User Panel
|
you missed a point.
It's 1 1/2 foot wide and worn centered on the back of the service dress coat. .... how else will people know you're a certified bad ass when you're leading from the front? |
|
View Quote |
|
I promised myself, that if I saw this in GD, I would stay out of it, but fuck it...
I'm re posting from a thread I started in the .Mil section, cause I ain't typing all that again.... I know most don't give a fuck, but the Armor Master Gunner Course was one of the most technically demanding courses with stringent standards for many years. My class started out with 32 and 4 months later 12 graduated. I never even head of Artillery of Patriot or Avenger MG courses until all this came out. and the Artillery MG school based on what I saw on there web site, is 2 weeks. To the Armor MG community, which is small, they had been asking for recognition for years and having the ASI was equal to Drill Sgt when it cam for promotions, order of Merit,etc.And the MG community had been asking for a badge for years... There were rumblings about a Armor "CIB" after Gulf War 1, which turned into the CAB, because as usual , everyone else had to jump on the bandwagon and not give Armor Branch its fair due on its own, The design of the badge, with no Tank Symbol, is being seen as a big slap in the face to the Armor MG's. A rifle.. a Missile and a Saber.... This is the Infantry Mafia plain and simple as many of them see it. It may not be exactly the same, but we see it similar to how the Rangers had there Black Beret taken room them and given to those less deserving. I know, It's flair, who cares... but this is something that could have been done is a much better fashion, and of course the younger MG's are all saying, hey, its a step in the right direction. But Heraldry will never revise or change the badge, so were stuck with it... I agree with my Armor MG brothers, we got fucked by the Grunt mafia at Benning. This would never have happened if Armor were still at Knox. |
|
Outside of Armor branch, You would never hear or know what a Master Gunner is...
OK Kids.. sit down.. Time for a History Lesson from Uncle Harv... Post VietNam... Army fucked up like a soup sandwich... Armor branch no different... taking a unit to the field and getting them to Boresight tanks and fire gunnery with some as-semblance of knowledge was non existent.. Some Armor guys were working with the Brits, who ,As Usual, Have a unique program that we want to emulate. They have NCO's in there Armor Branch that specialize in all thinks Tank Gunnery... its a career field and he is the SME on the Tank weapon Systems and Gunnery/Training... So we create a Pilot program in 1975 to give Armor units the same SME. The called them Master Gunners (The Brits called there's Master of Gunnery or something similar). The Program created these SME's who would go out into the units and spread the knowledge...Each class had about 30-35 students and the course ran for close to 4 months at Ft Knox. You spent your time at Todd Hall (Maint) and then Skidgel Hall (Weapons). Once graduated, you go back to your unit and CO/BN level and work with the units to improve/enhance gunnery... Things like the CAT trophy were around for years, we never won them because we sucked... now we had SME's to teach and mentor and create training programs and implement critical components like the importance of keeping TC's/Gunners together to build crew cohesiveness. Technology changes as well... early training devices were crude... Bolting a M16 with a .22LR sub cal kit onto the main gun and shooting .22 Tracer rds at scaled targets (we called the range Keebler Village's). Mounting M2's on the gun and shooting .50 at 1/4 scale targets on smaller rangers... Creating skills test like the TCGST (Tank Crew Gunner Skills test) that were made up of common core tasks all tank crews needed to be proficient at. Creating the Gunnery combat tables so crews now had a bench mark to be measured by. Keeping track of crew training thru the use of training records and matrix's so you could report to the commander the units progress... who's doing well, who's fucked up and what there fucked up with, and how to unfuck them. Setting up the units gunnery, running the ranges, and trouble shooting problem tanks that won't take a bore sight or can't seem to calibrate no mater what the crew's do. Creating the Armament Accuracy checks so crews know and understand there fire control systems and know when it's working and when it's not. As MG's grew at CO/BN, they were slotted at Division levels to do the same things for the commanders as there right hand SME's. When the Army first started going to places like Hungary to train... it was the Mike Golfs who would create and set up gunnery ranges. Same with Desert Shield in preparation for Desert Storm. When the Unit Conduct of Fire (UCOFT) simulators and SIMNET came on line in the 80's these Computerized simulators enhanced gunnery even more. It was a low cost way to get TC/Gunners valuable range time without running the