Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 8/28/2013 6:07:38 PM EDT
Thought I would ask the Hive.  I have 1 MKE AT-94K SBR and 1 MKE AT-94K pistol.  SBR has a folding stock, but was looking at getting a wood G3 stock and modifying it to fit, meaning one would be sitting while the other is mounted.  Is that legal?  





Pics found via the net.  Thanks




Link Posted: 8/28/2013 8:02:45 PM EDT
[#1]
To me, that's a gray area. I've had this discussion with some on this board before and there are many folks out there that will tell you that if you have the parts to assemble an SBR but have not filed a form 1, then you breaking the law. The discussion at the time was about having the components even within the same premises. Basically, inside your house.

My defense was, how is one supposed to have spare parts then (which is your very scenario)? Or what if one is acquiring parts for a new build.

Is either side of the argument wrong? I guess that would be for the ATF to decide. BUT, here is some black and white taken directly off of the ATFs FAQ.


Q: May a FFL or an individual legally possess the parts to manufacture an SBR or SBS as long as no firearms are actually assembled?

A FFL (Type-7 or Type-10) who pays the Special Occupational Tax (SOT) may possess parts required to assemble NFA firearms. A non-licensee or FFL who has not paid the SOT is required to register any NFA firearm via an ATF Form 1 (5320.1) prior to acquisition of the parts required to assemble such firearm.


Again, I would argue until the death if I had parts for a separate build that could be misconstrued as parts for an SBR. In your case, you do have a registered SBR so it may be a non issue. However, that spare stock could once again be misconstrued as a stock for your pistol. See the cat and mouse game there?
Link Posted: 8/28/2013 9:10:12 PM EDT
[#2]
Yes, completely legal.

Since you have an SBR, there is a legal use for the wood G3 stock. Doesn't matter that only one stock can be mounted at a time; nor does it matter that the stock could fit the pistol.

The ATF has ruled that if there is both a legal and an illegal way to use a part, it would be assumed that the part would be used legally (unless actually found mounted on the pistol). See "rule of lenity" on page 2, first paragraph under "unassembled parts kits."

http://www.kwikrnu.com/BATFE%20opinion%20letters/atf-ruling-2011-4%20pistol%20to%20rifle%20to%20pistol%20conversion.pdf
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top