User Panel
Quoted:
If she violated the law, she should be prosecuted. Period. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Who could have ever seen this coming? lol Shocked face If she violated the law, she should be prosecuted. Period. I completely agree, which is funny considering everyone had us pegged as Hillary supporters. |
|
Quoted: From a NY Times reporter at the meeting now. https://twitter.com/grynbaum http://i.imgur.com/wvYZcKC.jpg View Quote Notice his use of words. It's all strategy. It's not something he feels strongly about... meaning there are more important issues. He's certainly not saying he is going to tell Sessions to halt the CF investigation. |
|
Quoted: Always the little drama queen. Actually I was right all along about your Orange god being a flip flopper. Which is why this thread and I cause you so many feels. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why on earth would I leave? Is GD a backup mirror of /r/The_Donald? Just how many safe spaces do you tender ones need? Since I never saw you speak against Trump attacking republicans since his nomination, or the Trump fanboi's on this site doing the same thing I figured you kinda agreed with it by default. Why are you so obsessed with Cruz? I've never seen a guy get so much rent free space in people's heads. You were wrong about everything. You lost. I don't think you even got anyone's account locked, despite your best efforts. Always the little drama queen. Actually I was right all along about your Orange god being a flip flopper. Which is why this thread and I cause you so many feels. You still think you can cause me to feel anything? What a sad little man you are. |
|
Is this what I'm supposed to be outraged at today?
Let me get right on it... |
|
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says.
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 |
|
Quoted:
You still think you can cause me to feel anything? What a sad little man you are. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why on earth would I leave? Is GD a backup mirror of /r/The_Donald? Just how many safe spaces do you tender ones need? Since I never saw you speak against Trump attacking republicans since his nomination, or the Trump fanboi's on this site doing the same thing I figured you kinda agreed with it by default. Why are you so obsessed with Cruz? I've never seen a guy get so much rent free space in people's heads. You were wrong about everything. You lost. I don't think you even got anyone's account locked, despite your best efforts. Always the little drama queen. Actually I was right all along about your Orange god being a flip flopper. Which is why this thread and I cause you so many feels. You still think you can cause me to feel anything? What a sad little man you are. Could've fooled me. Anything I post that isn't a positive thought on Trump gets your attention and you have to white knight. Seem's what you're saying, and what you actually do are two different things. Holy shit just like Trump! |
|
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 View Quote All my searching is leading me to believe that he is trolling the left again. |
|
not surprised, they still wouldnt have been able to prosecute her. you guys thinking trump is the savior youve been waiting for are wrong. Dont be surprised if he goes forth with
an AWB the next time a shooting occurs. |
|
Quoted:
All my searching is leading me to believe that he is trolling the left again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 All my searching is leading me to believe that he is trolling the left again. That is always the safe assumption. |
|
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 View Quote "It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 |
|
Joe Scarborough NBC News claims to have a direct line into what Trump is thinking?
