User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 12:10:09 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock:
You want these... http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj3/roadblockxl/Block%20II%20M4-A1/IMG_20120724_202531.jpg http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj3/roadblockxl/Block%20II%20M4-A1/IMG_20120724_202338.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock:
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By NickOTime:
Originally Posted By TinyCrumb:
To clarify, that rear sight is definitely clone correct. They're a contract sight for USMC and show up on SOCOM Guns quite often. Front sight is not for clone tho. Shhhh..... they might be stolen. 
ETA: Are both the 300m and 600m clone correct(newer versions)? It's been a while since I've visited the MK18 thread. Just wanting some inspiration, but not doing a clone. The only micro sight that is correct is the 200-600. Those are USMC issued/marked. Originally Posted By bradpierson26:
I was offered a trade on ebay for my m300c for his KAC sights + his cash. I don't know dick about KAC sights so I was hoping you guys could help. He doesn't have a part number and says its a 300m rear. Assume they're used in good condition... Any help is appreciated http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NDgwWDY0MA==/z/loMAAOSwwbdWPTEy/$_122.JPG?set_id=880000500F You want these... http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj3/roadblockxl/Block%20II%20M4-A1/IMG_20120724_202531.jpg http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj3/roadblockxl/Block%20II%20M4-A1/IMG_20120724_202338.jpg Man I wish KAC didn't change the color tone on their Taupe sight...  " />
Your rear looks different than mine....  " />
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 12:13:53 AM EDT
[#2]
The 300m is definitely more suited for the CQBR. It's faster and has less functionality. Set it and forget it. Let the longer barreled Block IIs worry about dialing in range for BUIS sniper shots.
|
|
|
|
NC, USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 12:18:35 AM EDT
[#3]
I agree with GersonB90 about that sight looking weird... and I have about 6 KAC rear sights of different variations and all have a small dot directly under the rear aperature, possibly from the manufacturing process.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 12:52:23 AM EDT
[#4]
Remember the 300m KAC sight was issued to under the SOPMOD program at the very beginning. So, any old sights could be found and used by the units. Right now the 600m KAC rear sight is issued (that's whats in my parts bin).
CD |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 1:07:57 AM EDT
[#5]
Is the Elcan worth 1000 bucks more than an ACOG?
I feel I will never be satisfied when you compromise and don't get what you initially wanted(if that makes sense) |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 2:04:56 AM EDT
[Last Edit: jBoy723]
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GersonB90:
Your rear looks different than mine.... http:// <a href=http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o750/GersonB9p/Mobile%20Uploads/20151106_215916_zpshxxambkm.jpg</a>" /> USMC marked 600m KAC rear sights are stolen MIL property. This is another subject that has been beaten to death just like the gas port debate. This is the latest thread but, there have been many more prior to it asking the same thing and getting the same answer every time. KAC BUIS Thread ETA: Just noticed that you were the one that started the latest thread and was unaware when you purchased them. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 2:16:51 AM EDT
[#7]
I'm having my dealer cancel the currently pending form 4 on my FDE QDSS NT4 can. Gonna go with another SOCOM can instead.
