User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:30:44 PM EDT
[#1]
 " />
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:31:07 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Except for the fact that millions more people have voted for him than anyone else. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He'll pick up some percentage of the "not Hillary" vote. Believing that he will overcome a 63% (average) unfavorable rating by picking up those votes is folly. I've been assured it's the media's fault that people hate Trump. Why would anyone have disdain for him beforehand?  All evidence is to the contrary, of course Most people, in fact, did NOT vote for Trump I know...I hate bringing facts into a thread that is based entirely on BS but there you have it |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:31:38 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Most people don't hate him. Most people vote for him actually. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He'll pick up some percentage of the "not Hillary" vote. Believing that he will overcome a 63% (average) unfavorable rating by picking up those votes is folly. I've been assured it's the media's fault that people hate Trump. Why would anyone have disdain for him beforehand? MOST people, actually, do NOT vote for him. You and he will soon learn this truism. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:33:00 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Most people, in fact, did NOT vote for Trump I know...I hate bringing facts into a thread that is based entirely on BSC but there you have it Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I've been assured it's the media's fault that people hate Trump. Why would anyone have disdain for him beforehand? All evidence is to the contrary, of course Most people, in fact, did NOT vote for Trump I know...I hate bringing facts into a thread that is based entirely on BSC but there you have it Even more people, in fact, did not vote for your creepy Canadian. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:34:18 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Who would you suggest? If its a contested convention and they pick anyone but Trump, the most likely result is he runs 3rd party and the Republicans strongly behind Trump vote for him and we get Hillary. Just as Trump has a problem with all the people in the #nevertrump movement, whoever is picked to run (and it will certainly not be Cruz, who I voted for) has to win back all those Trump voters who will still be sore from the assfucking the GOPe gave them at the convention. So what great uniter is the republican party going to run who can win over all the people who voted for Trump (or draw in enough disaffected voters to replace all of them). Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I WILL NOT vote for Trump. If you want to beat Hillary, give me a different Republican nominee. Who would you suggest? If its a contested convention and they pick anyone but Trump, the most likely result is he runs 3rd party and the Republicans strongly behind Trump vote for him and we get Hillary. Just as Trump has a problem with all the people in the #nevertrump movement, whoever is picked to run (and it will certainly not be Cruz, who I voted for) has to win back all those Trump voters who will still be sore from the assfucking the GOPe gave them at the convention. So what great uniter is the republican party going to run who can win over all the people who voted for Trump (or draw in enough disaffected voters to replace all of them). Not Trump. I will not vote for him. We all saw this coming. It's a damned shame that the rubes fell for it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:36:27 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are you drunk? WTF are you talking about? What is this "another poster" is that you speak of? Seems like you can't keep your bullshit straight, liar. I never admitted to lying about anything. I owned my incorrect statement here about you (or your comrades) "posting a link", and acknowledged I was wrong even though what you posted was even more pathetic, liar. The "National Enquirer".... 
Or, are you assuming someone else's shift on pro-2A forum? I mean, this is the weekend, after all.....You fellers need to get on the same page if that's the case. By God, at least earn your pay, liar. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That's mean a lot coming from a guy that admitted he lied about what another poster said. Are you drunk? WTF are you talking about? What is this "another poster" is that you speak of? Seems like you can't keep your bullshit straight, liar. I never admitted to lying about anything. I owned my incorrect statement here about you (or your comrades) "posting a link", and acknowledged I was wrong even though what you posted was even more pathetic, liar. The "National Enquirer"....
Or, are you assuming someone else's shift on pro-2A forum? I mean, this is the weekend, after all.....You fellers need to get on the same page if that's the case. By God, at least earn your pay, liar. Oh, so when you get caught lying and making things up it's not considered "lying" it's considered making "incorrect statements." 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:37:42 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Even more people, in fact, did not vote for your creepy Canadian. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:Most people don't hate him. Most people vote for him actually. All evidence is to the contrary, of course Most people, in fact, did NOT vote for Trump I know...I hate bringing facts into a thread that is based entirely on BSC but there you have it Even more people, in fact, did not vote for your creepy Canadian. So what? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:41:17 PM EDT
[#8]
Ted still fuckin those bitches , he must be a real cocksman. A
  
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:41:19 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:42:07 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:51:27 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But if you think that he can't win the general, just sit back and enjoy the show 
He's already going to struggle to carry any sizeable amount of women, liberal men, Hispanics and the youth. Given enough time I'm sure he'll find a way to piss off African-Americans and Asian's too. He's such a gigantic pile of idiot I doubt he's gonna energize the conservatives to any great degree. What demographic is he going to so overwhelmingly carry that will make up for the significant beating he's gonna take in those key demos? The votes need to come from somewhere. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:55:30 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not Trump. I will not vote for him. We all saw this coming. It's a damned shame that the rubes fell for it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I WILL NOT vote for Trump. If you want to beat Hillary, give me a different Republican nominee. Who would you suggest? If its a contested convention and they pick anyone but Trump, the most likely result is he runs 3rd party and the Republicans strongly behind Trump vote for him and we get Hillary. Just as Trump has a problem with all the people in the #nevertrump movement, whoever is picked to run (and it will certainly not be Cruz, who I voted for) has to win back all those Trump voters who will still be sore from the assfucking the GOPe gave them at the convention. So what great uniter is the republican party going to run who can win over all the people who voted for Trump (or draw in enough disaffected voters to replace all of them). Not Trump. I will not vote for him. We all saw this coming. It's a damned shame that the rubes fell for it. So you will assist Hillary in becoming President then. 