I'm skeptical |
|
Quoted:
"Drain the swamp" "Hillary will be in prison" "I'm going to strengthen the 2nd Amendment" "I'm going to appoint Conservative judges to SCOTUS" "Mexico will pay for the wall" Strike two... and a half... ETA: I'm not a neverTrumper but I am no Trumphugger either. If he doesn't make good on the reasons he got my vote, he can expect to be a 1-term President. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Shocker "Hillary will be in prison" "I'm going to strengthen the 2nd Amendment" "I'm going to appoint Conservative judges to SCOTUS" "Mexico will pay for the wall" Strike two... and a half... ETA: I'm not a neverTrumper but I am no Trumphugger either. If he doesn't make good on the reasons he got my vote, he can expect to be a 1-term President. |
|
Quoted:
Could've fooled me. Anything I post that isn't a positive thought on Trump gets your attention and you have to white knight. Seem's what you're saying, and what you actually do are two different things. Holy shit just like Trump! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why on earth would I leave? Is GD a backup mirror of /r/The_Donald? Just how many safe spaces do you tender ones need? Since I never saw you speak against Trump attacking republicans since his nomination, or the Trump fanboi's on this site doing the same thing I figured you kinda agreed with it by default. Why are you so obsessed with Cruz? I've never seen a guy get so much rent free space in people's heads. You were wrong about everything. You lost. I don't think you even got anyone's account locked, despite your best efforts. Always the little drama queen. Actually I was right all along about your Orange god being a flip flopper. Which is why this thread and I cause you so many feels. You still think you can cause me to feel anything? What a sad little man you are. Could've fooled me. Anything I post that isn't a positive thought on Trump gets your attention and you have to white knight. Seem's what you're saying, and what you actually do are two different things. Holy shit just like Trump! Such a bitter little fella Hey, it's your life to waste. |
|
Quoted:
All my searching is leading me to believe that he is trolling the left again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 All my searching is leading me to believe that he is trolling the left again. He's trolling many on the right as well. The butthurt here is palpable. The same guys who got everything wrong for the past year and a half still think they have their gotcha moment. Sorry cupcakes, but 'we won, you lost, get over it'. Try learning something from the guy that outmaneuvered the GOP, DNC, and MSM simultaneously. He's playing the game and he's much better at it than you are. |
|
|
Quoted:
"It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 "It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 Not the first time he's changed his position multiple times, in the same day lol. |
|
After he's sworn in, and all of his DOJ appointments are made, and the FBI is cleaned out of Clintonistas, it will go something like this.
" I attempted to unify the right and the left in this country, by not going after Hillary for her crimes. Unfortunately, my new FBI director, in going over the documents in order to close the case, came upon evidence that I cannot ignore. The evidence is of a sort so grievous that not prosecuting Mrs Clinton would set an example that a high level of corruption is acceptable by our government. We came here to clean up the system and give make it a government that the people can trust again. After seeing this evidence, my AG Jeff Sessions has recommended prosecution. Mr. Trey Gowdy has been appointed special prosecutor." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The above could be planned way ahead of time. It's exactly what I would do if I were in his shoes. He has to look like he isn't vindictive and it isn't personal, because if he did, it would look as if the office of the president is being used as a weapon against his enemies. The way you really get someone that has gotten you, or your friends etc, is to play nice and get cozy, and behind the scenes set them up for a fall. You don't announce it. |
|
He's not even in office yet. Him not pursuing Clinton meh, the foundation being pursued by the FBI will cover that. Then he can say "I didn't go after the witch for the emails" but the FBI can get them on the foundation. Then he is not involve so to speak
|
|
Quoted:
This. It's like the children haven't learned a ding dong thing from the last year and a half about the "news" media. Holy fuck, people. Get your poop in a group. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Why would you want your first days as the new President to be about Hillary Clinton instead of your 100 day agenda? Plenty of time to let things settle down, get many things passed in congress and then let your AG go to work. This. It's like the children haven't learned a ding dong thing from the last year and a half about the "news" media. Holy fuck, people. Get your poop in a group. No sense in letting Clinton dominate the news cycle for the next 4 months and get the democrats all stirred up. Go in get the 100 day plan passed and implemented then let the chips fall where they may. |
|
I am reading that he will not pursue her for EMAIL. Didn't say anything about the on going CF investigation. |
|
Quoted: Such a bitter little fella Hey, it's your life to waste. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Could've fooled me. Anything I post that isn't a positive thought on Trump gets your attention and you have to white knight. Seem's what you're saying, and what you actually do are two different things. Holy shit just like Trump! Such a bitter little fella Hey, it's your life to waste. He's just sad the NeverTrump thread got shut down so he doesn't have an echo chamber in which to spout his bullshit anymore. Apparently, that thread was shut down too soon. This thread is proof that they're not done being butthurt yet. |
|
The political elite is not going to prosecute its own members.