Anyways, just an initial heads up in here first as I know those cans are fairly tough to find. |
|
|
|
MI, USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 4:55:19 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Roadblock]
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GersonB90: Man I wish KAC didn't change the color tone on their Taupe sight... http:// <a href=http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o750/GersonB9p/Mobile%20Uploads/20151106_220104_zpstak2zcng.jpg</a>" /> Your rear looks different than mine.... http:// <a href=http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o750/GersonB9p/Mobile%20Uploads/20151106_215916_zpshxxambkm.jpg</a>" /> Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GersonB90: Man I wish KAC didn't change the color tone on their Taupe sight... http:// <a href=http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o750/GersonB9p/Mobile%20Uploads/20151106_220104_zpstak2zcng.jpg</a>" /> Your rear looks different than mine.... http:// <a href=http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o750/GersonB9p/Mobile%20Uploads/20151106_215916_zpshxxambkm.jpg</a>" /> Correct. I have one of the really old school USMC KAC rear sights, one of early first batches. You have the more common version. Per KevinB Early version of the sight provided to the USMC back when we lazed the USMC on instead of made into the base on the current delivery items Kevin S. Boland Director of Military Operations @ Knights Armament |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 8:25:20 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PFran42:
SF charges something like $600 for a rebuild. Did you have to send your can in for a rebuild? |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 8:50:18 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AR-Ryan21: I'm having my dealer cancel the currently pending form 4 on my FDE QDSS NT4 can. Gonna go with another SOCOM can instead. Anyways, just an initial heads up in here first as I know those cans are fairly tough to find.  That FSP Block II with KAC can was tip-top. Tip-top.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 8:56:57 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CloneDiseased: Noooooooooooooooo! That FSP Block II with KAC can was tip-top. Tip-top.Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CloneDiseased: Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21: I'm having my dealer cancel the currently pending form 4 on my FDE QDSS NT4 can. Gonna go with another SOCOM can instead. Anyways, just an initial heads up in here first as I know those cans are fairly tough to find. That FSP Block II with KAC can was tip-top. Tip-top.Yeah dude, you're fucking nuts. I would LOVE to have a KAC corncob.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 9:12:39 AM EDT
[#12]
Minor improvements 
Still waiting on my SOCOM on F4 and looking for an NT4 
|
|
|
|
WV, USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 9:47:35 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By drewQ22:
Is the Elcan worth 1000 bucks more than an ACOG? I feel I will never be satisfied when you compromise and don't get what you initially wanted(if that makes sense) I too wanted an Elcan, and have only shot through 1 for about 4 whole rounds. 
I dont think its cost effective for me. This was my first clone attempt and I've come up short on a few items. optics being one of them. I have an Eotech 516 on mine right now. If I change the optic it will either be to a 553 (if I can find one when my budget allows), and EXPS3-0, or an ACOG. I'll never get 1200.00 worth of use out of an ACOG and will more than likely not push it to its range limits, let alone dropping 2k on an Elcan for the same purpose. I'll ust live out my days admiring all the guys' optics on here and shoot through them whenever the opportunity presents itself. If you're using the rifle for LEO duty or someething along those lines, then it may be cost effective for you. Just my .02 |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 9:47:57 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RTUtah:
Yeah dude, you're fucking nuts. I would LOVE to have a KAC corncob.
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RTUtah:
Originally Posted By CloneDiseased:
Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21:
I'm having my dealer cancel the currently pending form 4 on my FDE QDSS NT4 can. Gonna go with another SOCOM can instead. Anyways, just an initial heads up in here first as I know those cans are fairly tough to find. That FSP Block II with KAC can was tip-top. Tip-top.Yeah dude, you're fucking nuts. I would LOVE to have a KAC corncob.
Agreed....even though I went all in by pinning both my PR and B2 with SF3P's. Corn cob is the best cob! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 10:08:24 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Stoner25mkiv]
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By drewQ22:
Is the Elcan worth 1000 bucks more than an ACOG? I feel I will never be satisfied when you compromise and don't get what you initially wanted(if that makes sense) I liked my first one enough that I now have two..........although the second one is "moar correct" than my first. EDIT: I guess I didn't answer your question. Are they worth 1K more?.........hell no. "worth" is a worthless criteria though. 
