User Panel
|
|
Originally Posted By Calculating: I know it won't be a popular opinion, but I think it's stupid to hold businesses financially accountable for employees actions. How the fuck can they predict human insane behavior. View Quote Yeah, I was debating on posting this. At first my emotional response was to sue! Sue everyone! But then I thought, “what if I owned that business?” I mean, if I did my due diligence, to make sure the potential employee wasn’t a danger, then how am I responsible if he flies off the handle? I’ve seen completely reasonable and responsible men lose it once in a while. So, in the end, unless instacart didn’t do a background check on this clown, it’s not on them. |
|
|
Rob
|
Originally Posted By BoomFootShot: Yeah, I was debating on posting this. At first my emotional response was to sue! Sue everyone! But then I thought, “what if I owned that business?” I mean, if I did my due diligence, to make sure the potential employee wasn’t a danger, then how am I responsible if he flies off the handle? I’ve seen completely reasonable and responsible men lose it once in a while. So, in the end, unless instacart didn’t do a background check on this clown, it’s not on them. View Quote It wasn’t even the actual instacart employee. It was her boyfriend. Op updated the original post. |
|
|
After some research I also recommend Morgan and Morgan
|
|
|
Thanks for the update op. I hope the lady gets paid, I also hope the dirtbag get ventilated
|
|
|
Yet another case of someone pretending all people are equal and have the same moral structure and finding out the hard way they were wrong.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By bradpierson26: IC is negligent in having zero checks and balances in who delivers after initial app registration View Quote This is very, very similar to double brokering in the trucking industry. I’m not aware of any instance of liability (absent of proof showing prior knowledge) or burdens placed on the cargo or load board owner for additional preventative measures beyond those required by law. In all cases, the original carrier is liable for the actions of the secondary carrier. |
|
Don't you tell me about galaxies! I walk them in the timeline.
|
I had to Google "instacart".
|
|
Stuff I learned from A-Team: 1)Always pity da fool 2)Carry wire cutters (you may need to defuse a bomb or start a car) 3)Never trust a crazy fool 4)Carry grenade launcher/machine guns in the van 5)Know how to weld 6)Love It When A Plan Comes Together
|
|
Originally Posted By eolian: Boyfriend or not instacart still owes somebody for the attack. View Quote But why? Assuming they did the proper background checks. What if you owned a business, and did the proper pre employment checks? Would you be claiming responsibility for what this grown adult did while under your employ? What if you hired someone and they let their significant other masquerade as them, while performing work duty? Is that on you? At which point do you draw the line? I understand the other side, don’t get me wrong. The scumbags in question probably don’t have a dime to their names, so how are they going to pay? So the emotion kicks in, and people get angry and want someone to pay! Totally understandable. But to just look for the entity that has the deepest pockets, because it’s perceived they didn’t use their crystal ball to predict the future, is some liberal type shit. Dude shoots people with a DD and Hornady, DD and Hornady gets sued. Makes no sense, correct? Similar idea here. And I can’t stress this enough, I get the anger. I get the emotion. Makes me mad too. But this is why we need to fix society. On all levels. From spiritual to educational to employment. I want to say, “she should carry a gun!” And she should. But I’m more interested in building the society we used to have, where shit like this was rare. I’m just your run of the mill moron, though, so I could be missing something obvious here. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 80085: However, dirtbag bf was acting as an agent of Instacart by likely getting the groceries from the store via the app and delivering the groceries via the app. View Quote I swear I just read another story exactly like this some time last week, before OP's coworker got attacked. Someone was expecting a female delivery driver, turned out to be a guy doing the delivery, and the guy attacked someone. There were even some photos and names of the should-have-been-the-driver, a black female. Edit: half a second after I clicked "submit" I remembered the thread: https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/-Completely-traumatized-Angie-Harmon-says-Instacart-driver-shot-and-killed-her-dog/5-2716973/ This one was in North Carolina and involved famous hot actress Angie Harmon, whose dog got shot by the actual driver (who wasn't the woman who was supposed to be delivering her groceries). |
|
|
Originally Posted By Sebastian_MacMaine: I swear I just read another story exactly like this some time last week, before OP's coworker got attacked. Someone was expecting a female delivery driver, turned out to be a guy doing the delivery, and the guy attacked someone. There were even some photos and names of the should-have-been-the-driver, a black female. Edit: half a second after I clicked "submit" I remembered the thread: https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/-Completely-traumatized-Angie-Harmon-says-Instacart-driver-shot-and-killed-her-dog/5-2716973/ This one was in North Carolina and involved famous hot actress Angie Harmon, whose dog got shot by the actual driver (who wasn't the woman who was supposed to be delivering her groceries). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Sebastian_MacMaine: Originally Posted By 80085: However, dirtbag bf was acting as an agent of Instacart by likely getting the groceries from the store via the app and delivering the groceries via the app. I swear I just read another story exactly like this some time last week, before OP's coworker got attacked. Someone was expecting a female delivery driver, turned out to be a guy doing the delivery, and the guy attacked someone. There were even some photos and names of the should-have-been-the-driver, a black female. Edit: half a second after I clicked "submit" I remembered the thread: https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/-Completely-traumatized-Angie-Harmon-says-Instacart-driver-shot-and-killed-her-dog/5-2716973/ This one was in North Carolina and involved famous hot actress Angie Harmon, whose dog got shot by the actual driver (who wasn't the woman who was supposed to be delivering her groceries). Beating a customer and shooting a dog that attacked the driver is not the same thing. Anyone attacked by a dog has the right to defend themselves. Unlike this incident, the driver did not flee and was not arrested. He or the woman driver or both are no longer independent contractors for the delivery service. |
