User Panel
Quoted:
South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What the fuck has the UN ever accomplished? South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. |
|
Quoted:
Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What the fuck has the UN ever accomplished? South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. What, the blue helmeted clone army? |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What the fuck has the UN ever accomplished? South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. What, the blue helmeted clone army? The UN in general, I'd love to see America pull out and leave them flapping in the wind without all of America's money. |
|
Has anyone mentioned yet that such a "plan" is treason?
Waiting for the FBI to perp walk her.... |
|
Quoted:
The UN in general, I'd love to see America pull out and leave them flapping in the wind without all of America's money. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What the fuck has the UN ever accomplished? South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. What, the blue helmeted clone army? The UN in general, I'd love to see America pull out and leave them flapping in the wind without all of America's money. I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. |
|
Quoted:
Has anyone mentioned yet that such a "plan" is treason? Waiting for the FBI to perp walk her.... View Quote Yes, other people incapable of reading and comprehending English, with fantastic imaginations rooted in herp and derp mixed with unfounded paranoia, and lacking critical thinking skills, have already come to this conclusion. |
|
Quoted:
I have said for years that the most serious threat to out Second Amendment rights will be an indirect one, via International Treaties. Now, some of us know that Treaties DO NOT trump the Constitution, but proving so will take a long time in the courts. And what if the Courts are packed with Obama/Progresive judges? View Quote What is packed can be unpacked |
|
Quoted:
Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What the fuck has the UN ever accomplished? South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. Gee, South Korea? I would have thought that with out our blood and treasure that would have been impossible.........and the UK and the South Koreans. |
|
Quoted:
Yes, other people incapable of reading and comprehending English, with fantastic imaginations rooted in herp and derp mixed with unfounded paranoia, and lacking critical thinking skills, have already come to this conclusion. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Has anyone mentioned yet that such a "plan" is treason? Waiting for the FBI to perp walk her.... Yes, other people incapable of reading and comprehending English, with fantastic imaginations rooted in herp and derp mixed with unfounded paranoia, and lacking critical thinking skills, have already come to this conclusion. Are you saying we can trust Obama? That he doesn't want to throw the 2A in the crapper? GTFO of here! |
|
Quoted:
Gee, South Korea? I would have thought that with out our blood and treasure that would have been impossible.........and the UK and the South Koreans. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What the fuck has the UN ever accomplished? South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. Gee, South Korea? I would have thought that with out our blood and treasure that would have been impossible.........and the UK and the South Koreans. Are you suggesting the U.S. and UK weren't in the UN? I'm confused. |
|
Quoted:
Are you saying we can trust Obama? That he doesn't want to throw the 2A in the crapper? GTFO of here! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Has anyone mentioned yet that such a "plan" is treason? Waiting for the FBI to perp walk her.... Yes, other people incapable of reading and comprehending English, with fantastic imaginations rooted in herp and derp mixed with unfounded paranoia, and lacking critical thinking skills, have already come to this conclusion. Are you saying we can trust Obama? That he doesn't want to throw the 2A in the crapper? GTFO of here! What does Obama have to do with this? How can cops exchanging lessons learned and information on criminal enterprises with cops from other cities do anything to the 2nd amendment? This stuff goes on all the time now, but it's haphazard and unorganized. |
|
Quoted:
That's exactly right. You see, it all started when the reptilians crash-landed in Roswell '47. Is it any coincidence the UN was founded just two years prior? What do you think brought the reptilians to Earth? Opportunity. They'd actually arrived during the war, and had already begun embedding themselves in the government. They had enough agents in place to bury Roswell, and bury it quick. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
this cant be for real It's real. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/launch-strong-cities-network-strengthen-community-resilience-against-violent-extremism Where is the epidemic of violent extremism in the US that we need a new program to deal with it? They pack in a lot of feel-good buzzwords but it's not clear exactly what they will be doing or why. What's in the hand behind their back? Minneapolis, Minnesota. So let me see if I get this straight: Liberals bring in liberal minded inmigrants that want to destroy our fabric of life because they will demographically vote "D" yet the .gov turns around & wants more UN authority in the states to counteract this ideal they call "Right wing"? ? That's exactly right. You see, it all started when the reptilians crash-landed in Roswell '47. Is it any coincidence the UN was founded just two years prior? What do you think brought the reptilians to Earth? Opportunity. They'd actually arrived during the war, and had already begun embedding themselves in the government. They had enough agents in place to bury Roswell, and bury it quick. LOL!!!! |