|
|
|
|
WV, USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 10:20:17 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Stoner25mkiv:
I liked my first one enough that I now have two..........although the second one is "moar correct" than my first. EDIT: I guess I didn't answer your question. Are they worth 1K more?.........hell no. "worth" is a worthless criteria though. http://i840.photobucket.com/albums/zz327/T00lmanii/twinscqbr_zpsc9azzkcu.png Excuse me sir... there are too many pins in your lowers.. Please tone down your level of awesome at once.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 11:03:00 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MrFrZZ: I too wanted an Elcan, and have only shot through 1 for about 4 whole rounds. I dont think its cost effective for me. This was my first clone attempt and I've come up short on a few items. optics being one of them. I have an Eotech 516 on mine right now. If I change the optic it will either be to a 553 (if I can find one when my budget allows), and EXPS3-0, or an ACOG. I'll never get 1200.00 worth of use out of an ACOG and will more than likely not push it to its range limits, let alone dropping 2k on an Elcan for the same purpose. I'll ust live out my days admiring all the guys' optics on here and shoot through them whenever the opportunity presents itself. If you're using the rifle for LEO duty or someething along those lines, then it may be cost effective for you. Just my .02 Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MrFrZZ: Originally Posted By drewQ22: Is the Elcan worth 1000 bucks more than an ACOG? I feel I will never be satisfied when you compromise and don't get what you initially wanted(if that makes sense) I too wanted an Elcan, and have only shot through 1 for about 4 whole rounds. I dont think its cost effective for me. This was my first clone attempt and I've come up short on a few items. optics being one of them. I have an Eotech 516 on mine right now. If I change the optic it will either be to a 553 (if I can find one when my budget allows), and EXPS3-0, or an ACOG. I'll never get 1200.00 worth of use out of an ACOG and will more than likely not push it to its range limits, let alone dropping 2k on an Elcan for the same purpose. I'll ust live out my days admiring all the guys' optics on here and shoot through them whenever the opportunity presents itself. If you're using the rifle for LEO duty or someething along those lines, then it may be cost effective for you. Just my .02 I really like the ta33 as well, but have still always wanted to get an Elcan and finally got to shoot one of the 1.5-6x ones on a buddy's scar. It's hard to swallow that much coin and just don't know if the juice is worth the squeeze. Guess I could always sell it if I needed to maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 11:26:42 AM EDT
[#18]
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 11:37:23 AM EDT
[Last Edit: JohnnySasaki20]
[#19]
I think you have to click on the links because I'm a post or two short of 50, and I think that means they won't show up.
Btw, I've got a Magpul UBR stock, and a Magpul ACS stock in the mail. The Vltor one I have now, and the CAR Model 1 (I think that's what it's called) both can get my beard hair stuck in the little grooves on the Vltor and where the CAR stock ends and meets the buffer tube. I also have two Magpul extended magazine releases as well. Why not right? 
 </a>PSX_20151106_140920
 </a>PSX_20151106_140647
 </a>PSX_20150507_163021
 </a>PSX_20150507_163522
Edit: Also, to the guy above me, I was just running nearly that exact same setup just a few days ago, until I switched back to my ACOG. I figured I'd put the Elcan on my 16 inch. |
|
|
MI, USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 12:11:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Roadblock]
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987: http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp247/wormydog1724/B07AA94D-03D3-44D4-B895-2B11AEA570A1_zps1sg2jw7b.jpg That rifle is sick as fuck. Side note, who wants to sell me an LMT Gen 1 in FDE btw? |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 12:23:41 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock: That rifle is sick as fuck. Side note, who wants to sell me an LMT Gen 1 in FDE btw? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock: Originally Posted By Wormydog1987: http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp247/wormydog1724/B07AA94D-03D3-44D4-B895-2B11AEA570A1_zps1sg2jw7b.jpg That rifle is sick as fuck. Side note, who wants to sell me an LMT Gen 1 in FDE btw?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 12:29:59 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Wormydog1987: http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp247/wormydog1724/B07AA94D-03D3-44D4-B895-2B11AEA570A1_zps1sg2jw7b.jpg Also, what offset mount are you using for your mini scout? I got a gear sector one but it won't work cause it touches the side of the KAC front sight. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 1:55:57 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Wormydog1987]
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By drewQ22:
Does this mean yes I should fo on an Elcan? Also, what offset mount are you using for your mini scout? I got a gear sector one but it won't work cause it touches the side of the KAC front sight. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By drewQ22:
Originally Posted By Wormydog1987:
http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp247/wormydog1724/B07AA94D-03D3-44D4-B895-2B11AEA570A1_zps1sg2jw7b.jpg Also, what offset mount are you using for your mini scout? I got a gear sector one but it won't work cause it touches the side of the KAC front sight. I used gear sector for a long time just fine but won a Haley strategic mount on Facebook so I use that now. Both are solid. I sold the elcan and went back to the EXPS. Sold the EXPS and now I'm back to the T-1 and 3x magnifier. I can never make up my mind. For me, the elcan wasn't worth it. If I wanted magnification I would just grab one of my 16" guns with an optic. The do-all gun for me isn't the cqbr but it is fun. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 1:56:32 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CloneDiseased:
Lol, brah, they're hard to get ahold of without paying big monies. Trust me, I've got something stupid in the works Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By CloneDiseased:
Originally Posted By Roadblock:
Originally Posted By Wormydog1987:
http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp247/wormydog1724/B07AA94D-03D3-44D4-B895-2B11AEA570A1_zps1sg2jw7b.jpg That rifle is sick as fuck. Side note, who wants to sell me an LMT Gen 1 in FDE btw? You can find them, but yeah, for some reason they command a bigger price tag than black jenn juans. I did snag a black one last week for a sweet price for my cqbr B1. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 2:19:34 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AmericanCheese: You can find them, but yeah, for some reason they command a bigger price tag than black jenn juans. I did snag a black one last week for a sweet price for my cqbr B1. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By AmericanCheese: Originally Posted By CloneDiseased: Originally Posted By Roadblock: Side note, who wants to sell me an LMT Gen 1 in FDE btw? You can find them, but yeah, for some reason they command a bigger price tag than black jenn juans. I did snag a black one last week for a sweet price for my cqbr B1.
