User Panel
I hate the four team playoff less than the BCS, but it's still a popularity contest, and it is not adequate to settle the championship question for reals. 8 teams is the minimum to settle it fairly, and 12 would be better (top 4 get a bye). More than 16 is too many, but 4 is definitely too few. TCU got hosed. (I am not a TCU fan, but I sure as heck wouldn't want to play them. View Quote Yup, 8 minimum. 12 or 16 better. FCS went to 24 and that's just stupid. |
|
Quoted:
No need for excuses. Just admit it, your liking of UM was all a big mistake and you now realize you are a real Buckeye! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bad spot for a turnover, OSU. As a fellow Michigan fan, I cannot believe you are rooting for the fucking bucknuts. Turn in your M, son. I need the Big 10 to not be a national embarrassment. I'll get back to hating on OSU when Michigan isn't embarrassing to watch. Slow down there, chief. |
|
Quoted:
No need for excuses. Just admit it, your liking of UM was all a big mistake and you now realize you are a real Buckeye! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bad spot for a turnover, OSU. As a fellow Michigan fan, I cannot believe you are rooting for the fucking bucknuts. Turn in your M, son. I need the Big 10 to not be a national embarrassment. I'll get back to hating on OSU when Michigan isn't embarrassing to watch. Nailed it. |
|
There's too many games, what's the schedule twelve ? Then, two playoff bowls to decide who makes it to the National Championship Bowl ? So fourteen games. Cut it down to ten, then the best eight play four bowls, down to two bowls down to one. So thirteen games, seems much more feasible.
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Bad spot for a turnover, OSU. As a fellow Michigan fan, I cannot believe you are rooting for the fucking bucknuts. Turn in your M, son. I need the Big 10 to not be a national embarrassment. I'll get back to hating on OSU when Michigan isn't embarrassing to watch. Slow down there, chief. Michigan State and Ohio State aren't rooting for Michigan EVER. I remember when Michigan lost the national championship game in basketball a few years ago. OSU fans were writing to ESPN "Thank GOD! I would not be able to take Michigan winning a national championship". This bullshit that OSU or MSU fans say we should root for them because everyone should root for the Big 10. Ha, fuck that. They aren't going to root for Michigan to be successful so I'll never root for them.
|
|
Quoted: There's too many games, what's the schedule twelve ? Then, two playoff bowls to decide who makes it to the National Championship Bowl ? So fourteen games. Cut it down to ten, then the best eight play four bowls, down to two bowls down to one. So thirteen games, seems much more feasible. View Quote Easy, just cut out the pushover games for the major conferences - no more playing Mt. Holy Cross School for Girls, Bama and OSU...start your season with conference play, 1 OOC conference game like Texas or USC...whatever. Every FBS conference sends its conference champion to the tourney....then the top Independent team (by record), and 4 other at-larges by conference record. No popularity contest, no rankings, no BS. All settled on the field, just like the NCAAB. Also will work to even out the conferences and stop this push towards 3 or 4 super conferences. 16 game tourney, 8 bowls to set up the bracket, presto.
|
|
Quoted: Michigan State and Ohio State aren't rooting for Michigan EVER. I remember when Michigan lost the national championship game in basketball a few years ago. OSU fans were writing to ESPN "Thank GOD! I would not be able to take Michigan winning a national championship". View Quote This bullshit that OSU or MSU fans say we should root for them because everyone should root for the Big 10. Ha, fuck that. They aren't going to root for Michigan to be successful so I'll never root for them. So because they're morons you wanna be too? Dude, if OSU is in the NC, that lifts Michigan's stature by being in the same league and it challenges their staff to compete with the cream. It also helps strength of schedule (which hopefully becomes less of an issue in the future, but for now it matters). If you don't root for a team that helps yours out in this manner, no matter if you're an OSU fan or Michigan man, you're not much of a fan. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Bad spot for a turnover, OSU. As a fellow Michigan fan, I cannot believe you are rooting for the fucking bucknuts. Turn in your M, son. I need the Big 10 to not be a national embarrassment. I'll get back to hating on OSU when Michigan isn't embarrassing to watch. Slow down there, chief. |
|
Quoted: View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Michigan State and Ohio State aren't rooting for Michigan EVER. I remember when Michigan lost the national championship game in basketball a few years ago. OSU fans were writing to ESPN "Thank GOD! I would not be able to take Michigan winning a national championship". This bullshit that OSU or MSU fans say we should root for them because everyone should root for the Big 10. Ha, fuck that. They aren't going to root for Michigan to be successful so I'll never root for them. So because they're morons you wanna be too? Dude, if OSU is in the NC, that lifts Michigan's stature by being in the same league and it challenges their staff to compete with the cream. It also helps strength of schedule (which hopefully becomes less of an issue in the future, but for now it matters). If you don't root for a team that helps yours out in this manner, no matter if you're an OSU fan or Michigan man, you're not much of a fan. I'm a Michigan fan. Just like being a Lions fan, I'll never root for the Packers or Bears |
|
Needs to be a 10-game regular season schedule with optional Conference championship for week 11. Then a 5 week, 32 team playoff bracket.
