Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 6
You Must Be Logged In To Vote

Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:09:24 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JarheadPatriot:
No Kari Lake?
View Quote
That actually surprises me!



Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:11:50 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ArmyInfantryVet:
It is a case against fake electors. And them trying to help steal an election.
View Quote


The people who stole the elections, are now in power.

Including this AG who won with like a 200 ballot lead.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:11:55 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Sokarul:
A grand jury reviews evidence figure out if charges are warranted. There must be evidence somewhere. The evidence should be made public but it could be many years.
View Quote





you sweet summer child.

Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:12:15 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:


Are you talking about nonsense thread titles that 87% of GD falls for?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:
Originally Posted By azjeeper:

Every time.


Are you talking about nonsense thread titles that 87% of GD falls for?


For a group that claims to be so rational and objective conservatives seem to be easily bamboozled.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:17:12 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nu3gawhat:


The people who stole the elections, are now in power.

Including this AG who won with like a 200 ballot lead.
View Quote


So many on this site enjoyed mocking Kari Lake who lost in the same questionable election that took out Abe.  Well elections have consequences.  Maybe AZ Republicans can unfuck themselves and start running fair elections.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:22:12 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:
Come on, OP. Were they indicted for being skeptical? Or were they indicted for casting fraudulent electoral college votes?
View Quote

Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:22:54 PM EDT
[#7]
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:29:56 PM EDT
[#8]
Let's revisit this thread when Giuliani is pleading guilty and apologizing.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:31:29 PM EDT
[#9]
Is that the right think?

Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:34:54 PM EDT
[#10]
i'm not "skeptical".

I am "extremely doubtful"

You know how I know?

Look how they are acting.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:35:25 PM EDT
[#11]
Any of you silly folks who think the institutions will allow trump to win are delusional.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:36:11 PM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:37:32 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mikhail_86:

God forbid it be a menthol though
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mikhail_86:
Originally Posted By redfish86:
These people need to be taken outside, blindfolded, tied to a post, offered a cigarette, and

God forbid it be a menthol though

We have no blindfolds, señor, we are a poor country!
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:40:02 PM EDT
[#14]
The crew who tried to submit "alternate electors" in Michigan are due back in court next week I think.  The debate is if they knew what they were attempting to do was illegal, or if they were just stupid.  Signs are pointing to stupidity.  Part of their defense is the communications they have from Trump's lawyer telling them that they could do it.  Certainly not a legal defense, but it might get them some leniency.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 10:44:30 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DKUltra:
That actually surprises me!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DKUltra:
Originally Posted By JarheadPatriot:
No Kari Lake?
That actually surprises me!


"Kari Lake, so irrelevant even AZ Democrats won't bother indicting her?"
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:05:19 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By yankee43:
These indictments are bullshit, but I think this will not turn out the way these people think it will go.

FINALLY, evidence of 2020 election fraud will be disclosed in court.

No court has been willing to hear any of the evidence so far, which is why the actual "Big Lie", that Joe Biden was elected, is bandied to this day.

Here's a start:

View Quote



do yourself a favor and never post that video again. It was proven that all of those allegations were so much made up BS that the Republicans who asked those people to speak Apologized to everybody.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:06:08 PM EDT
[#17]
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:07:41 PM EDT
[#18]
It is perfectly legal and constitutional to submit alternate electors.

IT IS IN THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION WORD FOR FUCKING WORD.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:08:43 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bikedamon:
The crew who tried to submit "alternate electors" in Michigan are due back in court next week I think.  The debate is if they knew what they were attempting to do was illegal, or if they were just stupid.  Signs are pointing to stupidity.  Part of their defense is the communications they have from Trump's lawyer telling them that they could do it.  Certainly not a legal defense, but it might get them some leniency.
View Quote


It should. I don't completely understand the fake elector thing, but it sounds like the kind of thing that should just be rejected not prosecuted. It is just a witch hunt for conservatives nothing more. We don't have a free country anymore.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:13:40 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Low_Country] [#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By wyomingnick:


It should. I don't completely understand the fake elector thing, but it sounds like the kind of thing that should just be rejected not prosecuted. It is just a witch hunt for conservatives nothing more. We don't have a free country anymore.
View Quote


Most states have laws dictating that the party whose candidate wins the state’s popular vote, gets to choose the state’s electors. Joe Biden won both Michigan and Arizona, so the democrats got to choose the state’s electors. But Republicans in those states, under direction and guidance from the Trump administration, submitted their own electors anyway. The cast electoral votes, the party certified them, and then submitted them to congress and the national archives as if they were the legitimate electors. Blatantly in violation of the law.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:14:21 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By gotigers:
It is perfectly legal and constitutional to submit alternate electors.