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 2:20:39 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JohnnySasaki20]
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock:
That rifle is sick as fuck. Side note, who wants to sell me an LMT Gen 1 in FDE btw? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Roadblock:
Originally Posted By Wormydog1987:
http://i416.photobucket.com/albums/pp247/wormydog1724/B07AA94D-03D3-44D4-B895-2B11AEA570A1_zps1sg2jw7b.jpg That rifle is sick as fuck. Side note, who wants to sell me an LMT Gen 1 in FDE btw? It is pretty sweet. This is as close as I can get right now. It's actually pretty light as well. I guess I could have put a similar offset light that I have on my other upper, but I didn't feel like taking it off. This first one's from a while ago:  </a>20150226_180120 by Alex Legore, on Flickr" />
And all the rest are from today, just messing around.  </a>PSX_20151107_125551 by Alex Legore, on Flickr" />
 PSX_20151107_130550 by Alex Legore, on Flickr
 PSX_20151107_130025 by Alex Legore, on Flickr
Can't wait until the ACS and UBR buttstocks get here. I'm not really a fan of that Vltor anymore. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 2:32:14 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PFran42:
I don't think that's correct. You see more 300m rears than the 200-600m version. Come the think of it, I think a lot of CQBR uppers came without rear BUIS. Augee had a lengthy comment (imagine that) on it. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PFran42:
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By NickOTime:
Originally Posted By TinyCrumb:
To clarify, that rear sight is definitely clone correct. They're a contract sight for USMC and show up on SOCOM Guns quite often. Front sight is not for clone tho. Shhhh..... they might be stolen.
ETA: Are both the 300m and 600m clone correct(newer versions)? It's been a while since I've visited the MK18 thread. Just wanting some inspiration, but not doing a clone. The only micro sight that is correct is the 200-600. Those are USMC issued/marked. I don't think that's correct. You see more 300m rears than the 200-600m version. Come the think of it, I think a lot of CQBR uppers came without rear BUIS. Augee had a lengthy comment (imagine that) on it. You are correct brotha. Both the 2-6 and 300 are in use. But that front sight isn't |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 2:38:10 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RTUtah:
I mean I kiiinda get it, but after having shot suppressed, I can tell you there ain't NO going back for me. Can't really imagine a fork reducing much of the muzzle blast from a 10.3" shorty anyways. [shrug] Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RTUtah:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By RTUtah:
Originally Posted By ECPrevatte:
It was J Parish, and it really wasn't beat to shit. In fact, it looks like a bullet knicked the first baffle more than anything. My SF can is between 8-12K rounds and it looks fine. https://farm1.staticflickr.com/576/21676911551_1df47d61bd_b.jpg Link JParish posting SF Can: http://i1026.photobucket.com/albums/y322/_MacGyver-/Canwear_zps0b47e0f7.jpg That to me doesn't look like wear, but more of a strike. Regardless, I have my can and my evidence but people choose to overlook it.  I'll let people keep posting speculation and "heard this" as their proof I guess.10-4, just curious why the .mil insisted on pronged tuning-fork FHs over brakes, especially if it would aid in lengthening the lifetime of pricey suppressors. 
