User Panel
Quoted: Most things that are done more by keyboard than hands. Example when I was at Charter, they moved almost everyone that was a Engineer or Keyboard warrior to Colorado. 95% of the guys that cut cables, ran cables, fibers and other hands on shit stayed right where they were, they hired a few lower paid guys to do the hands on rack and stack in the HeadEnd/Hub sites and the guys in Colorado remotely do everything. I won't be surprised one day if they (the folks that moved to CO) are not all or mostly outsourced to India or a company based in the US, but its NOC/Engineers are in India, China Mexico or somewhere but the US. I see hands on trades being a bit more secure for awhile, but as robots gain more human like functionality, I see those becoming vulnerable too. View Quote I robot clip "Can you?" |
|
Quoted: Radiologists Cashiers Fast food workers Uber/Lyft drivers Payroll staff View Quote Total Recall Johnny Cab |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Most things that are done more by keyboard than hands. Example when I was at Charter, they moved almost everyone that was a Engineer or Keyboard warrior to Colorado. 95% of the guys that cut cables, ran cables, fibers and other hands on shit stayed right where they were, they hired a few lower paid guys to do the hands on rack and stack in the HeadEnd/Hub sites and the guys in Colorado remotely do everything. I won't be surprised one day if they (the folks that moved to CO) are not all or mostly outsourced to India or a company based in the US, but its NOC/Engineers are in India, China Mexico or somewhere but the US. I see hands on trades being a bit more secure for awhile, but as robots gain more human like functionality, I see those becoming vulnerable too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfAHbm7G2R0 Will Smith got those same glassy eyes as when his wife was telling him about August. |
|
Quoted: I've heard this before...that tests have shown AI superior to humans in reading radiographs. Someone still needs to know what to take the x-rays of though. I don't see it taking their job, but becoming an important tool in their job. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I have a doctor who is adamant that radiologists will be the first to go from AI. He feels that a human brain cannot compete with a machine that can compare your MRI to millions of other images. Same dude needs me to show him how to work his laptop when I bring him the CD of said MRI. He might be right. I've heard this before...that tests have shown AI superior to humans in reading radiographs. Someone still needs to know what to take the x-rays of though. I don't see it taking their job, but becoming an important tool in their job. Why Will Smith hates robots |
|
Quoted: I have a doctor who is adamant that radiologists will be the first to go from AI. He feels that a human brain cannot compete with a machine that can compare your MRI to millions of other images. Same dude needs me to show him how to work his laptop when I bring him the CD of said MRI. He might be right. View Quote An AI on my Apple Watch immediately informs me when I have to go in to do a mechanical thrombectomy on an LVO stroke patient the second the CT scan is done. A human radiologist confirms it in ten minutes as I’m driving in. Ten minutes is roughly 19,000,000 more brain cells I can help save by the AI reading and alerting the team early. The AI is wrong sometimes. The future is here now. |
|
Uninspired creative work.
Coding for sure. I’m intrigued to see what else. It could be our Overmind… or it could be like Y2k. Probably more overmind. |
|
Quoted: My crystal ball sees this - AI scans an image and highlights all problem areas with recommendations. MD reviews and filters findings. Radiologist efficiency is increased 2x so number of needed bodies is reduced by half. But this need is for very skilled MDs so the standards for practice increase and the slowest are culled. Wages go up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: AI doctors assistants are going to be super useful. AI has already diagnosed some obscure diseases. Yes. But that isn’t the same as replacing something. People (doctors) believed that the MRI and CT would replace radiologists. It would be so good that any doc would be able to interpret it. Nope. It just increased the need for Radiologists. There is also a reality that most people do not understand the scope of what a radiologist is responsible for. They can be reading a study ordered for the spine…but are responsible for “incidental” findings. Such as the problem with the lungs that show up at the very edge of the image. My crystal ball sees this - AI scans an image and highlights all problem areas with recommendations. MD reviews and filters findings. Radiologist efficiency is increased 2x so number of needed bodies is reduced by half. But this need is for very skilled MDs so the standards for practice increase and the slowest are culled. Wages go up. GE is working on this now. Integrating it with GE PACS if I recall correctly. |
|
Quoted: An AI on my Apple Watch immediately informs me when I have to go in to do a mechanical thrombectomy on an LVO stroke patient the second the CT scan is done. A human radiologist confirms it in ten minutes as I’m driving in. Ten minutes is roughly 19,000,000 more brain cells I can help save by the AI reading and alerting the team early. The AI is wrong sometimes. The future is here now. View Quote That is not AI though. that is a detection software that is programed to find one thing and is not good enough at that. It makes a guess that gets you moving. Talking about such things is what confuses people into thinking "its happening." because they dont understand the reality of the issue. You have something that is 80% good at doing one task out of a million and a human does it better....and the other million tasks. Even in the exact study it is looking for one thing, a radiologist is responsible for everything. For 80%, it is worth it, for that specific task. But that is still light years away from "replacing radiologists" |
