Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 265
Posted: 1/7/2018 11:35:39 AM EDT
[Last Edit: pezboytate]
United States Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) Upper Receiver Group, Improved (URG-I) and Naval Special Warfare (NSW) Upper Receiver Group, Improved (URG-I)

This thread is for pictures of and discussion about issued URG-Is and clones. That doesn't include "inspired by" rifles, "my take on an URG-I" rifles, Geissele Duty rifles, Geissele Super Duty rifles, or anything else. Please post those pictures here, here, or here.

Parts list for issued USASOC URG-I and NSW URG-I rifles:

Lower Receiver Group

lower receiver- M4A1

receiver extension- standard M4/M4A1

action spring- standard M4/M4A1

buffer- H2

grip- standard M16A2/M16A3/M16A4/M4/M4A1

stock- Type I, Type IIA, Type IIB, Gen 1 SOPMOD

trigger- Geissele SSF- P/N 05-102

selector- Colt/Manufacturing Support Industries full auto ambi- P/N SP401017

USASOC 14.5" Upper Receiver Group, Improved- from conversion kit NSN 1005-01-671-3911

upper receiver- standard M4/M4A1

bolt carrier group- standard M16A4/M4/M4A1

charging handle- Geissele Airborne Charging Handle in Desert Dirt Color with subdued markings- P/N 05-664S- NSN 1005-01-672-4803

barrel- Daniel Defense 14.5" mid length "GOV" profile with .076" gas port- P/N 07-077-07308

gas block- Daniel Defense pinned gas block which only comes on their rifles and URGs or barrel assemblies. Not available separately.

gas tube- Daniel Defense mid length- P/N 04-013-18034

hand guard- Geissele 13.5" MK16 in Desert Dirt Color- P/N 05-650S- NSN 1005-01-672-4794 (MK16s with no markings, laser P/N markings, and stamped NSN markings have all been seen in pictures)

M-LOK rail section- 3 ea Magpul 7 slot aluminum- P/N MAG582-BLK

M-LOK sling mount- Magpul QD- P/N MAG606-BLK

muzzle device- SureFire 4 prong flash hider- P/N FH556RC

suppressor- SureFire SOCOM in Dark Earth- P/N SOCOM556-RC

rear BUIS- Matech

front BUIS- Knight's Armament Front Flip Sight in Taupe P/N 99051

NSW 14.5" Upper Receiver Group, Improved- from conversion kit NSN 1005-01-671-3911

upper receiver- standard M4/M4A1

bolt carrier group- standard M16A4/M4/M4A1

charging handle- Geissele Airborne Charging Handle in Desert Dirt Color with subdued markings- P/N 05-664S- NSN 1005-01-672-4803

barrel- Daniel Defense 14.5" mid length "GOV" profile with .076" gas port- P/N 07-077-07308

gas block- Daniel Defense pinned gas block which only comes on their rifles and URGs or barrel assemblies. Not available separately.

gas tube- Daniel Defense mid length- P/N 04-013-18034

hand guard- Geissele 13.5" MK16 in Desert Dirt Color- P/N 05-650S- NSN 1005-01-672-4794 (MK16s with no markings, laser P/N markings, and stamped NSN markings have all been seen in pictures)

M-LOK rail section- 2 ea Magpul 7 slot aluminum- P/N MAG582-BLK

M-LOK light switch mount- Magpul Tape Switch Mountig Plate- P/N MAG631

M-LOK rail covers- 2 sets Geissele Rail Panel, Desert Dirt Color- P/N 04-428S

M-LOK sling mount- Magpul Paraclip- P/N MAG607-BLK

muzzle device- SureFire 4 prong flash hider- P/N FH556RC

suppressor- SureFire SOCOM in Dark Earth- P/N SOCOM556-RC

rear BUIS- Matech

front BUIS- Knight's Armament Front Flip Sight in Taupe P/N 99051

USASOC 11.5" Upper Receiver Group, Improved- from conversion kit NSN 1005-01-684-1906

upper receiver- standard M4/M4A1

bolt carrier group- standard M16A4/M4/M4A1

charging handle- Geissele Airborne Charging Handle in Desert Dirt Color with subdued markings- P/N 05-664S- NSN 1005-01-672-4803

barrel- Daniel Defense 11.5" "GOV" profile- P/N 07-077-07108

gas block- Daniel Defense pinned gas block which only comes on their rifles and URGs or barrel assemblies. Not available separately.