That's just the way the world turns. |
|
Quoted:
The way you really get someone that has gotten you, or your friends etc, is to play nice and get cozy, and behind the scenes set them up for a fall. You don't announce it. View Quote That's literally his talking points about military action against ISIS - stop telling the enemy what you're going to do before you do it. This guy tells you straight up how he plays this game, and people still aren't paying attention. I guess Trump Derangement Syndrome isn't fully cured yet after all |
|
This is how you start off on the wrong foot & piss off the people who spent the last year of their lives supporting you.
Would it have really been so hard to say something like "my new AG will address this after he is actually in office"? |
|
Quoted:
"It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 "It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 I'm good with that. if his AG does go after her, that is fine. The worst about the Clinton has yet to come to light... The foundation and Teneo is money shot material. And the FBI has been setting on it for the next admin. If everything about her time in state and the foundation is made public, without a criminal case, that is fine. Their name, and the names of their backers, will be ruined for good. Either way they are destroyed. |
|
I prefer that the incoming Administration put an end to the practice of giving Hillary a pass for her glaring violations of the Law.
Don't you? |
|
|
Quoted:
I prefer that the incoming Administration put an end to the practice of giving Hillary a pass for her glaring violations of the Law. Don't you? View Quote Remember when you swore up & down that Chris Christie was going to be the VP pick and then theatrically waved your arms and demanded we justify something that had only happened in your mind? |
|
Quoted:
Of course we would like to see her in jail, but at this point we don't need to give the left any more hate fuel. They already compare Trump to (insert past tyrant here), throwing political opponents in jail won't help that perception. Let her fade away and die her political death. I'd rather her be forgotten than a martyr. We won, the election is over, let's move on to making America Great Again. View Quote She committed treason. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Of course we would like to see her in jail, but at this point we don't need to give the left any more hate fuel. They already compare Trump to (insert past tyrant here), throwing political opponents in jail won't help that perception. Let her fade away and die her political death. I'd rather her be forgotten than a martyr. We won, the election is over, let's move on to making America Great Again. She committed treason. So has Obama and over two thirds of congress. lol |
|
Quoted:
"It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 View Quote I am reminded about a line from the Wheel of Time, "An Aes Sedai never lies, but the truth she speaks, may not be the truth you think you hear." Trump says "It is just not something I feel strongly about." You could hear that as "I am not going to prosecute" or "I have so many other things to think about, and I am going to turn it over to my AG. If he finds something illegal, great. If he finds nothing illegal, great. Either way there is going to be an investigation but I am not personally invested in the outcome of that investigation." or something else entirely. When Trump says “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." that could be "I am not going to go back on my claims to prosecute because she has been through enough. She lost the election, is no longer relevant, and I don't want her to suffer any more." or it could mean "I do not want to hurt the Clintons, I really don't. However if she is guilty of crimes then she will be prosecuted for those crimes. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways, but if she committed crimes she will be prosecuted." These are vague statements. They are statement of personal feelings and opinions. They are not statements about a course of action, or precluding a course of action. They are statements about how he feels about issues. Just because I do not want to go to work does not mean I do not go to work. It means just that, I do not WANT to do something. I can still do it. |
|
Honestly, I'd rather see the major networks have campaign finance law violations rammed up their asses.