IT IS IN THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION WORD FOR FUCKING WORD.
View Quote


Lol you think they care about the constitution?
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:15:22 PM EDT
[#22]
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:17:21 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By gotigers:
It is perfectly legal and constitutional to submit alternate electors.

IT IS IN THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION WORD FOR FUCKING WORD.
View Quote



 No, it's not.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:22:23 PM EDT
[#24]
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:23:55 PM EDT
[#25]
As an FYI:

1) Under AZ Rules of Crim Pro 15.1:
(a)Initial Disclosures in a Felony Case. Unless a local rule provides or the court orders otherwise:
(1) the State must make available to the defendant all reports containing information identified in (b)(3) and (b)(4) that the charging attorney possessed when the charge was filed; and
(2) the State must make these reports available by the preliminary hearing or, if no preliminary hearing is held, the arraignment.
(b)Supplemental Disclosure. Except as provided in Rule 39(b), the State must make available to the defendant the following material and information within the State's possession or control:
(1) the name and address of each person the State intends to call as a witness in the State's case-in-chief and any relevant written or recorded statement of the witness;
(2) any statement of the defendant and any co-defendant;
(3) all existing original and supplemental reports prepared by a law enforcement agency in connection with the charged offense;
(4) for each expert who has examined a defendant or any evidence in the case, or who the State intends to call at trial:
(A) the expert's name, address, and qualifications;
(B) any report prepared by the expert and the results of any completed physical examination, scientific test, experiment, or comparison conducted by the expert; and
(C) if the expert will testify at trial without preparing a written report, a summary of the general subject matter and opinions on which the expert is expected to testify;
(5) a list of all documents, photographs, other tangible objects, and electronically stored information the State intends to use at trial or that were obtained from or purportedly belong to the defendant;
(6) a list of the defendant's prior felony convictions the State intends to use at trial;
(7) a list of the defendant's other acts the State intends to use at trial;
(8) all existing material or information that tends to mitigate or negate the defendant's guilt or would tend to reduce the defendant's punishment;
(9) whether there has been any electronic surveillance of any conversations to which the defendant was a party, or of the defendant's business or residence;
(10) whether a search warrant has been executed in connection with the case; and
(11) whether the case involved an informant, and, if so, the informant's identity, subject to the restrictions under Rule 15.4(b)(2).
(c)Time for Supplemental Disclosures. Unless the court orders otherwise, the State must disclose the material and information listed in (b) no later than:
(1) in the superior court, 30 days after arraignment.
(2) in a limited jurisdiction court, at the first pretrial conference.

So once the defendants are arraigned, they will have a pretty good idea of what evidence the AG believes they have.  And, I'm sure, we'll know soon after

2) In Arizona, speedy trial rights for someone who was never booked is 270 days.  Of course that can be extended by agreement of the parties or court order.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:25:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: eesmith] [#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Tallahasseezz:


So many on this site enjoyed mocking Kari Lake who lost in the same questionable election that took out Abe.  Well elections have consequences.  Maybe AZ Republicans can unfuck themselves and start running fair elections.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Tallahasseezz:
Originally Posted By nu3gawhat:


The people who stole the elections, are now in power.

Including this AG who won with like a 200 ballot lead.


So many on this site enjoyed mocking Kari Lake who lost in the same questionable election that took out Abe.  Well elections have consequences.  Maybe AZ Republicans can unfuck themselves and start running fair elections.
I mean yeah she's a retard and I tried explaining to the party how their strategy to badger everyone into voting in person election day only was a disaster in the making, but they didn't want to listen.