|
|
Shitty deal her getting her ass kicked hopefully she will get paid and that she learned a lesson. It don't matter if someone is complete dick
and deserves to have their teeth kicked in, if you are going to exchange words with them you damn sure better be ready to go hands on if not more. |
|
|
The “Three Stupid” Rule: “Do not go to stupid places, with stupid people, and do stupid things”
Religion is a handy device for keeping the philosophically deficient in line. |
Interesting. Like I pointed out earlier, I've had several deliveries from men when the account showed an obviously female name.
I wondered if they were doing it to avoid the background checks. |
|
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By JellyBelly: Victim sues Instacart, they in turn sue their driver for exposing them to the liability by letting loser BF do her job and commiting the felony level violence upon their valued customer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By JellyBelly: Originally Posted By BoomFootShot: But why? Victim sues Instacart, they in turn sue their driver for exposing them to the liability by letting loser BF do her job and commiting the felony level violence upon their valued customer. A lot of good suing the driver is going to do. |
|
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By LeadRX: The dude delivered 6 bags of groceries to the wrong address, apparently her house is easily confused with her neighbors, when she went to get them the guy was leaving and she told him it was the wrong address. He didn’t take kindly to that and called her a stupid bitch and she said something along the lines of “get a real job asshole”, then he proceeded to try to run her over and beat the shit out of her. She has a concussion, severely bruised face, and two cracked ribs from him kicking her while she was unconscious. ETA: this happened in Waterbury. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By LeadRX: Originally Posted By burnka871: Wtf Was the driver ...disrespected perhaps? The dude delivered 6 bags of groceries to the wrong address, apparently her house is easily confused with her neighbors, when she went to get them the guy was leaving and she told him it was the wrong address. He didn’t take kindly to that and called her a stupid bitch and she said something along the lines of “get a real job asshole”, then he proceeded to try to run her over and beat the shit out of her. She has a concussion, severely bruised face, and two cracked ribs from him kicking her while she was unconscious. ETA: this happened in Waterbury. To be fair it sounds like she got equal treatment. Men have to conduct themselves appropriately because we all know that there is a line that can be crossed that will result in violence. Women on the other hand often hide behind the veil of femininity feeling quite comfortable they won’t get their ass kicked for talking out of hand, Just to be clear… I don’t think what he did was right, but if any man said that to another man in that situation we probably would see exactly how it sparked to violence. Also she’s not getting paid squat unless dudes girlfriends company pays. Can’t get blood from a stone. |
|
|
The “Three Stupid” Rule: “Do not go to stupid places, with stupid people, and do stupid things”
Religion is a handy device for keeping the philosophically deficient in line. |
Originally Posted By Cypher214: Interesting. Like I pointed out earlier, I've had several deliveries from men when the account showed an obviously female name. I wondered if they were doing it to avoid the background checks. View Quote They are typically doing it as a "side hussle". One person gets the account and they will sometimes do deliveries together or sometimes just one of them goes out and does them. It seems like a lot of people have little to no idea how people actually work those types of jobs. |
|
|
Originally Posted By LeadRX: What kind of attorney should she get? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By LeadRX: Originally Posted By Gspointer: Well, get an attorney. I don’t think she’ll be needing a real job for a while. Did the driver end up in jail? What kind of attorney should she get? The kind that breaks knees with a .45 |
|
|
Won’t this fall back on the girlfriend instead of instacart? I’m sure they have lawyers that will absolve them since their driver was not actually driving.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By fike: Apply that benchmark to everything. It’s an untenable slippery slope. Do you favor biometric sensors on firearms? View Quote I can’t open our manufacturers website or program a car without facial recognition. There’s no reason those apps couldn’t require it to “clock in”. |
|
|
And just like that, all the con law scholars on GD became tort experts.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By maslin02: I can’t open our manufacturers website or program a car without facial recognition. There’s no reason those apps wouldn’t require it to “clock in”. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By maslin02: Originally Posted By fike: Apply that benchmark to everything. It’s an untenable slippery slope. Do you favor biometric sensors on firearms? I can’t open our manufacturers website or program a car without facial recognition. There’s no reason those apps wouldn’t require it to “clock in”. And then the next person sues because it is easily defeated by having someone clock in for you….and on, and on. |
|
Don't you tell me about galaxies! I walk them in the timeline.
