User Panel
Magadonia
|
|
dont sell guns, sell parts kits lol
|
|
|
Originally Posted By jnk556: It's fear mongering mostly.... Read this part here circled..... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/111395/Screenshot_20240411_211653_Drive-3185446.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jnk556: Originally Posted By MeAndMyAR: Unless it’s a Curio and Relic, I get more recent makes sent to my FFL 01 guy whether I am buying it through an online dealer or private seller.. I rarely, if ever sell. I haven’t sold one in over 3 years. And if I did sell occasionally, I have read nothing in any of this that would affect me or 99% of the people here I would guess. It's fear mongering mostly.... Read this part here circled..... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/111395/Screenshot_20240411_211653_Drive-3185446.jpg “Fear mongering” is the point of this rule. But that doesn’t mean the fear it generates isn’t legitimate. It says right there in the text you circled that those scenarios are “a defense of prosecution”, but in a way to make the horrific reality more palatable. Those are not “get out of jail free” scenarios. They can still arrest you, book you, bankrupt you all the while you are trying to prove that you were just liquidating grandpa’s collection. |
|
|
Has lawyerup opined on this yet?
|
|
If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
|
Originally Posted By Duck_Hunt: Originally Posted By Ben_Raines: I mean, let's be honest, how many people actually buy guns from a private dealer at gun shows these days? All I ever hear about gun shows these days are that they barely qualify as "gun" shows anymore with all the dealers of products other than guns, that the guns they DO have are way overpriced, and most of them are crap. These days most people use websites like Armslist, GunBroker or a local forum website to buy privately, which has to go through an FFL anyways. No shit. Lol |
|
Shit like this is why you don't give typewriters to monkeys. - L_JE
Colonialism, bringing ethnic diversity to a continent near you. - My Father Me being brief, this is like seeing a comet - Geralt55 |
sell everything as a parts kit...problem solved.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Ben_Raines: I mean, let's be honest, how many people actually buy guns from a private dealer at gun shows these days? All I ever hear about gun shows these days are that they barely qualify as "gun" shows anymore with all the dealers of products other than guns, that the guns they DO have are way overpriced, and most of them are crap. These days most people use websites like Armslist, GunBroker or a local forum website to buy privately, which has to go through an FFL anyways. View Quote 2/3rds of a post a year guy says it's no big deal because gun shows suck anyways. Interdasting... |
|
|
Originally Posted By MudEagle: If you sell for a "profit" then yes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By MudEagle: Originally Posted By jd2395: summary? Am a "dealer" if I sell a rifle to someone locally? If you sell for a "profit" then yes. "Millions of KAC bros suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced." |
|
Not a Tennessee Squire
|
Originally Posted By Elkins45: Gunbroker sales almost always go thru an FFL already. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Elkins45: Originally Posted By StevenH: Going to kill Gun broker and armslist used gun sales Gunbroker sales almost always go thru an FFL already. Unless it’s an antique or black powder, they all have to go through an 03 or 01 FFL. |
|
Looking for Colt AR-15 Serial # SP154280 My first AR
|
Originally Posted By Everrest: So as a good citizen I apply for an FFL. My town doesn't allow FFLs in residential neighborhoods. I also have a school within 1000 feet of my house. FFL Denied. What is my recourse? View Quote -sell guns anyways -get your door kicked in -dog gets murdered -go to PMITA federal prison. Or, alternately... -resist/disregard unconstitutional laws -have government agents snipe your family members -agents burn your home down and take pictures in front of your charred corpse. Your choice. |
|
|
|
Since these alphabet agencies are going rogue and passing legislation without congress, why doesn't the congress cut all funding to agencies that violate their charter and fire all federal employees who violate their oath to uphold the constitution.
(then I woke up) |
|
|
Sounds like I'll sell you this pizza for $1200 and then I'll leave this backpack at your house? I guess.
I mean, it doesn't regulate how much I can sell pizza for does it? |
|
|
RINOs Now Say ATF's New Rule Is Lawless & Unconstitutional…But They Enabled It! WTF!
RINOs Now Say ATF's New Rule Is Lawless & Unconstitutional…But They Enabled It! WTF! |
|
"Bureau of Alcohol, Snuff, Firearms and Explosives" Google translator. @Everrest
|
I have every right to sell my personal property via legal channels. So what if the item has appreciated in the years I've owned it? how do they define "making a profit"? What if you sell it for your original purchase price, or less?
|
|
|
I go to most shows within an hour or two away and I see 9 or 10 of the same guys at every show, year after year. As soon as they trade for a gun they slap a price tag on it and drop it on their table. Until I see one of them being dragged out in handcuffs I’m going to conclude this is all just performative bullshit.
