User Panel
Originally Posted By ParityError: Maybe they'll ask for a hearing, so the attorneys can still get a chance to obliterate him on the stand. View Quote Meh, I'm going to post his deposition transcript when he's excluded so we can all share our opinions on his X and FB pages. I'm sure that will be just as fun. |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: Meh, I'm going to post his deposition transcript when he's excluded so we can all share our opinions on his X and FB pages. I'm sure that will be just as fun. View Quote I'm in for some ruthless mockery. Edit: I suggest we begin referring to him as Instructor Earl. World's Greatest Instructor - EVER - Instructor Earl |
|
Avatar stolen from Ranger Up.
“ If you rat on the Parade of Hope, you'll be lucky to find your toenails. These guys are the roughest of all the charities.” |
Originally Posted By bigbore: Read THIS. Try not to laugh at the outlandish claims/threats they made and were never able to prove or follow through on. Only about 1% of civil trials go to court, they are all about settlement $. View Quote In response to all that drivel, I will simply quote John Adams, "Facts, are stubborn things, gentlemen." The facts ARE NOT on their side and I look forward to reading of your acquittal - and counter-suit. |
|
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity" --- Sigmond Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanalysis
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: Nothing has to change for them to refile. They get a clean slate with all new scheduling for discovery and depositions, and experts, etc. I'll have to pay more legal fees. My insurance rates will stay high because the lawsuit. IMO, plaintiff would be better off if the boyfriend dies/too ill to testify. That way they can play his video deposition and my side won't be able to cross examine. I've thought about why they are doing this to me every day for the last 2 years when I KNOW they have nothing, and the only answer that makes sense is - because they can. This is what our "legal" system is set up to do. ETA - I dunno about the MSJ - could I just resubmit that on day one and ignore the rest of the stuff? Or, do they have to file and answer to the new complaint and go through discovery first? View Quote Wait a minute... They can't play a video disposition w/o any cross, I don't think. That's prejudicial and (should be) against the rules. |
|
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity" --- Sigmond Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanalysis
|
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity" --- Sigmond Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanalysis
|
Originally Posted By Freakinout: Too bad lawyers are paid and encouraged to lie. Would be nice to get them on the stand and see if they are willing to take a perjury charge for the things they say in court View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Freakinout: Originally Posted By bigbore: Originally Posted By DogtownTom: A jury would answer that question. If the plaintiff can convince a jury that you were negligent in the sale or transfer of that firearm, and it resulted in the death of a person, it doesn't matter if you didn't know them or the amount of time that has passed. What you believe are the facts aren't the facts as the Plaintiff sees them. Yup, and unfortunately for the plaintiff they have ZERO proof I was negligent. Too bad lawyers are paid and encouraged to lie. Would be nice to get them on the stand and see if they are willing to take a perjury charge for the things they say in court This was funny |
|
|
Originally Posted By Former11BRAVO: Wait a minute... They can't play a video disposition w/o any cross, I don't think. That's prejudicial and (should be) against the rules. View Quote It's not against the rules in Ohio. Not that it matters - I think I counted 6 times the guy lied under oath in his deposition that I have real legal documentation proving what he said was a lie. The Jury will see him as the adjudicated liar he is. |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
World ain't what it seems, is it Gunny?
|
You must hate a Democrat as you would the Devil.
Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue. NorCal_LEO-assigned callsign Bulkhead |
|
View Quote I mean.. at days end I guess she did cool down; albeit probably not in the way mom and dad had in mind. Darwinism is undefeated |
|
|
Originally Posted By Former11BRAVO: In response to all that drivel, I will simply quote John Adams, "Facts, are stubborn things, gentlemen." The facts ARE NOT on their side and I look forward to reading of your acquittal - and counter-suit. View Quote Sadly, a counter-suit isn't in the cards. The only entity for which there exists a viable cause of action is the estate. The estate has, literally, nothing. Total assets of $0.00. This is why @bigbore won't even get his costs paid by the plaintiff when he wins - the plaintiff is the very definition of judgement-proof. No assets, no means to ever acquire assets. |
|
Avatar stolen from Ranger Up.
