User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:39:33 PM EDT
[#1]
Do you have a link to the H.B.? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:39:50 PM EDT
[#2]
Nothing on thomas.loc.gov. Still shows last action as 3/19/2007. If it has been pulled, maybe it will be updated overnight.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:40:00 PM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:41:46 PM EDT
[#4]
Don't know about it being withdrawn but she did introduce a high cap magazine ban, including no transfers for grandfathered mags. Feinstein still has her AW ban out there. McCarthy is going for what she knows she can get. Pushing through a high cap mag ban will be a piece of cake. All they have to do is claim the shooter could not have shot as many people if he didn't have high caps. The Dems control the house and senate, the Republicans in the Senate have voted in favor of gun control many times, and Bush said he would sign an AW Ban so it goes without saying that he would sign a portion of that legislation as well.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:43:17 PM EDT
[#5]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:44:04 PM EDT
[#6]
Here's Carolyn McCarthy commenting on her assault weapons ban:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ospNRk2uM3U#GU5U2spHI_4 |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:47:32 PM EDT
[#7]
 ...Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:49:48 PM EDT
[#8]
What an idiot! Let's get her to sign a petition ending womens suffrage.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:52:09 PM EDT
[#9]
I dont think he had high caps!! and
 about the youtube!!! Stupid Nappyheaded Ho!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:52:29 PM EDT
[#10]
+1, the suffrage of women needs to stop. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:52:52 PM EDT
[#11]
That was a riot - it appears she stammered something about the barrel shroud being a folding stock!! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:53:56 PM EDT
[#12]
OK....cuz its in your legislature.... +1000
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:57:36 PM EDT
[#13]
It hasn't been withdrawn. She introduced a new bill. I believe it is HR 1889. This goes along with HR 297 and HR 1022.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 5:59:01 PM EDT
[#14]
... how her constituents can keep her in office is beyond me
|
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:00:01 PM EDT
[#15]
It's the thing that goes up  . What a stupid beyotch.
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:03:36 PM EDT
[#16]
BTW Thomas still shows that HR 1022 is in sub comittee and her new bill was submitted within hours of the shooting.
Funny Both Cho and Carolyn were mailing their manifestos off at almost the same time. Two psychos. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:04:26 PM EDT
[#17]
That was funnier than $hit. Another person that don't know the difference between a buttstock and broomstick. The guy asked her "what a barrel shroud is," she didn't anwser his quiestion, and started rambling about something else. You can tell she memorized all of this BS and just started talking.  Now that is one dangerous lady, making laws she knows nothing about. I guess you don't have to be very smart in order be a Congress(wo)man.
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:11:47 PM EDT
[#18]
Yet another case for retroactive abortion.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:12:39 PM EDT
[#19]
What is really scarry is that if she, the sponsor of the bill, doesn't know what is in it there are a great number of supporters or co sponsors whom will vote for it and have even less knowledge of what they are voting for.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:16:21 PM EDT
[#20]
who was the interviewer? god that must have felt great...he was just like "no"
And, is there an "ugly" prerequisite for those who intend to proposing a firearms ban or something? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:16:43 PM EDT
[#21]
Actually two new bills; H.R. 1859 to ban high capacity magazines and H.R. 1895 (I wonder if there is some significance in the 59/95 numbering) which is supposed to improve stolen firearm tracking (can you say registration?), requires more FFL inspections and the ever popular "for other purposes". No text on either is available yet on thomas.loc.gov. The funny thing is she may be right on H.R. 297. Improved access to mental health records for NICS would probably have flagged the VT shooter as a wack job. These hourly news updates on this guy are absolutely stunning. This guy was known to be a missing alot of his marbles yet NICS had no record of any problems including the court action against him. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:21:46 PM EDT
[#22]
What a stupid bitch
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:22:39 PM EDT
[#23]
Aardvark: I reserve judgement on this woman. She should've researched what is what before she inro'd the bill.
