![Bravo Company BCM](/images/2016/banners/sticky/BCM_StickyBarAd_225x40.gif)
![Login](/images/2016/spacer.gif)
Posted: 3/23/2016 8:15:50 PM EDT
But at a news conference Wednesday in Ankara, Erdogan said Turkey had detained Ibrahim el Bakraoui in July 2015, and deported him back to Europe after informing the Belgian Embassy. Bakraoui was sent to the Netherlands, at his request, NPR's Peter Kenyon reports, but Belgian authorities were notified about his detention and potential threat. Despite Turkey's warnings, Erdogan says, Belgium couldn't find any ties to terrorism — so the Netherlands released Bakraoui. |
|
Whoops.
I bet they won't do that again.... Well, yeah, they probably will. |
|
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go.
What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? |
|
That thread from yesterday where one of our counter terror guys said the Belgians are like children when it comes to the threat of Islam was right on the money.
|
|
Quoted: I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? View Quote ![]() |
|
They probably didn't give him enough pamphlets describing how to have sex with the local women.
|
|
Quoted:
If a Muslim warns you that a Muslim "immigrant" is a bad guy, you should take their advice. ![]() View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? |
|
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? View Quote Doncha remember when the fucking Russians warned us about the Boston Bombers? But nooooo, cuz of "well uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" Just like the feds had tabs on the San Bernardino assholes. But noooo cuz "well uh uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" |
|
Quoted:
OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? Ummm... *ahem* "Don't come in" "Here's a ticket back to Syria?" "Go away?" |
|
Quoted:
Doncha remember when the fucking Russians warned us about the Boston Bombers? But nooooo, cuz of "well uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" Just like the feds had tabs on the San Bernardino assholes. But noooo cuz "well uh uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? Doncha remember when the fucking Russians warned us about the Boston Bombers? But nooooo, cuz of "well uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" Just like the feds had tabs on the San Bernardino assholes. But noooo cuz "well uh uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" So, like I keep asking, what were they supposed to do? They weren't tied to any terrorist orgs that any investigation could find. They weren't wanted, they weren't prisoners, they were just people. What does a government do with people who can't be proven to be a threat? Are you suggesting all we need to start locking people is some guy in another country to tell us he's "a bad guy?" Cause that's fucking silly. |
|
Quoted:
Belgium is France's and Germany's Mini-Me. View Quote The same far left socialists who are killing their citizens to create the ideal post-racial, post-religious society. There will come a time when we will have to abandon the idiots who can't seem to realize what they are doing is against the survival of their own culture. Sacrificing the idiots in W. Europe seems like a fair trade to eradicate liberalism and socialism forever. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Ummm... *ahem* "Don't come in" "Here's a ticket back to Syria?" "Go away?" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? Ummm... *ahem* "Don't come in" "Here's a ticket back to Syria?" "Go away?" They didn't roll out a red carpet. They told the Netherlands they weren't terrorists, according to their investigation. |
|
They were warned.
. " the full Haaretz report: The Belgian security services, as well as other Western intelligence agencies, had advance and precise intelligence warnings regarding the terrorist attacks in Belgium on Tuesday, Haaretz has learned. The security services knew, with a high degree of certainty, that attacks were planned in the very near future for the airport and, apparently, for the subway as well. Despite the advance warning, the intelligence and security preparedness in Brussels, where most of the European Union agencies are located, was limited in its scope and insufficient for the severity and immediacy of the alert. As far as is known, the attacks were planned by the headquarters of the Islamic State (ISIS) in Raqqa, Syria, which it has pronounced as the capital of its Islamic caliphate. The terror cell responsible for the attacks in Brussels on Tuesday was closely associated with the network behind the series of attacks in Paris last November. At this stage, it appears that both were part of the same terrorist infrastructure, connected at the top by the terrorist Salah Abdeslam, who was involved in both the preparation for the Paris attacks and its implementation. Abdeslam escaped from Paris after the November attacks, hid out in Brussels and was arrested last week by the Belgian authorities. Abdeslam's arrest was apparently the trigger for Tuesday's attacks, due to the concern in ISIS that he might give information about the planned attacks under interrogation, particularly in the light of reports that he was cooperating with his captors. The testimony of the detained terrorist, alongside other intelligence information, part of which concerned ISIS operations in Syria, should have resulted in much more stringent security preparedness in crowded public places in Brussels, along with a heightened search for the cell. |
|
I am going with we nor the Europeans just cannot do a good enough background check on these "refugee's."