gas tube- Daniel Defense carbine length- P/N 04-013-01009

hand guard- Geissele 10.5" MK16 in Desert Dirt Color- P/N 05-1073S

M-LOK rail section- 3 ea Magpul 7 slot aluminum- P/N MAG582-BLK

sling mount- Magpul QD- P/N MAG606-BLK

muzzle device- SureFire 4 prong flash hider- P/N FH556RC

suppressor- SureFire SOCOM in Dark Earth- P/N SOCOM556-RC

rear BUIS- Matech

front BUIS- Knight's Armament Front Flip Sight in Taupe

NSW 11.5" Upper Receiver Group, Improved- from conversion kit NSN 1005-01-671-3911

upper receiver- standard M4/M4A1

bolt carrier group- standard M16A4/M4/M4A1

charging handle- Geissele Airborne Charging Handle in Desert Dirt Color with subdued markings- P/N 05-664S- NSN 1005-01-672-4803

barrel- Daniel Defense 11.5" "GOV" profile- P/N 07-077-07108

gas block- Daniel Defense pinned gas block which only comes on their rifles and URGs or barrel assemblies. Not available separately.

gas tube- Daniel Defense carbine length- P/N 04-013-01009

handguard- Geissele 10.5" Mk16 in Desert Dirt Color- P/N 05-1073S

M-LOK rail section- 2 ea Magpul 7 slot aluminum- P/N MAG582-BLK

M-LOK light switch mount- Magpul Tape Switch Mountig Plate- P/N MAG631

M-LOK rail covers- 2 sets Geissele Rail Panel, Desert Dirt Color- P/N 04-428S

M-LOK sling mount- Magpul Paraclip- P/N MAG607-BLK

muzzle device- SureFire 4 prong flash hider- P/N FH556RC

suppressor- SureFire SOCOM in Dark Earth- P/N SOCOM556-RC

rear BUIS- Matech

front BUIS- Knight's Armament Front Flip Sight in Taupe P/N 99051

10.3" Upper Receiver Group, Improved
NOT issued


Specs:

13.5" Mk16 mass- 419 g / 14.8 oz
14.5" barrel mass- 723g / 1 lb 8.1 oz
14.5" URG-I mass- 1.89kg / 4 lb 3 oz (14.5" RIS II URG with Govt profile barrel and same muzzle device is 2.00kg / 4 lb 7 oz)

10.5" Mk16 mass- 353 g / 12.5 oz
11.5" barrel mass - 620g / 1 lb 5.9 oz
11.5" barrel with gas block mass- 581g / 1 lb 4.5 oz
11.5" URG-I mass- 1.72kg / 3 lb 13 oz (10.3" RIS II URG with Govt profile barrel and same muzzle device is 1.71kg / 3 lb 12 oz)

9.3" Mk16 (not issued, only included for reference) mass- 335 g / 11.8 oz
10.3" barrel (not issued, only included for reference) mass - 525 g / 1 lb 2.5 oz
10.3" barrel with gas block (not issued, only included for reference) mass- 563 g / 1 lb 3.9 oz
10.3" URG-I (not issued, only included for reference) mass- 1.64kg / 3 lb 10 oz (10.3" RIS II URG with Govt profile barrel and same muzzle device is 1.71kg / 3 lb 12 oz)

Known upper receivers used on issued 14.5" URG-Is:
Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File


Known BCGs used in 14.5" URG-Is:
Attachment Attached File


14.5" URG-I gas blocks:
Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File


If you have any pictures that show issued upper receiver or BCG markings, please post them.