“ If you rat on the Parade of Hope, you'll be lucky to find your toenails. These guys are the roughest of all the charities.” |
Just a thought on the countersuit...
IANAL IF the plaintiffs dismiss prior to the hearing, could a successful countersuit head off the issue of them refiling the case and dragging this out even longer? |
|
|
Originally Posted By ParityError: Sadly, a counter-suit isn't in the cards. The only entity for which there exists a viable cause of action is the estate. The estate has, literally, nothing. Total assets of $0.00. This is why @bigbore won't even get his costs paid by the plaintiff when he wins - the plaintiff is the very definition of judgement-proof. No assets, no means to ever acquire assets. View Quote Proof positive of how broken the system is. When someone brings a lawsuit for no other reason then to get a payday or for malicious reasons, you should be able to go after the client's assets for bringing it. The law firm should be exposed, as well. That'd make frivolous lawsuits or lawfare a very rare event. Of course, I'm pretty sure the lawmakers WANT it like it is. Too bad honest politicians are pretty rare anymore, as well. |
|
"All planes close up tight . . .we'll have to ditch unless landfall . . .when the first plane drops below 10 gallons, we all go down together."
|
Originally Posted By Minerk: Just a thought on the countersuit... IANAL IF the plaintiffs dismiss prior to the hearing, could a successful countersuit head off the issue of them refiling the case and dragging this out even longer? View Quote As @ParityError said above you, its not the way it works. No lawyer if going to take on a judgment proof defendant on contingency, and I'm not paying thousands out of pocket to get nothing back. Also, legally, I don't believe I have any cause to sue. When a layer lies it's not defamation it's an "allegation". Just because their allegations didn't pan out doesn't mean I was legally harmed in a way that gives cause to sue. However it works, I can't do anything and the bad guys know that going into it. |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Originally Posted By tep0583: Proof positive of how broken the system is. When someone brings a lawsuit for no other reason then to get a payday or for malicious reasons, you should be able to go after the client's assets for bringing it. The law firm should be exposed, as well. That'd make frivolous lawsuits or lawfare a very rare event. Of course, I'm pretty sure the lawmakers WANT it like it is. Too bad honest politicians are pretty rare anymore, as well. View Quote The most frustrating part is the reaction of my customers who are lawyers, prosecutors, and judges when I tell them about the lawsuit. They will look me straight in the eye, and as stoic as can be say it's a money grab, this is just the cost of doing business. Don't worry, your insurance will settle to make it go away. |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: As @ParityError said above you, its not the way it works. No lawyer if going to take on a judgment proof defendant on contingency, and I'm not paying thousands out of pocket to get nothing back. Also, legally, I don't believe I have any cause to sue. When a layer lies it's not defamation it's an "allegation". Just because their allegations didn't pan out doesn't mean I was legally harmed in a way that gives cause to sue. However it works, I can't do anything and the bad guys know that going into it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bigbore: Originally Posted By Minerk: Just a thought on the countersuit... IANAL IF the plaintiffs dismiss prior to the hearing, could a successful countersuit head off the issue of them refiling the case and dragging this out even longer? As @ParityError said above you, its not the way it works. No lawyer if going to take on a judgment proof defendant on contingency, and I'm not paying thousands out of pocket to get nothing back. Also, legally, I don't believe I have any cause to sue. When a layer lies it's not defamation it's an "allegation". Just because their allegations didn't pan out doesn't mean I was legally harmed in a way that gives cause to sue. However it works, I can't do anything and the bad guys know that going into it. Wow. That's outrageous! |
|
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity" --- Sigmond Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanalysis
|
I'm local so I was really hoping I'd get to witness the trial. But I can't get the 21st of May off work. Bummer 🤬
|
|
|
Originally Posted By zul: I'm local so I was really hoping I'd get to witness the trial. But I can't get the 21st of May off work. Bummer 🤬 View Quote The 21st will likely just be jury selection. The trial will probably take all week. There are going to be several local customers there to watch. |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: The 21st will likely just be jury selection. The trial will probably take all week. There are going to be several local customers there to watch. View Quote In that case I'll try to make it down one of the other days that week. I'm having trouble finding the case on any of the local courts schedules, which court is this happening at? Sylvania, Lucas co., or Toledo? |
|
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
So when this is all over will we have addresses and phone numbers made available to send gifts and words of encouragment calls to the prosecuting attorney and deranged family?