Those guys have been flagrantly “engaging in the business” for years and ATF hasn’t done shit about it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By mgwantob: Similarly, there is no minimum number of transactions that determines whether a person is “engaged in the business” of dealing in firearms. Even a single firearm transaction, or offer to engage in a transaction, when combined with other evidence, may be sufficient to require a license. For example, even under the previous statutory definition, courts have upheld convictions for dealing without a license when few firearms, if any, were actually sold, when other factors were also present, such as the person representing to others a willingness and ability to repetitively purchase firearms for resale. Here we go... Welcome to the increasing world of "arbitrary and capricious". "Clarifying" definitions in a way that makes the law more squishy and arbitrary, opening up new avenues of "interpretation" that are LESS clear, is opposite of what the agencies are supposed to be using their rulemaking authority for. |
|
"No man is free who is not master of himself."
Never esteem anything as of advantage to you that will make you break your word or lose your self-respect. ~Marcus Aurelius |
-Wake me up when the lamp post decorating starts!
-In America, you ARE guilty if you are a Trump supporter or domestic terrorist (conservative white male Christian) -The older I get, the shorter a life sentence is. |
What a complete crock of shit
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Elkins45: Gunbroker sales almost always go thru an FFL already. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Elkins45: Originally Posted By StevenH: Going to kill Gun broker and armslist used gun sales Gunbroker sales almost always go thru an FFL already. Doesn’t matter. The seller has to BE an FFL |
|
Life member of CRPA. FPC contributor.
|
Originally Posted By Grunteled: That's the way Congress likes it. Then they they can hold 'hearings' and grandstand but they aren't 'to blame' for it and will eternally 'work to fight' it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Grunteled: Originally Posted By Dragynn: Why bother even having a Congress if .gov agencies and the potato potus simply make up whatever laws they want? That's the way Congress likes it. Then they they can hold 'hearings' and grandstand but they aren't 'to blame' for it and will eternally 'work to fight' it. So who regulates the regulators ?? It appears no one does. kwg |
|
|
Originally Posted By Mr-Mockingbird: FJB is sure playing the part of poking the bear over and over, hoping for a violent reaction so the bear can be put down Hold the line Don't do anything overly stupid right now. We're over the target; explains all the flak View Quote Trust the plan? Patriots in charge? Respectfully, I submit that it sounds too much like Qanon "trust the plan" nonsense. After all of these decades hearing phrases like you posted, I've lost any faith in that approach. A government can be wrong a thousand times and survive but an individual can only be wrong once and be destroyed. Tyranny favors the long game as all governments tend towards it. Incrementalism favors tyranny. Liberty happens in major bursts. Some will point to things like the "civil rights movement" as an example of incrementalism working against tyranny but fail to understand that it was backed by communists and those pushing for tyranny. They were using the cause to further their own agenda. That same agenda still has legs today. Frankly, I don't think there is enough time for the Supreme Court to smack all of this down before the Court is changed to something more pliable. We need a jugular lunge in a case that challenges the NFA, GCA, etc. Then, and only then, will we know if we still have a constitutional republic. I also don't think our culture and economy can withstand much more. Yuri Bezmenov's warnings have come to pass. Our future young citizens, alive right now, are broken, probably irreparably. They lack empathy, morals, critical thinking, faith in G-d, etc. There is, IMHO, no time to trust the plan. The flak we are seeing is just a smoke screen to play for time. Time is on the side of government as it lives a thousand lifetimes. An individual has only one so, for him, time is very short. Sit in the pot and boil. Jump out of the pot and die quicker. There are surely other options available. |
|
If I don't answer your reply to me in a reasonable amount of time, it means that I either missed it or it seemed like you were unnecessarily being an asshole. If it was the former, I sincerely apologize.