|
Quoted:
Its like the 90s with this bullshit all over again lol Is Briebart becoming a tinfoiler site lately? View Quote Yeah, I remember seeing all those anti-UN flags and the basement dwellers passing out conspiracy handbills at the gun shows. It was hilarious then and it's hilarious now. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What the fuck has the UN ever accomplished? South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. What, the blue helmeted clone army? They did an awesome job in Rwanda. |
|
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. View Quote Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! |
|
Quoted:
Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! Yes, let's just have Russia and China leading the planet to a brave new future while the U.S. watches reality TV and NASCAR. What could go wrong? Sign me the fuck up! The first half of the 20th century was so much better than the second, without that pesky UN! |
|
Quoted:
Yes, let's just have Russia and China leading the planet to a brave new future while the U.S. watches reality TV and NASCAR. What could go wrong? Sign me the fuck up! The first half of the 20th century was so much better than the second, without that pesky UN! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! Yes, let's just have Russia and China leading the planet to a brave new future while the U.S. watches reality TV and NASCAR. What could go wrong? Sign me the fuck up! The first half of the 20th century was so much better than the second, without that pesky UN! Lol, as if the only way to exert influence in the world is the bureaucratic faggotry that is the United Nations. I understand that you love you some big government international socialism, so it's no wonder you would felate the UN. |
|
Quoted:
Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! Haven't we de facto given it up already? What's the last thing we vetoed in the UNSC? Personally, I think the UN should be shut down - it's just the cantina scene from Star Wars but in real life... a wretched hive of scum and villainy. |
|
Quoted:
Yes, let's just have Russia and China leading the planet to a brave new future while the U.S. watches reality TV and NASCAR. What could go wrong? Sign me the fuck up! The first half of the 20th century was so much better than the second, without that pesky UN! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! Yes, let's just have Russia and China leading the planet to a brave new future while the U.S. watches reality TV and NASCAR. What could go wrong? Sign me the fuck up! The first half of the 20th century was so much better than the second, without that pesky UN! LOL!!! But Trump says that will be terrific and we'll all be rich and we'll be sick of winning. How could you possibly be against Russia and china running things while we sit back with our Canadian style healthcare and win? |
|
Quoted:
Haven't we de facto given it up already? What's the last thing we vetoed in the UNSC? Personally, I think the UN should be shut down - it's just the cantina scene from Star Wars but in real life... a wretched hive of scum and villainy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! Haven't we de facto given it up already? What's the last thing we vetoed in the UNSC? Personally, I think the UN should be shut down - it's just the cantina scene from Star Wars but in real life... a wretched hive of scum and villainy. We do not have the power to shut down the UN and we need to retain our veto in the security council. Doing anything else would be retarded. |
|
Quoted:
We do not have the power to shut down the UN and we need to retain our veto in the security council. Doing anything else would be retarded. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! Haven't we de facto given it up already? What's the last thing we vetoed in the UNSC? Personally, I think the UN should be shut down - it's just the cantina scene from Star Wars but in real life... a wretched hive of scum and villainy. We do not have the power to shut down the UN and we need to retain our veto in the security council. Doing anything else would be retarded. Not so sure. We foot the bill for most of it. If we were to withdraw, I think it would just fall apart. |
|
Quoted:
Haven't we de facto given it up already? What's the last thing we vetoed in the UNSC? ... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! Haven't we de facto given it up already? What's the last thing we vetoed in the UNSC? ... Are you going to tell me you follow UNSC proceedings? lol. We've formally vetoed at least 5 related to Israel in just the past decade. There have been plenty others relate to the Balkans and Israel as well. |
|
Quoted:
............... Are you going to tell me you follow UNSC proceedings? lol. We've formally vetoed at least 5 related to Israel in just the past decade. There have been plenty others relate to the Balkans and Israel as well. View Quote I think the last one was in 2010 or 2011 having to do with Israeli settlements. |
|
Never happen. UN is powerless and useless. Lynch can kiss my ass along with Obongo.