If you have any pictures of gas blocks on post testing issued URG-Is that are different, please post them.
Link Posted: 1/9/2024 12:12:34 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tanodized:

In addition to Sig's own published materials posted earlier, this article from SolSys shows the Tango 6T version submitted to SOCOM was the WSOT61233 featuring the M855A1 Hellfire reticle.

https://soldiersystems.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/3EBA59A6-5C35-4846-98CC-6FE16C33B668.jpeg

However, after final selection SOCOM then wanted Sig to replace the wire reticle with a new glass etched Tremor8; providing them an additional ten-million dollar contract to make the engineering change. That triggered Leupold to protest the entire contest, resulting in what seems to have been a multi-year protracted delay in deployment of the SU-293.

The legal determinations of those proceedings along with any potential settlements or accommodations are still unclear. What is evident are Sig S-VPS's starting to be observed on URG-I's. Those scopes being equipped with glass etched FL-6 Hellfire reticles, and Sig no longer manufacturing or making available for sale their previous wire reticle designs to include the SOT61233.

So all that is to say that yes, the SOT61230 has the same FL-6 reticle as the SOTSVPS, because the M855A1 Hellfire reticle is not the actual SOCOM reticle (anymore.) Hopefully that clears it up.

https://i.imgur.com/sOvQLpt.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/41vNvcy.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/dZgv4az.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/9P9spm2.jpg
View Quote
So what makes the SIG optic better than the Vortex? Reticle? Weight?
Link Posted: 1/9/2024 2:35:05 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By FreefallRet:
So what makes the SIG optic better than the Vortex? Reticle? Weight?
View Quote

I can only speculate, but let's assume the Razor was competing alongside the Tango6 in the SFP component of S-VPS solicitation. While unlikely, it's entirely possible that Vortex outperformed in every category except price. Sig had just previously been awarded the Squad Designated Marksman Rifle optic contract and after the S-VPS would go on to secure the Army's Direct View Optic selection. So on the contrary it's fair to argue the Tango6 has merit from multiple evaluations.



Perhaps a more interesting subject matter is the inverse of your question: Why would SOCOM purchase the Razor 1-6x (adopted as the SU-300) when it already had a new SFP scope in the pipeline?

Again, this is only conjecture. I believe it came down to timing and availability. The Gen IIE's NSN was established in November 2020, two years after the Sig was selected in October of 2018. Yet we're just now starting to see Sig's get fielded, whereas the Vortex scopes have been prevalent for some time (though exclusively with Rangers.)

The Leopold protest and resultant litigation caused a delay in procurement of the SU-293 that Regiment seemed to have been unwilling to wait for. That, or maybe USASOC never intended purchase of those MAS-D optics for the 75th to begin with. For that matter I haven't seen any ATACR's in their unit either.

In whichever case, the adoption of the Razor comes as a result of Rangers being forced or simply choosing to do their own thing.













Link Posted: 1/9/2024 3:44:13 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tanodized:

I can only speculate, but let's assume the Razor was competing alongside the Tango6 in the SFP component of S-VPS solicitation. While unlikely, it's entirely possible that Vortex outperformed in every category except price. Sig had just previously been awarded the Squad Designated Marksman Rifle optic contract and after the S-VPS would go on to secure the Army's Direct View Optic selection. So on the contrary it's fair to argue the Tango6 has merit from multiple evaluations.

https://i.imgur.com/oxSm947.jpg

Perhaps a more interesting subject matter is the inverse of your question: Why would SOCOM purchase the Razor 1-6x (adopted as the SU-300) when it already had a new SFP scope in the pipeline?

Again, this is only conjecture. I believe it came down to timing and availability. The Gen IIE's NSN was established in November 2020, two years after the Sig was selected in October of 2018. Yet we're just now starting to see Sig's get fielded, whereas the Vortex scopes have been prevalent for some time (though exclusively with Rangers.)