tanks. Crews spent hundreds of hours in them perfecting conduct of fire. Ask any Desert Storm Tank crew how much time they spend in a COFT prior to that war... One of the reasons we did so well in the desert.. all those years perfecting tank gunnery... Program was so successful that the Bradley guys implemented there own MG course with the same goals... These two courses chugged along all thru the 90's and early 2000's until the GWOT arrived... then the focus changed. And so did the Army.... now they started to bastardize the course and water it down by adding that name to a small arms course.. then the Artillery boys got into it, then aviation and ADA.... See a trend.... Give everyone a Black beret.... and they will start acting like Rangers..... and we all know how that worked... So yeah, a lot of the older Armor guys who grew up in that era and have seen all this, and the design of the badge and how it got to where it is... Yeah, are Jimmies got rustled a bit. So yeah, most of you would have never head of it...unless you were a Tanker. Are we a bit butt hurt by it... yup... should we be... ??? Like most in the Army, unless it directly effects you, most don't give a fuck.. MG school was the hardest thing I did in my career, I spent a year training, and went to two lesser schools (Tank Commanders certification Course at Knox and Reserve Tank Commanders qualification course at Gowen Field,ID) to prep for it, and it was my Proudest moment and it defined me as a NCO from that point until I retired. So now you know the history... go to bed.. |
|
Quoted:
They say copying is a form of flattery. The Russians must be feeling good these days https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/7E66F8E7-78F0-4C7B-9565-B35EEF09BEB7-437662.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/203E9A81-BC06-4866-9E3E-D044ABAFDB25-437677.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
They have enough badges, ribbons, awards, and who knows what that even Soviet Field Marshals are starting to look at our uniforms and shake their heads. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/7E66F8E7-78F0-4C7B-9565-B35EEF09BEB7-437662.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/203E9A81-BC06-4866-9E3E-D044ABAFDB25-437677.JPG |
|
|
|
Eleven years, 7 AAM's (3 downgraded from ARCOM's), 2 ARCOM's (1 downgraded from an MSM, 1 V Device denied). That should have been 4 ARCOM's - 1 w/ V Device, and 1 MSM. The MSM was my for my ETS. I never received anything but an excellent, promote ahead of peers, NCOER. I was asked to re-up for 6th deployment when I said no more (I was the an E-6 doing the work of a Platoon Sergeant, who was non-deployable due to bone spurs in his feet). So, I would have held an E-7 slot during deployment, nope I felt the big green weenie too many times. 5 combat deployments, 2 non-combat deployments, 8.5 years overseas. Far from an Audie Murphy type, nothing heroic by true standards, but I ran 5 X 3 on my chest, and was proud of it. No one under the rank of E-7 was ever recommended for a Bronze Star or higher, not a single soldier in my Battalion, that lived to wear it proudly. That's how senior leadership saw the recognition system, you either lived to re-up or move-on, or died fighting for their promotions.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Outside of Armor branch, You would never hear or know what a Master Gunner is... OK Kids.. sit down.. Time for a History Lesson from Uncle Harv... Post VietNam... Army fucked up like a soup sandwich... Armor branch no different... taking a unit to the field and getting them to Boresight tanks and fire gunnery with some as-semblance of knowledge was non existent.. Some Armor guys were working with the Brits, who ,As Usual, Have a unique program that we want to emulate. They have NCO's in there Armor Branch that specialize in all thinks Tank Gunnery... its a career field and he is the SME on the Tank weapon Systems and Gunnery/Training... So we create a Pilot program in 1975 to give Armor units the same SME. The called them Master Gunners (The Brits called there's Master of Gunnery or something similar). The Program created these SME's who would go out into the units and spread the knowledge...Each class had about 30-35 students and the course ran for close to 4 months at Ft Knox. You spent your time at Todd Hall (Maint) and then Skidgel Hall (Weapons). Once graduated, you go back to your unit and CO/BN level and work with the units to improve/enhance gunnery... Things like the CAT trophy were around for years, we never won them because we sucked... now we had SME's to teach and mentor and create training programs and implement critical components like the importance of keeping TC's/Gunners together to build crew cohesiveness. Technology changes as well... early training devices were crude... Bolting a M16 with a .22LR sub cal kit onto the main gun and shooting .22 Tracer rds at scaled targets (we called the range Keebler Village's). Mounting M2's on the gun and shooting .50 at 1/4 scale targets