I'm supporting Trump, but I'll vote for Cruz if he is the nominee. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:56:10 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Oh, so when you get caught lying and making things up it's not considered "lying" it's considered making "incorrect statements." Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's mean a lot coming from a guy that admitted he lied about what another poster said. Are you drunk? WTF are you talking about? What is this "another poster" is that you speak of? Seems like you can't keep your bullshit straight, liar. I never admitted to lying about anything. I owned my incorrect statement here about you (or your comrades) "posting a link", and acknowledged I was wrong even though what you posted was even more pathetic, liar. The "National Enquirer"....
Or, are you assuming someone else's shift on pro-2A forum? I mean, this is the weekend, after all.....You fellers need to get on the same page if that's the case. By God, at least earn your pay, liar. Oh, so when you get caught lying and making things up it's not considered "lying" it's considered making "incorrect statements." more *nervous laughter* from a known liar. got that quote ready for us, liar? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:58:04 PM EDT
[#14]
Meh, they're hoping to steal the election from the voters by means of shenanigans at the convention.
Paulbots v.2.0 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 9:59:52 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:01:48 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Meh, they're hoping to steal the election from the voters by means of shenanigans at the convention. Paulbots v.2.0 I can't speak for other posters, but if the GOP pulls that garbage, I hope it completely shatters the party. If Trump wins the proper amount of delegates, he should be the Republican candidate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:03:07 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hypothetically, assuming convention shenanigans and the installation of an establishment candidate, he'd have a good shot at a solid second place finish in the general on an independent run. It would wind up being a contest between his ego and his financial sense. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I WILL NOT vote for Trump. If you want to beat Hillary, give me a different Republican nominee. Who would you suggest? If its a contested convention and they pick anyone but Trump, the most likely result is he runs 3rd party and the Republicans strongly behind Trump vote for him and we get Hillary. Just as Trump has a problem with all the people in the #nevertrump movement, whoever is picked to run (and it will certainly not be Cruz, who I voted for) has to win back all those Trump voters who will still be sore from the assfucking the GOPe gave them at the convention. So what great uniter is the republican party going to run who can win over all the people who voted for Trump (or draw in enough disaffected voters to replace all of them). There's no one to suggest, and no such "great uniter". Trump is going to be nominee most likely. If it goes to a contested convention, the GOP might as well hang it up and quit spending money, because putting in any of their lackeys is going to accomplish nothing. I don't think Trump will run third party, I think he's smart enough to know that's a non-starter -- but the GOP is going to lose, and lose badly to Hillary if they nominate anyone else. Hypothetically, assuming convention shenanigans and the installation of an establishment candidate, he'd have a good shot at a solid second place finish in the general on an independent run. It would wind up being a contest between his ego and his financial sense. It would be a bad business decision. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:04:15 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I can't speak for other posters, but if the GOP pulls that garbage, I hope it completely shatters the party. If Trump wins the proper amount of delegates, he should be the Republican candidate. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Meh, they're hoping to steal the election from the voters by means of shenanigans at the convention. Paulbots v.2.0 I can't speak for other posters, but if the GOP pulls that garbage, I hope it completely shatters the party. If Trump wins the proper amount of delegates, he should be the Republican candidate. ...and if he doesn't get the required number of delegates, it won't be "shenanigans" that keeps him from getting the nomination |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:04:44 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Which swing states is Trump going to take? He's in danger of losing Utah which should be a red flag for anyone thinking he could somehow pull this off. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:If you hate him you hate him, that's fine. I'm not trying to change your mind, but he will pull over 50% in exactly 10 days in his home state which is something that no other candidate has done.
