User Panel
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: As soon as Lockheed Martin allows someone to walk out of the building with a View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By OzarkOkie: Where's the physical proof? As soon as Lockheed Martin allows someone to walk out of the building with a Fixed it for ya... |
|
Tactical Night Vision Corporation - TNVC, INC.
http://www.tnvc.com [email protected] (909) 796-7000 Dedicated to the men and women in uniform who fight the good fight. |
Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By OzarkOkie: Where's the physical proof? As soon as Lockheed Martin allows someone to walk out of the building with a Fixed it for ya... It can't all be .gov contractors, no matter how badly we'd like to believe it is us and we aren't in danger. There are hundreds of documented interactions through the ages, going back through Old Testament and New in the Bible. The Star over Bethlehem which the Three Magi followed is a good one. 200 years ago and prior, everybody was looking up and documenting everything strange, to the point the orbits were questioned before we had even decent telescopes. All strange things in the sky were strange things in the sky. Most took on a religious/Saint sort of Angel/Demon aspect but also brought messages and prophecies. It is a giant rabbit hole and Lockheed likely has a lot of what is going on, but it may be something on the level above nuclear warfare. There is no defense against a craft like a Tic Tac, which could show up anywhere in the world, assassinate or blow up a structure and vanish again and nobody would have a clue regarding aggressor. That might be the genie they're trying to keep in the bottle, as 2nd world nations would resort to nuking perceived oppressors if such tactics became en vogue. Once you spend some honest time studying the stories, and not the buzz over the stories or the synopsis videos of the compilation video of the most interesting bits of dozens of stories, things get weird, in a verifiable "High Strangeness" sort of way. The more you try to learn and "nail down" regarding the topic, the more questions you have, and the .mil aspect being universal doesn't fit at all, especially when comparing reports of foreign military and government reports. They are the reason the hotline was installed between Washington DC and Moscow - to let the other know they aren't attacking despite showing contacts all over. |
|
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. |
Originally Posted By brass: It can't all be .gov contractors, no matter how badly we'd like to believe it is us and we aren't in danger. There are hundreds of documented interactions through the ages, going back through Old Testament and New in the Bible. The Star over Bethlehem which the Three Magi followed is a good one. 200 years ago and prior, everybody was looking up and documenting everything strange, to the point the orbits were questioned before we had even decent telescopes. All strange things in the sky were strange things in the sky. Most took on a religious/Saint sort of Angel/Demon aspect but also brought messages and prophecies. It is a giant rabbit hole and Lockheed likely has a lot of what is going on, but it may be something on the level above nuclear warfare. There is no defense against a craft like a Tic Tac, which could show up anywhere in the world, assassinate or blow up a structure and vanish again and nobody would have a clue. That might be the genie they're trying to keep in the bottle, as 2nd world nations would resort to nuking perceived oppressors if such tactics became en vogue. Once you spend some honest time studying the stories, and not the buzz over the stories or the synopsis videos of the compilation video of the most interesting bits of dozens of stories, things get weird, in a verifiable "High Strangeness" sort of way. The more you try to learn and "nail down" regarding the topic, the more questions you have, and the .mil aspect being universal doesn't fit at all, especially when comparing reports of foreign government reports. They are the reason the hotline was installed between Washington DC and Moscow - to let the other know they aren't attacking despite showing contacts all over. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By OzarkOkie: Where's the physical proof? As soon as Lockheed Martin allows someone to walk out of the building with a Fixed it for ya... It can't all be .gov contractors, no matter how badly we'd like to believe it is us and we aren't in danger. There are hundreds of documented interactions through the ages, going back through Old Testament and New in the Bible. The Star over Bethlehem which the Three Magi followed is a good one. 200 years ago and prior, everybody was looking up and documenting everything strange, to the point the orbits were questioned before we had even decent telescopes. All strange things in the sky were strange things in the sky. Most took on a religious/Saint sort of Angel/Demon aspect but also brought messages and prophecies. It is a giant rabbit hole and Lockheed likely has a lot of what is going on, but it may be something on the level above nuclear warfare. There is no defense against a craft like a Tic Tac, which could show up anywhere in the world, assassinate or blow up a structure and vanish again and nobody would have a clue. That might be the genie they're trying to keep in the bottle, as 2nd world nations would resort to nuking perceived oppressors if such tactics became en vogue. Once you spend some honest time studying the stories, and not the buzz over the stories or the synopsis videos of the compilation video of the most interesting bits of dozens of stories, things get weird, in a verifiable "High Strangeness" sort of way. The more you try to learn and "nail down" regarding the topic, the more questions you have, and the .mil aspect being universal doesn't fit at all, especially when comparing reports of foreign government reports. They are the reason the hotline was installed between Washington DC and Moscow - to let the other know they aren't attacking despite showing contacts all over. TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". |
|
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". View Quote Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Edit...The best vid thus far for me was the Jelly fish! Just wish it could of been cleaner (like most other vids and pics). Also read somewhere the Jelly fish vehicle could not be seen under nods, which is interesting in itself but may not be surprising as NV is a light amplification device... |
|
Tactical Night Vision Corporation - TNVC, INC.