The Leopold protest and resultant litigation caused a delay in procurement of the SU-293 that Regiment seemed to have been unwilling to wait for. That, or maybe USASOC never intended purchase of those MAS-D optics for the 75th to begin with. For that matter I haven't seen any ATACR's in their unit either.

In whichever case, the adoption of the Razor comes as a result of Rangers being forced or simply choosing to do their own thing.

https://i.imgur.com/Tzu428c.png
https://i.imgur.com/O2crVwp.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/2GDFwOs.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/8ZIKJvv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/c8GT9Xl.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/u8LCQRM.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/d17k5vN.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/gSNeeVv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/yT234if.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/6mDfZ97.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/955rc7j.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/7ArCoyY.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/oK77fVX.jpg
View Quote

Is that a Modlite head?

Link Posted: 1/9/2024 4:07:06 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By officerX:

Is that a Modlite head?

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/335460/Capture_PNG-3088055.png
View Quote


Not just a head that’s the whole light.  I’ve seen a handful.  
Link Posted: 1/9/2024 7:50:07 PM EDT
[#5]
75th Ranger

Link Posted: 1/9/2024 11:55:24 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BlueShirtGuy:
75th Ranger

https://i.postimg.cc/4ymtwNTT/20240109-174208.jpg
View Quote



That's a fuck ton of glass for a 14.5" barreled rifle..................................I bet that bitch is heavy especially with that raptor up top
Link Posted: 1/11/2024 9:47:23 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BlueShirtGuy:
75th Ranger

https://i.postimg.cc/4ymtwNTT/20240109-174208.jpg
View Quote


Back to the weight room
Link Posted: 1/12/2024 3:53:12 PM EDT
[#8]
It’s killing the die hards but tech the industry as a whole has finally surpassed the old days of self innovation and there are no longer rules in the clone game aside from a specific barrel really.  Build the bitch the way that works for you just like units do.  I love it the possibilities are endless and minus a few specific parts clone game is fun again
Link Posted: 1/12/2024 6:59:02 PM EDT
[#9]
Sorry if this has come up but are non cage code Colt uppers making it around inventory? I have a spare one and was debating using it for my URG-I but I'd rather wait for the numbers or use a Mueller instead if it ain't fully correct.
Link Posted: 1/13/2024 1:42:17 AM EDT
[#10]
Going back to the Tango6T.

So the DVO FFP is NOT correct anymore? The SFP 6T will be correct going forward?
Link Posted: 1/13/2024 5:42:37 AM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Sevatar:
Sorry if this has come up but are non cage code Colt uppers making it around inventory? I have a spare one and was debating using it for my URG-I but I'd rather wait for the numbers or use a Mueller instead if it ain't fully correct.
View Quote

I would say 95% URG-I uppers are non cage coded.  Remember they were rebuilt using existing uppers off URGs already in service.

CD
Link Posted: 1/13/2024 6:29:22 AM EDT
[Last Edit: WittyTiger] [#12]
Anyone remember what page the correspondence with the vortex rep was on regarding their contract 30mm mount? Hell of a time trying to find it.
Link Posted: 1/13/2024 8:05:45 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WittyTiger:
Anyone remember what page the correspondence with the vortex rep was on regarding their contract 30mm mount? Hell of a time trying to find it.
View Quote

254.

They didn’t say much:
Link Posted: 1/13/2024 11:24:18 AM EDT
[#14]
GBs







Link Posted: 1/13/2024 4:57:29 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote


Thank you very much, I thought it was in the 100s but I was dead wrong.
Link Posted: 1/14/2024 3:20:47 AM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History

Wow!  Is that a Vortex Crossfire in Pics 1 and 3?  I haven't seen those issued.
Link Posted: 1/14/2024 11:13:57 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tanodized:
Definitely seems to be a thing.

https://i.imgur.com/mefUSqm.jpg
View Quote

So is this an actual mil spec ATACR, or just a mil spec  illumination cap installed?
Link Posted: 1/14/2024 11:26:07 PM EDT
[#18]
Am I going to get a clone demerit for having my razor in a 1.93” reptilia mount?