|
|
|
Quoted: That is not AI though. that is a detection software that is programed to find one thing and is not good enough at that. It makes a guess that gets you moving. Talking about such things is what confuses people into thinking "its happening." because they dont understand the reality of the issue. You have something that is 80% good at doing one task out of a million and a human does it better....and the other million tasks. Even in the exact study it is looking for one thing, a radiologist is responsible for everything. For 80%, it is worth it, for that specific task. But that is still light years away from "replacing radiologists" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: An AI on my Apple Watch immediately informs me when I have to go in to do a mechanical thrombectomy on an LVO stroke patient the second the CT scan is done. A human radiologist confirms it in ten minutes as I’m driving in. Ten minutes is roughly 19,000,000 more brain cells I can help save by the AI reading and alerting the team early. The AI is wrong sometimes. The future is here now. That is not AI though. that is a detection software that is programed to find one thing and is not good enough at that. It makes a guess that gets you moving. Talking about such things is what confuses people into thinking "its happening." because they dont understand the reality of the issue. You have something that is 80% good at doing one task out of a million and a human does it better....and the other million tasks. Even in the exact study it is looking for one thing, a radiologist is responsible for everything. For 80%, it is worth it, for that specific task. But that is still light years away from "replacing radiologists" There is no chance of AI replacing radiologists in anyone on this board’s lifetime. They do much more than read films. My point is I do see AI being a supplement to radiologists. It’s IR radiologists doing a lot of procedure’s people don't even know about until they are dying. An AI will not be doing those, but might be a useful tool to help with the shortage. |
|
Anyone who works remotely would most likely be easily replaced by AI. Those positions are already the first on the chopping block for most companies looking to make cuts. Would make it an easy choice for who to replace with AI.
|
|
Graphic design is probably on the chopping block within a couple years
|
|
Don't have the AI to read 4 pages. But what would happen if the AI is infected with their version of the China flu?
|
|
I’m a truck driver, and contrary to popular belief I won’t be replaced anytime soon.
|
|
Quoted: so does the costs off these services and or goods go down as well? with much of the labor costs being eliminated? View Quote Nope.... Not according to this |
|
|
I don't think many will be impacted if they know how to interact with AI.
Physics uses ML now to collate data that wasn't even possible a decade ago which changes theories today of how thing work. There are many areas where AI will be employed to sort through data and possibly create truly new ideas/theories/inception (Difference between Machine Learning and full Artificial Intelligence). Still, humans can link together some random data from various fields and answer questions by analogy and it will be a while for AI to comprehend analogies in their full meaning and that is just to understand them, rather than see something and think of an analogous problem. More people are out of work from robotic assembly lines than from STEM fields. The people in the middle, doing so so jobs of reading and entering spreadsheets won't be needed anymore. If you aren't continually learning and inventing new concepts and ideas, your job would be in danger from full AI, though not Within a decade yet, it was assumed that by now we'd have AI but the best we have is super scaled Machine Learning which can dynamically censor data but not create new never theorized before information. Used as big brother to spy on everybody and keep people from WrongThink is what the cutting edge ML are busy with at Google. Musicians could be in danger. Feed in top hits from last 20 years and ask for a top 10 song and it would be produced. Pulling various bits and patterns from other things that were enjoyable and could decide if it is enjoyable or not. Crafts and variable work blue collar swill still need people but need to work with hands on things that machines cannot do as well, which isn't a huge window anymore. Even cars are painted robotic for the thinnest layer of paint and clear coat possible to just cover but save on cost, weight, and to lower VOCs in atmosphere (though water based paints have reduce the VOC part). Repairing and painting repaired cars would be a manual job, same as auto mechanic and electronic troubleshooting as well as code troubleshooting. I think they'll advance our understanding of the world when used by people who want to and know how to use it, they also have a huge potential to be used against the population by a dictator. Thank China for pushing most of the AI in that direction for real world data and training. Facebook and Google bent over backward to please China need keep people in their own little 2 block square zones of allowed and their Phone would turn yellow then red if they strayed outside the zone. Police on all corners where you look at their camera and it shows red/yellow/green for allowed or not as well as matching with what Phone is saying in case of hacked phones. Totalitarian Big Brother. |
|
I’m not sure. But I think a whole lot more white collar jobs will be gone than some think.
