User Panel
|
|
Quoted: I shoot pistols right handed, but on a 1911 am not a fan of ambidextrous safeties. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How do you feel about ambidextrous safeties on a 1911? Disclaimer: I'm a lefty. I shoot pistols right handed, but on a 1911 am not a fan of ambidextrous safeties. You...you... Attached File |
|
|
Quoted: Forward cocking serrations. View Quote THIS, times one million. Forward serrations first came into being on "race guns" where the frame-mounted RDS being used interfered with using the normal cocking serrations, and putting ones near the front allowed equivalent purchase on the slide. Then every a-hole and his brother decided it was essential to have those on virtually all pistols, even if they don't have an RDS on them. In general, grabbing the slide up near where the bullets come out isn't a real good practice, especially under pressure. Putting features there to encourage doing so when no RDS is present is just ASKING for someone shoot themselves. |
|
Quoted: I agree with everything… That said I still like my CF barrels. I’ve found they are extremely accurate, consistent, and string less than pencil barrels. That said they are not meant for sustained fire and anyone who believes they handle heat better than equivalent diameter steel barrels is an idiot. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Piston driven - DI is lighter, more accurate, and more reliable CNC - Marketing gimmick, practically everything is CNC nowadays MPI - Almost meaningless unless you know the rejection criteria and detection rate Billet - Actually inferior to forgings but cost more so must be betta! Spiral fluting - Rigidity of a pencil barrel with 2x the weight. Benefits of head dissipation is practically worthless and pushed for idiots to eat up Carbon fiber barrels - If you think they dissipate heat better, you are a gullible idiot. Also prone to stringing due to differences in coefficient of thermal expansion between CF and steel. Delamination is an issue at higher temps I agree with everything… That said I still like my CF barrels. I’ve found they are extremely accurate, consistent, and string less than pencil barrels. That said they are not meant for sustained fire and anyone who believes they handle heat better than equivalent diameter steel barrels is an idiot. CF barrels only work if you have a cool barrel sticker on both sides for the gram. |
|
|
|
Mag release, why do you need a mag release when you only have to load in 5 rounds in the clip.
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: It works the same for a lefty as the M1s charging handle works for a righty. Dont bother. He argues with everyone. I use them left handed and they work fine. Sure aftermarket ones are slick but dam, if you are struggling with a charging handle that much maybe the AR isn't the platform for you. You know? |
|
|
|
Quoted: Compensators and red dots on carry guns of diminutive caliber… like that 9mm recoil is out of control or it has enough range to warrant an optic. LOL. View Quote I agree on the optics comment but on comps, well I used to feel the same way. Thought I was doing really good when a guy pulled up next to me at a match and offered to try his comped G45. It felt like I was cheating and I gotta admit, if god forbid I should ever have to use something in self defense with a handgun, I'd want to have that cheating edge and put more into them, especially failure to stop into more than one bad guy. Now I want to comp all the things. |
|
Quoted: I use them left handed and they work fine. Sure aftermarket ones are slick but dam, if you are struggling with a charging handle that much maybe the AR isn't the platform for you. You know? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It works the same for a lefty as the M1s charging handle works for a righty. Dont bother. He argues with everyone. I use them left handed and they work fine. Sure aftermarket ones are slick but dam, if you are struggling with a charging handle that much maybe the AR isn't the platform for you. You know? False equivalency. I am happy they work fine for you. They however don't with me. I don't know why this is hard for you both to accept that there is one guy out there that you have no control of and what he says doesn't affect you in any way, yet it really does upset you and for the life of me I cannot understand why this bothers you two. Maybe trying to give ill informed advice on the things you are not subject matter experts in is something you should consider as not being for you either. Because dam, you are not helping in any way. Meanwhile the AR15 with an ambidextrous CH is perfect for me because function matters more than form. |
|