Any reference pics knocking around out there or should I just sell/trade it for the G?
Link Posted: 1/15/2024 12:46:36 AM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By imdBman:

Wow!  Is that a Vortex Crossfire in Pics 1 and 3?  I haven't seen those issued.
View Quote


Not issued. Probably unit or personally purchased.

I got 2 of those on Unity mounts, so I can have a budget clone optic.
Link Posted: 1/16/2024 5:07:08 PM EDT
[#20]
Quick question - have they tested the Razor Gen 2 enough that they've decided backup irons are not needed any more? I don't see them in the pics. Thanks for any info.
Link Posted: 1/16/2024 5:24:58 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ar15ken:
Quick question - have they tested the Razor Gen 2 enough that they've decided backup irons are not needed any more? I don't see them in the pics. Thanks for any info.
View Quote

I don't think that decision has been made specifically in regards to the Razor, but it is common to not see backups. I believe the decision has more to do with a command's policies on the matter. Reminds me of something I heard about 15 or 20 years ago when one of the MEU's required their Marines to have iron sights on their weapons at all times so there were a few pics of guys with an ACOG up top and a carry handle in an obscure location on their M5 handguard.

Also, with fewer and fewer QD mounts out there, it's a bit of a hassle to take your Geissle or NF mount off in order to flip your irons up (but you should have the tools on hand in case you do need it off). That's why offset sights, whether red dot or irons, are pretty popular.
Link Posted: 1/16/2024 6:30:05 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WittyTiger:
Going back to the Tango6T.
So the DVO FFP is NOT correct anymore? The SFP 6T will be correct going forward?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WittyTiger:
Going back to the Tango6T.
So the DVO FFP is NOT correct anymore? The SFP 6T will be correct going forward?

The DVO is an Army program for their infantry M4A1's and NGSW. SOCOM has redundant capability with the SFP S-VPS. So it's unlikely you would ever see a DVO scope on a URG-I. But who knows, check back in five years once some National Guard SFG unit has had time to do weird things.


Originally Posted By FreddyPG:
So is this an actual mil spec ATACR, or just a mil spec  illumination cap installed?

Given the previous assertion these all roll off the same line and assembly process, what's the difference? The only thing I can tell you for certain is that it came from Night Force this way.
Link Posted: 1/16/2024 10:52:27 PM EDT
[#23]
I'm surprised no one has posted this yet: FDE Mark 5HD

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 1/18/2024 11:45:25 AM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By FreddyPG:

So is this an actual mil spec ATACR, or just a mil spec  illumination cap installed?
View Quote

I believe that is an actual MILSPEC ATACR.So I just dove into this for a different reason. I had to talk to people that use these scopes.  The MILSPEC marked battery cap is on ATACR's that are issued to non SOCOM units. The SOCOM contract scopes like Nightforce just released have non marked stepped caps and are FDE. The commercial ATACR has " ATACR 1-8X24 F1" on the battery cap. The dot matrix on the MILSPEC black ATACR is put on at the unit where as the SOCOM contract scope the dot matrix is included in the rectangle label  and is put on by Nightforce.
I probably explained that wrong so Tiny Crumb or Combat Diver can correct what I messed up. I saw a picture of one of these MILSPEC marked caps last week and wondered what they were on so I asked some guys that would know.
Link Posted: 1/18/2024 12:14:57 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:

