Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page Hometown » Ohio
Posted: 4/15/2024 6:08:54 PM EDT
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/courts/2024/04/15/blendon-township-ordered-to-name-officers-in-takiya-young-fatal-shooting-ohio-supreme-court-ohio/73330664007/

The Ohio Supreme Court ordered the Blendon Township Police Department to release the names of two police officers involved in the shooting of 21-year-old Ta'Kiya Young — but the names will not be made public yet.

The decision, issued on Wednesday, is the result of a complaint filed on behalf of Young's family by the Ohio Crime Victim Justice Center.

Civil attorneys for Young's family have previously identified the officer who shot Young as Connor Grubb, however, Blendon Township has not confirmed his identify, or that of the other officer involved in the incident, citing Marsy's Law.

The complaint filed with the Ohio Supreme Court argues that the officers do not qualify as victims and should not be afforded Marsy's Law protections as victims of crime.

How did Ta'Kiya Young die?

Young, who was six months pregnant, was fatally shot on Aug. 24 in the parking lot of the Kroger at 5991 Sunbury Road. Video from the store shows Young shoplifting multiple bottles of alcohol and getting in her vehicle.

A store employee flagged down two Blendon Township police officers who were in the parking lot trying to help a woman who had locked her keys in her vehicle and pointed out Young, according to body camera video.

The officers approached Young's vehicle, according to redacted body camera footage released by the department, and gave her multiple verbal commands to turn her vehicle off and talk to them.

Young is seen on the video turning the wheel and then the vehicle moves forward, striking an officer who was standing in front of the vehicle. Parking lot surveillance footage shows both of the officer's feet were off the ground when he fired a single shot, which went through the windshield and struck Young in the chest.

Young's family has said the officer who fired the shot is Grubb.

The other officer did not fire their weapon.

Young's vehicle continued forward through the parking lot and over a curb, striking the building. A doctor who was in the parking lot at the time helped officers provide first aid to Young until paramedics arrived. They did not know she was pregnant as she was already seated in the vehicle when they approached.

Both Young and her unborn daughter died at an area hospital.

The Montgomery County Prosecutor's office is currently reviewing the investigation that was done by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation into the shooting. The case is likely to be presented to a Franklin County grand jury for review for potential indictment in the next several months.

When does Blendon Township have to release officers' names?

The Ohio Supreme Court said in its decision that the police department has 20 days to provide the names of the officers to the justices, under seal. The justices also asked for briefs on the issue on an accelerated calendar, indicating they want to make a decision quickly about the use of Marsy's Law in the instance of Young's shooting.

The Dispatch filed a lawsuit against Columbus police challenging the use of Marsy's Law to withhold police officers' names. The case involves an unrelated shootout on Interstate 70 in July that injured a police officer and resulted in the death of a 19-year-old man.
Link Posted: 4/15/2024 6:15:22 PM EDT
[#1]
Young is seen on the video turning the wheel and then the vehicle moves forward, striking an officer who was standing in front of the vehicle. Parking lot surveillance footage shows both of the officer's feet were off the ground when he fired a single shot, which went through the windshield and struck Young in the chest.
View Quote


This is a better description than the Dispatch has made in past articles but it's still not quite right.  The officer in front of the vehicle was standing close enough to put his left hand on the hood; he drew his pistol only after Young started turning the wheel.  Maybe important, maybe not.  As stated above, both his feet were off the ground when he fired once; that was done strong hand only and his support hand was supporting him on the hood.  If you look at the body camera video very close you even can see the pistol action cycling in a couple frames.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 5:53:54 AM EDT
[#2]
Bottom line,  this is ALL on her. Without her making the premeditated decision to steal, none of this would have happened.


That said, officers who jump in front of, on top of, enter the box of vehicles create a dangerous situation for themselves and others. Not sure what they are teaching them, but seems like setting yourself up for failure when you tangle person versus vehicle. Would they do the same thing to a concrete truck? I think not. No difference.

Again, whatever happens in this is on her, but hard to defend his actions. And he's not the first, sadly, won't be the last
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 8:01:44 AM EDT
[#3]
What the officer did took training, either through an agency or on his own.  I’m not saying he wasn’t in danger. I do think the way he did it reduced the risk of injury. He was standing immediately in front of the vehicle, in a parking lot. She could not go straight and had to turn to move out of the lane. His support hand was on the vehicle from moment he was in front of the car. He was ready to get on the hood if the car started moving. As soon as she turned the wheel he drew his pistol. Once the car moved he was off his feet and fired once.

It’s not like the car moved several inches or feet then hit him.  He leaned into the hood letting the car move into him and pick up his feet, all to reduce the risk of injury.

Officers are paid to stop and apprehend criminals in the act. He deserves a medal. She deserves what she got. She chose poorly.

What the law says may be different, I don’t know. If I was on the jury he would walk free and not even be civilly liable.
Link Posted: 4/19/2024 12:25:48 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CavVet:
Bottom line,  this is ALL on her. Without her making the premeditated decision to steal, none of this would have happened.


That said, officers who jump in front of, on top of, enter the box of vehicles create a dangerous situation for themselves and others. Not sure what they are teaching them, but seems like setting yourself up for failure when you tangle person versus vehicle. Would they do the same thing to a concrete truck? I think not. No difference.

Again, whatever happens in this is on her, but hard to defend his actions. And he's not the first, sadly, won't be the last
View Quote


This is a reasonable take.
Page Hometown » Ohio
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top