on smaller rangers... Creating skills test like the TCGST (Tank Crew Gunner Skills test) that were made up of common core tasks all tank crews needed to be proficient at. Creating the Gunnery combat tables so crews now had a bench mark to be measured by. Keeping track of crew training thru the use of training records and matrix's so you could report to the commander the units progress... who's doing well, who's fucked up and what there fucked up with, and how to unfuck them. Setting up the units gunnery, running the ranges, and trouble shooting problem tanks that won't take a bore sight or can't seem to calibrate no mater what the crew's do. Creating the Armament Accuracy checks so crews know and understand there fire control systems and know when it's working and when it's not. As MG's grew at CO/BN, they were slotted at Division levels to do the same things for the commanders as there right hand SME's. When the Army first started going to places like Hungary to train... it was the Mike Golfs who would create and set up gunnery ranges. Same with Desert Shield in preparation for Desert Storm. When the Unit Conduct of Fire (UCOFT) simulators and SIMNET came on line in the 80's these Computerized simulators enhanced gunnery even more. It was a low cost way to get TC/Gunners valuable range time without running the tanks. Crews spent hundreds of hours in them perfecting conduct of fire. Ask any Desert Storm Tank crew how much time they spend in a COFT prior to that war... One of the reasons we did so well in the desert.. all those years perfecting tank gunnery... Program was so successful that the Bradley guys implemented there own MG course with the same goals... These two courses chugged along all thru the 90's and early 2000's until the GWOT arrived... then the focus changed. And so did the Army.... now they started to bastardize the course and water it down by adding that name to a small arms course.. then the Artillery boys got into it, then aviation and ADA.... See a trend.... Give everyone a Black beret.... and they will start acting like Rangers..... and we all know how that worked... So yeah, a lot of the older Armor guys who grew up in that era and have seen all this, and the design of the badge and how it got to where it is... Yeah, are Jimmies got rustled a bit. So yeah, most of you would have never head of it...unless you were a Tanker. Are we a bit butt hurt by it... yup... should we be... ??? Like most in the Army, unless it directly effects you, most don't give a fuck.. MG school was the hardest thing I did in my career, I spent a year training, and went to two lesser schools (Tank Commanders certification Course at Knox and Reserve Tank Commanders qualification course at Gowen Field,ID) to prep for it, and it was my Proudest moment and it defined me as a NCO from that point until I retired. So now you know the history... go to bed.. View Quote I qualified I was 1/13 armor 75-79, and my platoon Sargent was a master blaster. Must of been one of the first. |
|
|
Quoted:
Outside of Armor branch, You would never hear or know what a Master Gunner is... OK Kids.. sit down.. Time for a History Lesson from Uncle Harv... Post VietNam... Army fucked up like a soup sandwich... Armor branch no different... taking a unit to the field and getting them to Boresight tanks and fire gunnery with some as-semblance of knowledge was non existent.. Some Armor guys were working with the Brits, who ,As Usual, Have a unique program that we want to emulate. They have NCO's in there Armor Branch that specialize in all thinks Tank Gunnery... its a career field and he is the SME on the Tank weapon Systems and Gunnery/Training... So we create a Pilot program in 1975 to give Armor units the same SME. The called them Master Gunners (The Brits called there's Master of Gunnery or something similar). The Program created these SME's who would go out into the units and spread the knowledge...Each class had about 30-35 students and the course ran for close to 4 months at Ft Knox. You spent your time at Todd Hall (Maint) and then Skidgel Hall (Weapons). Once graduated, you go back to your unit and CO/BN level and work with the units to improve/enhance gunnery... Things like the CAT trophy were around for years, we never won them because we sucked... now we had SME's to teach and mentor and create training programs and implement critical components like the importance of keeping TC's/Gunners together to build crew cohesiveness. Technology changes as well... early training devices were crude... Bolting a M16 with a .22LR sub cal kit onto the main gun and shooting .22 Tracer rds at scaled targets (we called the range Keebler Village's). Mounting M2's on the gun and shooting .50 at 1/4 scale targets on smaller rangers... Creating skills test like the TCGST (Tank Crew Gunner Skills test) that were made up of common core tasks all tank crews needed to be proficient at. Creating the Gunnery combat tables so crews now had a bench mark to be measured by. Keeping track of crew training thru the use of