User Panel
Posted: 5/28/2024 10:56:51 AM EDT
I built up what has become my favorite .308...but it doesn't shoot accurately. The intended use is the "if I could only have one rifle" build. I wanted something light enough to carry and hunt with out west all day while being accurate enough to kill a deer at 500 yards. I put a Faxon 18in pencil on there figuring it would be accurate enough and light enough, and that's not the case. It will barely hold 2.5 MOA and is pretty random with fliers.
I'm thinking 18in Criterion and just accepting the extra half pound of weight. Is there anything else I should be considering? |
|
|
2.5 moa with what ammo? Criterion is awesome though and will be a better barrel. However, if you are shooting crap ammo, don't expect just the barrel to significantly reduce group size.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By spyderboy03: 2.5 moa with what ammo? Criterion is awesome though and will be a better barrel. However, if you are shooting crap ammo, don't expect just the barrel to significantly reduce group size. View Quote Federal Gold Medal Match, Black Hills, handloads run through a concentricity gauge...it's all 2.5 MOA at best. The BH load shoots .5 MOA consistently through an M40 build I have, so I know it isn't me and it isn't the ammo. It's the barrel. |
|
|
I’ve heard that the Faxon AR10 barrels are really hit or miss.
|
|
|
18" pencil is probably not the best starting point if precision is the goal, especially with a .308.
Can be done but tuning out barrel whip can be a booger, especially if there is any shooter inconsistency. Autos tend to be more sensitive to technique than a heavy barreled bolt gun. I'd lean towards a light taper. What optic? |
|
|
Take it from someone that just did this in the 16" flavor get a Criterion and be done with it. I got a hybrid and is super accurate. Pretty impressive with M80 ball even
|
|
|
Originally Posted By PeterPangenderPhD: Federal Gold Medal Match, Black Hills, handloads run through a concentricity gauge...it's all 2.5 MOA at best. The BH load shoots .5 MOA consistently through an M40 build I have, so I know it isn't me and it isn't the ammo. It's the barrel. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By PeterPangenderPhD: Originally Posted By spyderboy03: 2.5 moa with what ammo? Criterion is awesome though and will be a better barrel. However, if you are shooting crap ammo, don't expect just the barrel to significantly reduce group size. Federal Gold Medal Match, Black Hills, handloads run through a concentricity gauge...it's all 2.5 MOA at best. The BH load shoots .5 MOA consistently through an M40 build I have, so I know it isn't me and it isn't the ammo. It's the barrel. |
|
|
My faxon 308 barrel was ringing gongs at 500
i decided to upgrade it to a fluted Aero from schuyler , I need to get that set up sighted back in |
|
"The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the boogaloo, whose face is marred by pixels and ink and cheetos.”,
Teddy the Toad, (w,stte), "The Derpmen" |
Originally Posted By RDTCU: 18" pencil is probably not the best starting point if precision is the goal, especially with a .308. Can be done but tuning out barrel whip can be a booger, especially if there is any shooter inconsistency. Autos tend to be more sensitive to technique than a heavy barreled bolt gun. I'd lean towards a light taper. What optic? View Quote Athlon 1-10. I'm not looking for precision, but 2.5 MOA is pretty awful. I know it is the barrel. I have a Savage MSR Hunter 16in that is a consistent 1.5 MOA shooter with anything, and with handloads is an honest 5 shot 1 MOA rifle. It isn't me, it isn't technique, it isn't ammo. This rifle just will not shoot less than 2.5 MOA under any circumstances. I'm just looking to know what barrel to replace it with as Faxon has lost my interest. |
|
|
Preferred pronoun: MARINE
|
I'm happy with my Rainier Arms Ultramatch.
|
|
|
I've had two Faxon .308 barrels. Neither shot all that well. First was exchanged by Faxon. Replacement wasn't much better so I sold it.
