User Panel
Quoted: American media: “Joe is best president evah!!!” Overseas media: “What a joke America has become. Elected a dementia patient who can’t even read a teleprompter without making a gaffe.” View Quote as someone who does a lot of travel over-sea's I have to say "you ain't wrong" it is an embarrassment |
|
I'm surprised they haven't erected some type of barrier fencing, like they have to block the view of the old hotels leased to house illegal aliens.
|
|
Quoted: Fox News said it was actually his idea. The advisers also revealed the idea came from Biden himself, who pushed for the new approach before it was implemented in mid-April View Quote Of course it was. |
|
Next the aides will be shitting their pants as well to draw attention away
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Biden doesn't even consistently remember/realize he's President. The problem his obvious diminished capacity presents is a far bigger one. Because if the MPOTUS is just some meat-puppet figurehead, is this really some new low for American governance we've reached? Or, is it a more cosmetic issue where an extremely decrepit figurehead that cannot even handle the figurehead duties making it blatantly obvious the MPOTUS is merely a figurehead, and has been for some time? And if so, for how long? And how will the American public react to this? Will some simply engage in rationalization and utilitarian thinking, telling themselves that some combination of "Orange Man Bad" and party control is "worth it." And believes a better, more functional Democratic "actual President" will occupy the White House sooner or later? Will some just get more acclimated and inured to subsequent Presidents that are increasingly obvious figureheads? It gets more openly acceptable as status quo? Does it help explain anything else that ocurred in regards to the President or Executive Branch over previous Administrations? Does it explain some of the more outrageous, baseless, and double-standard things done against Trump? That what went on, however the Executive Branch "actually runs," Trump brought no one with him that successfully occupied those Executive Branch oligarchy slots, and he didn't bring anyone in who already did come from there? Did how Trump, somewhat coming out from left field, and not taken seriously until the last moment, mean there was no time for some more permanent presence in the Executive Branch to vet him or groom him as a figurehead? Perhaps the more usual patterns and political career progressions of Governors, Senators, Congressmen, or being a serving VP first, provides the needed time for this? Or creates the surface area so that leverage can be obtained? Is the actual Executive Branch seat of power some complicated network of individuals on the GS scale below the level of Presidential nomination and Senate confirmations? And only when one of them gets such nomination and confirmation, do they effectively lead that agency or cabinet? Is it why Hillary Clinton could so blatantly violate Federal laws on record keeping, security, and other things, that generally speaking "have teeth" and are generally on the more: "Don't FAFO with that"-end of the CFR, with the damn private email server in the Clinton mansion bathroom closet? And nothing came of it? Is it why the Clintons, both from the time Bill was Governor of Arkansas, and onward, and in the White House, were involved in a dozen odd scandals, and none, but the Lewinsky deposition perjury actually "stuck" at all? And even then, not very much? And all of them arguably more serious than Watergate, or at least Nixon's somewhat after-the-fact exposure to Watergate and his role in it. And the Clintons were far more directly involved in the various kinds of impropriety from the beginning, and it can all be characterized as being for their direct benefit. Was JFK and Nixon/Watergate the transition, or the battle to wrest control of the Executive Branch from the POTUS? Were the three main Republican Presidencies after Nixon, and before Trump, Reagan, Bush Sr., & Bush Jr., all somewhat characterized by big initiatives, policies, or events that more or less moved in directions large chunks of the Executive Branch Bureaucracy might want to go? And that's how these Republican Presidencies "survived?" Reagan: Defense build up. Opposing/confronting the USSR. That would obviously get support from the DOD, CIA, NSA, NRO. Bush Sr.: Gulf War I. Bush Jr.: 9/11, Patriot Act, creating DHS, Gulf War II, Afghanistan. Does it even better explain Obama's meteoric rise from ACORN community organizer to POTUS, and how it happened so quickly? That the "optics" and demeanor of his speechmaking delivery, and the rush for Affirmative Action checkboxing being the primary drivers, make all that much more sense if the POTUS is a figurehead? This is probably nothing "new" and I'm sure there's theories and books on this. Maybe very very well known ones I'm simply completely ignorant of. And there's always been talk how elected officials come and go, but the various government bureaucracies are staffed by people working 20+ years, and the bureaucracies themselves are perpetual. So obviously, that question of: "Where is the actual power in the Federal Government?" has been "a thing" for some time now. But, is the President even far weaker than most might even consider? And the ruling cabal, or some sort of stochastic oligarchy of Executive Branch Bureaucrats that's held the real power for some time, is simply getting more brazen and overt? View Quote "stochastic oligarchy refers to a system of governance where a small group of individuals or entities wield significant power and influence, but their control is not absolute or deterministic. Instead, their power is subject to random fluctuations, uncertainties, and external factors, making the outcome of their decisions and actions probabilistic. This concept combines the idea of an oligarchy, where a few individuals or groups hold significant power, with the concept of stochasticity, which refers to the presence of randomness or uncertainty. In a stochastic oligarchy, the outcome of decisions and actions is influenced by a combination of factors, including chance, uncertainty, and external events." |
|
It's fun to make fun of Biden.