So leave them in their shithole country. |
|
Quoted:
I am going with we nor the Europeans just cannot do a good enough background check on these "refugee's." So leave them in their shithole country. View Quote From what I've read the brothers were living in Belgium for decades. It's not like they were part of the recent flood of immigrants. |
|
Quoted:
Whoops. I bet they won't do that again.... Well, yeah, they probably will. View Quote Sadly, the ruling class in Brussels probably looks at this more like an interruption to their own baseball game. Perhaps a little more seriously than our dear leader but still, a major distraction to their charge towards multiculturalism. They are still very interested in the refugee issue. |
|
They're (Europe) going to have to make some serious course corrections to fix this problem they've got themselves into. And it's doubtful they'll have the backbone to do it since what is needed would be highly unpopular with liberal progressives, which they basically all are. Except some from the east.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? If they had been smart a deep hole and a bullet. |
|
Quoted:
If a Muslim warns you that a Muslim "immigrant" is a bad guy, you should take their advice. ![]() View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() You still have to follow the law. Was there enough for a case? |
|
Brussels is fucked from what I've gleaned in the last two days
|
|
View Quote Saw the article earlier and it reads like BS. The article says a lot of stuff, but doesn't really present any detail to support very bold claims. |
|
Quoted:
So, like I keep asking, what were they supposed to do? They weren't tied to any terrorist orgs that any investigation could find. They weren't wanted, they weren't prisoners, they were just people. What does a government do with people who can't be proven to be a threat? Are you suggesting all we need to start locking people is some guy in another country to tell us he's "a bad guy?" Cause that's fucking silly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? Doncha remember when the fucking Russians warned us about the Boston Bombers? But nooooo, cuz of "well uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" Just like the feds had tabs on the San Bernardino assholes. But noooo cuz "well uh uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" So, like I keep asking, what were they supposed to do? They weren't tied to any terrorist orgs that any investigation could find. They weren't wanted, they weren't prisoners, they were just people. What does a government do with people who can't be proven to be a threat? Are you suggesting all we need to start locking people is some guy in another country to tell us he's "a bad guy?" Cause that's fucking silly. I know what I would do.........but I probably would get banned. |
|
Turkey sent a terrorist to Europe? Well color me surprised...
![]() |
|
Quoted:
So, like I keep asking, what were they supposed to do? They weren't tied to any terrorist orgs that any investigation could find. They weren't wanted, they weren't prisoners, they were just people. What does a government do with people who can't be proven to be a threat? Are you suggesting all we need to start locking people is some guy in another country to tell us he's "a bad guy?" Cause that's fucking silly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? Doncha remember when the fucking Russians warned us about the Boston Bombers? But nooooo, cuz of "well uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" Just like the feds had tabs on the San Bernardino assholes. But noooo cuz "well uh uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" So, like I keep asking, what were they supposed to do? They weren't tied to any terrorist orgs that any investigation could find. They weren't wanted, they weren't prisoners, they were just people. What does a government do with people who can't be proven to be a threat? Are you suggesting all we need to start locking people is some guy in another country to tell us he's "a bad guy?" Cause that's fucking silly. If one is not a citizen of a country, they can be deported for any reason, even suspicion. If we are suspicious of a foreign national we can and should simply deport them. |
|
Don't know the details of the case.
If he was in custody (and you want to keep him in custody) here : -Needs to be (suported by evidence) suspected of a crime. -Belgium would need to ask for his exradition (something they did not do as far as i know) and you could hold him until you hand him over. |
|
Quoted: OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? Better yet, stop letting them into your country in the first place. After you have been warned he may be a threat hold him for whatever time is legal while you dig through his past and contact all his current contacts. Then follow him or maybe drop a line to a CI that he is a rat and see what happens. Be creative. Just don't shrug your shoulders and go dunno he seems like an okay guy. That is how you get Boston, Madrid, Paris, Brussels, and 9-11. We know the profile of these assholes so maybe put pressure on them. |
|
Quoted:
OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? If you say you can't find your own asshole does that mean you don't have one? Or just suck really bad at finding it? |
|
Quoted: OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? |
|
I'm getting the feeling that this is going to be the future as the numbers swell in Europe, Israel being targeted, Iran having the bomb soon, North Korea and its fuck tard dictator, and the US possibly having Hillary. Either way, I think we will see WW3 come out of this. And that is terrifying.