Because they're not dedicated suppressed, it's mission dependent whether a can is run or not, and running a brake without a can would be retarded in a war zone. I mean I kiiinda get it, but after having shot suppressed, I can tell you there ain't NO going back for me. Can't really imagine a fork reducing much of the muzzle blast from a 10.3" shorty anyways. [shrug] On a 10.3 a brake would be all bad for many reasons if it's not dedicated suppressed. The muzzle flash is ginormous for one thing, it would give away all of their positions, and of course it's louder, which is a bad idea as far as enemy hearing it and ringing your teammates' bells. The dust signature from shooting would be enormous, it's just bad for business. The tuning fork flash hiders work wonders for all of the above (249F/SF4P) and the SF4P can still host a can, which is muy bueno compared to a brake on a non dedicated suppressed 10.3 in a war zone. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 2:47:25 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556: On a 10.3 a brake would be all bad for many reasons if it's not dedicated suppressed. The muzzle flash is ginormous for one thing, it would give away all of their positions, and of course it's louder, which is a bad idea as far as enemy hearing it and ringing your teammates' bells. The dust signature from shooting would be enormous, it's just bad for business. The tuning fork flash hiders work wonders for all of the above (249F/SF4P) and the SF4P can still host a can, which is muy bueno compared to a brake on a non dedicated suppressed 10.3 in a war zone. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556: Originally Posted By RTUtah: Originally Posted By MILSPEC556: Originally Posted By RTUtah: Originally Posted By ECPrevatte: It was J Parish, and it really wasn't beat to shit. In fact, it looks like a bullet knicked the first baffle more than anything. My SF can is between 8-12K rounds and it looks fine. https://farm1.staticflickr.com/576/21676911551_1df47d61bd_b.jpg Link JParish posting SF Can: http://i1026.photobucket.com/albums/y322/_MacGyver-/Canwear_zps0b47e0f7.jpg That to me doesn't look like wear, but more of a strike. Regardless, I have my can and my evidence but people choose to overlook it. I'll let people keep posting speculation and "heard this" as their proof I guess.10-4, just curious why the .mil insisted on pronged tuning-fork FHs over brakes, especially if it would aid in lengthening the lifetime of pricey suppressors. Because they're not dedicated suppressed, it's mission dependent whether a can is run or not, and running a brake without a can would be retarded in a war zone. I mean I kiiinda get it, but after having shot suppressed, I can tell you there ain't NO going back for me. Can't really imagine a fork reducing much of the muzzle blast from a 10.3" shorty anyways. [shrug] On a 10.3 a brake would be all bad for many reasons if it's not dedicated suppressed. The muzzle flash is ginormous for one thing, it would give away all of their positions, and of course it's louder, which is a bad idea as far as enemy hearing it and ringing your teammates' bells. The dust signature from shooting would be enormous, it's just bad for business. The tuning fork flash hiders work wonders for all of the above (249F/SF4P) and the SF4P can still host a can, which is muy bueno compared to a brake on a non dedicated suppressed 10.3 in a war zone. True, I get it. But if I'm rolling up on-target, I'm suppressed 110% of the time.  |
|
|
|
IN, USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 3:04:48 PM EDT
[Last Edit: ninjasteezify]
[#30]
Uhhh....I think A brand new Surefire 4 prong just went in the EE for $85 shipped.......
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 3:07:38 PM EDT
[Last Edit: StevieJ309]
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ninjasteezify:
Uhhh....I think A brand new Surefire 4 prong just went in the EE for $85 shipped....... Just came here to post that. I always miss out on the good deals by minutes. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 3:07:45 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By ninjasteezify:
Uhhh....I think A brand new Surefire 4 prong just went in the EE for $85 shipped....... 