|
|
Quoted:
Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism’ In U.S. On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe. This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all. The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces? After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” more at link http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/obama-administration-and-un-announce-global-police-force-to-fight-extremism-in-u-s/ View Quote Is there a write-up on this from a non-biased source? Breitbart author makes it sound like we are being overrun by skynet and my boss might be a terminator. |
|
|
Quoted:
Is there a write-up on this from a non-biased source? Breitbart author makes it sound like we are being overrun by skynet and my boss might be a terminator. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism’ In U.S. On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe. This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all. The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces? After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” more at link http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/obama-administration-and-un-announce-global-police-force-to-fight-extremism-in-u-s/ Is there a write-up on this from a non-biased source? Breitbart author makes it sound like we are being overrun by skynet and my boss might be a terminator. The DoJ Press release: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/launch-strong-cities-network-strengthen-community-resilience-against-violent-extremism Here's a good article, with links to other press sources and press releases: http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/strong_cities_network_will_foster_collaboration_to_fight_violent_extremism And, it's good it know the Islamic Rage Boys of the world are raging right along with the GD Rage Boys. They truly have a lot in common: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/30/nyregion/new-york-city-to-join-us-anti-terrorist-program-criticized-by-rights-groups.html?_r=0 |
|
|
Quoted:
Is there a write-up on this from a non-biased source? Breitbart author makes it sound like we are being overrun by skynet and my boss might be a terminator. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism’ In U.S. On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe. This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all. The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces? After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” more at link http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/obama-administration-and-un-announce-global-police-force-to-fight-extremism-in-u-s/ Is there a write-up on this from a non-biased source? Breitbart author makes it sound like we are being overrun by skynet and my boss might be a terminator. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
It's the Red Blue Dawn arfcom wet dream. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The hardest part of the U.N. occupation... Is pretending that I'm not excited. Why would one be excited for this? It's the Red Blue Dawn arfcom wet dream. GD is all about killing people in support of UN operations, unless it's Marines in Beirut or Rangers in Somalia or what not. Then, cognitive dissonance kicks in big time. |
|
Quoted:
What does Obama have to do with this? How can cops exchanging lessons learned and information on criminal enterprises with cops from other cities do anything to the 2nd amendment? This stuff goes on all the time now, but it's haphazard and unorganized. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Has anyone mentioned yet that such a "plan" is treason? Waiting for the FBI to perp walk her.... Yes, other people incapable of reading and comprehending English, with fantastic imaginations rooted in herp and derp mixed with unfounded paranoia, and lacking critical thinking skills, have already come to this conclusion. Are you saying we can trust Obama? That he doesn't want to throw the 2A in the crapper? GTFO of here! What does Obama have to do with this? How can cops exchanging lessons learned and information on criminal enterprises with cops from other cities do anything to the 2nd amendment? This stuff goes on all the time now, but it's haphazard and unorganized. Obama's administration pushed the ATT. It is dangerous to our 2A rights. There is no doubt Obama will go to any means to push his agenda and the 2A is a big part of it. It will be more than an exchange of information. Go peddle that bullshit to somebody else. The UN ATT conference in Mexico in August had a large delegation from the US and then they announce this "information exchange" the day before the Oregon shooting? Purely coincidental I'm sure. The next fucking thing you are going to say is that Fast & Furious was just a poorly run investigation and that Lois Lerner's hard drive probably did crash. |
|
Quoted:
This is not a UN program, it was simply officially announced at the UN. Because, well, it's where all countries get together to talk and stuff. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Never happen. UN is powerless and useless. Lynch can kiss my ass along with Obongo. This is not a UN program, it was simply officially announced at the UN. Because, well, it's where all countries get together to talk and stuff. Yeah they do that all the time. They even announce new Walmart openings in China. |
|
|
Quoted:
Obama's administration pushed the ATT. It is dangerous to our 2A rights. There is no doubt Obama will go to any means to push his agenda and the 2A is a big part of it. It will be more than an exchange of information. Go peddle that bullshit to somebody else. The UN ATT conference in Mexico in August had a large delegation from the US and then they announce this "information exchange" the day before the Oregon shooting? Purely coincidental I'm sure. The next fucking thing you are going to say is that Fast & Furious was just a poorly run investigation and that Lois Lerner's hard drive probably did crash. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Has anyone mentioned yet that such a "plan" is treason? Waiting for the FBI to perp walk her.... Yes, other people incapable of reading and comprehending English, with fantastic imaginations rooted in herp and derp mixed with unfounded paranoia, and lacking critical thinking skills, have already come to this conclusion. Are you saying we can trust Obama? That he doesn't want to throw the 2A in the crapper? GTFO of here! What does Obama have to do with this? How can cops exchanging lessons learned and information on criminal enterprises with cops from other cities do anything to the 2nd amendment? This stuff goes on all the time now, but it's haphazard and unorganized. Obama's administration pushed the ATT. It is dangerous to our 2A rights. There is no doubt Obama will go to any means to push his agenda and the 2A is a big part of it. It will be more than an exchange of information. Go peddle that bullshit to somebody else. The UN ATT conference in Mexico in August had a large delegation from the US and then they announce this "information exchange" the day before the Oregon shooting? Purely coincidental I'm sure. The next fucking thing you are going to say is that Fast & Furious was just a poorly run investigation and that Lois Lerner's hard drive probably did crash. Wait, are you saying this Oregon shooting was part of the conspiracy? Also, did you follow the ATT process AT ALL? The U.S drew so many red lines and pushed back on so many issues, Mexico bitched for months and the Russians used it as their excuse not to sign. |
|
|
Quoted:
Wait, are you saying this Oregon shooting was part of the conspiracy? Also, did you follow the ATT process AT ALL? The U.S drew so many red lines and pushed back on so many issues, Mexico bitched for months and the Russians used it as their excuse not to sign. View Quote Just very coincidental. How fortuitous the timing! If you are going to believe what Obama's people say with his "transparent" administration's record, well, all I can say is you probably own ocean front property in Kansas. What is agreed upon behind closed doors is very seldom what they publicly announce. Especially with this lying Kenyan we have in office. Supposedly the ATT is not valid because the US Senate hasn't confirmed yet the US is trying to diminish the effects of that treaty here in the US? The bull shit just gets deeper. Keep shoveling it. I'm sure some people here will eat it up. |
|
Despite the herp and derp, there are a few posters here who can come through with rational analysis of these things. I'm glad they take the time to do this. It's nice to read views written from a position of understanding instead of tinfoil and ignorance.