|
|
MOVE Are you drunk or just that full of HATE? It is just a game, get over it dude before it eats you up, for your own sake, With your attitude in Ohio it is no wonder people at work get on you. What do you think it would be like if I lived in Mich and acted like you do?
Go bucks. Last night we were the better team. And you can shove your safety call too. The roughing the punter call was the bad call. Anytime a punters leg is in the air and he gets hit, it is roughing...except when the punter is from OSU and the hitter is from ANY other team. |
|
Quoted:
You were just lucky WIsky didnt have a QB. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
One more TD by the fuckeyes and this game is over. My luck the Ducks will choke on their own cocks like Bama did 59-0 in a conference championship. I thought OSU would struggle, but it would be close. Anyone who thought OSU didn't deserve to bump up after that epic beat down is crazy. And with our third string QB. lol. You were just lucky WIsky didnt have a QB. OR a DEFENSE worth a crap. |
|
|
First time ever that I have cheered for the Buckeyes.
That was better than Notre Dame beating LSU. |
|
Quoted:
I'm reasonably sure the state of ohio takes football just as serious as Alabama does. If it wasn't for college football Ohio wouldn't have anything going for itself! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Sucks to be a football fan of any team in AL today. Getting their asses handed to them by the Big 10. Those guys take it SERIOUSLY down there. You live behind the iron curtain and you are dumb enough to say that? I have had my chl for over 7 years. You got a dem gov, actually two of them that went to prison and your state and major cities are broke and you are dumb enough to say that? I know it is new years but what are you smokkng? |
|
dont watch much college football, but I must say with all the talk about the sec I liked the bama beat down.
|
|
Bama loses a game and you homos go 500 pages
BAMA stomps motherfuckers week in and week out, year in year out out and a pro Bama thread goes 2 pages. |
|
Seeing the look on Urbans face during the press conference when hearing about the Ducks game score was awesome.
|
|
lol, funny how the Michigan fans try to make this thread about them |
|
|
Quoted:
Ummm.... Missouri won it's bowl game. And with a sick quarterback. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Ummm.... Missouri won it's bowl game. And with a sick quarterback. Quoted:
Top 5 teams in "greatest CFB division in history" are 0-5 in their bowl games. Funny how they don't look so good when they have to play somebody outside their division. A sick QB from OHIO. He did not pass for crap, but he did run well. I heard them say he was not a great runner, but I saw him in high school and he could do anything he had to do. |
|
Quoted:
It's still a popularity contest. That's the reason TCU (and Baylor) was left out and OSU brought in. Popularity and brand recognition. OSU is awesome this year, but anybody wants to say they're simply better than TCU is blowing smoke. We don't know who's better, unless they settle it on the field. A 4-team field is still far too subject to the popularity contest, and that fact was exposed badly in the first year of the "playoff." FSU got in the playoffs, but they were by far the weakest of the top 5 teams. The selection committee said they were going to pick the best teams regardless of record, but FSU got in solely because of being undefeated, even though they had a whole bunch of garbage wins against garbage teams that they almost lost anyway. Despite the predictions of the boosters, FSU was blown out. TCU belonged, and the popularity selection of the four teams gypped TCU and every college football fan that wants to see a real champion on the field. Here's a notion for the popularity contest: TCU beat four top-10 teams (at the time) this year, with their only loss being by a field goal to another top-5 team. OSU will have played three top-10 teams, and their only loss is to a team that did not win their conference, was not/is not ranked, by two touchdowns. If OSU wins a squeaker against Oregon, give me a reason to say TCU should not be ranked #1 in the final AP poll. TCUs conference was asked to give the committee a conference champion, which they refused to do. Baylor beat TCU right? So, Baylor had a gripe. But since they would not send a conference champion, the committee eliminated that conference from the playoff. I do agree that there needs to be 8 teams, but on the other hand.....most teams who won their bowl game had fun celebrating and that will continue for a while. Meanwhile, Oregon and OSU has to go back to work right away. 15 games a year is a ton and for a student athlete, it is really hard. I only played soccer in college, but back then we did not have study groups and personal tutors and to be honest almost flunked out of school. Back then the profs did not like athletes and did not like them cutting their classes to play a game. Some of that has changed, but it is still hard for the student athlete and that should come first. But, since it is about money now.....8 teams is just around the corner. I hate the four team playoff less than the BCS, but it's still a popularity contest, and it is not adequate to settle the championship question for reals. 