But, he's the figurehead front-man for an extremely huge redistribution of wealth from the poor and middle to a few at the top. From the top some crumbs trickle down to elected and appointed officials, even to high ranking employees. His job is to be the lightning rod, to distract attention away from what is actually happening. He's doing his job. Figurehead POTUS, Resident but not actually President, get mansions in return. Let's not forget significant lifetime income. Trump is a threat to this really big criminal empire. We are seeing in real time The Empire Strikes Back. This episode is not fiction. |
|
Failed To Load Title |
|
Quoted: If Biden was a conservative the sarcastic jeering ridicule from Hollywood Comedians and Media Pundits would be a thunderous non stop tumult. The whole world would be pointing fingers and laughing View Quote The same folks who attacked Reagan under the same circumstances are suddenly silent… |
|
|
WATCH: Biden Again Flanked By Aides Upon Return To White House Biden returned to the White House last night had him once again flanked by aides, a practice that is becoming more common when he enters the building. |
|
Quoted: Terrible idea. You're showing people with normal walking gaits right next to Biden with his A-typical walking gait. Even in the still photograph you can see the difference in posture, arm positioning, and leg extension. It's only going to make him stand out even more. View Quote That was my thought. Your attention is dispersed, but now he’s surrounded by people that walk like normal human beings and not fucking automatons. |
|
His walk has more to do with his brain than his feet/legs - this is how dementia affects motor skills. My father walked normal until he started suffering from sundowners and then dementia so I get to watch him walk, talk, look, smile, glare like Biden. The 25th Amendment should have been triggered years ago and those propping him up charged with elder abuse but our country is too politically divided to stop this madness.
|
|
As someone who works with elderly patients in a regular basis, my first instinct is to feel bad for the guy….
Then I think about all of the corrupt, self-serving, dishonest, anti-American, anti-veteran, anti-Christian stuff that he and his family have been involved in over the years, and I can’t wait to see him breathe his last. |
|
Quoted: The same folks who attacked Reagan under the same circumstances are suddenly silent… View Quote I started noticing signs his last year in office but they didn't have the great drug cocktails that they have now so he quietly disappeared after he left office and stayed out of sight. He was still able to hold press conferences, give speeches, not make up crazy stories, answer questions - be presidential. |
|
That's your president you're disrespecting there bro
respect the rank |
|
He is the most popular president in the history of the country.
|
|
Gait keepers
Gate keepers: Why Biden isn’t walking alone across the White House lawn anymore |
|
and he will be re-installed as our leader.
