User Panel
Is it wrong to wish everyone in the AG's office was decorating either a tree or a lamppost?
How the fuck do they get away with this shit?!? |
|
Quoted: Make sure you vote this November. That will surely fix things. We can surely work this out peacefully. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted:
View Quote I will imprison my political opponents for having a differing opinion...man. "Democratsy" in action. |
|
|
How many commies in charge will indict Trump every month from now until Nov?
|
|
Pure communista dictatorship level shit right here.
I skeptical of everything the government does. That's my right. Get this person off the government payroll, strip their law license, felony charges of oppression because you just subverted the constitution. |
|
|
Quoted: do yourself a favor and never post that video again. It was proven that all of those allegations were so much made up BS that the Republicans who asked those people to speak Apologized to everybody. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: These indictments are bullshit, but I think this will not turn out the way these people think it will go. FINALLY, evidence of 2020 election fraud will be disclosed in court. No court has been willing to hear any of the evidence so far, which is why the actual "Big Lie", that Joe Biden was elected, is bandied to this day. Here's a start: do yourself a favor and never post that video again. It was proven that all of those allegations were so much made up BS that the Republicans who asked those people to speak Apologized to everybody. @JLH3 Yeah? That’s the first I’ve heard of that. Why don’t you do yourself a favor and post evidence to support your post. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote "Democracy" |
|
Quoted: It's a wonder Kari Lake isn't on that list. View Quote I'm sure she'll try to grab some of the spotlight, but since she wasn't involved in fraudulently submitting electoral votes why would she be indicted? Contrary to OP's bullshit/bald-faced lie headline, it was involvement in the submission of fake electors that resulted in the indictments, not "being skeptical". |
|
This thread is so thick with cope I'm surprised the site has enough resources to keep it going.
|
|
If the Arizona election was free and fair, then I would like a random sample of 1000 mail-in ballots to signature match the voter registration card to the envelope of the mail-in ballot. And of those that don't match, I would like to interview that voter.
I'll get back with on what I found. Thank you very much. |
|
It's amazing to me how credulous people are about garbage on social media.
Article: they are being charged with being skeptical Replies: omg they are being charged with being skeptical! We're next! Hang em (indistinct, gutteral rabble noises) What if they aren't being charged with being skeptical but with forgery and fraud? |
|
|
Quoted: The title of this thread is unequivocally untrue. It is a lie. Calling it out as such is sowing discord? Ok. View Quote Agreed the title is just GD bullshit and an invitation to join a circle jerk.... What's troubling and a microcosm of this nation, is that facts are no longer relevant to so many. |
|
|
Quoted: Ha, that’s pretty rich. So who is everyone supposed to believe? What’s the truth? What they say it is? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: GD sure willing laps up lies, as long as it confirms what they wish was true. Ha, that’s pretty rich. So who is everyone supposed to believe? What’s the truth? What they say it is? The court documents that directly contradict the thread title. This shit isn't hard. |
|
|
Quoted: It's amazing to me how credulous people are about garbage on social media. Article: they are being charged with being skeptical Replies: omg they are being charged with being skeptical! We're next! Hang em (indistinct, gutteral rabble noises) What if they aren't being charged with being skeptical but with forgery and fraud? View Quote Then let's investigate and charge all with forgery and fraud who deserve it. But it only goes one way, doesn't it? You see the elements in this thread all too happy to eat our own while being ok with the left committing massive election fraud. Kinda points to what they are, really. Gets old seeing the same names doing the same shit in every thread. |
|
Quoted: The title of this thread is unequivocally untrue. It is a lie. Calling it out as such is sowing discord? Ok. View Quote OP has started threads with fake titles before and refused to edit them when called out. There’s nothing wrong with your commentary… it just upsets the “you’re gonna get loaded into a train car for voting for Trump” crowd. |
|
Quoted: Then let's investigate and charge all with forgery and fraud who deserve it. But it only goes one way, doesn't it? You see the elements in this thread all too happy to eat our own while being ok with the left committing massive election fraud. Kinda points to what they are, really. Gets old seeing the same names doing the same shit in every thread. View Quote What gets old is members refusing to acknowledge facts they do not like... |
|
View Quote Almost the bottom of page 1 before any facts get posted. The good news about this is that any Democrats who try to sabotage a Republican victory this fall will get jammed up the same way. Indictments for errybody! |
|