Predicting human behavior is a very inexact science. What's going to happen is that the govt is going to err on the safe side and say this guy is crazy, when he isn't. Think about the liability issues for the govt, and the doctors. What happens if the docs pronounced this person as sane, and shoots up the place? I've met some kooky people in my life. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:26:46 PM EDT
[#24]
It's dead, she just doesn't realize it yet. And I'm saying this with all respect for those who died, but 4/16 will also be known as the day the gun control died. It turned more people to our side than we realize. Now all you chicken little's go ahead and call me an idiot.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:28:32 PM EDT
[#25]
NICS is supposed to have adjudications of "mental defect" listed. The failure to report what is already required by law does not make mccarthy right. HR 297 will give the feds unquestionable access to all of our medical records. Some people claim HR 297 is nothing more than a funding bill for the brady act. BS. The brady act contained funding provisions. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:30:20 PM EDT
[#26]
Would this qualify as a high cap?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:31:38 PM EDT
[#27]
no if your right I'll build a shrine in your honor. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:34:11 PM EDT
[#28]
+1 I'd bet money against that. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:34:23 PM EDT
[#29]
man o man o man...you guys really have no idea how much impact that had on making my night!!!!!!! i will be laughing about that dumb bitch on msnbc for i do not even know how long! thats the most classic thing ever! own.T |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:35:23 PM EDT
[#30]
I think it would be a mistake to underestate her and the Dems, remember everyone who though the '94 AWB was dead, and all of sudden they sprang to life and bit us in the @$$. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:39:49 PM EDT
[#31]
We need to be sure that whomever runs against her in the next election uses that video to show that she is trying to legislate things she knows nothing about.
That "clip" should be used by every Republican running for office period, just to show how a typical liberal thinks and acts. What a dumb bitch. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:41:15 PM EDT
[#32]
I dunno, I'll take the man's word that he'll build a shrine in my honor.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:44:10 PM EDT
[#33]
Barrel shroud as in heat dissapating handguard? And if she doesnt know what it is then who is it that is thinking this stuff up? Couldnt any weapon that is an assault rifle fall into whatever defintion they make it with the barrel shroud deal?
I wonder who feeds her this info she knows nothing about??? Hmmmmm |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:45:29 PM EDT
[#34]
OH SHIT.....THATS GOLD RIGHT THERE!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:45:56 PM EDT
[#35]
High capacity mags had nothing do to with the number of people he killed.
If he had used a 1911, they would still be bitching, It would just be about ".45 being to powerful for civilian use" or ".45 cal rounds are student killer bullets" It doesn't matter what the killer uses as a weapon the gungrabbers will always find a way to say that gun control could have prevented it. As a matter of fact, the most likely way to have prevented this would have been LESS gun control "Gun Free School Zones"...... my ass. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:46:33 PM EDT
[#36]
he reloaded the mags by hand. no large cap ban would change that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:51:06 PM EDT
[#37]
nope...the solution to that problem is simply what this guy did...carry enough mags to get the job done. just makes me sick that they (libs, media) cant see the obvious much less past it... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:53:08 PM EDT
[#38]
tag for later
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:57:12 PM EDT
[#39]
That right there is as good as a stack of pornos. . .  ETA: And, on the on topic side of things, I've heard a lot of people say how gun control wouldn't have affected this one bit, non gun people even. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 6:57:28 PM EDT
[#40]
on the other hand how can she ban something she doesn't know? lets all ban widgets!!!111 do it for the children |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:03:47 PM EDT
[#41]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:08:17 PM EDT
[#42]
link |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:17:28 PM EDT
[#43]
Tucker Carlson. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:19:41 PM EDT
[#44]
I agree with you 100%. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:20:30 PM EDT
[#45]
Made my night. |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:43:14 PM EDT
[#46]
I like gun control. Not that hard to do though with a little range time.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:50:47 PM EDT
[#47]
I certainly hope you're right |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:50:52 PM EDT
[#48]
H.R. 1022 is not only still an active bill, it gained three new sponsors on the day of the VT shootings.
In addition to that bill McCarthy has introduced H.R. 1859 which is basically the magazine restriction language of H.R. 1022 by itself. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 7:52:37 PM EDT
[#49]
I've said it once, and I'll say it again; Carolyn McCarthy is a tool.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2007 8:00:00 PM EDT
[#50]
If you have recently uploaded this video, you may need to wait a few minutes for the video to process. |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