|
|
Quoted: I’m not sure. But I think a whole lot more white collar jobs will be gone than some think. View Quote A crapload of middle management that only doles out work based on topic and employee performance. The days of milking the clock would be over with AI always watching for ISO 900x compliance and performance reviews and the like. It's easy to see what even a basic AI would do to "cut costs while maintaining standards, quality and throughput". Too many people just showing up 8 to 5 waiting out their clock for retirement that would be downsized quickly, especially in .gov jobs. |
|
Quoted: Which means there will be enough jobs for, what, 20% of the population? Interesting conundrum, businesses cut so much labor expense with AI in our service based economy that nobody is employed to get money to buy their products. View Quote Businesses will try to get a constitutional amendment to allow massive automation, because if 80% of the workforce gets laid off, they will vote to ban automation. |
|
'coding' is an interesting one folks keep quoting; if generating HTML for a new cookie cutter website 100% yes; if generating mundane database queries 100% yes; if coding a novel piece of hardware in RTL, or a new encryption technique in SW, nope.
The trick to keeping a job is to stay one level of abstraction beyond AI. But that was the same in regards to staying one level of abstraction beyond low-cost design centers; we still have western world, highly paid engineers doing the leading edge stuff, with low cost centers doing the behind-the-curve work. As the low cost centers improve and up their game, so the high cost engineers must move up the ladder to stay ahead. And they do, and will even against AI. Doctors are as exposed as lawyers; it's easy for AI to make a diagnosis from looking up billions of medical records and matching probabilities of age/history/symptoms to a prognosis. That's all Doctors do, but based on their own experiences and the research/books they have read. AI will have the combined experience of millions of doctors, billions of patients, and every medical text it can find online. |
|
Quoted: Businesses will try to get a constitutional amendment to allow massive automation, because if 80% of the workforce gets laid off, they will vote to ban automation. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Which means there will be enough jobs for, what, 20% of the population? Interesting conundrum, businesses cut so much labor expense with AI in our service based economy that nobody is employed to get money to buy their products. Businesses will try to get a constitutional amendment to allow massive automation, because if 80% of the workforce gets laid off, they will vote to ban automation. Or new frontiers are opened in jobs. People thought the end of foundries would have a far greater impact than it is showing, the downside is that we're dependent entirely on foreign nations to get steel from, and not all of them are allies (*cough* China *cough*) One door closes, another opens. There is some confusion in the middle, like the switch from Dino oil to Synthetic oils. Cars now can routinely run 100k miles while 40 years ago anything over 50k was a risky high miler, now it's a low mileage decent used car. That's just one area. People unwilling to change and insist on doing the same thing or insist they're only capable of same level do lose out, but those that remain on their feet and flexible and want to do something will succeed. Example is farming. Now a single farmer and a couple hired hands can work 5x and more the amount of land that could be managed when a family of 8 was all working on it dawn to dusk. Some farmers lost out, the ones that sold the land to the farmer that embraced the new technologies. That has had it's own down side effects, though, which can also be addressed (problem is .gov butting in). |
|
Depends who pays the politicians the most money I’d guess. No way they’ll let their entire tax base be put out of work unless they get paid.
|
|
Well, huh. I'd be kind of surprised if an ai could do much of my job. I guess if you boil it down, I'm a technical program manager. Used to be an engineer, but those days are long past.