8 teams is the minimum to settle it fairly, and 12 would be better (top 4 get a bye). More than 16 is too many, but 4 is definitely too few. TCU got hosed. (I am not a TCU fan, but I sure as heck wouldn't want to play them. ) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm glad we finally got rid of that popularity contest bullshit, because if the old system was in place, FSU and Alabama are playing for a national championship. I imagine there are alot of fraudulent champions in the past. Still need 8 team playoffs though. It's still a popularity contest. That's the reason TCU (and Baylor) was left out and OSU brought in. Popularity and brand recognition. OSU is awesome this year, but anybody wants to say they're simply better than TCU is blowing smoke. We don't know who's better, unless they settle it on the field. A 4-team field is still far too subject to the popularity contest, and that fact was exposed badly in the first year of the "playoff." FSU got in the playoffs, but they were by far the weakest of the top 5 teams. The selection committee said they were going to pick the best teams regardless of record, but FSU got in solely because of being undefeated, even though they had a whole bunch of garbage wins against garbage teams that they almost lost anyway. Despite the predictions of the boosters, FSU was blown out. TCU belonged, and the popularity selection of the four teams gypped TCU and every college football fan that wants to see a real champion on the field. Here's a notion for the popularity contest: TCU beat four top-10 teams (at the time) this year, with their only loss being by a field goal to another top-5 team. OSU will have played three top-10 teams, and their only loss is to a team that did not win their conference, was not/is not ranked, by two touchdowns. If OSU wins a squeaker against Oregon, give me a reason to say TCU should not be ranked #1 in the final AP poll. TCUs conference was asked to give the committee a conference champion, which they refused to do. Baylor beat TCU right? So, Baylor had a gripe. But since they would not send a conference champion, the committee eliminated that conference from the playoff. I do agree that there needs to be 8 teams, but on the other hand.....most teams who won their bowl game had fun celebrating and that will continue for a while. Meanwhile, Oregon and OSU has to go back to work right away. 15 games a year is a ton and for a student athlete, it is really hard. I only played soccer in college, but back then we did not have study groups and personal tutors and to be honest almost flunked out of school. Back then the profs did not like athletes and did not like them cutting their classes to play a game. Some of that has changed, but it is still hard for the student athlete and that should come first. But, since it is about money now.....8 teams is just around the corner. I hate the four team playoff less than the BCS, but it's still a popularity contest, and it is not adequate to settle the championship question for reals. 8 teams is the minimum to settle it fairly, and 12 would be better (top 4 get a bye). More than 16 is too many, but 4 is definitely too few. TCU got hosed. (I am not a TCU fan, but I sure as heck wouldn't want to play them. ) |
|
Quoted:
I think OSU cares a lot more about the rivalry than Michigan does, to the point they'll root against ANYONE Michigan plays, even when it degrades the Big10...which is 80 kinds of retarded. My uncle who's a die-hard OSU nut told me once that OSU fans hate Michigan more than they love OSU, which I believe is often true - and kind of pathetic. As a Michigan fan, I don't root for OSU often, but I respect them and love when they do well on the national stage. But, I also know that a lot of fans of OOC teams that come to Columbus talk about how cool the fans are to them and how chill everyone is, so there's two kind of fans here IMHO...rivalry zealots (the douches) and the normal OSU fans...who are pretty cool. Wow I had forgotten that, funny how you remembered. So, who is it that never forgot it? Gee, seems I remember seeing the sour grapes show on how UM got cheated out of going to the rose bowl one year by the big ten and how OSU went instead...wow the hatred still over that, you could hear it in the voices of all the UM alum and fans during the show. And, like very big school with a top notch program, there's a disproportionate number of OSU fans who think they're the best team that's ever taken the field, even if there's no real evidence or record to substantiate that. They've never forgot that game in 1902 when we beat them 86-0 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ohio State fan, you are better off being a Ohio fan at a Michigan