I believe that is an actual MILSPEC ATACR.So I just dove into this for a different reason. I had to talk to people that use these scopes.  The MILSPEC marked battery cap is on ATACR's that are issued to non SOCOM units. The SOCOM contract scopes like Nightforce just released have non marked stepped caps and are FDE. The commercial ATACR has " ATACR 1-8X24 F1" on the battery cap. The dot matrix on the MILSPEC black ATACR is put on at the unit where as the SOCOM contract scope the dot matrix is included in the rectangle label  and is put on by Nightforce.
I probably explained that wrong so Tiny Crumb or Combat Diver can correct what I messed up. I saw a picture of one of these MILSPEC marked caps last week and wondered what they were on so I asked some guys that would know.
View Quote



Does the entire reticle tree illuminate on these Milspec marked ATACR’s that are the non SOCOM model people are receiving?
Link Posted: 1/18/2024 12:48:51 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By stickyheat:



Does the entire reticle tree illuminate on these Milspec marked ATACR’s that are the non SOCOM model people are receiving?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By stickyheat:
Originally Posted By Samson-Dogg:

I believe that is an actual MILSPEC ATACR.So I just dove into this for a different reason. I had to talk to people that use these scopes.  The MILSPEC marked battery cap is on ATACR's that are issued to non SOCOM units. The SOCOM contract scopes like Nightforce just released have non marked stepped caps and are FDE. The commercial ATACR has " ATACR 1-8X24 F1" on the battery cap. The dot matrix on the MILSPEC black ATACR is put on at the unit where as the SOCOM contract scope the dot matrix is included in the rectangle label  and is put on by Nightforce.
I probably explained that wrong so Tiny Crumb or Combat Diver can correct what I messed up. I saw a picture of one of these MILSPEC marked caps last week and wondered what they were on so I asked some guys that would know.



Does the entire reticle tree illuminate on these Milspec marked ATACR’s that are the non SOCOM model people are receiving?

I do not have a milspec marked. I bought one of the socom contract scopes and I have only had time to mount it to my gun. I have not played with it yet.
Link Posted: 1/18/2024 9:35:30 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
I'm surprised no one has posted this yet: FDE Mark 5HD

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/262192/mark_5hd_3_6-18x44_m5c3_fde_185067_p-1_1-3097246.JPG
View Quote



Well sum'bitch I knew they would but damn I'm impressed!!  I will buy one this summer for sure..............
Link Posted: 1/19/2024 12:06:48 AM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tanodized:
Given the previous assertion these all roll off the same line and assembly process, what's the difference? The only thing I can tell you for certain is that it came from Night Force this way.
View Quote

I don’t think a tan mil-spec has ever been spotted in the wild. Only mil-specs I’ve seen are black and with JSOC SMUs (24th & dev). And those ones have different illumination than civilian atacrs. They may be made at the same facility but they’re not the same exact scope as the civilian ATACR.

So, only plausible guess I have is either a) someone accidentally engraved civilian atacrs with the wrong marking and NF either didn’t notice or didn’t care and sold them to distributors anyway…

Or

NF maybe marks all of their mil-sold ATACRs that way (for reasons like ITAR etc…) and maybe some random mil unit (maybe not even U.S.) bought some that were tan and newer reticles and these are an overrun or cancellation from that order that NF decided to sell to distributors.

Just random guesses. But either way I haven’t seen evidence of any U.S., mil group with tan “mil-spec” ATACRs, and I especially guess we’d never see that in any SOCOM unit given their access to S-VPS.
Link Posted: 1/19/2024 1:28:52 AM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By tanodized:

I can only speculate, but let's assume the Razor was competing alongside the Tango6 in the SFP component of S-VPS solicitation. While unlikely, it's entirely possible that Vortex outperformed in every category except price. Sig had just previously been awarded the Squad Designated Marksman Rifle optic contract and after the S-VPS would go on to secure the Army's Direct View Optic selection. So on the contrary it's fair to argue the Tango6 has merit from multiple evaluations.

https://i.imgur.com/oxSm947.jpg

Perhaps a more interesting subject matter is the inverse of your question: Why would SOCOM purchase the Razor 1-6x (adopted as the SU-300) when it already had a new SFP scope in the pipeline?