Asking for a friend… |
|
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: The most frustrating part is the reaction of my customers who are lawyers, prosecutors, and judges when I tell them about the lawsuit. They will look me straight in the eye, and as stoic as can be say it's a money grab, this is just the cost of doing business. Don't worry, your insurance will settle to make it go away. View Quote To that, I can only say, "No shit?" (the money grab part) That doesn't mean it isn't broken. "That's what insurance is for." is a poor answer. |
|
"All planes close up tight . . .we'll have to ditch unless landfall . . .when the first plane drops below 10 gallons, we all go down together."
|
Originally Posted By hawkin: So when this is all over will we have addresses and phone numbers made available to send gifts and words of encouragment calls to the prosecuting attorney and deranged family? Asking for a friend… View Quote If your friend truly wants to extend greetings and salutations, all that info is public and available at the docket link I posted above. |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: The most frustrating part is the reaction of my customers who are lawyers, prosecutors, and judges when I tell them about the lawsuit. They will look me straight in the eye, and as stoic as can be say it's a money grab, this is just the cost of doing business. Don't worry, your insurance will settle to make it go away. View Quote Of course, you can't expect them to bemoan their own racket can you? |
|
|
This dip shit will NOT be a witness in my trial.
You need to read his deposition Any questions as to why he would spew bullshit to get money from a lawyer who is a spot light donor to the Brady Campaign can be directed to the links below: https://www.facebook.com/TheShootingChannel https://twitter.com/ctwmediagroup |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Game on. He is a turd that needs to put in the spotlight.
|
|
Squatch
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: This dip shit will NOT be a witness in my trial. You need to read his deposition Any questions as to why he would spew bullshit to get money from a lawyer who is a spot light donor to the Brady Campaign can be directed to the links below: https://www.facebook.com/TheShootingChannel https://twitter.com/ctwmediagroup View Quote I rarely use FB but will fire it up Taking bets on how long both channels will be disabled/limited to friends? BTW his most recent picture on FB is of Jeff Cooper What a shitbag ETA and it's my email Sig line, aww man Attached File |
|
PROUD AMMOSEXUAL
Adam Calhoun: "You can’t hurt my feelings, I was born in the 80's" |
So, the investigator who didn't investigate, and who holds himself in high regard because he gave himself an honorary martial arts degree. He is pre-disposed because of his stated (deposition) prejudices and attempting to direct the outcome to suit his ego and desires. Oh, and plaintiff's counsel basically had to lead him back to their talking points by testifying for him.
Was this bozo's resume posted yet? ETA - He also thinks, because he's an advocate for the program, that the Don't Lie for the Other Guy program is gospel and each of the 87,000 must know and practice their edicts. Even in their videos they allude it's not infallible and it take some time to gain awareness. |
|
President, Quantico Shooting Club where we shoot 1,000yds every Sunday!