|
Originally Posted By Elkins45: I go to most shows within an hour or two away and I see 9 or 10 of the same guys at every show, year after year. As soon as they trade for a gun they slap a price tag on it and drop it on their table. Until I see one of them being dragged out in handcuffs I’m going to conclude this is all just performative bullshit. Those guys have been flagrantly “engaging in the business” for years and ATF hasn’t done shit about it. View Quote Then there is the other side of that coin. The guys who set up a table one every year or two to sell off parts of their collection because shipping has become too much of a hassle. Beware the “buyer” who asks you a lot of questions about how often you sell at gun shows. |
|
|
Originally Posted By JmE: ... n agenda. That same agenda still has legs today. Frankly, I don't think there is enough time for the Supreme Court to smack all of this down before the Court is changed to something more pliable. We need a jugular lunge in a case that challenges the NFA, GCA, etc. Then, and only then, will we know if we still have a constitutional republic. I also don't th... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By JmE: Originally Posted By Mr-Mockingbird: FJB is sure playing the part of poking the bear over and over, hoping for a violent reaction so the bear can be put down Hold the line Don't do anything overly stupid right now. We're over the target; explains all the flak ... n agenda. That same agenda still has legs today. Frankly, I don't think there is enough time for the Supreme Court to smack all of this down before the Court is changed to something more pliable. We need a jugular lunge in a case that challenges the NFA, GCA, etc. Then, and only then, will we know if we still have a constitutional republic. I also don't th... Be honest with yourself. We already know that answer. Even if we got that "jugular lunge", do you expect it to be followed? The Supreme Court has no mechanism to enact its rulings alone. |
|
" Laziness is an essential part of all walks of engineering."
|
~400 pages is a lot of paper and words to wipe my ass with.
|
|
|
PROUD AMMOSEXUAL
Adam Calhoun: "You can’t hurt my feelings, I was born in the 80's" |
Originally Posted By Elkins45: I go to most shows within an hour or two away and I see 9 or 10 of the same guys at every show, year after year. As soon as they trade for a gun they slap a price tag on it and drop it on their table. Until I see one of them being dragged out in handcuffs I’m going to conclude this is all just performative bullshit. Those guys have been flagrantly “engaging in the business” for years and ATF hasn’t done shit about it. View Quote Those guys are probably snitches and should be avoided. |
|
Heller II - Challenging DC's bans on semi-automatic rifles, large-capacity ammunition feeding devices, and its onerous and expensive handgun registration process. http://www.HellerFoundation.org/
|
Originally Posted By Bubbles: Those guys are probably snitches and should be avoided. View Quote I hope not because I’ve bought/traded guns from some of them in the past. Of course, with the new rule once they get nabbed they will probably be happy to be a honeypot for ATF if it keeps them out of prison. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Everrest: RINOs Now Say ATF's New Rule Is Lawless & Unconstitutional…But They Enabled It! WTF! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgK_jZCqclI View Quote 15 GOP senators voted for it. |
|
|
|
Seems to me that the easy way to avoid being prosecuted under this final rule is pretty simple--sell the gun for a loss. Then the phrase in the rule “to predominantly earn a profit" goes out the window.
But we all know this is 466 pages of bullshit and taxpayer money wasted by the BATF. FMG |
|
Knight of Blunder - Fogo '21
|
So resellers and panic speculators can be gotten as unlicensed dealers.
But you know as well as I do that nobody is enforcing these laws. |
|
|
Not a Tennessee Squire
|
KAC profiteers... LOL
this wont hold up when the lawsuits fly. so if my house sells at a profit im a realtor ? my car sells at a profit im a car dealer ? obviously guys buying five of one model and then selling them is grey. if i sold three guns that i had 30 years, to buy one cool one i always wanted that isnt being a dealer. this shit will get struck down. its more stupid then the brace stuff. Originally Posted By Subpar: I’ve been reporting all the EE KAC profiteer WTS ads as unlicensed dealers. View Quote |
|
|
Does this make gun "buy back" programs illegal?
|
|
"You get to pick your damn sacrifice. That's all. You don't get to not make one." - Jordan B. Peterson
|
So can I open a “gun store” without an FFL to only buy guns? I’ll offer 30% retail in cash.
For the elderly and newly divorced. No sales, just purchases. |
|
|
What about trading one in to an FFL for a different firearm?