|
Originally Posted By fike: And then the next person sues because it is easily defeated by having someone clock in for you….and on, and on. View Quote Obviously it’s not fool proof, but from the employers perspective it would shift the blame to the employee pretty quickly. Big difference between “there’s nothing stopping Billy from working for Sarah” and “Sarah clocked Billy in to work on her account”. Here’s the time stamp, here’s GPS data, here’s the photo. |
|
|
Originally Posted By denverdan: It wasn’t even the actual instacart employee. It was her boyfriend. Op updated the original post. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By denverdan: Originally Posted By BoomFootShot: Yeah, I was debating on posting this. At first my emotional response was to sue! Sue everyone! But then I thought, “what if I owned that business?” I mean, if I did my due diligence, to make sure the potential employee wasn’t a danger, then how am I responsible if he flies off the handle? I’ve seen completely reasonable and responsible men lose it once in a while. So, in the end, unless instacart didn’t do a background check on this clown, it’s not on them. It wasn’t even the actual instacart employee. It was her boyfriend. Op updated the original post. Lucky thing the driver didn't shoot her dog. |
|
|
Originally Posted By JellyBelly: Sounds like Instacart's problem. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By JellyBelly: Originally Posted By Cypher214: A lot of good suing the driver is going to do. Sounds like Instacart's problem. I'm sure Instacart will say "the drivers are independent contractors" and try to wash their hands of all of it. |
|
Get Active or Get Disarmed! That means get involved in helping good candidates in primary and general election. That is in addition to being politically active once they are elected.
|
Originally Posted By Bat15: Beating a customer and shooting a dog that attacked the driver is not the same thing. Anyone attacked by a dog has the right to defend themselves. Unlike this incident, the driver did not flee and was not arrested. He or the woman driver or both are no longer independent contractors for the delivery service. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Bat15: Originally Posted By Sebastian_MacMaine: Originally Posted By 80085: However, dirtbag bf was acting as an agent of Instacart by likely getting the groceries from the store via the app and delivering the groceries via the app. I swear I just read another story exactly like this some time last week, before OP's coworker got attacked. Someone was expecting a female delivery driver, turned out to be a guy doing the delivery, and the guy attacked someone. There were even some photos and names of the should-have-been-the-driver, a black female. Edit: half a second after I clicked "submit" I remembered the thread: https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/-Completely-traumatized-Angie-Harmon-says-Instacart-driver-shot-and-killed-her-dog/5-2716973/ This one was in North Carolina and involved famous hot actress Angie Harmon, whose dog got shot by the actual driver (who wasn't the woman who was supposed to be delivering her groceries). Beating a customer and shooting a dog that attacked the driver is not the same thing. Anyone attacked by a dog has the right to defend themselves. Unlike this incident, the driver did not flee and was not arrested. He or the woman driver or both are no longer independent contractors for the delivery service. LOL. You meant being a pussy/sociopath and shooting a little old dog. You're right. It's not the same thing, but neither are excusable. |
|
"Positive rights" are neither.
Busy leaving people the F alone. |
Originally Posted By Kuhndog: To be fair it sounds like she got equal treatment. Men have to conduct themselves appropriately because we all know that there is a line that can be crossed that will result in violence. Women on the other hand often hide behind the veil of femininity feeling quite comfortable they won’t get their ass kicked for talking out of hand, Just to be clear… I don’t think what he did was right, but if any man said that to another man in that situation we probably would see exactly how it sparked to violence. Also she’s not getting paid squat unless dudes girlfriends company pays. Can’t get blood from a stone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Kuhndog: Originally Posted By LeadRX: Originally Posted By burnka871: Wtf Was the driver ...disrespected perhaps? The dude delivered 6 bags of groceries to the wrong address, apparently her house is easily confused with her neighbors, when she went to get them the guy was leaving and she told him it was the wrong address. He didn’t take kindly to that and called her a stupid bitch and she said something along the lines of “get a real job asshole”, then he proceeded to try to run her over and beat the shit out of her. She has a concussion, severely bruised face, and two cracked ribs from him kicking her while she was unconscious. ETA: this happened in Waterbury. To be fair it sounds like she got equal treatment. Men have to conduct themselves appropriately because we all know that there is a line that can be crossed that will result in violence. Women on the other hand often hide behind the veil of femininity feeling quite comfortable they won’t get their ass kicked for talking out of hand, Just to be clear… I don’t think what he did was right, but if any man said that to another man in that situation we probably would see exactly how it sparked to violence. Also she’s not getting paid squat unless dudes girlfriends company pays. Can’t get blood from a stone. No. If I was on the job and the customer yelled at me, I wouldn't beat the shit out of him, especially if I fucked up. |
|
"Positive rights" are neither.