http://www.tnvc.com [email protected] (909) 796-7000 Dedicated to the men and women in uniform who fight the good fight. |
Originally Posted By TNVC: Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. |
|
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! |
|
Tactical Night Vision Corporation - TNVC, INC.
http://www.tnvc.com [email protected] (909) 796-7000 Dedicated to the men and women in uniform who fight the good fight. |
Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. |
|
Pope Gregorius Billingsgate Callipygian Quimtickler, First of His Name
Chakravartin of the Feculent Multiversal Litterbox Protodeacon of the Iniquitous Gurkhan of the Illimitable Feline Hordes |
Originally Posted By Kagetora: You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. |
|
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. |
Originally Posted By brass: It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. |
|
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. We are information in a form we can understand and work with. We can't see thee raw details and inner workings as it wouldn't help us understand anything. Same way knowing exactly how every part of your car's drive train works doesn't make you a safer driver or get better mileage. We're just in a VR Interface, and then we can see that cascading further down rather quickly into more virtual works. The idea that we are a blip of experience to an astral intelligence on a journey is more believable than we are just random people who are born and die for no reason at all. We are here as a challenge experience to learn and to think and to learn how to think to then move onward in The Journey. The inverse of this hypothesis related to the moon also fits in with the simulation, from the the "too perfect" clause of believable: "It seems much easier to explain the nonexistence of the moon than its existence." -- Dr. Robin Brett, NASA Scientist “The best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn’t exist.’ "The Moon is bigger than it should be, apparently older than it should be and much lighter in mass than it should be. It occupies an unlikely orbit and is so extraordinary that all existing explanations for its presence are fraught with difficulties are none of them could be considered remotely watertight." -- Irwin Shapiro, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics "The Moon has astonishing synchronicity with the Sun. When the Sun is at its lowest and weakest in mid-winter, the Moon is at its highest and brightest, and the reverse occurs in mid-summer. Both set at the same point on the horizon at the equinoxes and at the opposite point at the solstices. What are the chances that the Moon would naturally find an orbit so perfect that it would cover the Sun at an eclipse and appear from Earth to be the same size? What are chances that the alignments would be so perfect at the equinoxes and solstices? " -- Christopher Knight and Alan Bulter |
|
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. |
Originally Posted By brass: We are information in a form we can understand and work with. We can't see the raw details and inner workings as it wouldn't help us understand anything. Same way knowing exactly how every part of your car's drive train works doesn't make you a safer driver or get better mileage. We're just in a VR Interface, and then we can see that cascading further down rather quickly into more virtual works. The idea that we are a blip of experience to an astral intelligence on a journey is more believable than we are just random people who are born and die for no reason at all. View Quote Very succinct and well stated. |
|
|
Originally Posted By brass: It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. View Quote If the world only had one observer, I wonder how things may differ from a world with 8 billion? Is it only human observers? Another question I have. |
|
“There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy”.
