User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
GA, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:17:31 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AZCOP: Alito just called all leftist prosecutors out for doing this to interfere with his election bid. Jay He has the special counsel stammering a bit |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:18:47 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TinSpinner: He has the special counsel stammering a bit Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TinSpinner: Originally Posted By AZCOP: Alito just called all leftist prosecutors out for doing this to interfere with his election bid. Jay He has the special counsel stammering a bit He's circling back. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:18:53 AM EDT
[#3]
'Mostly peaceful'
 Jay |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:19:22 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TinSpinner: He has the special counsel stammering a bit |
|
|
|
OH, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:20:01 AM EDT
[#5]
LOL Gorsuch pulls out the "mostly peaceful protest" for the second time this week. Nice.
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:23:06 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By glklvr: Both her and Sotomayor. Complete morons that a first year law student could outwit. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By glklvr: Originally Posted By azjeeper: Justice Brown comes across as a box of rocks. Both her and Sotomayor. Complete morons that a first year law student could outwit. Sotomayor showed a brain once in awhile at the Circuit Level. Brown is an absolutely awful DEI pick. I personally know jurists who also wouldn't be qualified for that seat, but would be better than her. Though, at least she didn't rule on the constitutionality of legislation she helped draft, like Kagan did in the Obamacare case. I guess that's something. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:23:37 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Kihn]
[#7]
We just want to make special exceptions to prosecute a president just a tiny little bit.
|
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:24:55 AM EDT
[#8]
can someone clear my question up? is the claimed immunity for things done while trump was president or afterwards? (or both)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:25:50 AM EDT
[#9]
 LIVE: Supreme Court weighs Trump's bid for immunity from prosecution |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:28:14 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RLR350: Kagan and Jackson, Biden’s attorneys disguised as Supreme Court Justices, are arguing no immunity should apply. Trump’s lawyer is arguing absolute immunity does not exist. Impeachment is the remedy for official acts. Robert’s is trying to bring some sanity back to the questioning. “You’re arguing that a former president can be prosecuted because he is being prosecuted.” Directed at the special counsel. The special counsel is saying political prosecutions won’t happen because of the checks and balances in place. Laughable. They will argue no immunity until Dem President gets accused of something |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:28:15 AM EDT
[#11]
Wow. Tagged to follow while working.
|
|
|
|
OR, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:29:40 AM EDT
[#12]
Michael Dreeben needs to be charged with a crime of being a douche, and election interference.
He's been around the block PUSHING all these fake Trump charges with Jack. These traitors need to be taking a dirt nap imho. |
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:30:25 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wvfarrier: They will argue no immunity until Dem President gets accused of something Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wvfarrier: Originally Posted By RLR350: Kagan and Jackson, Biden’s attorneys disguised as Supreme Court Justices, are arguing no immunity should apply. Trump’s lawyer is arguing absolute immunity does not exist. Impeachment is the remedy for official acts. Robert’s is trying to bring some sanity back to the questioning. “You’re arguing that a former president can be prosecuted because he is being prosecuted.” Directed at the special counsel. The special counsel is saying political prosecutions won’t happen because of the checks and balances in place. Laughable. They will argue no immunity until Dem President gets accused of something That's exactly what I was thinking. If any of Bidens crimes ever come before a court they will change their tune. Alito was eluding to that a few minutes ago. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:30:43 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By azjeeper: Justice Brown comes across as a box of rocks. Ketanji, like Daktari? Yeah, vapid as fuck. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:33:58 AM EDT
[#15]
Gorsuch asked Dreeban(justice department counsel)what would happen if a president held a sit in and had a mostly peaceful protest in front of congress.