He's got way more votes than anyone else, so this "everyone hates him" thing is BS. The key figure that you still haven't wrapped your head around is "50% of what"? Which swing states is Trump going to take? He's in danger of losing Utah which should be a red flag for anyone thinking he could somehow pull this off. He's not going to lose UT to Hillary. Don't be silly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:04:50 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not Trump. I will not vote for him. We all saw this coming. It's a damned shame that the rubes fell for it. Trumptards were warned about this. They laughed and post memes, told lies and posted memes, "We don't need your vote" they said and posted memes. The fact is that they brought this liberal RINO cocksucker to the party based on "feelings" as opposed to weighing his past record and his current actions. They dismissed his past liberal stances and said "He's evolved". They ignored his contributions to elect liberals and said " He's just doing business". They ignore his lies and shout "liar" at everyone who points them out. They cheered Trump on when Trump lied about Cruz's eligibility - Some idiots here still call Cruz a Canadian. They thought it was great when Trump bought a governor's endorsement with promises of ethanol mandates. They justify his smears of people like Scott Walker and other conservatives who have stood up to the liberals and should be held in high esteem. They make excuses for Trump's asshattery and ignore every red flag and every lie that is pointed out. They said Trump was here to destroy the GOPe - but Trump was here to destroy everything that was opposed to a liberal victory. The GOP is nothing but a vehicle to oppose liberalism and socialism - if it's pointed in the right direction. Instead of working to change the driver, Trump has slashed the tires and sugared the engine so it is of no use to anyone to oppose anything. Trumptards own this mess. Reap what you've sown motherfuckers. You've earned it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:06:40 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So what? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Even more people, in fact, did not vote for your creepy Canadian. So what? So which less popular candidate do you think is going to ride in on a white horse and save the republican party? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:07:57 PM EDT
[#22]
I'm about to the F'it point and not vote for Trump or Cruz. Yeah yeah you're voting for Hillary if you don't vote R.
I just don't F'ing care anymore. This election cycle has made both sides show their true colors let's just get it over with 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:08:13 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So which less popular candidate do you think is going to ride in on a white horse and save the republican party? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Even more people, in fact, did not vote for your creepy Canadian. So what? So which less popular candidate do you think is going to ride in on a white horse and save the republican party? That wasn't the point. A poster stated that Trump had received "most " of the votes. I merely corrected him |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:11:26 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Not Trump. I will not vote for him. We all saw this coming. It's a damned shame that the rubes fell for it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I WILL NOT vote for Trump. If you want to beat Hillary, give me a different Republican nominee. Who would you suggest? If its a contested convention and they pick anyone but Trump, the most likely result is he runs 3rd party and the Republicans strongly behind Trump vote for him and we get Hillary. Just as Trump has a problem with all the people in the #nevertrump movement, whoever is picked to run (and it will certainly not be Cruz, who I voted for) has to win back all those Trump voters who will still be sore from the assfucking the GOPe gave them at the convention. So what great uniter is the republican party going to run who can win over all the people who voted for Trump (or draw in enough disaffected voters to replace all of them). Not Trump. I will not vote for him. We all saw this coming. It's a damned shame that the rubes fell for it. Then who? I'm sure you have in mind a more viable candidate, since you believe Trump can't possibly win. Who is going to defeat Hillary? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:13:41 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That wasn't the point. A poster stated that Trump had received "most " of the votes. I merely corrected him Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Even more people, in fact, did not vote for your creepy Canadian. So what? So which less popular candidate do you think is going to ride in on a white horse and save the republican party? That wasn't the point. A poster stated that Trump had received "most " of the votes. I merely corrected him Yes, you're playing semantics games. Winning "most" -- if you define it as 50% or greater -- of the votes is almost impossible in a 17 man field. It's less impossible in a 3 man field, but still difficult. And tell me again, which states has Cruz won with over 50% of the vote? Not even his own home state? And Kasich is just in the race as a spoiler. So tell me again, which less popular candidate is going to save the party at the brokered convention you keep hoping for, knowing that brokered convention is going to end the republican party, put Hillary in the white house for eight years, and permanently swing the court into a left-wing ideologue anti-Constitution decision factory? You realize you're working to end the right to keep and bear arms in this country by playing games, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:16:08 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Who is going to defeat Hillary? Great question! Thanks Trumptards! - Mission accomplished! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:18:00 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, you're playing semantics games. Winning "most" -- if you define it as 50% or greater -- of the votes is almost impossible in a 17 man field. It's less impossible in a 3 man field, but still difficult. And tell me again, which states has Cruz won with over 50% of the vote? Not even his own home state? And Kasich is just in the race as a spoiler. So tell me again, which less popular candidate is going to save the party at the brokered convention you keep hoping for, knowing that brokered convention is going to end the republican party, put Hillary in the white house for eight years, and permanently swing the court into a left-wing ideologue anti-Constitution decision factory? You realize you're working to end the right to keep and bear arms in this country by playing games, right? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what? So which less popular candidate do you think is going to ride in on a white horse and save the republican party? That wasn't the point. A poster stated that Trump had received "most " of the votes. I merely corrected him Yes, you're playing semantics games. Winning "most" -- if you define it as 50% or greater -- of the votes is almost impossible in a 17 man field. It's less impossible in a 3 man field, but still difficult. And tell me again, which states has Cruz won with over 50% of the vote? Not even his own home state? And Kasich is just in the race as a spoiler. So tell me again, which less popular candidate is going to save the party at the brokered convention you keep hoping for, knowing that brokered convention is going to end the republican party, put Hillary in the white house for eight years, and permanently swing the court into a left-wing ideologue anti-Constitution decision factory? You realize you're working to end the right to keep and bear arms in this country by playing games, right? Its not "semantics". It is the definition of the word "most" and i'm sorry it is not convenient for you Trump did not receive MOST of the votes cast. That is a fact. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:18:01 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So tell me again, which less popular candidate is going to save the party at the brokered convention you keep hoping for, knowing that brokered convention is going to end the republican party and put Hillary in the white house for eight years. You call the candidates other than Trump "less popular", but they don't have 60+ negativity ratings like Trump. There are two voting blocks in the GOP primary: Trump and anti-Trump. The anti-Trump vote makes up the majority of voters, but is divided among multiple candidates. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:25:58 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So which less popular candidate do you think is going to ride in on a white horse and save the republican party? Vincent: Ah, so by that rationale, if a pig had a better personality, he would cease to be a filthy animal. Is that true? Jules: Well, we'd have to be talkin' about one charming motherfucking pig. I mean, he'd have to be ten times more charming than that Arnold on Green Acres, you know what I'm saying? Vincent: [laughing] That's good. Let me know when Trump surpasses Arnold on Green Acres. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:30:39 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
more *nervous laughter* from a known liar. got that quote ready for us, liar? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's mean a lot coming from a guy that admitted he lied about what another poster said. Are you drunk? WTF are you talking about? What is this "another poster" is that you speak of? Seems like you can't keep your bullshit straight, liar. I never admitted to lying about anything. I owned my incorrect statement here about you (or your comrades) "posting a link", and acknowledged I was wrong even though what you posted was even more pathetic, liar. The "National Enquirer"....
Or, are you assuming someone else's shift on pro-2A forum? I mean, this is the weekend, after all.....You fellers need to get on the same page if that's the case. By God, at least earn your pay, liar. Oh, so when you get caught lying and making things up it's not considered "lying" it's considered making "incorrect statements." more *nervous laughter* from a known liar. got that quote ready for us, liar? The guy who admits that he lies (oh, I'm sorry: makes "incorrect statements") is calling someone else a "known liar."
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:31:15 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Its not "semantics". It is the definition of the word "most" and i'm sorry it is not convenient for you Trump did not receive MOST of the votes cast. That is a fact. Quote HistoryQuoted: Its not "semantics". It is the definition of the word "most" and i'm sorry it is not convenient for you Trump did not receive MOST of the votes cast. That is a fact. Since you like the definition of MOST: Which Republican candidate has received the MOST votes? Trump Which Republican candidate has won the MOST states? Trump Which Republican candidate has been awarded the MOST delegates? Trump The reason your argument is pedantic is the current scenario. We started with a large field of candidates and only a fucking idiot would expect anyone to win the majority of votes. He hasn't won most of the votes cast, but he has won the most votes. I got accused of being pedantic for a joking exchange, but you're being serious. Btw this isn't the first time you've been accused of being pedantic. Posted by FortyFiveAutomatic: But you're such a combative pedantic weirdo that you made an ass of yourself, yet again. and yet again in this thread. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:31:31 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. https://imgur.com/V8v8F9J.gif Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons and now gifs are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:34:04 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The guy who admits that he lies (oh, I'm sorry: makes "incorrect statements") is calling someone else a "known liar."
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's mean a lot coming from a guy that admitted he lied about what another poster said. Are you drunk? WTF are you talking about? What is this "another poster" is that you speak of? Seems like you can't keep your bullshit straight, liar. I never admitted to lying about anything. I owned my incorrect statement here about you (or your comrades) "posting a link", and acknowledged I was wrong even though what you posted was even more pathetic, liar. The "National Enquirer"....
