User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/10/2003 2:39:11 PM EDT
[#1]
I know exactly what you mean. I can not state publicly what I would like to do to these people.
However, if I read the article correctly the injunction IS NOT in effect. From what I read it will become effective as soon as the plaintiffs (The damn city fu**wads) come up with the $250,000 bond. It said in the article they were trying to come up with the money this afternoon but nowhere did it say they had it yet. Duke, we need your laywerly skills in interpreting this, please... Thanks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2003 5:05:47 PM EDT
[#2]
"Starting" to hate people?
LOL! Well than, you're a better man than I. It sure doesn't take much anymore........ Anyway, back to the subject at hand. Can somebody confirm or deny whether we are a go on this, or whether the injunction is in effect? I'm not to optimistic right now. Too much liberal agenda coming from the bench as of late to make me feel comfortable about our chances...... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2003 6:24:07 PM EDT
[#3]
They waited until the Plaintiffs got the 250K to announce the injunction. If we are to believe the news the injunction is in effect.
Jeff D. Yet another god d*mn lawyer 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2003 6:35:40 PM EDT
[#4]
I read it this way:
Do you want this injunction so bad that you'll pay a quarter of a million dollars for it? Even if the injunction becomes active, it'll be overturned before a higher court. CJ |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2003 7:54:06 PM EDT
[#5]
What is wrong wif Missouri's metropolitan centers?
If they pull this shit off then every law in the state prohibiting open carry better get repealed. The "preemption" law (RSMo 21.750) clearly flies in the face of the Missouri Constitution. So unless there was a constitutional amendment, which would've included a statewide vote, to pass the preemption law, then it is null and void and we can pack openly anywhere we feel like. Bitches. Edited wo add a "w" to "if". |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2003 8:40:47 PM EDT
[#6]
Please explain or post the 'preemption law'...
curious to see what it says... If the anti-gunners want to use the courts to stop us, then we need to adopt the same tactic and use the laws and courts to shove it in their faces... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2003 9:23:55 PM EDT
[#7]
edited to add that to my layman's eye, that little part in red doesn't jibe with Article 1, Section 23 of the state constitution:
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2003 9:25:48 PM EDT
[#8]
I think this is exactly right. The Missouri Constitution clearly states we have the right to be armed, and these preemption laws are clearly in violation of that. If the supreme court upholds that we cannot carry conceled they cannot deny us open carry and be constitutional (though they have for years). We are going to win either way I think. I would probably prefer to open carry anyway if I would not get hassled every ten minutes. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2003 6:48:53 AM EDT
[#9]
Even then, the stipulation in the constitution regarding concealed firearms does not preclude concealment by permit.
Although, clearly the people who penned that article in the state constitution were IDIOTS. CJ |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