game than a Michigan fan at Ohio game, I was setting in the Michigan Student section rooting for OSU at Michigan. I'd agree with this, as a Michigan fan living in OSU territory. My family is in the Ann Arbor area (two cousins played for Bo in the 80's) and I've been to both games many times. Seen a lot more venom directed at Michigan folks in Columbus than the other way around - but in truth, all rivalry games all over the nation have a bit of this. Auburn/Bama is a cauldron of stupidity, from what I've heard). I think OSU cares a lot more about the rivalry than Michigan does, to the point they'll root against ANYONE Michigan plays, even when it degrades the Big10...which is 80 kinds of retarded. My uncle who's a die-hard OSU nut told me once that OSU fans hate Michigan more than they love OSU, which I believe is often true - and kind of pathetic. As a Michigan fan, I don't root for OSU often, but I respect them and love when they do well on the national stage. But, I also know that a lot of fans of OOC teams that come to Columbus talk about how cool the fans are to them and how chill everyone is, so there's two kind of fans here IMHO...rivalry zealots (the douches) and the normal OSU fans...who are pretty cool. Wow I had forgotten that, funny how you remembered. So, who is it that never forgot it? Gee, seems I remember seeing the sour grapes show on how UM got cheated out of going to the rose bowl one year by the big ten and how OSU went instead...wow the hatred still over that, you could hear it in the voices of all the UM alum and fans during the show. And, like very big school with a top notch program, there's a disproportionate number of OSU fans who think they're the best team that's ever taken the field, even if there's no real evidence or record to substantiate that. They've never forgot that game in 1902 when we beat them 86-0 |
|
|
I think the Big 10 did a hell of a job against the SEC these past couple days. I think we are all tired of hearing their crap. Would have have liked to have seen the Hawkeyes take down the Volunteers too, but 3 out of 4 isn't bad overall.
|
|
By the transitive property, we have now beaten 'Bama! Go HOKIES!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
<a href="https://flic.kr/p/qnmA76" target="_blank">https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7487/15994225817_e0018ca9e7_o.jpg</a>10891767_933439146668451_7057439779012603522_n by 4DAIVIPAI2K5, on Flickr View Quote |
|
Quoted: Tressell Ball got us a National Championship View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Thank God the days of "Tressell Ball" are gone Tressell Ball got us a National Championship But it would have been mauled on Thursday and Cie Grant was a local kid so around here it is Cie Grant that won us a NC , it isn't true because Cie wasn't the only person on the field but I let the hillbillies think as they want That "Pass Interference" helped in getting an NC also |
|
Quoted:
Easy, just cut out the pushover games for the major conferences - no more playing Mt. Holy Cross School for Girls, Bama and OSU...start your season with conference play, 1 OOC conference game like Texas or USC...whatever. Every FBS conference sends its conference champion to the tourney....then the top Independent team (by record), and 4 other at-larges by conference record. No popularity contest, no rankings, no BS. All settled on the field, just like the NCAAB. Also will work to even out the conferences and stop this push towards 3 or 4 super conferences. 16 game tourney, 8 bowls to set up the bracket, presto. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
There's too many games, what's the schedule twelve ? Then, two playoff bowls to decide who makes it to the National Championship Bowl ? So fourteen games. Cut it down to ten, then the best eight play four bowls, down to two bowls down to one. So thirteen games, seems much more feasible. Easy, just cut out the pushover games for the major conferences - no more playing Mt. Holy Cross School for Girls, Bama and OSU...start your season with conference play, 1 OOC conference game like Texas or USC...whatever. Every FBS conference sends its conference champion to the tourney....then the top Independent team (by record), and 4 other at-larges by conference record. No popularity contest, no rankings, no BS. All settled on the field, just like the NCAAB. Also will work to even out the conferences and stop this push towards 3 or 4 super conferences. 16 game tourney, 8 bowls to set up the bracket, presto. If conference "co champions" go too, what is the point of the conference championship game. 5 conference champions, 3 at large teams based upon AP poll or BCS computers. Done. |
|
I look forward to Alabama crushing the Ducks tonight after their glorious victory against the overrated big 10 whores! Oh, wait....
hahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahah |
|
|
|
I'm getting sick to my stomach thinking about this game.
Go Bucks!! |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.