Or, are you assuming someone else's shift on pro-2A forum? I mean, this is the weekend, after all.....You fellers need to get on the same page if that's the case. By God, at least earn your pay, liar. Oh, so when you get caught lying and making things up it's not considered "lying" it's considered making "incorrect statements." more *nervous laughter* from a known liar. got that quote ready for us, liar? The guy who admits that he lies (oh, I'm sorry: makes "incorrect statements") is calling someone else a "known liar."
When have I admitted I lied? More lies from a member of the trump cult. Where's that quote liar? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:37:50 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trumptards were warned about this. They laughed and post memes, told lies and posted memes, "We don't need your vote" they said and posted memes. The fact is that they brought this liberal RINO cocksucker to the party based on "feelings" as opposed to weighing his past record and his current actions. They dismissed his past liberal stances and said "He's evolved". They ignored his contributions to elect liberals and said " He's just doing business". They ignore his lies and shout "liar" at everyone who points them out. They cheered Trump on when Trump lied about Cruz's eligibility - Some idiots here still call Cruz a Canadian. They thought it was great when Trump bought a governor's endorsement with promises of ethanol mandates. They justify his smears of people like Scott Walker and other conservatives who have stood up to the liberals and should be held in high esteem. They make excuses for Trump's asshattery and ignore every red flag and every lie that is pointed out. They said Trump was here to destroy the GOPe - but Trump was here to destroy everything that was opposed to a liberal victory. The GOP is nothing but a vehicle to oppose liberalism and socialism - if it's pointed in the right direction. Instead of working to change the driver, Trump has slashed the tires and sugared the engine so it is of no use to anyone to oppose anything. Trumptards own this mess. Reap what you've sown motherfuckers. You've earned it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Not Trump. I will not vote for him. We all saw this coming. It's a damned shame that the rubes fell for it. Trumptards were warned about this. They laughed and post memes, told lies and posted memes, "We don't need your vote" they said and posted memes. The fact is that they brought this liberal RINO cocksucker to the party based on "feelings" as opposed to weighing his past record and his current actions. They dismissed his past liberal stances and said "He's evolved". They ignored his contributions to elect liberals and said " He's just doing business". They ignore his lies and shout "liar" at everyone who points them out. They cheered Trump on when Trump lied about Cruz's eligibility - Some idiots here still call Cruz a Canadian. They thought it was great when Trump bought a governor's endorsement with promises of ethanol mandates. They justify his smears of people like Scott Walker and other conservatives who have stood up to the liberals and should be held in high esteem. They make excuses for Trump's asshattery and ignore every red flag and every lie that is pointed out. They said Trump was here to destroy the GOPe - but Trump was here to destroy everything that was opposed to a liberal victory. The GOP is nothing but a vehicle to oppose liberalism and socialism - if it's pointed in the right direction. Instead of working to change the driver, Trump has slashed the tires and sugared the engine so it is of no use to anyone to oppose anything. Trumptards own this mess. Reap what you've sown motherfuckers. You've earned it. Very illuminating. Thanks for shedding some light on the subject. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:38:13 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trumptards were warned about this. They laughed and post memes, told lies and posted memes, "We don't need your vote" they said and posted memes. The fact is that they brought this liberal RINO cocksucker to the party based on "feelings" as opposed to weighing his past record and his current actions. They dismissed his past liberal stances and said "He's evolved". They ignored his contributions to elect liberals and said " He's just doing business". They ignore his lies and shout "liar" at everyone who points them out. They cheered Trump on when Trump lied about Cruz's eligibility - Some idiots here still call Cruz a Canadian. They thought it was great when Trump bought a governor's endorsement with promises of ethanol mandates. They justify his smears of people like Scott Walker and other conservatives who have stood up to the liberals and should be held in high esteem. They make excuses for Trump's asshattery and ignore every red flag and every lie that is pointed out. They said Trump was here to destroy the GOPe - but Trump was here to destroy everything that was opposed to a liberal victory. The GOP is nothing but a vehicle to oppose liberalism and socialism - if it's pointed in the right direction. Instead of working to change the driver, Trump has slashed the tires and sugared the engine so it is of no use to anyone to oppose anything. Trumptards own this mess. Reap what you've sown motherfuckers. You've earned it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Not Trump. I will not vote for him. We all saw this coming. It's a damned shame that the rubes fell for it. Trumptards were