|
Originally Posted By sq40: If the world only had one observer, I wonder how things may differ from a world with 8 billion? Is it only human observers? Another question I have. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By brass: It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. If the world only had one observer, I wonder how things may differ from a world with 8 billion? Is it only human observers? Another question I have. Absolute certainty about "religions" and "oral histories" the further you go back from the "scientific revolution", increasing greatly as the world population was still in separate groups, the various religions, weren't faiths, they were documented occurrences. This has been shown to be more real with some of the Indian texts, descriptions of giant perfect cities in documents 100k+ years old, and they've been located and excavated. Also were the stories of the giant cities created by removing mountain that wasn't city leaving beautiful buildings and decorations behind, and created in anywhere from a day to a couple weeks. There is the vast difference in religions in certain areas that were cut off from most others, and now when all compared, many have a TON of similar themes, even down to civilization "rules" and behavior (until some were morphed into control than observe). Think how one meditates alone now and gets some results. Imagine hundreds or thousands of people fully synchronized thinking/saying and observing the same thing they're referring to in spoken word/song. Some light "lucid dreaming" shared by all, for example - except they'd likely see the same thing, not several different accounts. So I would put my bet on 'Yes, things were radically different/malleable when the global population was below the 5 digit mark after the biggest disaster we survived. Witchcraft and prayer worked at some level for some desires. Things that do nothing and are useless are typically discarded quickly, to have some themes of the "occult" carry all the way to today isn't still practiced and researched because it's crazy stories, might just be interacting with whatever other is out there for a negative (to others) result. Today with millions of minds Not in synchronization, actually quite the opposite, are observing things and collapsing the wave function" which decides what is seen. I'm reminded of Jesus in the Bible - "Whenever two or more are gathered in my name, I am there". This possibly explains the spiritual feelings people experience in a Church, where minds are as close in thoughts, actions, and observations. With so many others thinking randomly, that "field" can be weakened or disrupted.. In short, yes, I think the density of population fixes in the world which things are decided to be "Real". The biggest issue with all of the stories of spirits, ghosts, abductions, UAP/UFO and other experienced by a single or no more than a handful can see something remotely. Sort of a synchronicity kind of hing which individuals can link to "The Source/God/channel" or whatever it is that we're bumping into the fringes of, some much deeper than others. It can NOT be "scientifically" proven, by definition. Scientific method requires control of all aspects for comparing an idea to results, but the time cannot be controlled, the system cannot be repeated, etc. The best we an do is mesh the anecdotes globally throughout history. --ETA: This very close to the concept put forward in Rise and Fall of Project D.O.D.O. by Neal Stephenson, though that book posits that photography is what "stopped" magic, so an isolation box is built that still practicing witches can go into and cast themselves to any point in time/space and do magic (prior to 1851 - when photography locked it), able to solve current wars by changing a little event 300 years ago that puts a border on the other side of a mountain, for example. That book also uses the "Many Worlds" theories of Time Travel, where for some thing, only one change is needed, but for very large swings, like eliminating Shakespeare (to prevent photography from being invented), hundreds and hundreds of changes need to be made and all the various worlds are slightly different due to the other changes being made by other witches.. It's a long book and drones on at times but is worth it, like all Neal Stephenson books. |
|
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. |
“There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy”.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. Why can't someone say it could be actually be human made? Yes, I see the flight characteristics, etc., along with the physics. This article did at that. https://amuedge.com/beyond-ufos-what-are-navy-pilots-seeing-in-the-skies/ It's a good read all should really read and understand. |
|
Tactical Night Vision Corporation - TNVC, INC.
http://www.tnvc.com [email protected] (909) 796-7000 Dedicated to the men and women in uniform who fight the good fight. |
Originally Posted By TNVC: Why can't someone say it could be actually be human made? Yes, I see the flight characteristics, etc., along with the physics. This article did at that. https://amuedge.com/beyond-ufos-what-are-navy-pilots-seeing-in-the-skies/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. Why can't someone say it could be actually be human made? Yes, I see the flight characteristics, etc., along with the physics. This article did at that. https://amuedge.com/beyond-ufos-what-are-navy-pilots-seeing-in-the-skies/ Physics, multiple subsections: Gravity, energy density, propulsion method, no atmospheric heating/cooling, no slow down entering water, just slipped under surface. We don't have any craft that can operate underwater and in air, Trident missiles still suffer water drag at launch stage and need the air to get them to surface to launch. The craft simply roiled/moved the water out of the way and went to 40k ft in an instant, then stopped climbing instantly. That one maneuver