|
|
Quoted:
Sessions, if confirmed, would be working for Trump. If your boss told you not to do something, and you did it anyways, what would happen? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Is it Trump's job to prosecute, or his AG? Why don't we wait until he's actually in office and Sessions sworn in as AG before we jump to the conclusion that Clinton will walk. Sessions, if confirmed, would be working for Trump. If your boss told you not to do something, and you did it anyways, what would happen? Or what if your boss didn't tell you not to do something, what would happen? |
|
|
Quoted:
Not the first time he's changed his position multiple times, in the same day lol. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 "It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 Not the first time he's changed his position multiple times, in the same day lol. Donald J. Trump ?@realDonaldTrump Nov 20 "I have always had a good relationship with Chuck Schumer. He is far smarter than Harry R and has the ability to get things done. Good news!" |
|
Quoted:
"It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 "It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 I wonder if he found out that she doesn't have long to live. Maybe he thinks it wouldn't be worth it if she isn't going to live long enough to be prosecuted anyway. FBIAnon said if it all came out in the open the government would collapse and there would be civil war. If that were true, if things are really THAT bad, maybe Trump and the FBI have plans to attack the issue more discreetly. Also there is the idea that he is simply playing this down for now to try to keep Obama from issuing her a pardon. It's way too early to judge Trump on his performance. What he said today isn't something we want to hear, but he's having to work around Obama until Jan 20th, and he's definitely working with more information on this subject than we are. I'm going to continue to be optimistic about Trump's presidency and reserve judgment until his first 100 or so days in office are behind him. |
|
Quoted:
I wonder if he found out that she doesn't have long to live. Maybe he thinks it wouldn't be worth it if she isn't going to live long enough to be prosecuted anyway. FBIAnon said if it all came out in the open the government would collapse and there would be civil war. If that were true, if things are really THAT bad, maybe Trump and the FBI have plans to attack the issue more discreetly. Also there is the idea that he is simply playing this down for now to try to keep Obama from issuing her a pardon. It's way too early to judge Trump on his performance. What he said today isn't something we want to hear, but he's having to work around Obama until Jan 20th, and he's definitely working with more information on this subject than we are. I'm going to continue to be optimistic about Trump's presidency and reserve judgment until his first 100 or so days in office are behind him. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 "It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 I wonder if he found out that she doesn't have long to live. Maybe he thinks it wouldn't be worth it if she isn't going to live long enough to be prosecuted anyway. FBIAnon said if it all came out in the open the government would collapse and there would be civil war. If that were true, if things are really THAT bad, maybe Trump and the FBI have plans to attack the issue more discreetly. Also there is the idea that he is simply playing this down for now to try to keep Obama from issuing her a pardon. It's way too early to judge Trump on his performance. What he said today isn't something we want to hear, but he's having to work around Obama until Jan 20th, and he's definitely working with more information on this subject than we are. I'm going to continue to be optimistic about Trump's presidency and reserve judgment until his first 100 or so days in office are behind him. |
|
Quoted:
not surprised, they still wouldnt have been able to prosecute her. you guys thinking trump is the savior youve been waiting for are wrong. Dont be surprised if he goes forth with an AWB the next time a shooting occurs. View Quote Yea, we should have taken our chances with Klinton the Second...how could we have been so stupid??? |
|
Quoted:
I wonder if he found out that she doesn't have long to live. Maybe he thinks it wouldn't be worth it if she isn't going to live long enough to be prosecuted anyway. FBIAnon said if it all came out in the open the government would collapse and there would be civil war. If that were true, if things are really THAT bad, maybe Trump and the FBI have plans to attack the issue more discreetly. Also there is the idea that he is simply playing this down for now to try to keep Obama from issuing her a pardon. It's way too early to judge Trump on his performance. What he said today isn't something we want to hear, but he's having to work around Obama until Jan 20th, and he's definitely working with more information on this subject than we are. I'm going to continue to be optimistic about Trump's presidency and reserve judgment until his first 100 or so days in office are behind him. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for the Clintons, @maggieNYT says. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/801126963675037697 "It's just not something I feel strongly about." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126844414226432 “I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways." https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/801126615388274688 I wonder if he found out that she doesn't have long to live. Maybe he thinks it wouldn't be worth it if she isn't going to live long enough to be prosecuted anyway. FBIAnon said if it all came out in the open the government would collapse and there would be civil war. If that were true, if things are really THAT bad, maybe Trump and the FBI have plans to attack the issue more discreetly. Also there is the idea that he is simply playing this down for now to try to keep Obama from issuing her a pardon. It's way too early to judge Trump on his performance. What he said today isn't something we want to hear, but he's having to work around Obama until Jan 20th, and he's definitely working with more information on this subject than we are. I'm going to continue to be optimistic about Trump's presidency and reserve judgment until his first 100 or so days in office are behind him. If FBIanon is legit that particular revolution will not be televised. >>>FBIanon is LARPING is the safe assumption. but if that kind of corruption is present it will never be made public. Think low key federal cases that are sealed. |
|
This would be the best play.................Hillary is done, and so is Bill..................if you want to cut them off completely, get Chelsea and the house collapses
Quoted:
They may not pursue the Clintons directly, but the foundation is bigger than them. If they find evidence of the Clintons doing illegal acts then nail them. Chelsea is a obvious target since she had her fingers in the mix from the start. If you want to kill the Clintons for good go after her and remove her ability to run. View Quote |
|
Bullshit. Her daughter will be running next and she was involved in the Clinton Foundation.
