User Panel
Posted: 2/22/2007 8:09:52 PM EDT
|
|
|
|
|
Good read. But I suppose it's all made up because according to ARFCOM there is nothing wrong with the M16. |
||
|
i didnt know vickers was a ol dboy. ill talk to my uncle, see what kind of man he really is.
|
|
HUH?! What kind of guy "he really is"... The guy was a Firearms INSTRUCTOR for SFOD-D for christs sake. Go to Vickers Tactical. Here's a little "snipit" of his Military background....
|
||
|
Thats an option. Of course so is taking the bolt apart and cleaning the sumbitch. These guys are Rangers. It really bothers me that THEY had problems with thier extractors. Thier are only two reasons for a FTE. If the extractor is defective, DX it for a new one. If it is dirty, clean it. If you know you are having FTEs, but you carry a cleaning rod instead of cleaning/DXing your extractor, I really dont know what to tell you. Yes, I am aware the Army supply system can be a bitch (I've got my fingers crossed that when I go to drill this month they will finally have a XL MICH waiting for me, not to mention a XL bottom half of the new fleece cold weather gear, now that winter is over ). Im also aware that a new extractor costs about $15. This is NOT 1965. The fact that the AR-15 family of weapons has to be cleaned and lubricated is no longer considered new information. |
|
|
A former Ranger who was on that mission commented on another forum. He more or less said that they were very very short on support and parts so their rifles did not get the armorer level replacement of worn parts like they needed.
They were shooting a LOT and not able to replace weapons when they were worn out. Not a cleaning issue. |
|
Maybe if soldiers cleaned them. A lot of pogues (yes, I know pogues are different than the 'real' men of the military) I've seen in Iraq had weapons so dirty, it make civilian AR owners cringe and question what we are teaching folks in the military.
|
|
no disrespect meant, but im gonna seek out first hand knowledge of his character. people are people anywhere you go, not everybody gets along. before i take his word as law, im gonna get more information. |
|||
|
You should take heed infsqdldr and not offend the mighty vickers, some of the guys here get on their knees and suck his ... you know what. I'm curious to know what "perks" he gets for telling the world how vastly superior an HK product over others. |
||||
|
C'mon guys... let's use a little common sense here.. as one Poster put it.. the Army Times is not exactly the most accurate rag out there. So take anything in that article with a grain..
As to LAV.. I think he has a pretty established set of credentials. I'm sure he has some strong opinions based on way more experience then 95% of any of us on this board. Does that make him the Gospel?? No, but I respect his opinion and acknowledge his experience and would expect you would treat him the same way you should treat anyone who has served his country with honor and distinction for over 20 years. I think has has earned that from everyone here.. |
|
|
|
|
For me the Army Times was good for one thing………Promotion Point Scores!
|
|
And IIRC it is actually printed by USA Today. |
||
|
Who's sucking his dick? I've never met the guy myself. He does have opinions, just like everyone else, and you don't have to agree with him. You may want to "take heed" on what he says though, as he has more experience in combat arms than 99.99% of the people on this board. He was an Operator and INSTRUCTOR, for the WORLDS best Combat Shooters/CT Unit. Infsqdldr, I don't think that anyone would make it to his position, especially in that Unit, with major character flaws. EDIT: Forgot about the HK comment. Vickers helped design the HK416 for his Unit. He did work for HK after retiring, but is no longer on their payrole. |
|
|
Gannet Media.. one of the big News media conglomerates.When I retired.. I let my subscription go.. have not misses it..
|
|
I agree with you about the “dragging down” of the site. |
|
|
i believe he worked on the first version of the hk45 as well. there was a small tight group in delta back in the early days, and i need to get more information before i can explain. my dad got some old books when my grandfather died a few mos ago, a couple were about the early days of delta. ill try to get ahold of them and share the info/pics. no disrespect meant, i just dont trust industry professionals opinions as easily anymore. i think its mainly because of the break in threads. sorry for the misdirection, i want to find out more info on delta using/testing the hk416. i know a distinguished service medal awardee ill try to get some info from. |
||
|
I've heard from an Industry source the HK416s are beating themselves to death.
|
|
Whether it's the HK 416, Colt M4 or whatever, it's still using that questionable M855 round. What we need is a new gas piston upper for the AR lowers and a 6.8mm SPC round, that should solve a lot of problems. Hey if it cost $1B purchase 1MM new infantry weapons (at $1K each), or even less to swap out an upper, that's only a single B-2 bomber, right? I say, let's go for it.