Seller done fucked up! http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_7_22/1486550_FS__Surefire_FH____85.html |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 3:16:54 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StevieJ309:
Just came here to post that. I always miss out on the good deals by minutes. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By ninjasteezify:
Uhhh....I think A brand new Surefire 4 prong just went in the EE for $85 shipped....... Just came here to post that. I always miss out on the good deals by minutes. I usually do too
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 3:22:52 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GripnAK47s:
I usually do too Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By ninjasteezify:
Uhhh....I think A brand new Surefire 4 prong just went in the EE for $85 shipped....... Just came here to post that. I always miss out on the good deals by minutes. I usually do too You got lucky my friend. I've seen a lot of these sell, but I've never seen one sell under 100. They sell for 3-4 times that. |
|
|
|
MI, USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 3:41:11 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Roadblock]
[#35]
Yeah I didn't figure it would be cheap, for an LMT Gen 1 in FDE that is.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 3:54:43 PM EDT
[#36]
What the fuck
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 3:59:35 PM EDT
[#37]
#WTF
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 4:18:36 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Seller done fucked up! http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_7_22/1486550_FS__Surefire_FH____85.html Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By ninjasteezify:
Uhhh....I think A brand new Surefire 4 prong just went in the EE for $85 shipped.......
Seller done fucked up! http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_7_22/1486550_FS__Surefire_FH____85.html thats how much ive paid for my last 3.... |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 4:48:38 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pbjunkiee: thats how much ive paid for my last 3.... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By pbjunkiee: Originally Posted By MILSPEC556: Originally Posted By ninjasteezify: Uhhh....I think A brand new Surefire 4 prong just went in the EE for $85 shipped....... Seller done fucked up! http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_7_22/1486550_FS__Surefire_FH____85.html thats how much ive paid for my last 3....
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:02:11 PM EDT
[#40]
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:09:21 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money. 
I'll have to remember never to deal with that guy then. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:10:26 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money. Wow. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:15:59 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StevieJ309:
I'll have to remember never to deal with that guy then. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money.
I'll have to remember never to deal with that guy then. Yea, bummer. Id say that is a welch, posted accordingly. Everyone had the same chance I did
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:19:49 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StealthGuy:
Wow. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StealthGuy:
Originally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money. Wow. That's bullshit... so is he just going to repost it for more now? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:20:52 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StealthGuy:
Wow. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StealthGuy:
Originally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money. Wow. I figured somebody would do something shitty like that. Now to see if he'll trade his name for a little cash. This is why you almost can't post things like this in public, some piece of shit always fucks it up. On topic - got my Mk18 clone done-ish. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:21:16 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sbye:
That's bullshit... so is he just going to repost it for more now? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sbye:
Originally Posted By StealthGuy:
Originally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money. Wow. That's bullshit... so is he just going to repost it for more now? EE rules say he'll be banned for welching if he doesn't follow through. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:21:18 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money. Ban him..
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:28:46 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sweatpants:
EE rules say he'll be banned for welching if he doesn't follow through. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By sweatpants:
Originally Posted By sbye:
Originally Posted By StealthGuy:
Originally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money. Wow. That's bullshit... so is he just going to repost it for more now? EE rules say he'll be banned for welching if he doesn't follow through. Good. A deal is a deal. It's not GripnAK47s fault that the other guy is too stupid to do some research before listing it. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:29:54 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Yea, bummer. Id say that is a welch, posted accordingly. Everyone had the same chance I did Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money.
I'll have to remember never to deal with that guy then. Yea, bummer. Id say that is a welch, posted accordingly. Everyone had the same chance I did I was hoping no one actually tattled and he just did some research after it "sold" (I'm sure the guy got a lot of IM's asking if he had more), but I just saw your thread in the EE... I almost can't believe someone in here would do that. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2015 5:38:27 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StevieJ309:
I was hoping no one actually tattled and he just did some research after it "sold" (I'm sure the guy got a lot of IM's asking if he had more), but I just saw your thread in the EE... I almost can't believe someone in here would do that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
Originally Posted By GripnAK47s:
Dont feel too bad guys. Someone here tattled and the guy refunded the money.
I'll have to remember never to deal with that guy then. Yea, bummer. Id say that is a welch, posted accordingly. Everyone had the same chance I did I was hoping no one actually tattled and he just did some research after it "sold" (I'm sure the guy got a lot of IM's asking if he had more), but I just saw your thread in the EE... I almost can't believe someone in here would do that. I hope that is the case. Hopefully there isn't anyone in here like that |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