Again, this is only conjecture. I believe it came down to timing and availability. The Gen IIE's NSN was established in November 2020, two years after the Sig was selected in October of 2018. Yet we're just now starting to see Sig's get fielded, whereas the Vortex scopes have been prevalent for some time (though exclusively with Rangers.)

The Leopold protest and resultant litigation caused a delay in procurement of the SU-293 that Regiment seemed to have been unwilling to wait for. That, or maybe USASOC never intended purchase of those MAS-D optics for the 75th to begin with. For that matter I haven't seen any ATACR's in their unit either.

In whichever case, the adoption of the Razor comes as a result of Rangers being forced or simply choosing to do their own thing.

https://i.imgur.com/Tzu428c.png
https://i.imgur.com/O2crVwp.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/2GDFwOs.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/8ZIKJvv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/c8GT9Xl.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/u8LCQRM.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/d17k5vN.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/gSNeeVv.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/yT234if.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/6mDfZ97.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/955rc7j.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/7ArCoyY.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/oK77fVX.jpg
View Quote
Thanks,
 I have a second URG-I with a eotech, eyes are getting old and trying to decide between a SIG or another Razor.

I really like the Razor, so guess it will be another Razor when the time comes.

RLTW!
Link Posted: 1/19/2024 4:59:40 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Combat_Diver:

Because the majority of SOF forces had purchased their M4A1s back in 95'.  Only MARSOC is newly formed, and I haven't seen their guns yet.  Those in Astan were Theater Property Equipment (TPE).  Units here have additional guns on TPE and those currently are all Colt in my AO.
View Quote


CD does this still stand? No FN Lowers?

A buddy told me he saw some while at range 37 with URGI uppers but i don't know if he was mistaken...

And are black eotechs starting to pop up??
Link Posted: 1/20/2024 5:11:21 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Combat_Diver] [#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By bravenport:


CD does this still stand? No FN Lowers?

A buddy told me he saw some while at range 37 with URGI uppers but i don't know if he was mistaken...

And are black eotechs starting to pop up??
View Quote

There are very few FN M4A1s in Groups in my experience due to timelines.  I haven't been to Range 37 since 97' when I graduated SFARTAET so can't commit on current weapons there.

I haven't seen any black EoTechs recently
Link Posted: 1/20/2024 10:51:18 AM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Combat_Diver:

There are very few FN M4A1s in Groups in my experience due to timelines.  I haven't been to Range 37 since 97' when I graduated SFARTAET so can't commit on current weapons there.

I haven't seen any black EoTechs recently
View Quote


Makes sense, thank you for your reply.

Excuse my ignorance, but do you think SWCS had different purchasing timelines and inventories compared to Groups?

I was digging for FN pictures last night and stumbled across SMA Grinston with a black eotech at range 37 of all places... couldn't find any clear pics of the lowers.

Interesting.

Link Posted: 1/26/2024 1:02:01 PM EDT
[#33]
Is there a issued suppressor cover for the RC?
Link Posted: 1/26/2024 1:45:22 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BlueShirtGuy:
Is there a issued suppressor cover for the RC?
View Quote

Not that I'm aware of.
Link Posted: 1/26/2024 6:32:33 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Combat_Diver:

Not that I'm aware of.
View Quote


Thanks CD. Are you seeing any used? The mirage out of the NF scope is awful on 8x.
Link Posted: 1/26/2024 6:44:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: LsuJon] [#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BlueShirtGuy:


Thanks CD. Are you seeing any used? The mirage out of the NF scope is awful on 8x.
View Quote
Not CD obviously but I've seen a good amount of mod tags being used in photos.
Link Posted: 1/27/2024 11:37:13 AM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LsuJon:
Not CD obviously but I've seen a good amount of mod tags being used in photos.
View Quote


Thank you
Link Posted: 1/27/2024 8:17:24 PM EDT
[#38]
Ranger



Link Posted: 1/29/2024 9:53:00 PM EDT
[#39]
Link Posted: 1/30/2024 6:26:12 AM EDT
[#40]
Link Posted: 1/30/2024 10:51:09 AM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History