training records and matrix's so you could report to the commander the units progress... who's doing well, who's fucked up and what there fucked up with, and how to unfuck them. Setting up the units gunnery, running the ranges, and trouble shooting problem tanks that won't take a bore sight or can't seem to calibrate no mater what the crew's do. Creating the Armament Accuracy checks so crews know and understand there fire control systems and know when it's working and when it's not. As MG's grew at CO/BN, they were slotted at Division levels to do the same things for the commanders as there right hand SME's. When the Army first started going to places like Hungary to train... it was the Mike Golfs who would create and set up gunnery ranges. Same with Desert Shield in preparation for Desert Storm. When the Unit Conduct of Fire (UCOFT) simulators and SIMNET came on line in the 80's these Computerized simulators enhanced gunnery even more. It was a low cost way to get TC/Gunners valuable range time without running the tanks. Crews spent hundreds of hours in them perfecting conduct of fire. Ask any Desert Storm Tank crew how much time they spend in a COFT prior to that war... One of the reasons we did so well in the desert.. all those years perfecting tank gunnery... Program was so successful that the Bradley guys implemented there own MG course with the same goals... These two courses chugged along all thru the 90's and early 2000's until the GWOT arrived... then the focus changed. And so did the Army.... now they started to bastardize the course and water it down by adding that name to a small arms course.. then the Artillery boys got into it, then aviation and ADA.... See a trend.... Give everyone a Black beret.... and they will start acting like Rangers..... and we all know how that worked... So yeah, a lot of the older Armor guys who grew up in that era and have seen all this, and the design of the badge and how it got to where it is... Yeah, are Jimmies got rustled a bit. So yeah, most of you would have never head of it...unless you were a Tanker. Are we a bit butt hurt by it... yup... should we be... ??? Like most in the Army, unless it directly effects you, most don't give a fuck.. MG school was the hardest thing I did in my career, I spent a year training, and went to two lesser schools (Tank Commanders certification Course at Knox and Reserve Tank Commanders qualification course at Gowen Field,ID) to prep for it, and it was my Proudest moment and it defined me as a NCO from that point until I retired. So now you know the history... go to bed.. View Quote I qualified I was 1/13 armor 75-79, and my platoon Sargent was a master blaster. Must of been one of the first. Did manage to earn this Attached File |
|
Quoted:
What the fuck is my J3 ASI, then, chopped liver? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Outside of Armor branch, You would never hear or know what a Master Gunner is... The Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) was introduced to the Army in 1981, and the first Bradley Master Gunner Course was established in 1983. The 10-week course, modeled after the 11-week Armor Master Gunner Course, focused on skill levels I through III tasks and instructed 20 and 30-level maintenance on the M240C machine gun and the M242 Bushmaster cannon. Over the last 25 years, the instruction for the Bradley Master Gunner Course has undergone 10 evolutions, growing from 11 to 14, to 13 to eight weeks. These changes occurred to meet the needs of the force and return highly trained NCOs who possess the technical expertise to implement BFV gunnery and turret maintenance training programs. The introduction of Army Force Generation (ARFORGEN) necessitated that the 29th Infantry Regiment examine what critical tasks a master gunner must possess, how long it takes to train those tasks, and how to best support the operational force. This article explains not only the Bradley Master Gunner Course; but also what challenges and trends have been observed during ARFORGEN and how the 1st Battalion, 29th Infantry Regiment has adjusted and continues to adjust to support units. "Because of challenges within ARFORGEN and the needs that have been identified by the field, the course has now undergone its eleventh change in the last 25 years to return highly skilled, technically proficient NCOs to units. To that end, beginning in January 2007, the Bradley Master Gunner Course will increase from 49 training days to 55 training days, or 11 weeks, beginning with Class #1-07. Bottom line... the course was ignored for years.... and then a bunch of strap hangers come along and copy the course but with much lower standards and critiera, and then decide now to create a badge..... and its an epic abortion of a design.... and a slap in the face to you and I... |
|
|
Quoted:
I am starting to agree with you, damn first female Master gunner is a petroleum specialist View Quote |
|
I went to Bradley MG school in 1988. We were the last class before the move to Building 5500 at Benning.