Because he objects to a piece of legislation that’s going through. In fact, delays those proceedings. Technically, that would be interrupting an official proceeding. Gorsuch asked Dreeban if that is prosecutable or not prosecutable at its core? Some official acts congress can criminalize and some they can’t. Dreeban’s answer was “probably not” This is kind of restating Jan 6 IMO. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:36:20 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kharn: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/195/e8443-17133410384245-1920_jpg-3197422.JPG Are you an Eastern or Central Floridian? Kharn Panhandle is best Floridian. |
|
|
|
VEN
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:37:24 AM EDT
[#17]
summary for those that cannot listen?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:38:24 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 6SJ7GT]
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TinSpinner: That's exactly what I was thinking. If any of Bidens crimes ever come before a court they will change their tune. Alito was eluding to that a few minutes ago. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TinSpinner: Originally Posted By wvfarrier: Originally Posted By RLR350: Kagan and Jackson, Biden’s attorneys disguised as Supreme Court Justices, are arguing no immunity should apply. Trump’s lawyer is arguing absolute immunity does not exist. Impeachment is the remedy for official acts. Robert’s is trying to bring some sanity back to the questioning. “You’re arguing that a former president can be prosecuted because he is being prosecuted.” Directed at the special counsel. The special counsel is saying political prosecutions won’t happen because of the checks and balances in place. Laughable. They will argue no immunity until Dem President gets accused of something That's exactly what I was thinking. If any of Bidens crimes ever come before a court they will change their tune. Alito was eluding to that a few minutes ago. "No reasonable prosecutor..." We have already heard that line. It only goes one way. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:38:38 AM EDT
[#19]
What ?
Get the AG to sign off on what ever the Prez wants to do, and he's immune? Jay |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:39:35 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ZuoZongtang: Gorsuch asked Dreeban(justice department counsel)what would happen if a president held a sit in and had a mostly peaceful protest in front of congress. Because he objects to a piece of legislation that’s going through. In fact, delays those proceedings. Technically, that would be interrupting an official proceeding. Gorsuch asked Dreeban if that is prosecutable or not prosecutable at its core? Some official acts congress can criminalize and some they can’t. Dreeban’s answer was “probably not” This is kind of restating Jan 6 IMO. At least congress won't reap the whirlwind. |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:40:01 AM EDT
[#21]
This very interesting and the arguments would open up a serious can of worms. Sounds mostly like the DOJ is going for a power grab, usurping the power of the President, much like the commissars did in Soviet Russia under the Bolsheviks as arbitrators of what the President may do.
I do not think the reasonable justices are having it. The usuals suspects are all 🤡 show it seems. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:40:23 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By R2point0: Tag for the random speculation and ranting. That's why I'm jumping in! |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:40:37 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alex_F: TLDR: for those of us in Teams meetings who can't watch the video? This please! This Teams meeting is killing me. I want to stab out my eardrums. OFFS, as I typed this the HR lady just announced we are changing payroll systems AGAIN. Good grief that’s 3 times in 2 years. Please give me some SCOTUS good news to bring back my will to live. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:40:41 AM EDT
[#24]
Michael Dreeben sounds super gay.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:41:28 AM EDT
[#25]
If this prosecution is allowed to go through, you can be certain every prez will pardon himself for anything they did before he leaves office.
Dreeben is an idiot to think otherwise. Jay |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:42:09 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By jd2395: summary for those that cannot listen? Orange man is bad, that's about all the DOJ is basing their argument on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:42:36 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Blackbeard28: Michael Dreeben sounds super gay. He says the same things that I've read some people on here saying. Almost like talking points. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:44:15 AM EDT
[#28]
When does SCOTUS vote on this?
|
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:44:19 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Blackbeard28: Michael Dreeben sounds super gay. That seems to be a requirement to be a part of the current administration |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:46:02 AM EDT
[#30]
6-3 against Trump. As usual, he chose the wrong hill to die on. No previous POTUS has ever claimed absolute presidential immunity.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:46:54 AM EDT
[#31]
tag for later
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:47:44 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wesr228: That's why I'm jumping in! Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By wesr228: Originally Posted By R2point0: Tag for the random speculation and ranting. That's why I'm jumping in! Tagged for the eventual 20 page thread slide by the_crew where they keep repeating the same wrong things over and over and pretend they haven't been shot down dozens of times already. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:47:57 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: She is going to be another O'Connor. the female version of Roberts on the Court. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Kihn: Originally Posted By amos1909: Originally Posted By Meathook: Barret was a bad hire. I don't trust her. She is going to be another O'Connor. the female version of Roberts on the Court. 