Quoted: Almost the bottom of page 1 before any facts get posted. The good news about this is that any Democrats who try to sabotage a Republican victory this fall will get jammed up the same way. Indictments for errybody! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Almost the bottom of page 1 before any facts get posted. The good news about this is that any Democrats who try to sabotage a Republican victory this fall will get jammed up the same way. Indictments for errybody! Yeah. Sure thing. |
|
Quoted: Come on, OP. Were they indicted for being skeptical? Or were they indicted for casting fraudulent electoral college votes? View Quote Attached File thanks buddy! |
|
Quoted: If the Arizona election was free and fair, then I would like a random sample of 1000 mail-in ballots to signature match the voter registration card to the envelope of the mail-in ballot. And of those that don't match, I would like to interview that voter. I'll get back with on what I found. Thank you very much. View Quote Fun fact: record retention laws provide for a LOT less time to retain election records. The IRS requires that you hold on to your tax information for years. Employers' personnel records have to be retained for years. Election records are often purged & trashed in a year or two, depending on local state laws. This is one thing that election reform might have tackled after 2020, but for some reason there was remarkable little election reform in the state legislatures. Like state governments across the country weren't serious about making sure their elections were as secure as possible. Note that this goes for states under Republican control too. After 2020 we should have seen a wave of election reform laws tightening up in-person voting, ballot record accuracy, record retention, public access to records, ID requirements, voter roll requirements, etc, etc. Why did we not see that? Why did that not make a bunch of headlines for months between 2020 and 2022? Now here it is 2024, and we're going into another Presidential election with basically the same system we had in place four years ago. My state adopted a couple minor changes to bar external funding for election support (Zuckerberg paying for ballot drop boxes and the like and requiring only actual election officials could exercise authority. Really minor changes. No changes in early voting, mail-in ballots, record retention, etc. |
|
Quoted: Well? 12% of GD are fucking liberal commie shills View Quote I didn't say it but take it from Moderators in a similar thread https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Has-GD-become-a-sanctuary-site-for-communists-POLL-/5-2715268/?page=10#i108475962 THE LAST WORD Folks, rather than handing out the numerous warnings that have been earned in this thread, we're going to lock it with a simple reminder - anything you direct toward another member that is intended as an insult is a violation of our Code of Conduct. 6 - Attacking or insulting a member in an effort to elicit a negative response. You have the right to disagree, but please do so in a respectful manner. This rule also includes posting disparaging remarks about a member's family. Labeling someone a communist because they are not in lock step agreement with all of your political positions, or because they do not support your favored candidate, is over the line. No, we won't accept the disingenuous excuse that you are just making an observation. Anyone accusing a member here of being a communist is clearly doing so intending to insult, and that is the way we will interpret it, just as we will if you decide to use an alternate phrase to convey the same insult. If you spend enough time here, you may start to forget we all have far more in common with each other than with those who are working to disarm us and render the citizenry powerless. The spectrum of political thought does not run from DeSantis to Trump. Yes, there are some significant differences, but we need to learn to discuss them respectfully or move on. This infighting harms the community and drives people away, and for that reason, we will not tolerate it. A significant part of G.D. seems to have has devolved to: If'N Yu WoOdnuT BeeLiVe DuNaLd j. TRuMp is JeBus, tHeN Yu'za CoMmIe!! Facts are: Evidence was presented to a Grand Jury, who returned indictments. Trump is currently unindicted in the AZ fake electors case. Maybe some people were on to something when suggesting Republicans might be much better with a different Candidate who did not have tons of legal baggage from 2020 to run in 2024. Bigger_Hammer |
|
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/327183/IMG_3197_jpeg-3197098.JPG
Video in X posts above. View Quote Let me guess what political party that dumb twat belongs to . |
|
Quoted: Come on, OP. Were they indicted for being skeptical? Or were they indicted for casting fraudulent electoral college votes? View Quote Electors are not required to cast the popular vote so I guess it depends how you define fraudulent. Pretty sure we all know where "certain" individuals on ARF stand . Inbeded conspirators work much the same way on this forum as they do in government. They are a cancer that is allowed to work within the rules while killing the host . Anybody that is OK with the current lawfare taking place in this country is part of the disease killing it and, will be the first to cry when and if the pendulum ever swings the other way. |
|