Would that be legal or illegal based on the ruling? |
|
I can't think of anything to say. Nada, zip, nothing.
|
Originally Posted By JThompson: What about trading one in to an FFL for a different firearm? Would that be legal or illegal based on the ruling? View Quote Cocaine dusted pedo politician's boy? He can sell glocks converted to FA for $2k each, and walk free . Post memes online about cocaine dusted pedo politician's boy, selling glocks converted to FA for $2k each? Your name will be on the watch list. Sell a broken HI Point frame for $1, and go directly to jail. |
|
|
Originally Posted By JThompson: What about trading one in to an FFL for a different firearm? Would that be legal or illegal based on the ruling? View Quote As long as a licensed dealer was involved in the transaction it is legal. You can even do that in California. The ruling is only about transactions between two unlicensed persons. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Duck_Hunt: Who the fuck allows those cock suckers to have a booth at shot show? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Duck_Hunt: Originally Posted By osprey21: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/766/ATFgay-3147229.jpg Who the fuck allows those cock suckers to have a booth at shot show? I would bet the shot show promoters would rather stay in the good graces of our atf overlords or there is some requirement for them to have a presence durring shot show thus they get a table. |
|
Don't steal the government hates competition
A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves! The government is wise. The government knows what is best. …For us |
Not a Tennessee Squire
|
|
Originally Posted By StevenH: Going to kill Gun broker and armslist used gun sales View Quote How so? The guns just go through a local to you ffl. It’s a fucked up rule and should get punted by the courts but it won’t kill online sites that facilitate sales of used guns. It’s not like arms list couldn’t set up an office and get an ffl. Honestly them doing this could be the way the ffl system gets gotten away with since if I make available space online for the sale of used guns that requires me to have a ffl thus requiring a bound book that can be inspected for guns I never possession let alone see I would think would get me a favorable ruling in say the 5th circuit. |
|
Don't steal the government hates competition
A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves! The government is wise. The government knows what is best. …For us |
Originally Posted By Elkins45: As long as a licensed dealer was involved in the transaction it is legal. You can even do that in California. The ruling is only about transactions between two unlicensed persons. View Quote I don't think that is correct. Would you mind pointing out where the rule states that? From my reading, I didn't see anything about exempting transactions with an FFL from their judging whether or not you as an unlicensed person are in violation. People keep saying this rule will "kill private F2F sales", but from the text of the rule, its scope is far FAR greater than that, encompassing ALL unlicensed persons, whether they sell to an FFL or not. |
|
Beware the Liberal. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.
|
Originally Posted By Kent: I don't think that is correct. Would you mind pointing out where the rule states that? From my reading, I didn't see anything about exempting transactions with an FFL from their judging whether or not you as an unlicensed person are in violation. People keep saying this rule will "kill private F2F sales", but from the text of the rule, its scope is far FAR greater than that, encompassing ALL unlicensed persons, whether they sell to an FFL or not. View Quote https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/docs/undefined/finalrule2022r-17f-questionsandanswerspdf/download “ Individuals may continue to make intrastate private sales without a license provided they do not rise to the level of being “engaged in the business,” and the transactions are otherwise compliant with law.” |
|
|
Should I feel like selling a Title 1 firearm in a transaction that doesn’t cross a state line, I’m going to completely disregard this unconstitutional nonsense. For any anti-freedom ATF agents perusing this thread, ”FUCK THE ATF”.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By notso: Be honest with yourself. We already know that answer. Even if we got that "jugular lunge", do you expect it to be followed? The Supreme Court has no mechanism to enact its rulings alone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By notso: Originally Posted By JmE: Originally Posted By Mr-Mockingbird: FJB is sure playing the part of poking the bear over and over, hoping for a violent reaction so the bear can be put down Hold the line Don't do anything overly stupid right now. We're over the target; explains all the flak ... n agenda. That same agenda still has legs today. Frankly, I don't think there is enough time for the Supreme Court to smack all of this down before the Court is changed to something more pliable. We need a jugular lunge in a case that challenges the NFA, GCA, etc. Then, and only then, will we know if we still have a constitutional republic. I also don't th... Be honest with yourself. We already know that answer. Even if we got that "jugular lunge", do you expect it to be followed? The Supreme Court has no mechanism to enact its rulings alone. I honestly don't know. I have a glimmer of hope that the Court would rule properly but know better than to hold my breath. And, yes, even if they did rule properly ("shall not be infringed"), the Court apparently has little to no teeth. However, it might be a wake-up to some that need it that our Republic is stone dead or if there is still a little life left in her. At least that important question could be answered. |
|
If I don't answer your reply to me in a reasonable amount of time, it means that I either missed it or it seemed like you were unnecessarily being an asshole. If it was the former, I sincerely apologize.
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.