I'd love to have an ai that could do most of the debug tasks associated with the task forces I run, though. That would be awesome, somehow, though, I think we'd spend all our time debugging the ai instead of the customer issue |
|
Quoted: Well, huh. I'd be kind of surprised if an ai could do much of my job. I guess if you boil it down, I'm a technical program manager. Used to be an engineer, but those days are long past. I'd love to have an ai that could do most of the debug tasks associated with the task forces I run, though. That would be awesome, somehow, though, I think we'd spend all our time debugging the ai instead of the customer issue View Quote We ended up having to create a new group to deal with the care and feeding of it. |
|
Quoted: Well, huh. I'd be kind of surprised if an ai could do much of my job. I guess if you boil it down, I'm a technical program manager. Used to be an engineer, but those days are long past. I'd love to have an ai that could do most of the debug tasks associated with the task forces I run, though. That would be awesome, somehow, though, I think we'd spend all our time debugging the ai instead of the customer issue View Quote The trial and error troubleshooting will be around for a long time. Everything breaks/fails/glitches, from AI to a simple screw. Trying to isolate the actual fault instead of secondary issues stemming from it isn't something an AI could realistically do, changing out component, see if symptoms change, etc. Anything that melds thinking with diverse physical tasks will be left to humans while all the easier targets are tackled first. Automotive factories and McDonalds aren't fully automated yet but they're trying and those jobs were supposed to be gone 20 years ago. Amazon is the one that made a business model out of automation filling most orders but still relies on a lot of humans to make sure the right things are in right spot and spotting acceptable cosmetic defect or not, etc. |
|
|
|
Quoted: AI doctors assistants are going to be super useful. AI has already diagnosed some obscure diseases. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I have a doctor who is adamant that radiologists will be the first to go from AI. He feels that a human brain cannot compete with a machine that can compare your MRI to millions of other images. Same dude needs me to show him how to work his laptop when I bring him the CD of said MRI. He might be right. Lots of docs think that…and have been saying the exact same thing for decades. They are wrong, and will continue to be wrong for a good while. One day they will be right. I assume they will say “I told you so” (if they are still alive) of course, Radiology will succumb to AI after many other medical specialties. They don’t seem to talk about that. Radiology is almost always brought up in these conversations. Again, it is because it is one of the ultimate prizes. Not because it is “soon” or “easy” AI doctors assistants are going to be super useful. AI has already diagnosed some obscure diseases. I believe those are called "expert systems" Computer Chronicles: Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems (1984) Part 1 |
|
When ai can do an airplane interior, I’ll go off and die in the woods.
|
|
Quoted: Watch this. One of my favorite YouTube channels, especially regarding AI. He talks about this very subject, among a lot of other AI related things. Video dropped a few hrs ago. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIU48QL5Cyk View Quote The entire voice script of that video was AI generated. Maybe not the reader's voice but the script for sure. The future has already passed by most people. Many mentally left lane slow drivers still don't understand. |
|
|
Nah. Massive AI (not just augments but actual replacement of entire job sectors) isn't an end state -- just a step towards our end.
Massive AI adoption -which leads to- Massive unemployment -which leads to- UBI -which leads to- Total Societal Collapse. Not enough of other people's money to make a sustainable system of paying 90% of people to do nothing. Either you get total collapse or the ruling class implements methods to significantly and forcibly reduce the population of those who do nothing but drain government funds. Once we're 3rd world status consisting only of warring factions and feudalism, we won't have a lot of use for high societal order jobs such as coders, call centers, teachers, etc etc. Seems impossible to you? Go ahead -- show me why it can't happen here. |
|
Quoted: I could see AI having a supporting role in architecture and engineering, most likely providing real-time structural analysis for architects, design optimization for energy compliance, etc. I can’t see it replacing architects and engineers. View Quote I can only imagine how fucked up that would be. |
|
