECTIONS-RELATED LOCATIONS.

With limited time to act, we were able to submit over 500 written testimonies expressing opposition to this over-reaching ban on the possession of firearms near a polling location. Due to this overwhelming response, the bill has already been amended moving the 1,000 foot radius to 250 feet, among other changes. Still, this bill is unacceptable and we will continue to fight it.

We are seeking the removal the section 2 in its entirety. Since passing the Government Administration and Election committee, the bill has remained stagnant and not continued to proceed through the legislative process. We are watching this carefully and will be issuing an action alert when this bill is slated for discussion.

Please BE ON THE LOOKOUT for an email from CCDL to write your legislators and stop this bill in its tracks.
View Quote
Link Posted: 4/10/2024 11:24:09 AM EDT
[Last Edit: sbhaven] [#13]
Some updates on this anti gun bill. The update joint favorable substitute bill has been posted. Links below. Further links to the Joint Favorable report is also linked below. New Sec 2 language, still bad, also posted below. They dropped the 1,000 foot to 250 feet. They did add an exemption for private property not part of election site and if firearm is not loaded, in locked container in a motor vehicle, along with some language about school property (public/private).

H.B. No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING SECURITY OF CERTAIN ELECTION WORKERS AND ELECTIONS-RELATED LOCATIONS.

GAE Joint Favorable Substitute (doc)

GAE Joint Fav. Rpt

Revised Sec 2 language:

Sec. 2. (NEW) (Effective July 1, 2024) (a) A person is guilty of possession of a weapon near an elections site when, knowing that such person is not permitted by law to do so, such person possesses a firearm or deadly weapon, as such terms are defined in section 53a-3 of the general statutes, within two hundred fifty feet of any (1) polling place on the day of an election, primary or referendum, (2) location designated for the conduct of early voting during the period of early voting at an election or primary, (3) location designated for same-day election registration on the day of a regular election, (4) central location designated for the counting of absentee ballots, early voting ballots or same-day election registration ballots at an election, primary or referendum, as applicable, (5) place where a recanvass is being conducted, or (6) drop box designated for the deposit of absentee ballots during the period beginning on the first day of issuance of absentee voting sets and ending at the close of the polls at an election, primary or referendum.

(b) The provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to the otherwise lawful possession of a firearm:

(1) On private property that is not part of any elections site described in subdivisions (1) to (6), inclusive, of subsection (a) of this section;

(2) That is (A) not loaded, and (B) in a locked container, or a locked firearms rack, that is on a motor vehicle;

(3) In the case of any elections site described in subdivisions (1) to (6), inclusive, of subsection (a) of this section that is in or on the real property comprising a public or private elementary or secondary school, by a person (A) for use in a program approved by school officials in or on such school property, (B) in accordance with an agreement entered into between school officials and such person or such person's employer, or (C) while traversing such school property for the purpose of gaining access to public or private lands open to hunting or for other lawful purposes, provided such firearm is not loaded and the entry on such school property is permitted by the local or regional board of education;

(4) By a peace officer, as defined in subdivision (9) of section 53a-3 of the general statutes, while engaged in the performance of such peace officer's official duties; and

(5) By a person passing within two hundred fifty feet of an elections site described in subdivisions (1) to (6), inclusive, of subsection (a) of this section only for as long as necessary to be within such two hundred fifty feet while on the way to a place or location other than such elections site.

(c) Possession of a weapon near an elections site is a class D felony.
View Quote


Edit to add: Several additional documents posted.

File No. 414 (doc)

Fiscal Note For File Copy 414

Bill Analysis For File Copy 414
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 5:02:24 PM EDT
[#14]
Bill has been sent to the Judiciary Committee today (4/16/24).

4/16/2024 Referred by House to Committee on Judiciary
View Quote
Link Posted: 4/23/2024 11:24:55 AM EDT
[Last Edit: sbhaven] [#15]
Possible Victory on HB 5448 (Gun Free Zone Election Locations): The Gun Free Zone Language Reportedly Removed (04/23/24)

Yesterday it appears the Judiciary committee stripped out section 2 from the HB 5448 Bill. Section 2 was the section that setup 250 foot gun free zone around many location related to elections.

CCDL has posted a short video clip on Facebook of Rep. Blumenthal indicating during the judiciary session yesterday that section 2 would be removed from the bill.

The revised bill has yet to be posted.

https://cga.ct.gov/asp/cgabillstatus/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&bill_num=HB-5448

Edit to add: See the following CT-N video at appox the 54 minute mark to see Rep. Blumenthal discuss then make a motion to remove Sec. 2 in it's entirety from the bill:
http://ct-n.com/ctnplayer.asp?odID=23034&jump=0:54:30

One can listen to several Democrats talk about wanting more gun control and wanting to revisit it at a later time.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top