Quoted: I didn't say it but take it from Moderators in a similar thread https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Has-GD-become-a-sanctuary-site-for-communists-POLL-/5-2715268/?page=10#i108475962 THE LAST WORD Folks, rather than handing out the numerous warnings that have been earned in this thread, we're going to lock it with a simple reminder - anything you direct toward another member that is intended as an insult is a violation of our Code of Conduct. 6 - Attacking or insulting a member in an effort to elicit a negative response. You have the right to disagree, but please do so in a respectful manner. This rule also includes posting disparaging remarks about a member's family. Labeling someone a communist because they are not in lock step agreement with all of your political positions, or because they do not support your favored candidate, is over the line. No, we won't accept the disingenuous excuse that you are just making an observation. Anyone accusing a member here of being a communist is clearly doing so intending to insult, and that is the way we will interpret it, just as we will if you decide to use an alternate phrase to convey the same insult. If you spend enough time here, you may start to forget we all have far more in common with each other than with those who are working to disarm us and render the citizenry powerless. The spectrum of political thought does not run from DeSantis to Trump. Yes, there are some significant differences, but we need to learn to discuss them respectfully or move on. This infighting harms the community and drives people away, and for that reason, we will not tolerate it. A significant part of G.D. seems to have has devolved to: If'N Yu WoOdnuT BeeLiVe DuNaLd j. TRuMp is JeBus, tHeN Yu'za CoMmIe!! Facts are: Evidence was presented to a Grand Jury, who returned indictments. Trump is currently unindicted in the AZ fake electors case. Maybe some people were on to something when suggesting Republicans might be much better with a different Candidate who did not have tons of legal baggage from 2020 to run in 2024. Bigger_Hammer View Quote Oh, heavens.....INFIGHTING? Mean words and name calling? Is that anything like when the founders would come to blows over ideology and they had to ban pistols and daggers from congress? A grand jury indicted Kyle. "Republicans" would be better off flushing the milque toast rino assholes, close ranks, support the people who actually want to get shit done. Do we need to pull out the list of the shit Trump actually got done in the face of opposition from the opposing party, the media, and his own party? I'm wasting my keystrokes. I realize that. Y'all aren't going to quit doing what you do. I should enjoy it for what it is, same as MSM, antifa, BLM, etc. Entertainment. |
|
Quoted: Oh, heavens.....INFIGHTING? Mean words and name calling? Is that anything like when the founders would come to blows over ideology and they had to ban pistols and daggers from congress? A grand jury indicted Kyle. "Republicans" would be better off flushing the milque toast rino assholes, close ranks, support the people who actually want to get shit done. Do we need to pull out the list of the shit Trump actually got done in the face of opposition from the opposing party, the media, and his own party? I'm wasting my keystrokes. I realize that. Y'all aren't going to quit doing what you do. I should enjoy it for what it is, same as MSM, antifa, BLM, etc. Entertainment. View Quote It’s a good thing he faced opposition from his own party or we’d have an AWB in effect right now. |
|
Quoted: Then let's investigate and charge all with forgery and fraud who deserve it. But it only goes one way, doesn't it? You see the elements in this thread all too happy to eat our own while being ok with the left committing massive election fraud. Kinda points to what they are, really. Gets old seeing the same names doing the same shit in every thread. View Quote Those elements you refer to are the left. |
|
Quoted: Oh, heavens.....INFIGHTING? Mean words and name calling? Is that anything like when the founders would come to blows over ideology and they had to ban pistols and daggers from congress? A grand jury indicted Kyle. "Republicans" would be better off flushing the milque toast rino assholes, close ranks, support the people who actually want to get shit done. Do we need to pull out the list of the shit Trump actually got done in the face of opposition from the opposing party, the media, and his own party? I'm wasting my keystrokes. I realize that. Y'all aren't going to quit doing what you do. I should enjoy it for what it is, same as MSM, antifa, BLM, etc. Entertainment. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I didn't say it but take it from Moderators in a similar thread https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Has-GD-become-a-sanctuary-site-for-communists-POLL-/5-2715268/?page=10#i108475962 THE LAST WORD Folks, rather than handing out the numerous warnings that have been earned in this thread, we're going to lock it with a simple reminder - anything you direct toward another member that is intended as an insult is a violation of our Code of Conduct. 