Quoted: That is not AI though. that is a detection software that is programed to find one thing and is not good enough at that. It makes a guess that gets you moving. Talking about such things is what confuses people into thinking "its happening." because they dont understand the reality of the issue. You have something that is 80% good at doing one task out of a million and a human does it better....and the other million tasks. Even in the exact study it is looking for one thing, a radiologist is responsible for everything. For 80%, it is worth it, for that specific task. But that is still light years away from "replacing radiologists" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: An AI on my Apple Watch immediately informs me when I have to go in to do a mechanical thrombectomy on an LVO stroke patient the second the CT scan is done. A human radiologist confirms it in ten minutes as I’m driving in. Ten minutes is roughly 19,000,000 more brain cells I can help save by the AI reading and alerting the team early. The AI is wrong sometimes. The future is here now. That is not AI though. that is a detection software that is programed to find one thing and is not good enough at that. It makes a guess that gets you moving. Talking about such things is what confuses people into thinking "its happening." because they dont understand the reality of the issue. You have something that is 80% good at doing one task out of a million and a human does it better....and the other million tasks. Even in the exact study it is looking for one thing, a radiologist is responsible for everything. For 80%, it is worth it, for that specific task. But that is still light years away from "replacing radiologists" @neshomamench I just asked the Viz AI app representative about it. He said it is 100% an AI logarithms controlling the software, so IDK. It seems similar to the other AI app (rads say it’s AI)our radiologists use for bone density readings. The AI pretty much reads them instead of the rad opening books and doing it like the old days. |
|
Quoted: The industrial revolution didn't create an economy were no one could find jobs, and neither did later automation in factories. The question is, what parts of the economy will this grow, and what new opportunities will be created? View Quote No but it absolutely inched that way. There was a brief period in manufacturing where the MBAs had the genius idea to reduce skilled wages by using automation to control processes as much as increase productivity, and so stopped investing in higher levels of training in favor of hiring anyone mildly capable of making a machine go (green button) or stop (red button.) We're going to regret that if we don't yet, since every day there seems to be fewer people available who can discriminate between when to mash geen button and when to mash red button much less understand what's going on at a higher level. The industrial revolution removed some jobs from society that made, lets say, <80 IQ people employable to an extent they subsidized their existence. What happens when 100 IQ is no longer sufficient as any non-automated job requires 110+ to do? That seems to be the inevitable conclusion to machine learning, the question is how long will it take and how quickly we adapt to it economically and socially. |
|
Voiceover work. Just listened to AI read a script I wrote in like 7 different voices. It’s ready for prime time.
|
|
|
Wall Street Journal: The Jobs Most Exposed to ChatGPT
Accountants are among the professionals whose careers are most exposed to the capabilities of generative artificial intelligence, according to a new study. The researchers found that at least half of accounting tasks could be completed much faster with the technology. The same was true for mathematicians, interpreters, writers and nearly 20% of the U.S. workforce, according to the study by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and OpenAI, the company that makes the popular AI tool ChatGPT. They found that most jobs will be changed in some form by GPTs, with 80% of workers in occupations where at least one job task can be performed more quickly by generative AI. Information-processing roles—including public relations specialists, court reporters and blockchain engineers—are highly exposed, they found. The jobs that will be least affected by the technology include short-order cooks, motorcycle mechanics and oil-and-gas roustabouts. GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models Abstract We investigate the potential implications of large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPTs), on the U.S. labor market, focusing on the increased capabilities arising from LLM-powered software compared to LLMs on their own. Using a new rubric, we assess occupations based on their alignment with LLM capabilities, integrating both human expertise and GPT-4 classifications. Our findings reveal that around 80% of the U.S. workforce could have at least 10% of their work tasks affected by the introduction of LLMs, while approximately 19% of workers may see at least 50% of their tasks impacted. We do not make predictions about the development or adoption timeline of such LLMs. The projected effects span all wage levels, with higher-income jobs potentially facing greater exposure to LLM capabilities and LLM-powered software. Significantly, these impacts are not restricted to industries with higher recent productivity growth. Our analysis suggests that, with access to an LLM, about 15% of all worker tasks in the US could be completed significantly faster at the same level of quality. When incorporating software and tooling built on top of LLMs, this share increases to between 47 and 56% of all tasks. This finding implies that LLM-powered software will have a substantial effect on scaling the economic impacts of the underlying models. We conclude that LLMs such as GPTs exhibit traits of general-purpose technologies, indicating