Back the Blue |
Originally Posted By bigbore: This dip shit will NOT be a witness in my trial. You need to read his deposition Any questions as to why he would spew bullshit to get money from a lawyer who is a spot light donor to the Brady Campaign can be directed to the links below: https://www.facebook.com/TheShootingChannel https://twitter.com/ctwmediagroup View Quote My God...what a clown show. Boil all of that down to "this guy has no expert knowledge, no specific knowledge and no tangential knowledge of anything relating to the case at hand." $200/$300/hour is a rip off for the prosecution. What an absolute sham. |
|
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: This dip shit will NOT be a witness in my trial. You need to read his deposition Any questions as to why he would spew bullshit to get money from a lawyer who is a spot light donor to the Brady Campaign can be directed to the links below: https://www.facebook.com/TheShootingChannel https://twitter.com/ctwmediagroup View Quote Has he been excluded by the court or the plaintiff's finally figured out what a fraud he is? |
|
"In knifemaking everyone gets cut and everyone gets burned." Devin Thomas
|
Originally Posted By Defender3: So, the investigator who didn't investigate, and who holds himself in high regard because he gave himself an honorary martial arts degree. He is pre-disposed because of his stated (deposition) prejudices and attempting to direct the outcome to suit his ego and desires. Oh, and plaintiff's counsel basically had to lead him back to their talking points by testifying for him. Was this bozo's resume posted yet? ETA - He also thinks, because he's an advocate for the program, that the Don't Lie for the Other Guy program is gospel and each of the 87,000 must know and practice their edicts. Even in their videos they allude it's not infallible and it take some time to gain awareness. View Quote @Defender3 It was posted on page 35 but its good for another laugh if you haven't seen it. Maybe you can pick out on his resume what makes him an expert qualified to call me a liar in this case? • CEO, Radio, and Tv Talk Show Host – CTW Media Group / CTW Tv Network November 2020 – Present - Asheville, North Carolina • Security Professional – Security Manager / HRC, Client Manager, Field Supervisor, RDO, Patrol Supervisor. Trainer / Instructor - Allied Universal Security Services June 2019 – Present - Asheville, North Carolina • CEO / Chief Instructor & Consultant / Self Employed – TAP3X Group of Companies /Tango3Global May 2012 – Present – Lewiston NY & Fletcher, North Carolina • Operations Generalist, Forklift Driver, Truck / Delivery Driver – Single Source Industrial Solutions July 2015 – October 2016 – Fletcher, North Carolina • TV & Radio Talk Show Host - "Put It On Target" Radio and TV Shows, Chase The Wolf Radio Show May 2014 – Present – Hendersonville / Fletcher, North Carolina • Broker (Hunting & Fishing) - Put it on Target Sportsman Adventures October 2013 – 2014 – New York & Hendersonville, North Carolina • Gun Sales, Range Safety Officer, Firearms Instructor – Niagara Gun Range October 2013 – June 2014 – North Tonawanda, New York • Business Partner - Accurate Freedom 1 Semi-Automatic Hunting Rifle, LLC August 2013 – July 2014 - Virginia and North Carolina, USA • Executive Vice President, Senior Editor and Radio Talk Show Host - The Shooting Channel March 2013 – May 2014 - Studio Offices North - New York, USA (Contract) • Director of Operations - AFI International Group, Inc November 2010 – May 2012 - Milton Ontario Canada (Contract) • Project Coordinator / Manager/ Security Consultant – IMAC 2010 - 2012 – USA (Contract) • Owner & Director of Training - Jade Dragon Martial Arts Academy 1975 - 2012 - USA / Canada (Martial Artist since 1965) • Director of Operations, General Manager, EP, DHS Security Contractor – CSS USA and CSS Global Protection Group January 2007 – November 2009 – USA (Contract) • Field Supervisor / Evidence Coordinator/ Executive Protection Specialist Special Response Corporation 2005 – 2007 – USA (Contract) • Retired - Canada 2000 – 2005 • Sales Associate / Operations Manager / Customer Service Manager Circuit City Stores, Inc. – Fort Myers Fla. & Naples Fla. 1996 - 1999 • Sales Associate / Store Manager (2 Stores) Radio Shack (A Tandy Corporation) – Savannah Ga. / Calhoun Ga. 1993 – 1996 • Reserve Police Officer, Police Officer, Detective, Master Firearms Instructor & Range Master, SWAT, EMT, P.O.S.T. Police Academy Instructor, In-Service Instructor 1983 - 1992 – Leesville, La. PD, Chatham County, Ga. PD, Georgia P.O.S.T • Combat Arms Soldier, Drill Sergeant (Reserves), Small Arms Instructor, Armorer, Sr. Weapons Technical Advisor (SETAF) 1977 – 1986 US Army & US Army Reserves - USA, Europe, Middle East |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Listening to this dripspit explaining this self-awarded degree to Col. Cooper would be hysterical. I suspect the Colonel would have a clear and pointed response to this nonsense.
|
|
Avatar stolen from Ranger Up.