Quoted: You know you can just sight in the gun using the IR laser itself… like without a visible laser? Neither of my guns with IR lasers has a vis laser and it wasn’t a problem. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The vis laser is for sighting in the IR laser You know you can just sight in the gun using the IR laser itself… like without a visible laser? Neither of my guns with IR lasers has a vis laser and it wasn’t a problem. The vis laser is absolutely fantastic for keeping NPCs out of the picture. Rolling up savages at night overseas could often draw the curious and various others purposefully or cluelessly coming along- We specifically went from PEQ2s to 15s for adding the visible. People get the dot and GTFO. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: No, it absolutely does not. I want my CH to work for a lefty the same way an OEM works for a righty. For the record, I am not using it wrong, it's wrong for people that are not right handed. And I've already gotten a different CH. I know that you think that you are helping, but you are not. The people that make the ignorant comments that we don't need anything other than OEM CH's are ignorant right handed people who lack critical thinking. The A2 does not do anything better than what you're saying. Over 1/4 do indeed perform better than an A2. After seeing a bunch of Smith and Surefire pronged MD's alongside some A1 and A2's, the A1 and A2 were lightbulbs. The BCM Gunfighter hybrid while not being great at flash, does a better job at compensating. The A2 can't beat at comping and can't beat at flash suppression, so it's just cheap. Cheap isn't a function, it's a form. Function matters more than form. View Quote If what the right hand supremacists think is true, then we should be able to give them a left handed rifle and not have them utter even a peep in complaint. Just train more bro. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I agree on the optics comment but on comps, well I used to feel the same way. Thought I was doing really good when a guy pulled up next to me at a match and offered to try his comped G45. It felt like I was cheating and I gotta admit, if god forbid I should ever have to use something in self defense with a handgun, I'd want to have that cheating edge and put more into them, especially failure to stop into more than one bad guy. Now I want to comp all the things. View Quote I was mostly joking… my primary carry gun is a G19C+RMR. It’s fabulous and loud and has sweet flame jet…. It’s FLAMEboyant! Haiku: Attached File |
|
|
ARs with quick change barrels. Easier and less expensive to just get multiple uppers, plus no loss of zero
|
|
|
|
Quoted: False equivalency. I am happy they work fine for you. They however don't with me. I don't know why this is hard for you both to accept that there is one guy out there that you have no control of and what he says doesn't affect you in any way, yet it really does upset you and for the life of me I cannot understand why this bothers you two. Maybe trying to give ill informed advice on the things you are not subject matter experts in is something you should consider as not being for you either. Because dam, you are not helping in any way. Meanwhile the AR15 with an ambidextrous CH is perfect for me because function matters more than form. View Quote Just how large of an optic are you using (and how far back) that you can’t use the two finger claw motion? Maybe I’m using mine wrong, but I have full access to the CH from the top on all my rifles. |
|
|
View Quote Decocker is the way on a DA/SA gun. |
|
|
Quoted: I was mostly joking… my primary carry gun is a G19C+RMR. It’s fabulous and loud and has sweet flame jet…. It’s FLAMEboyant! Haiku: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/132797/5D913F58-0F4E-452F-8E6F-12A8EDBE04A9_jpe-2467381.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I agree on the optics comment but on comps, well I used to feel the same way. Thought I was doing really good when a guy pulled up next to me at a match and offered to try his comped G45. It felt like I was cheating and I gotta admit, if god forbid I should ever have to use something in self defense with a handgun, I'd want to have that cheating edge and put more into them, especially failure to stop into more than one bad guy. Now I want to comp all the things. I was mostly joking… my primary carry gun is a G19C+RMR. It’s fabulous and loud and has sweet flame jet…. It’s FLAMEboyant! Haiku: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/132797/5D913F58-0F4E-452F-8E6F-12A8EDBE04A9_jpe-2467381.JPG |
|
Quoted: Just how large of an optic are you using (and how far back) that you can’t use the two finger claw motion? Maybe I’m using mine wrong, but I have full access to the CH from the top on all my rifles. View Quote If it doesn't work for me, then it doesn't work at all for me. This isn't hard to understand really. Use it how you like and leave the rest to how I like it up to me. The claw is old school and a bit outdated. Plus when running a folding BUIS like a Troy or a Magpul MBUS, they're in the way from being able to effectively use a claw as fast as a pinch that righties do. Pinching the charging handle with your support hand’s index finger on the latch with the thumb backing it up at the tail end of the handle is more modern and more effective. This cannot be done with a left handed person using an OEM. The pinching method allows me to keep my left hand on the fire controls and back up and gunning in no time. Reaching over and clawing it is rather gross in function to me. I want ease of use, which is why cheap and effective isn't effective and is being superimposed without a critical thought. It explains why this is so hard for many to understand because to those taking this with any difficulty are not thinking this through because they're being stuck in their ways and cannot think of anyone else doing it any which way but theirs |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.