This shit is serious and they need to stop treating it like it's a fun game with nothing at stake instead of for all the marbles. "Elections have consequences" well no shit they do, maybe it's time to quick jerking off to grift bait and put in the work.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:27:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: bikedamon] [#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Smokey0844:
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/electoral-college-rogues-trump-clinton-232195

They got indicted right? Right?
View Quote


I know this is hard, but those people were actual electors.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:28:53 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Smokey0844:
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/electoral-college-rogues-trump-clinton-232195

They got indicted right? Right?
View Quote



Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:29:00 PM EDT
[#29]
Man, it's like some of you guys never had civics class in school.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:35:38 PM EDT
[#30]
We should go back to the losing candidate having to be the Vice President.  Can you imagine what a hoot that would be now?  The 12th Amendment fucked up on that one.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:39:34 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bikedamon:


I know this is hard, but those people were actual electors.
View Quote


So Polly Baca an elector from Colorado wasn’t an elector?
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:40:52 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bikedamon:
We should go back to the losing candidate having to be the Vice President.  Can you imagine what a hoot that would be now?  The 12th Amendment fucked up on that one.
View Quote


Make them both sit in the Oval Office facing each other too
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:42:55 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By seek2:
Link to the actual indictment FYI.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By seek2:
Link to the actual indictment FYI.
What a surprise!  The charges have nothing to do with skepticism and everything to do with fraud, forgery, and conspiracy to commit those crimes!

Originally Posted By Smokey0844:
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/electoral-college-rogues-trump-clinton-232195

They got indicted right? Right?
"Faithless" electors are real electors and being "faithless" is within the Constitutional power of an elector.

These guys are accused of impersonating electors and forging vote certificates and conspiracy.

Originally Posted By gotigers:
It is perfectly legal and constitutional to submit alternate electors.

IT IS IN THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION WORD FOR FUCKING WORD.
Please, please, please explain this claim!  I have got to hear this one!

Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:43:27 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HLB0302:


Make them both sit in the Oval Office facing each other too
View Quote

Trump would have convinced Biden to resign in exchange for two cookies and a ten year old within the first hour.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:45:31 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Smokey0844:


So Polly Baca an elector from Colorado wasn’t an elector?
View Quote


Do you understand the difference between a faithless elector and a fraudulent one?
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:49:43 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By fenderCAB:


Moth to flame...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By fenderCAB:
Originally Posted By Low_Country:
Come on, OP. Were they indicted for being skeptical? Or were they indicted for casting fraudulent electoral college votes?


Moth to flame...

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:52:37 PM EDT
[#37]
Not even going to waste my time reading it.  All these comie POS’s moving here has totally screwed this state to hell. Bet not a single one was born or raised here as far as AG or her supporters.  They suck .
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:55:03 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:


Most states have laws dictating that the party whose candidate wins the state's popular vote, gets to choose the state's electors. Joe Biden won both Michigan and Arizona, so the democrats got to choose the state's electors. But Republicans in those states, under direction and guidance from the Trump administration, submitted their own electors anyway. The cast electoral votes, the party certified them, and then submitted them to congress and the national archives as if they were the legitimate electors. Blatantly in violation of the law.
View Quote
You serious Clark??

Lets do talk about blantly violating the law, and Soros DA's and Judges who find technical caveats or just through blatant subversion throw out any legitimate attempts to stop the coup from happening.

Your version IS A VERSION, just not a realistic view.  I know you will side with the leftists judges and DA's put into place by Soros and Obammy.  This was systematic though.  It was/is real.  And those who deny haven't remotely studied the problem.  

Oh and YOU HAVE NO STANDING, how do you like them apples?
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:57:35 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:


Do you understand the difference between a faithless elector and a fraudulent one?
View Quote


I was confused. Read a bit more and I’m good. F’em imo but still doesn’t change that our government is banana republic corrupt and I inherently am skeptical about this case because of their past actions.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:57:35 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:


Do you understand the difference between a faithless elector and a fraudulent one?
View Quote
Do you understand proof TIME AND TIME AGAIN, only to be fraudulently thrown out.  All of election fraud.

It really happened dude.  They just had more people in charge in key places with the lawfare.  