“ If you rat on the Parade of Hope, you'll be lucky to find your toenails. These guys are the roughest of all the charities.” |
Originally Posted By bigbore: This dip shit will NOT be a witness in my trial. You need to read his deposition Any questions as to why he would spew bullshit to get money from a lawyer who is a spot light donor to the Brady Campaign can be directed to the links below: https://www.facebook.com/TheShootingChannel https://twitter.com/ctwmediagroup View Quote Just read all that deposition again. Just noticed this on page 25 I think. I guess this is the insurance lawyer. He thinks there are NO background checks at gun shows. Attached File |
|
FTFTWFMF
|
Originally Posted By TN-MadDog: Just read all that deposition again. Just noticed this on page 25 I think. I guess this is the insurance lawyer. He thinks there are NO background checks at gun shows. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/35314/IMG_3367_jpeg-3204076.JPG View Quote Like most people, he thought there were no background checks at gun shows. He never claimed to be an expert regarding firearms laws. If you look back to page 20, you can read that the firearms expert doesn't understand the 4473 is a federal form when he says he cant comment on the restraining order question because he doesn't know the laws of my particular state. |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
You should fight to get his deposition admitted. His very last statement is that there was no correlation to the suicide. I wonder how bad the plaintiff’s lawyer knows how bad they messed up using this guy as their “expert”.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By cap6888: You should fight to get his deposition admitted. His very last statement is that there was no correlation to the suicide. I wonder how bad the plaintiff’s lawyer knows how bad they messed up using this guy as their “expert”. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By cap6888: You should fight to get his deposition admitted. His very last statement is that there was no correlation to the suicide. I wonder how bad the plaintiff’s lawyer knows how bad they messed up using this guy as their “expert”. They know how bad they messed by hiring this dip shit. Look at page 40, when my lawyers asked him if I made any mistakes on the 4473. Keep in mind the 4473 is the ONLY piece of evidence from that day. To my recollection after reviewing that previously, I do not see anything that he done that was incorrect on it. So my answer would be, no, there was nothing done incorrect on it as per Mr. Stephen Thompson |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
I suggest we trade a question mark in for a maybe.
IA, USA
|
Originally Posted By hawkin: So when this is all over will we have addresses and phone numbers made available to send gifts and words of encouragment calls to the prosecuting attorney and deranged family? Asking for a friend… View Quote I can think of some candy that might be nice to send them. |
WARNING-this post contains words or thoughts that may at some point be discovered by the state of California to cause cancer.
|
Originally Posted By kcobean: My God...what a clown show. Boil all of that down to "this guy has no expert knowledge, no specific knowledge and no tangential knowledge of anything relating to the case at hand." $200/$300/hour is a rip off for the prosecution. What an absolute sham. View Quote He went to be an expert witness while knowing absolutely nothing about a case because, based on his resume of changing jobs every 2 years and wishing he owned the company, he would sucking cock in a truck stop to pay the bills without the extra help. I hope the Brady campaign paid him thousands though, drain all the BS out of that organization you can. |
|
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand. 87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note) |
Read the entire thing... Wow, what a shit bird.