He will up his game regarding illegals and try to top his previous terms numbers. Refugees will come from every nation. |
|
Quoted: Biden doesn't even consistently remember/realize he's President. The problem his obvious diminished capacity presents is a far bigger one. Because if the MPOTUS is just some meat-puppet figurehead, is this really some new low for American governance we've reached? Or, is it a more cosmetic issue where an extremely decrepit figurehead that cannot even handle the figurehead duties making it blatantly obvious the MPOTUS is merely a figurehead, and has been for some time? And if so, for how long? And how will the American public react to this? Will some simply engage in rationalization and utilitarian thinking, telling themselves that some combination of "Orange Man Bad" and party control is "worth it." And believes a better, more functional Democratic "actual President" will occupy the White House sooner or later? Will some just get more acclimated and inured to subsequent Presidents that are increasingly obvious figureheads? It gets more openly acceptable as status quo? Does it help explain anything else that ocurred in regards to the President or Executive Branch over previous Administrations? Does it explain some of the more outrageous, baseless, and double-standard things done against Trump? That what went on, however the Executive Branch "actually runs," Trump brought no one with him that successfully occupied those Executive Branch oligarchy slots, and he didn't bring anyone in who already did come from there? Did how Trump, somewhat coming out from left field, and not taken seriously until the last moment, mean there was no time for some more permanent presence in the Executive Branch to vet him or groom him as a figurehead? Perhaps the more usual patterns and political career progressions of Governors, Senators, Congressmen, or being a serving VP first, provides the needed time for this? Or creates the surface area so that leverage can be obtained? Is the actual Executive Branch seat of power some complicated network of individuals on the GS scale below the level of Presidential nomination and Senate confirmations? And only when one of them gets such nomination and confirmation, do they effectively lead that agency or cabinet? Is it why Hillary Clinton could so blatantly violate Federal laws on record keeping, security, and other things, that generally speaking "have teeth" and are generally on the more: "Don't FAFO with that"-end of the CFR, with the damn private email server in the Clinton mansion bathroom closet? And nothing came of it? Is it why the Clintons, both from the time Bill was Governor of Arkansas, and onward, and in the White House, were involved in a dozen odd scandals, and none, but the Lewinsky deposition perjury actually "stuck" at all? And even then, not very much? And all of them arguably more serious than Watergate, or at least Nixon's somewhat after-the-fact exposure to Watergate and his role in it. And the Clintons were far more directly involved in the various kinds of impropriety from the beginning, and it can all be characterized as being for their direct benefit. Was JFK and Nixon/Watergate the transition, or the battle to wrest control of the Executive Branch from the POTUS? Were the three main Republican Presidencies after Nixon, and before Trump, Reagan, Bush Sr., & Bush Jr., all somewhat characterized by big initiatives, policies, or events that more or less moved in directions large chunks of the Executive Branch Bureaucracy might want to go? And that's how these Republican Presidencies "survived?" Reagan: Defense build up. Opposing/confronting the USSR. That would obviously get support from the DOD, CIA, NSA, NRO. Bush Sr.: Gulf War I. Bush Jr.: 9/11, Patriot Act, creating DHS, Gulf War II, Afghanistan. Does it even better explain Obama's meteoric rise from ACORN community organizer to POTUS, and how it happened so quickly? That the "optics" and demeanor of his speechmaking delivery, and the rush for Affirmative Action checkboxing being the primary drivers, make all that much more sense if the POTUS is a figurehead? This is probably nothing "new" and I'm sure there's theories and books on this. Maybe very very well known ones I'm simply completely ignorant of. And there's always been talk how elected officials come and go, but the various government bureaucracies are staffed by people working 20+ years, and the bureaucracies themselves are perpetual. So obviously, that question of: "Where is the actual power in the Federal Government?" has been "a thing" for some time now. But, is the President even far weaker than most might even consider? And the ruling cabal, or some sort of stochastic oligarchy of Executive Branch Bureaucrats that's held the real power for some time, is simply getting more brazen and overt? View Quote Wow . That is some serious brainstorming and so well thought out. I think it’s pretty safe to assume that the President is expected to take orders from someone. Biden certainly is . Obama certainly was , others including the Clintons and Bush’s were probably doing so as well . Trump probably was not so much and that was not tolerated at all . The Kennedy reference is interesting and probably a huge piece of the puzzle . I had read a piece years ago explaining the theory of his death being linked to his opposition of Israels nuclear weapons program . That theory makes much more sense to me than any of the smoke and mirror bullshit thats been fed to the American public via Hollywood and elsewhere. Of course its very easy to start yelling ANTISEMITISM!! For even pointing it out , but if you look closely at it and the players involved you might find yourself coming to some uncomfortable conclusions. |
|
I’m having an extremely difficult time generating any sympathy for this piece of shit.
|
|
The propaganda is so think everywhere that I really have grown tired of it. "neuropathy of the feet.. anything but admit that his smooth, miniscule brain is degenerating. We all know it. They all know it. Yet they look us in the eye and lie.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.