6 - Attacking or insulting a member in an effort to elicit a negative response. You have the right to disagree, but please do so in a respectful manner. This rule also includes posting disparaging remarks about a member's family. Labeling someone a communist because they are not in lock step agreement with all of your political positions, or because they do not support your favored candidate, is over the line. No, we won't accept the disingenuous excuse that you are just making an observation. Anyone accusing a member here of being a communist is clearly doing so intending to insult, and that is the way we will interpret it, just as we will if you decide to use an alternate phrase to convey the same insult. If you spend enough time here, you may start to forget we all have far more in common with each other than with those who are working to disarm us and render the citizenry powerless. The spectrum of political thought does not run from DeSantis to Trump. Yes, there are some significant differences, but we need to learn to discuss them respectfully or move on. This infighting harms the community and drives people away, and for that reason, we will not tolerate it. A significant part of G.D. seems to have has devolved to: If'N Yu WoOdnuT BeeLiVe DuNaLd j. TRuMp is JeBus, tHeN Yu'za CoMmIe!! Facts are: Evidence was presented to a Grand Jury, who returned indictments. Trump is currently unindicted in the AZ fake electors case. Maybe some people were on to something when suggesting Republicans might be much better with a different Candidate who did not have tons of legal baggage from 2020 to run in 2024. Bigger_Hammer Oh, heavens.....INFIGHTING? Mean words and name calling? Is that anything like when the founders would come to blows over ideology and they had to ban pistols and daggers from congress? A grand jury indicted Kyle. "Republicans" would be better off flushing the milque toast rino assholes, close ranks, support the people who actually want to get shit done. Do we need to pull out the list of the shit Trump actually got done in the face of opposition from the opposing party, the media, and his own party? I'm wasting my keystrokes. I realize that. Y'all aren't going to quit doing what you do. I should enjoy it for what it is, same as MSM, antifa, BLM, etc. Entertainment. LOL. I've said (over & over & over...) that I will vote for the "Republican Candidates" in every election & position I can. I have in every election. Since I voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980. If you want to keep huffing that Copeium somehow believing a marginal low IQ Reality TV "personality" who was a Democrat (until he decided to run as a "Republican") who lived a disastrous personal life (sexual assaults, serial cheating, trail of bankruptcies & failed businesses) is somehow "The Righteous Saviour" of America just keep on. I should enjoy it for the comedy & LOLs. Trump was elected as an "unknown" over the most hated Democrat since Jefferson Davis by a whisper thin few votes over a few key electoral college states. Trump lost the Popular Total Vote in 2016 (& again in 2020). Hey, I'm glad Trump surprised everyone with that whisker thin win. 4 (or 8 years) of Madame President Hilary Clinton certainly would have been terrible & a disaster for America. But, while President Trump had chances to really get things done & he flubbed it. Instead of being focused on being the President and getting legislation passed (while he held the House & Senate), Trump cared more about generating "All Eyes On Me" attention whoring instead of letting his accomplishments do the speaking. He did Executive Orders that could just as easily be revoked by any successor. Trump's Legal Problems? Mostly caused by Trump's stupid & illegal actions. Paying off a Porn Starlett & ex-Playboy bunny & trying to hide the payoffs? His hair brained January 6th Fake Electors Fiasco? Sorry for your distress about my comment. A Golden Rule of Life to Remember. "Don't do legally questionable idiotic actions & it's much harder to end up at the defendants desk in a trial". Bigger_Hammer |
|
The communist left hates America. The Republicans are just the other side of the same counterfeit coin.
|
|
Quoted: Much of GD isn't going to understand that without a catchy, misleading tweet, a Rumble video, and 60 angry, reinforcing posts from Trump on Truth Social at 2AM. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Most states have laws dictating that the party whose candidate wins the state’s popular vote, gets to choose the state’s electors. Joe Biden won both Michigan and Arizona, so the democrats got to choose the state’s electors. But Republicans in those states, under direction and guidance from the Trump administration, submitted their own electors anyway. The cast electoral votes, the party certified them, and then submitted them to congress and the national archives as if they were the legitimate electors. Blatantly in violation of the law. Much of GD isn't going to understand that without a catchy, misleading tweet, a Rumble video, and 60 angry, reinforcing posts from Trump on Truth Social at 2AM. You two make a set. |
|
Quoted: Apparently 27 people so far who support the sniffy ol pedo potatus and his legion of orcs and drag queens and millions of illegal alien criminals. How many DU plants are in this place now? Anybody got a head count? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Who the fuck voted yes? Apparently 27 people so far who support the sniffy ol pedo potatus and his legion of orcs and drag queens and millions of illegal alien criminals. How many DU plants are in this place now? Anybody got a head count? They love it here. It compliments their self-loathing, gender and father issues to be called homos by men. |
|
|
Meanwhile, during the Supreme Court hearing today, the attorney general said if you don’t like the results of the election, you are more than welcome to challenge them in court.