No knowledge of the people involved, no research on anything, all guess work that's predisposed to one side because of where the paycheck is coming from and even without any expert opinion/facts/etc to back anything up at all. Wow... Just wow... He even admits that nothing was done wrong at all, but you should have known (Now give me my three grand) |
|
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: They know how bad they messed by hiring this dip shit. Look at page 40, when my lawyers asked him if I made any mistakes on the 4473. Keep in mind the 4473 is the ONLY piece of evidence from that day. quote: To my recollection after reviewing that previously, I do not see anything that he done that was incorrect on it. So my answer would be, no, there was nothing done incorrect on it as per Mr. Stephen Thompson /quote View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bigbore: Originally Posted By cap6888: You should fight to get his deposition admitted. His very last statement is that there was no correlation to the suicide. I wonder how bad the plaintiff’s lawyer knows how bad they messed up using this guy as their “expert”. They know how bad they messed by hiring this dip shit. Look at page 40, when my lawyers asked him if I made any mistakes on the 4473. Keep in mind the 4473 is the ONLY piece of evidence from that day. quote: To my recollection after reviewing that previously, I do not see anything that he done that was incorrect on it. So my answer would be, no, there was nothing done incorrect on it as per Mr. Stephen Thompson /quote This is where I went BOOM HEADSHOT MF.... ......game over.....better luck next time gadget. |
|
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand. 87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note) |
I’m ashamed that fucker lives in NC
|
|
Did you just assume my anatomy? - Cowbell
No Tyrant has ever found itself guilty of tyranny in its own court. - ohland Weapons of war are our birthright - Dark_zero_x The dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed - Lube |
If they weren't such heinous people I'd almost feel bad for the plaintiff's lawyers for how big of a mistake it was hiring that guy. Holy shit.
He literally says he's basing his entire expert testimony on the two depositions and admits that the two opposite versions of events from Steve and Zahn are the only evidence - other than a completely normal 4473 - as to what happened during the sale. But then says even so, he chooses to exclusively believe Zahn's story and even invent fairytales about body language and "helper signals" that he claims Steve missed even though no one has ever mentioned or talked about those things at all. He just completely fabricates that shit out of thin air. He couldn't even answer the question why he chooses to believe Zahn over Steve but I think we know why: he was hired by the plaintiffs and so is just telling them what they want to hear. This guy is the definition of a crock of shit. |
|
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Originally Posted By TN-MadDog: Just read all that deposition again. Just noticed this on page 25 I think. I guess this is the insurance lawyer. He thinks there are NO background checks at gun shows. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/35314/IMG_3367_jpeg-3204076.JPG View Quote He's a liberal lawyer that probably knows nothing about gun shows other than wat he's heard on MSNBC "gun show loopholes" bullshit. The expert witness is a piece of shit that basically he went with what the lawyers who were paying him provided and goaded him to say. $200-300 and hour and he'll say anything. Beats sucking dicks for $10 a pop. |
|
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: This dip shit will NOT be a witness in my trial. You need to read his deposition Any questions as to why he would spew bullshit to get money from a lawyer who is a spot light donor to the Brady Campaign can be directed to the links below: https://www.facebook.com/TheShootingChannel https://twitter.com/ctwmediagroup View Quote |
|
“Liberalism, the noble annihilator, has hollowed out every institution, every binding force, every social failsafe and backstop, and its agents feign surprise when the liberating infanticide it promotes is taken to its next logical step.”
|
|
Originally Posted By bigbore: If your friend truly wants to extend greetings and salutations, all that info is public and available at the docket link I posted above. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bigbore: Originally Posted By hawkin: So when this is all over will we have addresses and phone numbers made available to send gifts and words of encouragment calls to the prosecuting attorney and deranged family? Asking for a friend… If your friend truly wants to extend greetings and salutations, all that info is public and available at the docket link I posted above. please do not post it here |
|
|
|
The bad guys lawyers filed a R.41 dismissal. In Ohio that means they have 1 year to start it all over again, but as of today it's over.
This entire thing was a bullshit bluff all along. We called them on it and didn't offer a penny in settlement. They knew they would never win at trial so they quit. They can refile, but their lawyers know its a lost cause and, and I can't imagine any other lawyers will want to pick this up and expect a different outcome. Thanks for all the support, it's been a wild ride, and fortunately the bad guys lost. To better understand how bad the trial would have gone for them read this - parents depositions. Imagine my attorneys cross examining them in front of a jury! |
|
I'm no good at telling people what they want to hear when I dont believe it myself :)
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.