I have a Criterion now that is a solid 1 MOA shooter with good ammo. |
|
Nobody is coming. It's up to you.
|
Originally Posted By wildearp: CRITERION https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/41996/IMG_0364_JPG-2821003.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/41996/PSA_PA10_JPG-3028347.jpg View Quote WOW. |
|
|
Originally Posted By cb4017: I've had two Faxon .308 barrels. Neither shot all that well. First was exchanged by Faxon. Replacement wasn't much better so I sold it. I have a Criterion now that is a solid 1 MOA shooter with good ammo. View Quote What Criterion did you go with? Best place to buy? I'm leaning towards this one. https://criterionbarrels.com/products/large-frame-ar/m118lr-308-win-7-62x51-nato/dpms-pattern-308-hybrid-barrel-rifle-gas-chrome/?v=7516fd43adaa |
|
|
Originally Posted By PeterPangenderPhD: What Criterion did you go with? Best place to buy? I'm leaning towards this one. https://criterionbarrels.com/products/large-frame-ar/m118lr-308-win-7-62x51-nato/dpms-pattern-308-hybrid-barrel-rifle-gas-chrome/?v=7516fd43adaa View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By PeterPangenderPhD: Originally Posted By cb4017: I've had two Faxon .308 barrels. Neither shot all that well. First was exchanged by Faxon. Replacement wasn't much better so I sold it. I have a Criterion now that is a solid 1 MOA shooter with good ammo. What Criterion did you go with? Best place to buy? I'm leaning towards this one. https://criterionbarrels.com/products/large-frame-ar/m118lr-308-win-7-62x51-nato/dpms-pattern-308-hybrid-barrel-rifle-gas-chrome/?v=7516fd43adaa Got it direct from Criterion. I bought the 20" with nitride finish, mostly because it was in stock and ready to ship. No complaints. I like the one you're considering too. |
|
Nobody is coming. It's up to you.
|
I have a Faxon Big Gunner 18” 308 that shoots 2 moa from my AR10 build and I’m definitely the cause of at least .5 moa of that.
|
|
"Now none of the frightened soldiers moved, for they saw that cowardice and valor purchased equal plots in the snipers' killing field."
“Everything is hard before it is easy.” |
I started with Criterion, my first .308. The next two have Noveske
barrels. My favorite is the Criterion. It's is just as good as I am hitting the mark. All three of my .308's are 16" rifle gas as well. |
|
|
|
Have you contacted Faxon to see what they say?
Both my Faxon barrels are .55 or .65" shooters. |
|
"What is socialism? The most difficult and tortuous way to progress from capitalism to capitalism." -Stated at an intel conference, East Berlin, Oct. 1988
"Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." -H.L. Mencken |
Originally Posted By lew: Have you contacted Faxon to see what they say? Both my Faxon barrels are .55 or .65" shooters. View Quote Nope. I don't know what they would say, but I don't really care. The barrel functions fine, and does what a barrel does. It just doesn't do it well. As to Faxon barrels being a .5 MOA shooter, if you can string 5 five shot groups together and post pictures where we can't see the powder burns, I'll believe it. But I still won't believe it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By PeterPangenderPhD: Nope. I don't know what they would say, but I don't really care. The barrel functions fine, and does what a barrel does. It just doesn't do it well. As to Faxon barrels being a .5 MOA shooter, if you can string 5 five shot groups together and post pictures where we can't see the powder burns, I'll believe it. But I still won't believe it. View Quote Just like other commercial brands they do put out a shooter every now and then. I've had MOA or better barrels from DPMS, Faxon, Ballistic Advantage. It's not guaranteed but it does happen. |
|
|
I am really pleased with the Criterion barrel I have. I did a 20" hybrid rifle gas nitride barrel and although I am not an expert shooters so far it is more than capable of putting up tight groups. It would probably do better with a better shooter behind it. Even with quality ammo not match but not cheap ammo it will put up 1.5" groups and match ammo around 1".
I am happy with the outcome of the rifle overall and as I try more and more different loads I think I will lock down the best load it likes. |
|
I know you can feel it let it in people will still hate you in the end.
So hate back, plan the attack then they will realize they cannot crack the mind of a fucking maniac. The voice inside you always wins your grave's been dug so lie in it. |
|
Dunno if you are into accurizing your rifle, but.
With a Criterion 18.5" barrel from Fulton, I was frustrated with fliers after the first shots would land touching. After reading, faced off the receiver to true the surface, and shimmed the barrel to receiver with .001" stainless shim. Had to thermo fit it. Pretty much stopped the fliers even with junk white box M80 ammo. |
|
|
I have a Proof Research 308 barrel that shoots 1/2” Moa
Love it. And that’s just factory loads. 1 11/16” at 200 yard's.; |
|
|
I guess it depends on the rifle you have, but being light enough to carry all day, and accurate enough for deer at 500 yards at the same time is asking quite a bit of a semi auto 308 of any kind. I would be putting all I could into the barrel, and I'd be looking at a good cut rifled barrel, not that I think Criterion is bad. If any offer fluted barrels, that can save some weight.