warned about this. They laughed and post memes, told lies and posted memes, "We don't need your vote" they said and posted memes. The fact is that they brought this liberal RINO cocksucker to the party based on "feelings" as opposed to weighing his past record and his current actions. They dismissed his past liberal stances and said "He's evolved". They ignored his contributions to elect liberals and said " He's just doing business". They ignore his lies and shout "liar" at everyone who points them out. They cheered Trump on when Trump lied about Cruz's eligibility - Some idiots here still call Cruz a Canadian. They thought it was great when Trump bought a governor's endorsement with promises of ethanol mandates. They justify his smears of people like Scott Walker and other conservatives who have stood up to the liberals and should be held in high esteem. They make excuses for Trump's asshattery and ignore every red flag and every lie that is pointed out. They said Trump was here to destroy the GOPe - but Trump was here to destroy everything that was opposed to a liberal victory. The GOP is nothing but a vehicle to oppose liberalism and socialism - if it's pointed in the right direction. Instead of working to change the driver, Trump has slashed the tires and sugared the engine so it is of no use to anyone to oppose anything. Trumptards own this mess. Reap what you've sown motherfuckers. You've earned it. Could not have said it any better |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:38:30 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Since you like the definition of MOST: Which Republican candidate has received the MOST votes? Trump Which Republican candidate has won the MOST states? Trump Which Republican candidate has been awarded the MOST delegates? Trump The reason your argument is pedantic is the current scenario. We started with a large field of candidates and only a fucking idiot would expect anyone to win the majority of votes. He hasn't won most of the votes cast, but he has won the most votes. I got accused of being pedantic for a joking exchange, but you're being serious. Btw this isn't the first time you've been accused of being pedantic. from here and yet again in this thread. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Its not "semantics". It is the definition of the word "most" and i'm sorry it is not convenient for you Trump did not receive MOST of the votes cast. That is a fact. Since you like the definition of MOST: Which Republican candidate has received the MOST votes? Trump Which Republican candidate has won the MOST states? Trump Which Republican candidate has been awarded the MOST delegates? Trump The reason your argument is pedantic is the current scenario. We started with a large field of candidates and only a fucking idiot would expect anyone to win the majority of votes. He hasn't won most of the votes cast, but he has won the most votes. I got accused of being pedantic for a joking exchange, but you're being serious. Btw this isn't the first time you've been accused of being pedantic. Posted by FortyFiveAutomatic:
But you're such a combative pedantic weirdo that you made an ass of yourself, yet again. and yet again in this thread. The original post said "Most people vote for Trump". It wasnt "Trump received the most votes" or "Trump won the most states". Once again, most people DID NOT VOTE for Trump You cant just redefine words to meet your perception |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:39:32 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When have I admitted I lied? More lies from a member of the trump cult. Where's that quote liar? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Are you drunk? WTF are you talking about? What is this "another poster" is that you speak of? Seems like you can't keep your bullshit straight, liar. I never admitted to lying about anything. I owned my incorrect statement here about you (or your comrades) "posting a link", and acknowledged I was wrong even though what you posted was even more pathetic, liar. The "National Enquirer"....
Or, are you assuming someone else's shift on pro-2A forum? I mean, this is the weekend, after all.....You fellers need to get on the same page if that's the case. By God, at least earn your pay, liar. Oh, so when you get caught lying and making things up it's not considered "lying" it's considered making "incorrect statements." more *nervous laughter* from a known liar. got that quote ready for us, liar? The guy who admits that he lies (oh, I'm sorry: makes "incorrect statements") is calling someone else a "known liar."
When have I admitted I lied? More lies from a member of the trump cult. Where's that quote liar? Pretty sad that you lie so much you can't even keep track of them. Unfortunately for you your post was quoted before you could edit it out. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:46:09 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pretty sad that you lie so much you can't even keep track of them. Unfortunately for you your post was quoted before you could edit it out. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Are you drunk? WTF are you talking about? What is this "another poster" is that you speak of? Seems like you can't keep your bullshit straight, liar. I never admitted to lying about anything. I owned my incorrect statement here about you (or your comrades) "posting a link", and acknowledged I was wrong even though what you posted was even more pathetic, liar. The "National Enquirer"....