alone, using our current understanding of physics, would take all the power of the world's nuclear power plants produce in a year, just for the climb start, rate, and stop indicated on radar, generating forces dozens of times more intense than our most agile missiles would fall apart attempting. It would have some control to fully understand/manipulate gravity which we don't really have a solid reason for how it works, let alone controlling or negating gravity, same for friction, except we understand how friction works. Objects had no visible exhaust or propulsion system and were colder than the surrounding air, even after a climb that would burn all the tiles off the Space Shuttle from atmospheric overheating, The object in sky move at any speed from stationary to hypersonic without a sonic boom. Professor Michio Kaku & Ross Coulthart interview IN FULL | UFO UAP News https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEs-lrw_hhQ Otherwise, if we've got ways around all of those things, it could be man made, but I can't see some understanding of gravity to not leak, as that is just too important. I can see them keeping an energy source secret, as it would destroy the oil/energy markets, which are holding the US up. I would like to know more about them and how they work, no matter who made them, personally. Looking through historic reports in various religions (notably from China and India), the controllers have apparently been on Earth longer than civilized humans have, which raises rather large historical blocks missing. They seem to be almost playful toying with our tech and not damaging our equipment, only reminding us that we're helpless to stop them from going anywhere. Allowing themselves to be observed up to a point but remotely controlling electronic devices like flight radar/avionics which have been shut down when missile locks were tried, as well as nuclear Missiles in Montana going offline while they were above it. China and Russia both have programs looking into them which they admit are real, as does Canada, Mexico, Brazil, France, India, Argentina, and others - they're seeing and trying to figure out the same things. The US is the only nation still trying to say they're nothing at all. Otherwise, they could be human, but an evolved type of human which goes into the spiritual/dimensional realm. Here's a report from outside the US with things that might seem familiar: The Falcon Lake Incident | Full Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hx968LHEXiY |
|
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. |
Originally Posted By TNVC: Why can't someone say it could be actually be human made? Yes, I see the flight characteristics, etc., along with the physics. This article did at that. https://amuedge.com/beyond-ufos-what-are-navy-pilots-seeing-in-the-skies/ It's a good read all should really read and understand. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. Why can't someone say it could be actually be human made? Yes, I see the flight characteristics, etc., along with the physics. This article did at that. https://amuedge.com/beyond-ufos-what-are-navy-pilots-seeing-in-the-skies/ It's a good read all should really read and understand. When in the history of the world has the government tested ultra top secret technology over populated areas for all to see? When have they operated in open test ranges without notifying the airmen operating in that area and then allowed the airmen to talk about it publicly? When have they operated all over the world, not caring if one was spotted and not caring if one crashed in an adversarial nation to be retrieved? Even if you don't believe the stories about these things being seen for wayyyy longer than we've had the ability to fly, you have to admit the sightings don't follow the standard protocol for classified projects, not at all. |
|
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Cypher214: When in the history of the world has the government tested ultra top secret technology over populated areas for all to see? When have they operated in open test ranges without notifying the airmen operating in that area and then allowed the airmen to talk about it publicly? When have they operated all over the world, not caring if one was spotted and not caring if one crashed in an adversarial nation to be retrieved? Even if you don't believe the stories about these things being seen for wayyyy longer than we've had the ability to fly, you have to admit the sightings don't follow the standard protocol for classified projects, not at all. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. Why can't someone say it could be actually be human made? Yes, I see the flight characteristics, etc., along with the physics. This article did at that. https://amuedge.com/beyond-ufos-what-are-navy-pilots-seeing-in-the-skies/ It's a good read all should really read and understand. When in the history of the world has the government tested ultra top secret technology over populated areas for all to see? When have they operated in open test ranges without notifying the airmen operating in that area and then allowed the airmen to talk about it publicly? When have they operated all over the world, not caring if one was spotted and not caring if one crashed in an adversarial nation to be retrieved? Even if you don't believe the stories about these things being seen for wayyyy longer than we've had the ability to fly, you have to admit the sightings don't follow the standard protocol for classified projects, not at all. From the late 50's to mid 70's the majority of UFO sightings in the USA were caused by the Top Secret programs Dragon Lady (U2) and Oxcart (A-12, D-21, SR-71) operating over populated areas for all to see, both programs had crashes in adversarial nations that were recovered with at least one being reverse engineered. Palladium, part of the Oxcart program, was used to spoof soviet radars. At the very least this was done during the Cuban missile crisis with hints that it was done during Soviet training exercises in the Pacific, there are also reports from American pilots that sound an awful lot like Palladium. If the CIA is willing to do this when the threat of a nuclear exchange is extremely high, why should we believe they wouldn't try to test a new technology in less dangerous circumstances? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Herc: From the late 50's to mid 70's the majority of UFO sightings in the USA were caused by the Top Secret programs Dragon Lady (U2) and Oxcart (A-12, D-21, SR-71) operating over populated areas for all to see, both programs had crashes in adversarial nations that were recovered with at least one being reverse engineered. Palladium, part of the Oxcart program, was used to spoof soviet radars. At the very least this was done during the Cuban missile crisis with hints that it was done during Soviet training exercises in the Pacific, there are also reports from American pilots that sound an awful lot like Palladium. If the CIA is willing to do this when the threat of a nuclear exchange is extremely high, why should we believe they wouldn't try to test a new technology in less dangerous circumstances? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Herc: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By Kagetora: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: Originally Posted By TNVC: Originally Posted By Cypher214: TNVC is a nonbeliever who can't stop following the topic for some reason. With as much time as he and his dudes spend under NV, I'm amazed he hasn't seen some shit to convert him yet. I've seen a handful that didn't make me think "definitely aliens" but I certainly lean "that shit ain't ours". Yea I do spend an ordinate amount of time through a razor thin FOV NV aided telescope. Also worked most of my adult life before TNVC in the aerospace community and worked on some pretty neat stuff. I do like coming into these topics to see all the cool vids! They are very interesting. One explanation I had never heard before awhile back, that we're all in a simulation. Now that was Jiffy peanut butter, not Jiff! Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. Lol, nice! You guys joke, but it really does explain WAY too much of literally everything. It's also one of the few outlandish theories that we might be able to essentially "prove." Unlike so many other wild thoughts. It does explain the biggest mysteries we've run into: Why does physics act differently if there is a human observer involved or not? The delved decision double slit experiment (aka "Quantum Eraser") is mind blowing in that regard. Nobody is looking - approximate, somebody is paying attention - be precise. It's crazy and is just as scary as other ideas tossed around. It's one of my favorites.. My personal favorite is quantum entanglement to support the idea that we live in a simulation. Apparently, information is the only thing that travels faster than light. Why can't someone say it could be actually be human made? Yes, I see the flight characteristics, etc., along with the physics. This article did at that. https://amuedge.com/beyond-ufos-what-are-navy-pilots-seeing-in-the-skies/ It's a good read all should really read and understand. When in the history of the world has the government tested ultra top secret technology over populated areas for all to see? When have they operated in open test ranges without notifying the airmen operating in that area and then allowed the airmen to talk about it publicly? When have they operated all over the world, not caring if one was spotted and not caring if one crashed in an adversarial nation to be retrieved? Even if you don't believe the stories about these things being seen for wayyyy longer than we've had the ability to fly, you have to admit the sightings don't follow the standard protocol for classified projects, not at all. From the late 50's to mid 70's the majority of UFO sightings in the USA were caused by the Top Secret programs Dragon Lady (U2) and Oxcart (A-12, D-21, SR-71) operating over populated areas for all to see, both programs had crashes in adversarial nations that were recovered with at least one being reverse engineered. Palladium, part of the Oxcart program, was used to spoof soviet radars. At the very least this was done during the Cuban missile crisis with hints that it was done during Soviet training exercises in the Pacific, there are also reports from American pilots that sound an awful lot like Palladium. If the CIA is willing to do this when the threat of a nuclear exchange is extremely high, why should we believe they wouldn't try to test a new technology in less dangerous circumstances? I'll add the F-117 outta TTR in the early 80's. We used to take bets how many UFO calls the locale constables would get in a night. I won a few of those wagers! Lol Edit, I want to thank everyone who responded to my post above, very good reads. I will say what I learned with many years in the aerospace sector, that EVERYTHING happens for reason, everything. Even though you may not understand it, there IS a reason. One thing I found very interesting when the NY Times story broke with the tic-tacs, BOTH the PRC and Russia a few weeks before the leaked story were pumping their chests out with the successful hypersonic missle tech etc. Checkmate.... |
|
Tactical Night Vision Corporation - TNVC, INC.
http://www.tnvc.com [email protected] (909) 796-7000 Dedicated to the men and women in uniform who fight the good fight. |
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Yeah man, sometime around 2012, our simulation went to version 3.0 and the developers fucked some shit up. View Quote Our timeline is fucked, the sysadmin is currently guzzling loads of vodka, redbull, some meth, fentanyl and other shit. Probably some other tube shaped vegetables as well. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.