I know a couple of 19D's (Scouts) that went to both Tank and Bradley MG school. I'll go by Clothing Sales and buy a badge when they start selling them so when my family buries me someday my uniform will be squared away. |
|
I went from the Marines, where we flair none of the things to the Army, where we flair all of the things. After 4 years I'm still trying to figure out if I've met the minimum required pieces of flair. I do have aircrew wings, so I've got that going for me which is good.
|
|
Quoted:
Airborne became a gentleman/woman’s course but the Army seems to want every division hosting an air assault course these days https://www.army.mil/e2/rv5_images/women/new_profiles/current/320/darpino.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Well yeah, Air Assault Airbourne Just to name a few. If that doesn't tell anyone all they need to know about it idk what does |
|
Quoted: Cadet command rents out an entire class at the WTC air assault course every summer, and we pretty much all passed except a couple of females who couldn't even climb a rope. If that doesn't tell anyone all they need to know about it idk what does View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Outside of Armor branch, You would never hear or know what a Master Gunner is... OK Kids.. sit down.. Time for a History Lesson from Uncle Harv... Post VietNam... Army fucked up like a soup sandwich... Armor branch no different... taking a unit to the field and getting them to Boresight tanks and fire gunnery with some as-semblance of knowledge was non existent.. Some Armor guys were working with the Brits, who ,As Usual, Have a unique program that we want to emulate. They have NCO's in there Armor Branch that specialize in all thinks Tank Gunnery... its a career field and he is the SME on the Tank weapon Systems and Gunnery/Training... So we create a Pilot program in 1975 to give Armor units the same SME. The called them Master Gunners (The Brits called there's Master of Gunnery or something similar). The Program created these SME's who would go out into the units and spread the knowledge...Each class had about 30-35 students and the course ran for close to 4 months at Ft Knox. You spent your time at Todd Hall (Maint) and then Skidgel Hall (Weapons). Once graduated, you go back to your unit and CO/BN level and work with the units to improve/enhance gunnery... Things like the CAT trophy were around for years, we never won them because we sucked... now we had SME's to teach and mentor and create training programs and implement critical components like the importance of keeping TC's/Gunners together to build crew cohesiveness. Technology changes as well... early training devices were crude... Bolting a M16 with a .22LR sub cal kit onto the main gun and shooting .22 Tracer rds at scaled targets (we called the range Keebler Village's). Mounting M2's on the gun and shooting .50 at 1/4 scale targets on smaller rangers... Creating skills test like the TCGST (Tank Crew Gunner Skills test) that were made up of common core tasks all tank crews needed to be proficient at. Creating the Gunnery combat tables so crews now had a bench mark to be measured by. Keeping track of crew training thru the use of training records and matrix's so you could report to the commander the units progress... who's doing well, who's fucked up and what there fucked up with, and how to unfuck them. Setting up the units gunnery, running the ranges, and trouble shooting problem tanks that won't take a bore sight or can't seem to calibrate no mater what the crew's do. Creating the Armament Accuracy checks so crews know and understand there fire control systems and know when it's working and when it's not. As MG's grew at CO/BN, they were slotted at Division levels to do the same things for the commanders as there right hand SME's. When the Army first started going to places like Hungary to train... it was the Mike Golfs who would create and set up gunnery ranges. Same with Desert Shield in preparation for Desert Storm. When the Unit Conduct of Fire (UCOFT) simulators and SIMNET came on line in the 80's these Computerized simulators enhanced gunnery even more. It was a low cost way to get TC/Gunners valuable range time without running the tanks. Crews spent hundreds of hours in them perfecting conduct of fire. Ask any Desert Storm Tank crew how much time they spend in a COFT prior to that war... One of the reasons we did so well in the desert.. all those years perfecting tank gunnery... Program was so successful that the Bradley guys implemented there own MG course with the same goals... These two courses chugged along all thru the 90's and early 2000's until the GWOT arrived... then the focus changed. And so did the Army.... now they started to bastardize the course and water it down by adding that name to a small arms course.. then the Artillery boys got into it, then aviation and ADA.... See a trend.... Give everyone a Black beret.... and they will start acting like Rangers..... and we all know how that worked... So yeah, a lot of the older Armor guys who grew up in that era and have seen all this, and the design of the badge and how it got to where it is... Yeah, are Jimmies got rustled a bit. So yeah, most of you would have never head of it...unless you were a Tanker. Are we a bit butt hurt by it... yup... should we be... ??? Like most in the Army, unless it directly effects you, most don't give a fuck.. MG school was the hardest thing I did in my career, I spent a year training, and went to two lesser schools (Tank Commanders certification Course at Knox and Reserve Tank Commanders qualification course at Gowen Field,ID) to prep for it, and it was my Proudest moment and it defined me as a NCO from that point until I retired. So now you know the history... go to bed.. View Quote The whole MG idea is good but the "all in one" badge is stupid as hell. They should have done an MOS specific badge for each MOS that has an MG course. Let the cannon cockers have their cannon and the infantry have their rifle etc. but don't try to shove them all into one ugly badge. |
|
Quoted:
We’ll need to requisition more Velcro https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/45613B42-D428-4A69-AB67-EA2346B728A0-437660.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/1F7F9CED-577D-4FDB-82D4-97D6C636D9E9-437661.JPG View Quote |
|
BTW, I survived incompetent management. Do I get anything other than retirement?