When I think of "walk all day" rifle, I'm thinking under 10 pounds, and under 9 would be better. I just don't see an AR10 under 10 pounds having the capability of a 500 yard shot. Just the scope needed for such shooting pushes it up. People have a hard enough time getting a combo like that with a bolt action like a Tikka T3 lite. Or you could just accept some limitation, say 300 yards. Then you can get away with much less. 1.5 MOA accuracy is fine, and standard rifle scopes work good enough. |
|
|
Won't say anything about Criterion other than when you get a good one its pretty good.
I would go with Craddock all day long though. All...day. Get a RTR barrel if its in stock the way you like it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By vectorsc: Won't say anything about Criterion other than when you get a good one its pretty good. I would go with Craddock all day long though. All...day. Get a RTR barrel if its in stock the way you like it. View Quote This is about where I’m at. I’ve had a few criterions. I’ve had generally favorable opinions of them, and so regard the brand highly, mostly for the price to value. For the price, you’re getting a lot of barrel. But at the same time mine have been varying in overall precision, and have often been pretty ammo picky. Doesn’t seem to be a lot of rhyme or reason either. Every barrel has been a crapshoot in terms of what it likes, and what it hates. It gets to where I’ll try one out and if it doesn’t shoot what I want it to shoot, I’ll sell it off and try again. I do have two RTRs coming in, and one signature series. Craddock has an excellent rep and I’ve used them before. I have full confidence they’ll be great barrels, and the same confidence that in the off chance they’re not that Craddock will take good care of me. They’re a pretty cool company in my limited dealings with them. |
|
|
Pencil barrels would not be my choice for a 500 yard deer rifle. One shot accuracy might be there, but pencils heat up and have a better chance a bad harmonics.
The Criterion I had was MOA, but it was a heavy profile. Not really apples to apples. The Faxon barrels i had were just gov or m4. All within spec. |
|
I'm not always a dick, just kidding, go fuck yourself.
|
Point shooting will give you monkeypox. - John_Wayne777
The Emu War could have been won if the Australians used red dots on their handguns. |
I am an FFL and an armorer. I have built several dozen of large frame ARs last couple of years. I have noticed a few things they have in common.
1) they are just not as inherently accurate as their 5.56 brethren. Most are about 2-3 MOA on a good day. Just how it is. 2) The barrel makes a massive difference. Even a lot of cheap nitride barrels on 5.56 can crank out 1.5 MOA or better. A quality barrel makes a huge difference. The .308 barrels I am confident are accurate are: Rainier, Criterion, and Wilson Combat. All are about the same in accuracy. I am very impressed with the Wilson Combat when they have their 25% off sale. I like Faxon, but am underwhelmed with their .308 barrels, ballistic Advantage too. 3) Ammo, in regards to run of mill M80 ball ammo in not as consistent as 193 or stand 5.56 ammo. Most AR .308s with a 1-10 or similar like 168 SMK. I use it as a baseline to compare to most of the time. 4) the receiver/barrel nut interface is critical. The receiver is bigger, the barrel is bigger, and the pressures are higher. A quality steel barrel nut is a variable that should be addressed. Because the rail selection is more limited in large frame ARs, I can confidently endorse the MI barrel nut, SOLGW, and SLR. There are probably lots of other good systems that aid in accuracy, but I use those 3 more than anything else. 5) I can’t prove it, but I am a believer some BCG can aid in accuracy. I use Aero and stick with them. I built this and it is sub MOA. Has a Wilson Combat 16” barrel and MI rail. Once I zeroed it and saw it was sub MOA, I am not changing a thing. I don’t want to upset the .308 AR Gods and cause unintended consequences. I was going to put a Reptilia scope mount on it, nope, not changing a thing. It is surprisingly accurate with M80 ball. Can hit any steel target any practical distance. With 168 SMK, all the rounds touch on paper. Attached File |
|
|
I built my Aero M5 around the Criterion 18" M118 LR barrel and have never regretted it.