That Eotech has probably seen some stuff.
Link Posted: 1/31/2024 2:12:27 AM EDT
[#42]
Having dealt with both M855A1 offerings from both Sig and Vortex, I would have to say Sig got the contract nod from price alone. There is nothing better about the sig optic in 1-6. Now, as off last fiscal year change, both Vortex and Sigs are ruynning the same price on the NSN website. Maybe that might level things out for them.
Link Posted: 2/1/2024 9:35:28 PM EDT
[#43]
Link Posted: 2/1/2024 9:41:49 PM EDT
[#44]
I'm thinking the more I see it and where it positions the Razor 1-6 that Whortex should release those mounts because I kinda want one...................
Link Posted: 2/5/2024 3:51:58 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History


URGIs literally can have any kind of optic on them.

"clone correct' means nothing when anything in the inventory can be found on them

My build list:

Demco mueller dog bone upper 150 (They had the best deal I could find)

450$ DD chf 14.5 Gov barrel

SF4p 180

Geissele SSA-E on sale 200

DDC 13.5 mk16 350

Have a noveske BCG, NFA lower, stock, and the other small bits.
Link Posted: 2/5/2024 7:37:46 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By fadedsun:


URGIs literally can have any kind of optic on them.

"clone correct' means nothing when anything in the inventory can be found on them

My build list:

Demco mueller dog bone upper 150 (They had the best deal I could find)

450$ DD chf 14.5 Gov barrel

SF4p 180

Geissele SSA-E on sale 200

DDC 13.5 mk16 350

Have a noveske BCG, NFA lower, stock, and the other small bits.
View Quote


Could have saved you some $$ on the DD barrel at Rooftop Defense.
Sol, owner, is good people and has them in stock with the pinned GB for less, even more less if you join their Hero’s program.

Link Posted: 2/5/2024 8:50:25 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BSOL:


Could have saved you some $$ on the DD barrel at Rooftop Defense.
Sol, owner, is good people and has them in stock with the pinned GB for less, even more less if you join their Hero’s program.

View Quote


I haven't bought anything yet but when I do I will buy it from them now
Link Posted: 2/5/2024 9:02:21 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Subpar] [#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By fadedsun:


URGIs literally can have any kind of optic on them.

"clone correct' means nothing when anything in the inventory can be found on them

My build list:

Demco mueller dog bone upper 150 (They had the best deal I could find)

450$ DD chf 14.5 Gov barrel

SF4p 180

Geissele SSA-E on sale 200

DDC 13.5 mk16 350

Have a noveske BCG, NFA lower, stock, and the other small bits.
View Quote

Thoroughbred has SF4Ps for $152.  I think free shipping as well.

https://www.thoroughbredarmco.com/product/43/

They have dogbone uppers as well for $145.  Charlie’s has a pretty bad rep for not actually having things in stock.

https://www.thoroughbredarmco.com/product/1030/
Link Posted: 2/5/2024 9:08:11 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BSOL:


Could have saved you some $$ on the DD barrel at Rooftop Defense.
Sol, owner, is good people and has them in stock with the pinned GB for less, even more less if you join their Hero’s program.

View Quote


Rooftop is where it's at, and Sol is a certified quality human being. Very responsive, and accommodating as heck.
Link Posted: 2/5/2024 9:20:35 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BigVelvet:


Rooftop is where it's at, and Sol is a certified quality human being. Very responsive, and accommodating as heck.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BigVelvet:
Originally Posted By BSOL:


Could have saved you some $$ on the DD barrel at Rooftop Defense.
Sol, owner, is good people and has them in stock with the pinned GB for less, even more less if you join their Hero’s program.



Rooftop is where it's at, and Sol is a certified quality human being. Very responsive, and accommodating as heck.

Plus free Ramen with every order.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 265
Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top