Or, are you assuming someone else's shift on pro-2A forum? I mean, this is the weekend, after all.....You fellers need to get on the same page if that's the case. By God, at least earn your pay, liar. Oh, so when you get caught lying and making things up it's not considered "lying" it's considered making "incorrect statements." more *nervous laughter* from a known liar. got that quote ready for us, liar? When have I admitted I lied? More lies from a member of the trump cult. Where's that quote liar? Pretty sad that you lie so much you can't even keep track of them. Unfortunately for you your post was quoted before you could edit it out. Pretty sad you're so accustomed to lying, that you project that on others who don't. Want to quote me where I met your own standard for the definition of a "cruz zealot" in your own thread, liar? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:50:10 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons and now gifs are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. https://imgur.com/V8v8F9J.gif Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons and now gifs are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:52:19 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pretty sad you're so accustomed to lying, that you project that on others who don't. Want to quote me where I met your own standard for the definition of a "cruz zealot" in your own thread, liar? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh, so when you get caught lying and making things up it's not considered "lying" it's considered making "incorrect statements." more *nervous laughter* from a known liar. got that quote ready for us, liar? When have I admitted I lied? More lies from a member of the trump cult. Where's that quote liar? Pretty sad that you lie so much you can't even keep track of them. Unfortunately for you your post was quoted before you could edit it out. Pretty sad you're so accustomed to lying, that you project that on others who don't. Want to quote me where I met your own standard for the definition of a "cruz zealot" in your own thread, liar? Haha, I love it. What? No more claims that you didn't admit to lying? Kind of hard when the proof that you did gets posted, liar.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:53:18 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It would be a bad business decision. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I WILL NOT vote for Trump. If you want to beat Hillary, give me a different Republican nominee. Who would you suggest? If its a contested convention and they pick anyone but Trump, the most likely result is he runs 3rd party and the Republicans strongly behind Trump vote for him and we get Hillary. Just as Trump has a problem with all the people in the #nevertrump movement, whoever is picked to run (and it will certainly not be Cruz, who I voted for) has to win back all those Trump voters who will still be sore from the assfucking the GOPe gave them at the convention. So what great uniter is the republican party going to run who can win over all the people who voted for Trump (or draw in enough disaffected voters to replace all of them). There's no one to suggest, and no such "great uniter". Trump is going to be nominee most likely. If it goes to a contested convention, the GOP might as well hang it up and quit spending money, because putting in any of their lackeys is going to accomplish nothing. I don't think Trump will run third party, I think he's smart enough to know that's a non-starter -- but the GOP is going to lose, and lose badly to Hillary if they nominate anyone else. Hypothetically, assuming convention shenanigans and the installation of an establishment candidate, he'd have a good shot at a solid second place finish in the general on an independent run. It would wind up being a contest between his ego and his financial sense. It would be a bad business decision. You mean like Trump Airlines? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:53:23 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. https://imgur.com/V8v8F9J.gif Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons and now gifs are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons and now gifs are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:55:40 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The original post said "Most people vote for Trump". It wasnt "Trump received the most votes" or "Trump won the most states". Once again, most people DID NOT VOTE for Trump You cant just redefine words to meet your perception Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Its not "semantics". It is the definition of the word "most" and i'm sorry it is not convenient for you Trump did not receive MOST of the votes cast. That is a fact. Since you like the definition of MOST: Which Republican candidate has received the MOST votes? Trump Which Republican candidate has won the MOST states? Trump Which Republican candidate has been awarded the MOST delegates? Trump The reason your argument is pedantic is the current scenario. We started with a large field of candidates and only a fucking idiot would expect anyone to win the majority of votes. He hasn't won most of the votes cast, but he has won the most votes. I got accused of being pedantic for a joking exchange, but you're being serious. Btw this isn't the first time you've been accused of being pedantic. Posted by FortyFiveAutomatic: But you're such a combative pedantic weirdo that you made an ass of yourself, yet again. and yet again in this thread. The original post said "Most people vote for Trump". It wasnt "Trump received the most votes" or "Trump won the most states". Once again, most people DID NOT VOTE for Trump You cant just redefine words to meet your perception Doubling down on the pedantry I see. I guess FortyFiveAutomatic was correct. Carry on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 10:58:41 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons and now gifs are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 11:00:28 PM EDT
[#45]