|
|
From a logistical standpoint the proposition of changing calibers at this stage of the game would be a nightmare. If you have been in any sort of dealing with the Army supply system you know this. They had a heck of a time trying to standardize a new cold weather cap and gloves...issues are not limited to, but would include:all the .5.56mm ammo in storage, getting FN to rechamber the Minimi platform, getting appropriate spare parts unique to the new caliber out, replacing all those magazines... |
|
|
The Units that are issued the HK416, along with the White SOF, have Mk262 (77gr BH) available. They are not limited to M855. The 6.8 is not going to happen. |
|
|
It's hilarious how angry people here get when someone dares to criticize the AR. The ARMY TIMES has no horse in this race. They just print what their reporting uncovers. It's not enough proof to the diehards that the most elite choose a piston. It's like trying to convince someone to change thier religion. You guys will argue to the end
Its the soldiers fault for not cleaning enough...blah blah blah. Any one with military experience will know that its hard enough to get a soldier to show up at the right place, at the right time. and in the right uniform. It only makes sense to field a weapon that requires the average joe to spend less time pulling maintenance. I don't care what the weapon is 416 or whatever. A weapon is a tool. I will use the best tool available to me. I like my M4 just fine. Its the only choice we have. That does not make it the best. |
|
May I ask, what's the significance of that? Are you referring to the operating rod acting on the "carrier key?" |
|
|
Wow. Just wow. |
|
|
The 416 is a step in the right direction. It's just a baby step. The next military weapon should offer a lot more IMHO
|
|
Hey legion, are you in the military? I would hope that you are but the context of your message makes it sound like your not, just a guy that knows something about the military. Enlighten me about your status.
Your comment angers me to the core. POGs (Personnel Other than Grunts) are not guilty of cleaning their weapons any less than a 11B. It is soldiers that clean or don't clean thier weapons. Do you think that the enemy stops to ask the guy in a HMMWV if he is an 11B or something else before he blows them into the next life? NO, he dosent. You are disrespecting all the non-11B soldiers out there that have died with your comment. Do you think that all the non-11B soldiers that have died weren't real men or women? Please tell me you are in the military, I can understand a service member saying the stuff you have but not a civilian. Sorry for ranting in this thread but that was uncalled for. Comments like that from people that just don't know are what really hurts great places like this. |
|
But with that said, it's also important to keep in mind that the Army, as lead service in ALL small arms research and acquisition, is pretty messed up in this area. They have little unity of management and oversight in weapons development and utterly fail at the "one mission, one boss" concept in this area-something that's not at all new. When the M14 was developed there were enormous differences of opinion about it even after McNamera ordered its adoption; enough differences that high ranking officers openly defied the Secretary and held back on procurement actions. It happened again with the M16. To say that "the official Army position on the HK416 is..." does not have the force it should because the Army is often at war with itself on small arms issues. The "official" Army position is neither the final word nor something carved in stone, and that's bad for Soldiers, bad for the Army, and bad for the United States. |
|
|
I think the HK416 will or would be a much better choice over the M-16 as you dont always have time to strip the M-16 down and clean it and oil it during combat situation.If the HK416 can do the job they say by being buried in sand and water and go several thousand rounds and function properly without cleaning or oiling then it would be a much better weapon for the folks getting issued the rifle!!Just a scenario just got done cleaning the M-16 then have to get in a very dirty situation where you submerge your weapon in sand,water or muddy enviroment and we all know what to expect from the basic M-16Alot of guys you see since the 60s do what they can to grab and switch over to a AK-47 from Asia to Iraq and only for 1 reason,Reliabilty as the AK is not any more accurate but will function every time they pull the trigger in these conditions!!
|
|
I was wondering if it was just me. |
|
|
Gannett --- that's that Al Neuharth guy (owner and columnist in USAToday) ... ain't he vehemently anti-gun ?? |
|
|
Yes ****** That article was typical HK propoganda. Remember how great the XM-8 was? All the M-4 malfunctions they detailed in that article were due to the colse-toleranced bolt and carrier jamming with sand. The HK 416 has the same parts there, and would have exactly the same problems in a sandy environment. |
||
|
I bet it gets lost in all the red tape of procurement. It will cost the Pentagon big bucks to replace the inventory. same with the 6.8mm ammo. I don't think it will happen for a long time.
The M16A2 came out in what... 1983? When I left in 1987 I never even heard of the thing, and I was in a front line Infantry unit in Germany. USAEUR usually gets all the toys first. 84 to 85 in Ft Hood and we still had the steel pot while USAEUR had the k-pot. change will come, but not for a while. Unless of course some General wants it now, like the berets... |
|
But - But - But - That cant be! I've seen several videos where HK reps lay it in the sand with ejection port closed, cover it up, uncover it and fire without problem! |
|
|
There IS nothing wrong with the M16 - it does everything it's designed to as well-as if not better than everything else available.... Those of us with significant recent experience (pre 90s doesn't count) pretty much agree on that... Now, folks who have never picked up a USGI M16 in the past 5-10 years... That's another story... And the Army Times is owned by USA Today... They're good for pay-charts, new medals, and the latest 'WTF is DC going to screw us with next' gossip... That's about it... They don't know jackshit about guns... But then again, neither do the folks at 'Guns & Ammo'.... Oh, BTW... The 'Army Times' gun people LOVE HK... They also write what they think their readers want to read... 'M16 works fine, no replacement required' doesn't sell papers as well as 'This could be your next rifle'... |
|||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.