It shoots better than I can. https://criterionbarrels.com/products/large-frame-ar/m118lr-308-win-7-62x51-nato/dpms-pattern-308-hybrid-barrel-rifle-gas-nitride/?v=7516fd43adaa I use the standard M5 buffer and spring with a non adjustable gas block, and have never needed an adjustable block...it just runs. Attached File |
|
Left-handed and right-minded!
|
criterion is great.
i typically run rainier arms barrels. they shoot dead nuts accurate. not that expensive and you can get varying profiles and lengths. |
|
|
I’ve tried to like Faxons but they keep disappointing me. I’ve been pretty happy with BA for cheapie barrels
|
|
|
Noveske or Criterion
|
|
|
I had a faxon. Would not shoot no matter what ammo I fed it. Changed to a Rainer select. Better, but still not impressive. Then switched to a Criterion. Very happy with it. I have two other AR10’s both equipped with 20 inch Kriegers. They are absolutely the best(shot .346 last weekend). For the money the Criterion is a great deal.
|
|
|
I bought a criterion 18" 308 barrel some years back and a couple thousand rounds of bulk M118LR expecting magic to happen.
Can't print less than 2MOA with it and i was pissed. Then i shot some 147 grain PPU for shits and giggles and had sub-MOA results. Guess the rumors about the bulk M118LR were true. It renewed my faith in the criterion barrel, and shat upon my faith in the M118. Another funny thing is that with an LVPO on my G3k SBR clone, it also shot MOA with the PPU. I was impressed. |
|
|
Originally Posted By vectorsc: Won't say anything about Criterion other than when you get a good one its pretty good. I would go with Craddock all day long though. All...day. Get a RTR barrel if its in stock the way you like it. View Quote This…..and if I remember correctly they use Bartlein |
|
|
Bartlein
|
|
|
|
Point shooting will give you monkeypox. - John_Wayne777
The Emu War could have been won if the Australians used red dots on their handguns. |
I have a 16 criterion hybrid match barrel it shoots at best 1moa and that only happens when I do my part . I also have a 16 faxon pencil 308 barrel and with the best ammo I have it’s a 2to3 moa rifle . Some members hear like to exaggerate there abilities when comes down to accuracy .
|
|
|
Just an update on this. We have some Criterion Hbar chrome lined barrels coming in next week. I will try to test them with some Hornady match ammo at distance and see if I can hold the accuracy I get in the 15 yard test range I use. These are in .223, the 308 testing is still off a couple months.
I normally like the Criterion Core barrels but they only had Hbar so we went with those. I will test in 16" and 20" All the good scopes are out on loan, so that will be the weak link...besides me. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: I find this exceedingly difficult to believe. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 45-Seventy: Originally Posted By lew: Have you contacted Faxon to see what they say? Both my Faxon barrels are .55 or .65" shooters. I find this exceedingly difficult to believe. I could never get my Faxons much under 1.5” |
|
|
Originally Posted By RhinelandArms: Just an update on this. We have some Criterion Hbar chrome lined barrels coming in next week. I will try to test them with some Hornady match ammo at distance and see if I can hold the accuracy I get in the 15 yard test range I use. These are in .223, the 308 testing is still off a couple months. I normally like the Criterion Core barrels but they only had Hbar so we went with those. I will test in 16" and 20" All the good scopes are out on loan, so that will be the weak link...besides me. View Quote In for your results ! Thanks |
|
*Hold on to your AR-15s. Their magic must be very powerful, or they wouldn’t want them.*
JAFOM.... Just another fat old man. ________________________________ TOGC,IADC |
Originally Posted By bfoosh06: First, I'd make sure the Faxon barrel / gas block isn't making any , even possible contact with your handguard. As for Criterion barrels, my 18" 308 has been very good to me. 10rds rapid'ish fire, 100yds benched scoped... etc. First is 168gr FGMM... second is Hornady 155gr AG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/171545/IMG_3040_JPG-572554.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/171545/IMG_3106_JPG-860403.jpg View Quote This is impressive. Makes want to take down what i just posted. But i never have the patience to shoot 10 shot groups. Someday i will, I know it is the right way to do things. |
|
|
Originally Posted By dana: This is impressive. Makes want to take down what i just posted. But i never have the patience to shoot 10 shot groups. Someday i will, I know it is the right way to do things. View Quote |
|
"Technique isn't something that can be taught. It's something you find on your own." - Bunta Fujiwara
|
Originally Posted By HighpowerRifleBrony: It's okay to shoot smaller size samples, but back it up with more samples. Three 10 shot groups or ten 3 shot groups. The composite should be similar. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HighpowerRifleBrony: Originally Posted By dana: This is impressive. Makes want to take down what i just posted. But i never have the patience to shoot 10 shot groups. Someday i will, I know it is the right way to do things. I like doing three or four five-shot groups to get a good feel for it. Is that better or worse than one ten-shot group? There’s a statistically valid answer to that question that I don’t care to find, but it’s what I do. Either are far more meaningful than single 3-shot groups though. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.