Busy leaving people the F alone. |
|
|
If instacart is liable for contracting with that shopper, then whoever contracted with instacart to shop for them and deliver their groceries is even more liable than instacart. They started this whole chain of events by placing the order.
|
|
|
So he was a "straw deliverer"...
|
|
"They want you dead but will settle for your submission" - Malice
|
Originally Posted By Imzadi: If the groceries were delivered to the wrong address, then she wasn't the customer. She wasn't limited by the terms of service. View Quote The problem is Jane allowed her boyfriend Quayshawn to use her profile to deliver groceries for It is possible that |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By BoomFootShot: Yeah, I was debating on posting this. At first my emotional response was to sue! Sue everyone! But then I thought, “what if I owned that business?” I mean, if I did my due diligence, to make sure the potential employee wasn’t a danger, then how am I responsible if he flies off the handle? I’ve seen completely reasonable and responsible men lose it once in a while. So, in the end, unless instacart didn’t do a background check on this clown, it’s not on them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BoomFootShot: Originally Posted By Calculating: I know it won't be a popular opinion, but I think it's stupid to hold businesses financially accountable for employees actions. How the fuck can they predict human insane behavior. Yeah, I was debating on posting this. At first my emotional response was to sue! Sue everyone! But then I thought, “what if I owned that business?” I mean, if I did my due diligence, to make sure the potential employee wasn’t a danger, then how am I responsible if he flies off the handle? I’ve seen completely reasonable and responsible men lose it once in a while. So, in the end, unless instacart didn’t do a background check on this clown, it’s not on them. Wherever the liability lands, IC would probably be wise to slip her a sizeable enough settlement to shut up about it. The video getting out and being distributed would definitely make people think twice about using the service. Their position right now needs to be "how far can we go to make sure this is a happy customer and will talk about how quickly we resolved the issue?". Might be expensive, but not as expensive as the service being boycotted or avoided. Not too hard to turn the shit sandwich into lemonade if they're willing to cough up the bucks. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By JellyBelly: Sounds like Instacart's problem. View Quote If you took your boyfriend’s uniform to his job, and kicked the shit out of someone, you honestly think it’s the companies responsibility? They probably didn’t even know this was occurring. Oh, you want more laws and rules? Forced biometric checks? Etc. More regulation? From the government? It’s funny how quickly people flip flop their stance when it doesn’t fit the current narrative. |
|
|
Originally Posted By BoomFootShot: Or you don’t have the intelligence to think this situation through logically. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BoomFootShot: Originally Posted By TAG_Match: I haven’t been around here very long. But I know a troll post when I see one. Or you don’t have the intelligence to think this situation through logically. Yeah, okay: Duty owed - Deliver groceries without inflicting ass whoopin to client Duty Breached- Did not deliver groceries and whooped clients ass. Your move Aristotle |
|
|
Originally Posted By BoomFootShot: If you took your boyfriend’s uniform to his job, and kicked the shit out of someone, you honestly think it’s the companies responsibility? They probably didn’t even know this was occurring. Oh, you want more laws and rules? Forced biometric checks? Etc. More regulation? From the government? It’s funny how quickly people flip flop their stance when it doesn’t fit the current narrative. View Quote Nice red herring Professor Moriarty. A stolen police uniform wasn’t used as a ruse for a home invasion. A subbed, sub contractor was used to actually perform the duties set forth by the employer for expected remuneration by the employer. Ask your husband to explain it to you f you still don’t see the difference. |
|
|
Originally Posted By fike: This is very, very similar to double brokering in the trucking industry. I’m not aware of any instance of liability (absent of proof showing prior knowledge) or burdens placed on the cargo or load board owner for additional preventative measures beyond those required by law. In all cases, the original carrier is liable for the actions of the secondary carrier. View Quote Interesting |
|
I wouldn't stand in front of a piss-filled supersoaker. Does that make it a good pistol? - Caboose314
I thought I was covered for 22 cans, but the NFAids is a bitch when it mutates - themagikbullet |
Originally Posted By Gary_Plauche: I don't know why people use these services. I get it if you're disabled or something like that, but what did you do before these apps? Why invite total strangers to your house? Get in the car and go get your own shit and you won't have to pay their absurd charges. View Quote It looks like you're one of the poors and not making 87 gazillions an hour working from home. Only poors like you can afford to waste their precious time and go to a store and shop there rubbing shoulder with other poors. I don't use these services either because my butler's assistant is fully capable of doing this shit. |
|
|
Either way it was instacart’s contractor’s actions which lead to this woman’s injuries.