Since you've painted yourself into a corner and yet still feel the need to post something I guess emoticons and now gifs are all you're left with. How sad. Amusing, but sad.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 11:01:09 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Its not "semantics". It is the definition of the word "most" and i'm sorry it is not convenient for you Trump did not receive MOST of the votes cast. That is a fact. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So what? So which less popular candidate do you think is going to ride in on a white horse and save the republican party? That wasn't the point. A poster stated that Trump had received "most " of the votes. I merely corrected him Yes, you're playing semantics games. Winning "most" -- if you define it as 50% or greater -- of the votes is almost impossible in a 17 man field. It's less impossible in a 3 man field, but still difficult. And tell me again, which states has Cruz won with over 50% of the vote? Not even his own home state? And Kasich is just in the race as a spoiler. So tell me again, which less popular candidate is going to save the party at the brokered convention you keep hoping for, knowing that brokered convention is going to end the republican party, put Hillary in the white house for eight years, and permanently swing the court into a left-wing ideologue anti-Constitution decision factory? You realize you're working to end the right to keep and bear arms in this country by playing games, right? Its not "semantics". It is the definition of the word "most" and i'm sorry it is not convenient for you Trump did not receive MOST of the votes cast. That is a fact. So you're going to ignore the actual issue in favor of playing semantic games. Got it. I think you're a single issue troll, or at least you've become one over the last few months. I've never seen a single post from you on this entire website in the 11 years I've been here other than your anti-Trump diatribes. You're attitudes are what the GOP is counting on to put Hillary in the oval office. Quite frankly, I don't think it's very smart, but if you all really want Hillary that badly, it's your vote to cast as you choose. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 11:03:08 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You mean like Trump Airlines? Is it your position that he purposely makes bad business decisions? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 11:04:11 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Doubling down on the pedantry I see. I guess FortyFiveAutomatic was correct. Carry on. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Since you like the definition of MOST: Which Republican candidate has received the MOST votes? Trump Which Republican candidate has won the MOST states? Trump Which Republican candidate has been awarded the MOST delegates? Trump The reason your argument is pedantic is the current scenario. We started with a large field of candidates and only a fucking idiot would expect anyone to win the majority of votes. He hasn't won most of the votes cast, but he has won the most votes. I got accused of being pedantic for a joking exchange, but you're being serious. Btw this isn't the first time you've been accused of being pedantic. Posted by FortyFiveAutomatic:
But you're such a combative pedantic weirdo that you made an ass of yourself, yet again. and yet again in this thread. The original post said "Most people vote for Trump". It wasnt "Trump received the most votes" or "Trump won the most states". Once again, most people DID NOT VOTE for Trump You cant just redefine words to meet your perception Doubling down on the pedantry I see. I guess FortyFiveAutomatic was correct. Carry on. OK. Maybe i can dumb this down for you... Which of these two statements is correct: A....Most people voted for Trump B....Most people did not vote for Trump It can only be one or the other but before you answer, here is some reference material for you Popular Vote Totals: Trump................7,863,052' Cruz...................5,782,142 Rubio.................3,470,384 Kasich................2,822,210 Take all the time you need... |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 11:08:55 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you're going to ignore the actual issue in favor of playing semantic games. Got it. I think you're a single issue troll, or at least you've become one over the last few months. I've never seen a single post from you on this entire website in the 11 years I've been here other than your anti-Trump diatribes. You're attitudes are what the GOP is counting on to put Hillary in the oval office. Quite frankly, I don't think it's very smart, but if you all really want Hillary that badly, it's your vote to cast as you choose. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So which less popular candidate do you think is going to ride in on a white horse and save the republican party? That wasn't the point. A poster stated that Trump had received "most " of the votes. I merely corrected him Yes, you're playing semantics games. Winning "most" -- if you define it as 50% or greater -- of the votes is almost impossible in a 17 man field. It's less impossible in a 3 man field, but still difficult. And tell me again, which states has Cruz won with over 50% of the vote? Not even his own home state? And Kasich is just in the race as a spoiler. So tell me again, which less popular candidate is going to save the party at the brokered convention you keep hoping for, knowing that brokered convention is going to end the republican party, put Hillary in the white house for eight years, and permanently swing the court into a left-wing ideologue anti-Constitution decision factory? You realize you're working to end the right to keep and bear arms in this country by playing games, right? Its not "semantics". It is the definition of the word "most" and i'm sorry it is not convenient for you Trump did not receive MOST of the votes cast. That is a fact. So you're going to ignore the actual issue in favor of playing semantic games. Got it. I think you're a single issue troll, or at least you've become one over the last few months. I've never seen a single post from you on this entire website in the 11 years I've been here other than your anti-Trump diatribes. You're attitudes are what the GOP is counting on to put Hillary in the oval office. Quite frankly, I don't think it's very smart, but if you all really want Hillary that badly, it's your vote to cast as you choose. So you want me to go along with this lie that most people have voted for Trump AND that I am somehow going to be responsible for Hillary winning in November? As has been said before, you Trumpets have been warned over and over about how high Trump's negatives are, about how destroying the GOP alone wont be enough to get him to the White House, that he SUCKS in interviews, that between two liberals running for President, people will pick the Democrat, etc. Now you want to blame me and people like me for not filing in to support a man who spent his entire life advocating for those things that i have opposed and that we told you could not win in the general? Not fucking likely |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2016 11:09:18 PM EDT
[#50]
Don't mind me just popping OST and to laugh at all the people who think Hillary (who's about to lose another state to an admitted communist) could beat the mildly retarded guy that works at the tire shop downtown in the General. I could empty the Supermax Prison in Colorado and find you at least a dozen people that would beat her by 100 delegates. But by all means continue your whining. That seems to be about all yall are good at.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
.jpg)
