Quoted: Depending on how the law is written - or not ever written - 80% lowers may be safe or not.
|
Well,
Harrott really addressed commercial firearms that could be identified and described accurately.
They are not banned by name. They are not banned by feature. They are federally legal.
|
Federal matters are nonissue here.
But it's impossible to ban them by name/model and put them in CCR 979.11 simply because they don't have way of finding that out. "BillyBob's Rifle #1", etc. is impossible to list, and 'homebuilt AR' description can't be listed (vague). Given the impracticality of this, Harrott well may only apply to listable rifles/lowers - leaving Kasler to (disastrously) cover the lowers incapable of being listed, making these banned ARs de facto, without requirement of DOJ declaration...
This is quite grey and I would run, not walk away from this.
A prosecutor can indite a ham sandwich if they want.
|
Yes.
But these charges have a far greater chance of sticking and having to be resolved in appellate court. That can cost $30K-$40K in legal fees just to stay out of the cooler. And the book could be thrown at you - illegal manufacture, illegal transport, illegal possession - all compounded.
Let's walk the straight and narrow - especially as there's no need for homebuilt lowers when you can get a perfectly good off-list lower for $175 today.
Bill Wiese
San Jose CA