Don’t see how Instacart could weasel out of any liability here. If they could successfully not be responsible because an employee violated policy then that defense would be a bulletproof way to insulate anyone. A company would be immune from anything no matter what an employee/contractor did. |
|
|
@LeadRX
Is the douchebag in jail yet? |
|
The “Three Stupid” Rule: “Do not go to stupid places, with stupid people, and do stupid things”
Religion is a handy device for keeping the philosophically deficient in line. |
Originally Posted By Baddy: There was a case down here where a Best Buy delivery guy murdered an old lady and set her on fire in her home while delivering a refrigerator. Guy charged and convicted. Lady's family sued the sh#t out of Best Buy, JB Hunt (the contracted carrier), a subcontracted carrier, and both delivery drivers. Lawsuit was later dropped by the family with prejudice with no public notice of reason. But it's not hard to imagine all parties and their insurance wrote big checks to make things go away and the family be quiet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Baddy: There was a case down here where a Best Buy delivery guy murdered an old lady and set her on fire in her home while delivering a refrigerator. Guy charged and convicted. Lady's family sued the sh#t out of Best Buy, JB Hunt (the contracted carrier), a subcontracted carrier, and both delivery drivers. Lawsuit was later dropped by the family with prejudice with no public notice of reason. But it's not hard to imagine all parties and their insurance wrote big checks to make things go away and the family be quiet. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2020/01/11/deliveryman-accused-of-killing-boca-woman-at-21-years-old-i-threw-my-life-away/ According to transcripts of the statement, Lachazo said he lived with his mother and stepfather in Hialeah. He was born in Cuba and came to the United States in 2014 and completed two years at Miami Springs Senior High before getting his GED. He drove a late model Mustang and had a tattoo of its speedometer. .... When Lachazo is asked flat out if he uses any drugs, his response is always redacted from the transcript. When asked if he used drugs on the day of Udell’s delivery, he said no. However, a police report released after the attack said Lachazo admitted to recently using cocaine and marijuana through a vape pen. According to other records, a search of the truck Lachazo was driving in that morning found a black vape pen in the car’s cupholder, a glass pipe with an unknown residue and gray brillo pad inside a backpack belonging to Lachazo, and a lighter in the car’s front seat. He references “people” who he began to purchase marijuana from during high school. He said that a year and a half ago, he began to purchase another type of drug from them — the name of the drug is redacted from the transcript. Lachazo claimed these people had “touched” him a month prior and that he owed them money — so much so he was falling behind on his car payments. He said they called him to do things, “like robbery, like stealing.” If he didn’t, he said, they threatened to kill his mother. At one point, Lachazo claimed, a man was waiting for him outside of his home in Hialeah that morning. Lachazo said the man was waiting for him “to give him money, to give him the things.” Detectives ask Lachazo if these people directed him to attack Udell and rob her. “My mom,” Lachazo responds, repeatedly. Later he says, “Her or my mom.” Although Lachazo is consistent about referring to the “people” throughout the transcript, as well as fearing for his mother’s safety, whether that pressure is real is cast into doubt at other points. During the conversation, Lachazo said, “I see things lately.” Elsewhere he said, “Those people appear everywhere” and suggests they constantly bother him. Later, he talks of hallucinations and paranoia. “Sometimes I felt … someone was watching me or something,” he said. And this is why random drug spot checks are a thing, people. Drugs can break people prone to schizophrenia, causing events like this. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By LeadRX: The dude delivered 6 bags of groceries to the wrong address, apparently her house is easily confused with her neighbors, when she went to get them the guy was leaving and she told him it was the wrong address. He didn’t take kindly to that and called her a stupid bitch and she said something along the lines of “get a real job asshole”, then he proceeded to try to run her over and beat the shit out of her. She has a concussion, severely bruised face, and two cracked ribs from him kicking her while she was unconscious. View Quote Smart. |
|
|
Never make another person a priority when they merely see you as an option...
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs." |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.