that they could have considerable economic, social, and policy implications. Occupations with no labeled exposed tasks Agricultural Equipment Operators Athletes and Sports Competitors Automotive Glass Installers and Repairers Bus and Truck Mechanics and Diesel Engine Specialists Cement Masons and Concrete Finishers Cooks, Short Order Cutters and Trimmers, Hand Derrick Operators, Oil and Gas Dining Room and Cafeteria Attendants and Bartender Helpers Dishwashers Dredge Operators Electrical Power-Line Installers and Repairers Excavating and Loading Machine and Dragline Operators, Surface Mining Floor Layers, Except Carpet, Wood, and Hard Tiles Foundry Mold and Coremakers Helpers–Brickmasons, Blockmasons, Stonemasons, and Tile and Marble Setters Helpers–Carpenters Helpers–Painters, Paperhangers, Plasterers, and Stucco Masons Helpers–Pipelayers, Plumbers, Pipefitters, and Steamfitters Helpers–Roofers Meat, Poultry, and Fish Cutters and Trimmers Motorcycle Mechanics Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators Pile Driver Operators Pourers and Casters, Metal Rail-Track Laying and Maintenance Equipment Operators Refractory Materials Repairers, Except Brickmasons Roof Bolters, Mining Roustabouts, Oil and Gas Slaughterers and Meat Packers Stonemasons Tapers Tire Repairers and Changers Wellhead Pumpers Table 11: All 34 occupations for which none of our measures labeled any tasks as exposed. |
|
Just about everything other than servicing machines and on call trade work can be done by ai and automation. Customer service, art and design, manufacturing health diagnosis, research, accounting, legal work that doesn't require direct communications and on foot investigation.transportation, video work, farming, marketing research.
We will definitely have to consider a new economic system as this continues or everyone will be poor other than giant corporations and those who service the machines. In many operations you'll still need a few people to assist the ai and make decisions but not many |
|
Quoted: Nah. Massive AI (not just augments but actual replacement of entire job sectors) isn't an end state -- just a step towards our end. Massive AI adoption -which leads to- Massive unemployment -which leads to- UBI -which leads to- Total Societal Collapse. Not enough of other people's money to make a sustainable system of paying 90% of people to do nothing. Either you get total collapse or the ruling class implements methods to significantly and forcibly reduce the population of those who do nothing but drain government funds. Once we're 3rd world status consisting only of warring factions and feudalism, we won't have a lot of use for high societal order jobs such as coders, call centers, teachers, etc etc. Seems impossible to you? Go ahead -- show me why it can't happen here. View Quote This ties into those assholes who did the Georgia stones, where they want the Earths population down to an sustainable 500 million. Guess how they will accomplish that? You won't like it... |
|
Quoted: The trial and error troubleshooting will be around for a long time. Everything breaks/fails/glitches, from AI to a simple screw. Trying to isolate the actual fault instead of secondary issues stemming from it isn't something an AI could realistically do, changing out component, see if symptoms change, etc. Anything that melds thinking with diverse physical tasks will be left to humans while all the easier targets are tackled first. Automotive factories and McDonalds aren't fully automated yet but they're trying and those jobs were supposed to be gone 20 years ago. Amazon is the one that made a business model out of automation filling most orders but still relies on a lot of humans to make sure the right things are in right spot and spotting acceptable cosmetic defect or not, etc. View Quote Yup, the more a job deals with unknowns, non-standard scenarios, and requires abstract analysis and problem solving - the safer it is. This is why I prefer to be a business analyst working on the requirements and solution design end of software development, and not actually writing code. |
|
Quoted: Have you seen the current crop of AI hands? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A lot of good ones mentioned already, so I'll add something different. Models, porn stars, and acting No need for people for this once a computer generated video or image is impossible to tell from the real thing. Have you seen the current crop of AI hands? AI image generation is improving rapidly. I generated this image for another thread. Click To View Spoiler Hands are not perfect, but pass casual inspection. The discontinuity with the sofa is actually the biggest red flag, and someone could fix that with inpainting and photoshop with 15 minutes. This is with freely available models, the pay stuff is even better. It's also a huge jump from the Stable Diffusion 1.4 random balls of fingers we had six months ago. Give it a year, and the tech will not be a limitation at all. |
|
Anything that’s completed work is created on a computer or anything that can be manufactured through the use of a computer.
|
|
I just saw a survey where they asked one thousand AIs what career they most wanted to perform in the near future.
67% of AIs surveyed want to become radiologists. The other 33% want to hang sheetrock. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.