If you even remotely deny it wasnt real, then you will have shown you haven't studied that election for even a few seconds.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:58:16 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:


Most states have laws dictating that the party whose candidate wins the state’s popular vote, gets to choose the state’s electors. Joe Biden won both Michigan and Arizona, so the democrats got to choose the state’s electors. But Republicans in those states, under direction and guidance from the Trump administration, submitted their own electors anyway. The cast electoral votes, the party certified them, and then submitted them to congress and the national archives as if they were the legitimate electors. Blatantly in violation of the law.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:
Originally Posted By wyomingnick:


It should. I don't completely understand the fake elector thing, but it sounds like the kind of thing that should just be rejected not prosecuted. It is just a witch hunt for conservatives nothing more. We don't have a free country anymore.


Most states have laws dictating that the party whose candidate wins the state’s popular vote, gets to choose the state’s electors. Joe Biden won both Michigan and Arizona, so the democrats got to choose the state’s electors. But Republicans in those states, under direction and guidance from the Trump administration, submitted their own electors anyway. The cast electoral votes, the party certified them, and then submitted them to congress and the national archives as if they were the legitimate electors. Blatantly in violation of the law.


It seems like that would be easy enough just to ignore. I don't get this forgery part. They didn't forge someone else's name did they ? They claimed to be an elector, if it was obvious they weren't then just ignore it. It seems the courts are making it bigger then it was.

Would have never happened if Trump won and democrats summited fake electors.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:58:55 PM EDT
[#42]
Fascists.
Link Posted: 4/24/2024 11:59:25 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lug1:
You serious Clark??

Lets do talk about blantly violating the law, and Soros DA's and Judges who find technical caveats or just through blatant subversion throw out any legitimate attempts to stop the coup from happening.

Your version IS A VERSION, just not a realistic view.  I know you will side with the leftists judges and DA's put into place by Soros and Obammy.  This was systematic though.  It was/is real.  And those who deny haven't remotely studied the problem.  

Oh and YOU HAVE NO STANDING, how do you like them apples?
View Quote


All I’m doing is telling you what the law is, and what the state GOPs did. Don’t shoot the messenger.
Link Posted: 4/25/2024 12:00:30 AM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:


All I'm doing is telling you what the law is, and what the state GOPs did. Don't shoot the messenger.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Low_Country:
Originally Posted By Lug1:
You serious Clark??

Lets do talk about blantly violating the law, and Soros DA's and Judges who find technical caveats or just through blatant subversion throw out any legitimate attempts to stop the coup from happening.

Your version IS A VERSION, just not a realistic view.  I know you will side with the leftists judges and DA's put into place by Soros and Obammy.  This was systematic though.  It was/is real.  And those who deny haven't remotely studied the problem.  

Oh and YOU HAVE NO STANDING, how do you like them apples?


All I'm doing is telling you what the law is, and what the state GOPs did. Don't shoot the messenger.
What good is fucking law when the election was a fraud?  FUCK IT MAN.  They wanted it this way.  Give it to them.
Link Posted: 4/25/2024 12:01:29 AM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DKUltra:
Well?

12% of GD are fucking liberal commie shills
View Quote

Those twats don't even hide their distain for us anymore. Give them a keyboard and a few vodka and sodas and they will argue all night how right they are. Sad just sad they hate us.
Link Posted: 4/25/2024 12:01:52 AM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote


Multiple Democrat representatives voted against confirming the last 4 Republican presidents, yet….muh insurrection!
Link Posted: 4/25/2024 12:03:01 AM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mikhail_86:
I'm skeptical, I wanna be indicted
View Quote

Same here. Pick me! Pick me!
Link Posted: 4/25/2024 12:03:44 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Smokey0844:


I was confused. Read a bit more and I’m good. F’em imo but still doesn’t change that our government is banana republic corrupt and I inherently am skeptical about this case because of their past actions.
View Quote


No worries. Faithless electors are an actual thing. Nothing makes a legitimate elector beholden to a certain candidate. But that is completely different than fake electors submitting electoral college votes as if they were legitimate electors.
Link Posted: 4/25/2024 12:04:11 AM EDT
[#49]
Now do Stacey Abrams and Hildebeast. I seem to recall them denying election results
Link Posted: 4/25/2024 12:04:41 AM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By cwm1150:
For fucks sake

Commies coming out of the wood work. That AG needs to be fired.
View Quote

I had something else in mind, but whatever.
Page / 6
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top