|
|
|
|
https://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-maintains-2016-election-160716779.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAM4Yz8ulYhpyO8f-HuqczFlmg-qRJPeC0OrhWgfted_Qspkmxm86ClaO2Bo0TaVWCUiumMw_n09tVxbILPsX3vDUoOBuUL_IBDmnVVmoigRGsVo-j1j1m7x_BM8Qj2GgKhqxY20_ziCcXi_1IeR9twXQDrIzobL_u9rLfpUYS20O
Hillary Clinton is sticking with her conviction that the 2016 presidential election was not conducted legitimately, saying the details surrounding her loss are still unclear. "There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level," Clinton said during an interview for the latest episode of The Atlantic's politics podcast, The Ticket. "We still don't know what really happened." "There's just a lot that I think will be revealed. History will discover," the Democratic Party's 2016 presidential nominee continued. "But you don't win by 3 million votes and have all this other shenanigans and stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, 'Whoa, something's not right here.' That was a deep sense of unease." Clinton also offered copious criticism of President Trump, saying she warned the country about her former rival, and "it was even worse than I thought it was." "I really did feel sometimes like the tree falling in the forest. I believed he was a puppet of Putin. I believed that there was relevant, important information in his tax returns. I believed he did not have the temperament to be president, he was unfit not a partisan comment, but an assessment of him," the former secretary of state said. In August, Clinton said Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden should not concede the upcoming November election "under any circumstances" because she believes "this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don't give an inch, and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is." |
|
Quoted: Electors are not required to cast the popular vote so I guess it depends how you define fraudulent. Pretty sure we all know where "certain" individuals on ARF stand . Inbeded conspirators work much the same way on this forum as they do in government. They are a cancer that is allowed to work within the rules while killing the host . Anybody that is OK with the current lawfare taking place in this country is part of the disease killing it and, will be the first to cry when and if the pendulum ever swings the other way. View Quote You are conflating faithless electors and fraudulent electors. Legitimate electors can cast a vote for whoever they want (crossing party lines makes them a “faithless elector”). Perfectly legal. Fraudulent electors don’t get to cast a vote at all, because they aren’t the legitimate electors from that state. Pretending they are earns you a criminal indictment. |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Make sure you vote this November. That will surely fix things. We can surely work this out peacefully. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/321624/00872e8f2c30370c_png-3197474.JPG Question, HeadInSand: Will you be voting in this election or not? |
|
|
Quoted: The tread title is irrelevant. The actions of the Arizona government are the problem. So I guess reality is hard for some? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The court documents that directly contradict the thread title. This shit isn't hard. The tread title is irrelevant. The actions of the Arizona government are the problem. So I guess reality is hard for some? The thread title is directly what the person you quoted was talking about. How is that not relevant? Reality is hard for some when you want so hard to believe something you will grasp onto any bullshit on the internet. Basic reasoning skills are hard, I know. But hey, keep on stomping your feet, and maybe what you want will come true. |
|
Quoted: @JLH3 Yeah? That's the first I've heard of that. Why don't you do yourself a favor and post evidence to support your post. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: These indictments are bullshit, but I think this will not turn out the way these people think it will go. FINALLY, evidence of 2020 election fraud will be disclosed in court. No court has been willing to hear any of the evidence so far, which is why the actual "Big Lie", that Joe Biden was elected, is bandied to this day. Here's a start: do yourself a favor and never post that video again. It was proven that all of those allegations were so much made up BS that the Republicans who asked those people to speak Apologized to everybody. @JLH3 Yeah? That's the first I've heard of that. Why don't you do yourself a favor and post evidence to support your post. @yankee43 How about the fact Harris admitted there was no proof to back up the allegations [tweet]https://twitter.com/brahmresnik/status/1630746464824459265?ref_src=twsrc[/tweet] and the Republican-controlled house voted to expel her over it https://apnews.com/article/liz-harris-expel-arizona-legislature-accusations-4e7ac52509920377acc8b71175d38876#:~:text=PHOENIX%20 and here is what House President Toma said about the presentation. "What should have been a joint hearing to examine commonsense election reforms devolved into disgraceful fringe theater," Toma said in a statement Monday. "I'm not alone in believing that it was irresponsible and bad judgment for Ms. Harris to invite a person to present unsubstantiated and defamatory allegations in a legislative forum." https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/arizona-republicans-disavow-wide-ranging-bribery-allegation/ |
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.