Quoted:
Yes, Dam Neck is running GPNVG's. No, it is not the only goggle in their armory. Yes, it is possible that GPNVG's were present on the raid. Yes, there are movies coming out about the raid. No, they will not be accurate because the guys that did the hit will not talk to the media, let alone Hollywood. Yes, the White House has loose lips concerning national security in a bid to show off the administration's so-called foreign policy. No, their account of what happened is not accurate.
Yes, the Hurt Locker was an entertaining movie. No, it was not at all accurate except to show guys in ACU's with M4's in the desert. No, the gear depicted was not entirely accurate. No, the tactics depicted were not accurate either. Yes, SME's intentionally lead Hollywood astray so they depict military (particularly SOF personnel) TTP's inaccurately so the uninitiated (including our enemies) will see it and think (ah, so that's how it's done." Yes, the Hurt Locker was a shitty movie from the technical aspect. Yes, they did get some things right such as some individuals' reactions with PTSD and others' need for the drug that is the rush of combat. No, these topics are not security risks.
Anyhoo, the GPNVG is a pretty amazing device, but it is not perfect. The 97 degree FOV is awesome because it actually makes CQB a more feasible prospect under goggles. With regular goggles, I do not advocate CQB under goggles. It's too fast an activity and the outcome is almost completely reliant on the ability to instantly observe and process everything in your sector, determining as quickly as possible if a threat is present, and then the ability to process the bad guys is too much to effectively do under standard goggles. Pano's change this somewhat. But, this technology is still in its infancy. The GPNVG's are cool, but they are huge. The weight is not as bad as you might think and the remote battery pack does help with counterweight. But, Tier 1 units are the guys who test this new tech, so Dam Neck and CAG are the guys that see it first. But, if you have a ton of cash and want to run these cool toys too, contact us and we can get you hooked up.
Hi Chip,
Good post.
But what can I say? You know how worked up I get over little things like faked NV footage... It just encourages bad photoshopped images in magazine and advertisements. I guess I just like to see real images where it counts. Like here in the forum. Or the ones you took last year.
Nice pic and goggles too. Four 18mm tubes instead of 16mm tubes? Impressive. Nice set of gear also in the pics. You guys have all the best stuff.
But there's still one unanswered question... Is there a video recording add-on for the GPNVG? After all, the stuff that makes a normal PVS-14 act like a SENVG attaches to the rear ocular and screws in - but I wasn't aware of any such attachment points on the GPNVG?
I'd love to know if there is? ( unless that's something that can't be discussed here ).
As for the practical side of faking NVG?s Well, it may not hurt the US military, but the Australian military recently acquired VBS2 for training, and based on the released footage, it's completely incapable of producing realistic NV scenario's. And this is something they use for training!. Probably because the people who create the games have no idea how NVGs look. They have no familiarity with them. All they know is everything is green, so they make it like that. Then apply all the daylight models.
OK, I am rambling on... I will go sit quietly by the blackboard and write a hundred times "I will not get worked up over zero dark thirty's fake NV images"...
David.