|
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:49:17 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MikeJGA: 6-3 against Trump. As usual, he chose the wrong hill to die on. No previous POTUS has ever claimed absolute presidential immunity. I think it will be 6-3 or 5-4 in favor of Trump based on what I've heard so far. The DOJ has a weak argument. |
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:49:28 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By azjeeper: Justice Brown comes across as a box of rocks. It should be clear to everyone by now that she wasn’t placed on the USSC because of her scholarly and judicial acumen. |
|
|
KY, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:52:11 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wineraner: Sotomayor showed a brain once in awhile at the Circuit Level. Brown is an absolutely awful DEI pick. I personally know jurists who also wouldn't be qualified for that seat, but would be better than her. Though, at least she didn't rule on the constitutionality of legislation she helped draft, like Kagan did in the Obamacare case. I guess that's something. Sotomayer and Kagan are not dumb really they are just diehard leftists. Brown is 100% stupid |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:52:33 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TinSpinner: I think it will be 6-3 or 5-4 in favor of Trump based on what I've heard so far. The DOJ has a weak argument. Their response to the question of malicious prosecution has basically been that yes it could happen but it won’t because trust us. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:52:48 AM EDT
[#38]
Call me crazy, but somewhere there has to be a crime, doesn't there? So far Trumps has not been convicted of a crime anywhere that I can remember, at least one that was legit and not made up, bought and paid for by the democraps.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:52:59 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By buck19delta: They didn’t get picked for scotus seats because they were the BEST / SMARTEST candidates available.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:53:56 AM EDT
[#40]
My only fear is, if Trump get immunity, the Left will use that to gin up the retards to get Biden in and pack the court.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:54:23 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryOriginally Posted By ExtraHardTaco: Originally Posted By buck19delta: They didn’t get picked for scotus seats because they were the BEST / SMARTEST candidates available. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/this-gif-793.gif May want to rename her to Kamtaji Diversity Hire, similar to Kareen Diversity Hire. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:54:59 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By S58DRIVER: Diversity hire... 100% |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:55:15 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MikeJGA: 6-3 against Trump. As usual, he chose the wrong hill to die on. No previous POTUS has ever claimed absolute presidential immunity. Obviously you aren't paying too close of attention. It's the Left claiming that Trump is angling "absolute Presidential immunity". But maybe you are repeating yourself. Trump is hanging his hat on "Impeachment by the Legislative branch is the only remedy Constitutionally available to hold a President accountable". |
|
|
|
SC, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:56:47 AM EDT
[#44]
If there is not immunity, can we go back and prosecute BHO for killing Americans with drones without due process?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 11:59:54 AM EDT
[#45]
Alito asks about a fictitious hotly contested and close election.
He talked about Third World countries, historically that have thrown out an incumbent and then toss them in jail. So he put the question to him about a bitter political opponent tossing the loser in jail. Of course, Dreeban said that wouldn’t happen here. In other words, take your loss and argue about in court. |
|
|
|
AZ, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 12:00:52 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AZshooter71: It should be clear to everyone by now that she wasn’t placed on the USSC because of her scholarly and judicial acumen. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AZshooter71: Originally Posted By azjeeper: Justice Brown comes across as a box of rocks. It should be clear to everyone by now that she wasn’t placed on the USSC because of her scholarly and judicial acumen. Painfully apparent. |
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 12:00:58 PM EDT
[#47]
If a President closed the border is he liable? What if he abolished the border?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 12:01:53 PM EDT
[#48]
Trump 2024!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 12:02:24 PM EDT
[#49]
IMO judging by the scope of questions being asked that it’ll go Trump’s way. Not really because of him but because of the can of worms the DOJ is opening up and they admit there’s really no safe guards against corruption other than to place trust in the DOJ to do the right thing and this would put future administrations at risk of malicious prosecution by their opponents.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2024 12:05:36 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By atavistic: If there is not immunity, can we go back and prosecute BHO for killing Americans with drones without due process? That's the same thing Pool and others have been saying- this has the potential to open a door that would cause all sorts of problems but the dems must feel confident they're going to be in charge from now on. Given the actions, or more specifically non-actions, of most RINOs, they're probably right. And yeah, despite having no law training, I'm pretty sure I could do a little reading and hold my own against Brown- like so many other DIE hires she's dumb as a box of rocks and less useful. 
|
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