|
|
Laughs in DD214. Just go all out. Expert Master Gunner badge and Combat Gunner Badge.
|
|
Jesus the army is starting to look like third world dictators in their uniforms. The Marines aren't too far behind.
|
|
Quoted:
Twinkie’s were the original MRE https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/DFB59434-CC77-4564-8B2F-0E9F8BAC923A-437659.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That chick looks like a master of twinkies. Not a master gunner. |
|
When everyone gets a participation trophy they eventually become irrelevant and diminish those that actually put in the work.
Attached File |
|
Quoted:
Jesus the army is starting to look like third world dictators in their uniforms. The Marines aren't too far behind. View Quote |
|
Quoted: when the hell did the sniper/sapper tab get approved for wear View Quote |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/CEA31E18-1B8F-43B1-B925-E35AD3DDEF69-439182.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Jesus the army is starting to look like third world dictators in their uniforms. The Marines aren't too far behind. |
|
|
Quoted: In before the US .mil starts awarding people the rank of King of Scotland. View Quote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
You may as well have stayed out of it... not reading all of that shit View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I promised myself, that if I saw this in GD, I would stay out of it, but fuck it... You wouldn't want to learn anything about a thread you clicked on and then posted in.....That's the GD I know... |
|
In the Navy, unless it's actual full-dress uniform (which you'd never wear outside a gala event in D.C. anyway) you're authorized to wear your top 3 ribbons and that's it.
At least that's how it was circa 2008. Shit was awesome. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
In the Navy, unless it's actual full-dress uniform (which you'd never wear outside a gala event in D.C. anyway) you're authorized to wear your top 3 ribbons and that's it. At least that's how it was circa 2008. Shit was awesome. View Quote |
|
Looks like there are a few pics of generals - some of them do not have a COB.
I did not serve in Military so I do not know - seems odd you make it general w/o and combat experience - can someone chime in on that? Im very curious. |
|
Quoted:
Airborne became a gentleman/woman’s course but the Army seems to want every division hosting an air assault course these days https://www.army.mil/e2/rv5_images/women/new_profiles/current/320/darpino.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
In the Navy, unless it's actual full-dress uniform (which you'd never wear outside a gala event in D.C. anyway) you're authorized to wear your top 3 ribbons and that's it. At least that's how it was circa 2008. Shit was awesome. View Quote I just thought the Navy was full of a bunch of people who didn't earn very many awards. I want to know when the Army will issue a ribbon for drawing a certain number of dicks on captured enemy structures and equipment. |
|
Quoted:
By all means don"t You wouldn't want to learn anything about a thread you clicked on and then posted in.....That's the GD I know... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I promised myself, that if I saw this in GD, I would stay out of it, but fuck it... You wouldn't want to learn anything about a thread you clicked on and then posted in.....That's the GD I know... |
|
Quoted:
I didn’t... the rest of the thread was a good read tho View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I promised myself, that if I saw this in GD, I would stay out of it, but fuck it... You wouldn't want to learn anything about a thread you clicked on and then posted in.....That's the GD I know... LOL Army Get more Flair LOL gay and LOL Flair comments... yes, It's a great thread.... Lol. |
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.