|
|
Collaboration is a good thing, and I really doubt we'll end up with UN troops on our soil in any military or police capaccity, this would greatly upset me, and if it would do that to me I can't imagine how everyone else would feel about it. We have our own boys to handle violent extremism in this country, even if our own troops end up in the streets to defend us, I'll be the first to bring them coffee and donuts...but some invading UN cocksucker, I don't think so.
|
|
Quoted:
Just very coincidental. How fortuitous the timing! If you are going to believe what Obama's people say with his "transparent" administration's record, well, all I can say is you probably own ocean front property in Kansas. What is agreed upon behind closed doors is very seldom what they publicly announce. Especially with this lying Kenyan we have in office. Supposedly the ATT is not valid because the US Senate hasn't confirmed yet the US is trying to diminish the effects of that treaty here in the US? The bull shit just gets deeper. Keep shoveling it. I'm sure some people here will eat it up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Wait, are you saying this Oregon shooting was part of the conspiracy? Also, did you follow the ATT process AT ALL? The U.S drew so many red lines and pushed back on so many issues, Mexico bitched for months and the Russians used it as their excuse not to sign. Just very coincidental. How fortuitous the timing! If you are going to believe what Obama's people say with his "transparent" administration's record, well, all I can say is you probably own ocean front property in Kansas. What is agreed upon behind closed doors is very seldom what they publicly announce. Especially with this lying Kenyan we have in office. Supposedly the ATT is not valid because the US Senate hasn't confirmed yet the US is trying to diminish the effects of that treaty here in the US? The bull shit just gets deeper. Keep shoveling it. I'm sure some people here will eat it up. You are so clueless about the issues you can't even articulate what they are. The important thing is, though, that you have opinions. |
|
Quoted:
Yes, let's just have Russia and China leading the planet to a brave new future while the U.S. watches reality TV and NASCAR. What could go wrong? Sign me the fuck up! The first half of the 20th century was so much better than the second, without that pesky UN! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm sure you, like all posters who have come before, could clearly articulate exactly why this would be so wonderful without sounding like a liberal talking about guns. I'm sure of it. Dude, the world would be a terrific if we gave up our security council veto! It would be so terrific and wonderful, we'd get sick of how wonderful it will be! Yes, let's just have Russia and China leading the planet to a brave new future while the U.S. watches reality TV and NASCAR. What could go wrong? Sign me the fuck up! The first half of the 20th century was so much better than the second, without that pesky UN! Not our backyard. Stop policing the world for a change. George Washington was an isolationist. etc etc etc -GD Refute THAT. |
|
|
Quoted:
Are you suggesting the U.S. and UK weren't in the UN? I'm confused. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What the fuck has the UN ever accomplished? South Korea not enough? Shitloads of peacekeepers. Establishment of Israel? And has been the venue for some of the most widespread international treaties and significant debates in modern history? Maybe that? Meh. Their negatives have far outstripped their positives. Gee, South Korea? I would have thought that with out our blood and treasure that would have been impossible.........and the UK and the South Koreans. Are you suggesting the U.S. and UK weren't in the UN? I'm confused. no, quite the contrary, The US and the UK took the lead..........the comment about a shit load of UN peacekeepers in Korea seemed to say that it was the UN in general carried the load. It was the US along with the UK and the South Koreans themselves.............. |
|
If the term had been in use in 1775, the American revolutionaries would have been labeled "violent extremists" by a king intent on oppressing the colonies at almost any cost.
A government that does not have the consent of the governed is a powder keg waiting for a match. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.