|
|
Quoted:
Remember when you swore up & down that Chris Christie was going to be the VP pick and then theatrically waved your arms and demanded we justify something that had only happened in your mind? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I prefer that the incoming Administration put an end to the practice of giving Hillary a pass for her glaring violations of the Law. Don't you? Remember when you swore up & down that Chris Christie was going to be the VP pick and then theatrically waved your arms and demanded we justify something that had only happened in your mind? |
|
Quoted:
No sense in letting Clinton dominate the news cycle for the next 4 months and get the democrats all stirred up. Go in get the 100 day plan passed and implemented then let the chips fall where they may. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why would you want your first days as the new President to be about Hillary Clinton instead of your 100 day agenda? Plenty of time to let things settle down, get many things passed in congress and then let your AG go to work. This. It's like the children haven't learned a ding dong thing from the last year and a half about the "news" media. Holy fuck, people. Get your poop in a group. No sense in letting Clinton dominate the news cycle for the next 4 months and get the democrats all stirred up. Go in get the 100 day plan passed and implemented then let the chips fall where they may. No president ever got without giving. And your right thats all we need to see is that old goat on the news every night while nothing is getting done policy-wise. We beat her. Isnt it enough to watch her just shrivel and blow away? Yes it would be great fun to see her in Jail house digs but maybe, just maybe, making her show her snoot after blowing the biggest gimmee in Political History is even a bigger penalty. But I hope Trump got it in writing she'll keep her Yap shut. |
|
Quoted:
"You don't tell an enemy when you are going to attack." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hey all you Trumpers...is it starting to dawn on you yet that you voted in the biggest con man since PT Barnum. This is only the beginning...can't wait to hear all the excuses people make for him. An anonymously sourced story from the most liberal of outlets. Will you liberals never learn? Confirmed by Conway "You don't tell an enemy when you are going to attack." Or who is going to attack, or where, ie., FHRC, Clinton Foundation, or even Chelsea. I'd focus on Chelsea and the Clinton Foundation via RICO. Put a stop to that before she even begins. Send her to jail, IF guilty and let FHRC chew on that. |
|
Trump didn't win because voters wanted Clinton prosecuted. Trump won because of immigration and trade.
|
|
Quoted:
Or who is going to attack, or where, ie., FHRC, Clinton Foundation, or even Chelsea. I'd focus on Chelsea and the Clinton Foundation via RICO. Put a stop to that before she even begins. Send her to jail, IF guilty and let FHRC chew on that. View Quote The 10d chess move would be to try to put Obama's against the Clintons and have them wrestle for power over the dnc, then when one wins, take the other down with what you learned while they were fighting. That way you use less resources and have an easier battle. It would also keep it from becoming a unifying event between the obamas and Clintons. The last thing we need is those two power mongers working together. Just a thought. Take the Clintons out of the picture and obama gets the dnc unopposed......and I'm not sure that having either left standing is preferable to the other. They both need to lose their legacy and political power. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.