![]() |
|
Quoted: You still have to follow the law. Was there enough for a case? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() You still have to follow the law. Was there enough for a case? |
|
Quoted:
From what I've read the brothers were living in Belgium for decades. It's not like they were part of the recent flood of immigrants. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I am going with we nor the Europeans just cannot do a good enough background check on these "refugee's." So leave them in their shithole country. From what I've read the brothers were living in Belgium for decades. It's not like they were part of the recent flood of immigrants. If they're not citizens, deport. This isn't a difficult concept. |
|
|
Quoted:
I'm getting the feeling that this is going to be the future as the numbers swell in Europe, Israel being targeted, Iran having the bomb soon, North Korea and its fuck tard dictator, and the US possibly having Hillary. Either way, I think we will see WW3 come out of this. And that is terrifying. ![]() View Quote I think we'd wrap up WW3 here in the CONUS pretty quick if that is going to be it. We'd mow down Islamburg and Mohammedville in the blink of an eye and after Hitlary is impeached, VP shotgun Joe would start the roundup post haste. |
|
Quoted:
Are they following the "law" like the current administration here is following the law with regard to immigration? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() You still have to follow the law. Was there enough for a case? That someone, somewhere in a world of seven billion people, isn't adhering to the law isn't justification to do the same. |
|
Quoted: So, like I keep asking, what were they supposed to do? They weren't tied to any terrorist orgs that any investigation could find. They weren't wanted, they weren't prisoners, they were just people. What does a government do with people who can't be proven to be a threat? Are you suggesting all we need to start locking people is some guy in another country to tell us he's "a bad guy?" Cause that's fucking silly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? Doncha remember when the fucking Russians warned us about the Boston Bombers? But nooooo, cuz of "well uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" Just like the feds had tabs on the San Bernardino assholes. But noooo cuz "well uh uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" So, like I keep asking, what were they supposed to do? They weren't tied to any terrorist orgs that any investigation could find. They weren't wanted, they weren't prisoners, they were just people. What does a government do with people who can't be proven to be a threat? Are you suggesting all we need to start locking people is some guy in another country to tell us he's "a bad guy?" Cause that's fucking silly. ![]() ![]() |
|
Quoted:
We need http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2013/01/Precog_minorityreport1-660x272.jpg View Quote Have it. ![]() |
|
Quoted:
![]() ![]() View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? Doncha remember when the fucking Russians warned us about the Boston Bombers? But nooooo, cuz of "well uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" Just like the feds had tabs on the San Bernardino assholes. But noooo cuz "well uh uh uh uh dey dinnit do nuffins bad" So, like I keep asking, what were they supposed to do? They weren't tied to any terrorist orgs that any investigation could find. They weren't wanted, they weren't prisoners, they were just people. What does a government do with people who can't be proven to be a threat? Are you suggesting all we need to start locking people is some guy in another country to tell us he's "a bad guy?" Cause that's fucking silly. ![]() ![]() You still have to build a case. It's not enough that Turkey says he's a bad guy; he has to be bad in a way that violates codified law, and it has to be proven in court. Just because Turkey says this, doesn't mean they've said it in a way that will stand up to legal scrutiny. Turkey is overrun with refugees from Syria and in/out flux of ISIS fighters and sympathizers - are they putting a lot of detail in these deportation cases, or just happy to get them the heck out of Turkey for the time being? So far, the most likely flag in the system for these brothers was something like a parole violation by one of them. It looks like the information on the other brother passed along by Turkey concerning radicalism didn't meet the threshold for legal action in Belgium, thus the release by the Netherlands. How high up the watch list did these things place them? How did these things differentiate them, if at all, from the common 1st/2nd generation immigrant street crime? Putting everybody on the watch list and making everybody a top priority isn't productive. |
|
Quoted: I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? View Quote Most rational people without an agenda would probably do anything else than release him back into the public. But I guess if you want to be edgy on the internet your'e doing a good job. |
|
Quoted:
Ummm... *ahem* "Don't come in" L "Here's a ticket back to Syria?" "Go away?" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't understand the problem. They investigated, failed to find a credible threat and let him go. What were they supposed to do? Consult their crystal ball and discover he would later be involved in a terrorist plot? ![]() OK. So, again, I ask, what were they supposed to do? Ummm... *ahem* "Don't come in" L "Here's a ticket back to Syria?" "Go away?" Weren't they Belgain citizens, born there? I think that would complicate things more that a simple migrant, but I'm not saying you're wrong. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.