I just saw this thread today.
The U.S. Supreme Court might want a word with the PA. Court.
7th circuit out of Chicago, in Ezell I and Ezell II vs city of Chicago ruled some years ago, target shooting is a corrolary right to the 2A its self. Therefor to stop someone from target shooting, REQUIRES a substantial public SAFETY issue to infringe on someones 2n A rights by preventing someone from target shooting .
Including on their own property.
Now the above is paraphrased , but EZELL I and EZELL II are both very specific , because at the time , Chicago was useing very similar tactics to prevent shooting ranges in the city limits , to what new york city has been trying to do to prevent people from carrying inside city limits.
There have already been 2 federal rulings in PA. affirming the right to use private shooting ranges as long as it is done in a safe manner.
I suspect this Pa. Supreme Court ruling is an attempt to circumvent those.
No need to panic.
We are winning.