User Panel
Quoted: If you're willing to take the time, the two videos explain the fundamentals. Engine is not critical, any exhaust dumped into the apporpriate sized "thunderstorm generator" system will do. Only requirement from the engine is the heat from the exhaust to start the catalyst and vacuum to draw in the air and create the cavitation bubbles. They are demonstrating with just a gas engine, there is no electrical generator components, just the retrofitting of the "thunderstorm generator" components. The UV bulb that ionizes the water where the air is drawn in is powered by an outlet in the building. There is a stone air diffuser, I think they are just in the discovery/proof of concept phase and will continue to define how to create the most efficient sized cavitation bubbles. The "thunderstorm" name is in reference to the two opposing vortex passing each other, each in their own tube, one hot (exhaust) and one cold (intake), aka how a thunderstorm generates, which is a part of the fundamental operating principal. The key is the ionized cavitation bubbles that form plasmoids when collapsed. These plasmoids are purportedly a collapsed bubble in the form of a toroid that can self maintain, and essentially consume the exhaust molecules, stripping them into an atomic level and reconstruct them into different elements (oxygen) on the other side (gasp.. the word zero point to rumored to be mentioned during this process). As to how, watch the vid a few posts up, I can follow loosely, but don't have the patients/comprehension to fully absorb to properly understand and try to reproduce similar tech at my work bench. I just think it would be kick ass if they are onto something real. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I think they may be onto something, but they do a poor job of explaining and demonstrating it. The "Woo Hoo!'s" in the video didn't do much for me. I would have preferred more charts and graphs. Maybe if I go find and read the referenced paper in Nature, it will do a better job of explaining. It would be nice if they could demonstrate operation without the engine in the loop. Just a known composition of gases at a known pressure and rate going into the vortex thingy, and measurements of what is coming out. Or, maybe I am missing something and the engine is a critical part of the apparatus. Also, needed a more controlled way to generate specific bubble sizes. With a variety of sizes, it's harder to understand which sizes are important/working. Also, the name "thunderstorm generator" is confusing. Am I supposed to see storm clouds forming in the sky? Why do they demonstrate with a genator instead of just an engine? It seems like the only thing the generator might be powering was the UV light. If you're willing to take the time, the two videos explain the fundamentals. Engine is not critical, any exhaust dumped into the apporpriate sized "thunderstorm generator" system will do. Only requirement from the engine is the heat from the exhaust to start the catalyst and vacuum to draw in the air and create the cavitation bubbles. They are demonstrating with just a gas engine, there is no electrical generator components, just the retrofitting of the "thunderstorm generator" components. The UV bulb that ionizes the water where the air is drawn in is powered by an outlet in the building. There is a stone air diffuser, I think they are just in the discovery/proof of concept phase and will continue to define how to create the most efficient sized cavitation bubbles. The "thunderstorm" name is in reference to the two opposing vortex passing each other, each in their own tube, one hot (exhaust) and one cold (intake), aka how a thunderstorm generates, which is a part of the fundamental operating principal. The key is the ionized cavitation bubbles that form plasmoids when collapsed. These plasmoids are purportedly a collapsed bubble in the form of a toroid that can self maintain, and essentially consume the exhaust molecules, stripping them into an atomic level and reconstruct them into different elements (oxygen) on the other side (gasp.. the word zero point to rumored to be mentioned during this process). As to how, watch the vid a few posts up, I can follow loosely, but don't have the patients/comprehension to fully absorb to properly understand and try to reproduce similar tech at my work bench. I just think it would be kick ass if they are onto something real. The key is the ionized cavitation bubbles that form plasmoids when collapsed. These plasmoids are purportedly a collapsed bubble in the form of a toroid that can self maintain, and essentially consume the exhaust molecules, stripping them into an atomic level and reconstruct them into different elements (oxygen) on the other side (gasp.. the word zero point to rumored to be mentioned during this process). This might be a significant invention if it could replace the function of a catalytic converter without using platinum, palladium, or similar. I don't see this being a popular addition to gasoline powered vehicles. People would rather have a cat than having to add bubbler fluid every so many miles. I see the potential application more in the fixed plant area, like electric power plants. Reducing CO2 emissions is a big deal now. However, the tide will turn when politicians start listening to the voices of suffocating plants. |
|
Quoted: You have to input a tremendous amount of energy to split carbon from oxygen. You can sequester it, but you still have co2 waste. View Quote ETA: This would still be a big deal because of carbon credits. |
|
Quoted: You could use the energy output of your car's engine to convert the exhaust CO2 back into carbon and oxygen. But then you'd have no energy left to propel the vehicle. View Quote According to what I've watched of the first video, that's not even what they are claiming. Such claims would be one of the particularly nefarious types of scam energy products, where they are built on an element of truth, but ignoring the big picture issues making it a non-starter. Here, that would be the truth that you can reverse the products of combustion back to their original elements/compounds, but then ignoring the basic fact that doing so requires more energy than you got out of combustion to begin with. These types of scam proposals tend to dupe more people than those which are just BS through and through. But what is being claimed is far more . They are actually claiming that they are fusing hydrogen and carbon into oxygen. |
|
Quoted: Plasma dissociation has been around for a while, I spent some time operating a high energy dissociation transport reactor prototype at a powerplant in 2009. Most of my career in energy research has been high temperature energy conversion and emission controls. We knew 15 years ago it won't work. Simple thermodynamics, the energy to dissociate C and O is higher than the energy you get by joining them by combustion in the first place. Yes I can pass hydrocarbons through a plasma chamber and break them down into C and H, sure we can break up N2O NO and NO2 into N2 and O2. Yup we can take CO2 back into C and O2 at 5500°F It just takes lots of energy and money. View Quote This post right here. Also in the energy industry. CO catalyst in boilers, SCR catalyst also. Converting the compounds into something else isn't hard. CO2 is a bitch to convert though. Plants and trees seem to like it. I have been reading of some interesting tech/experiements taking place with CO2 as a feedstock mixed in the refining process with methane and other crude sources. Using different catalysts you can make liquid fuels and oils with it, you have to change up the current refining methods a little. You take in high concentration CO2, such as sequestered from a boiler exhaust stack and use it your source stock of CO2. No one seems much interested though, all the money is in the destruction of fossil fuels as an energy source, not actual solutions. The big money is in solar and wind. |
|
Did you guys know that there is a carburetor that will allow any internal combustion gas engine to achieve 100mpg, but it was covered up and stolen by Big Oil and the Government?
This is probably the same technology. |
|
Op you have the internet the amount of knowledge you have at your fingertips is unfathomable. It is the modern equivalent of living in the library of Alexandria. You have chosen to leave the library and seek out knowledge from the Alexandria ale house.
|
|
|
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: Plasma dissociation has been around for a while, I spent some time operating a high energy dissociation transport reactor prototype at a powerplant in 2009. Most of my career in energy research has been high temperature energy conversion and emission controls. We knew 15 years ago it won't work. Simple thermodynamics, the energy to dissociate C and O is higher than the energy you get by joining them by combustion in the first place. Yes I can pass hydrocarbons through a plasma chamber and break them down into C and H, sure we can break up N2O NO and NO2 into N2 and O2. Yup we can take CO2 back into C and O2 at 5500°F It just takes lots of energy and money. View Quote Yep. I think pretty much every lay person who likes to think about these things, at one point thought hey why not try and separate the C and the O2? I did some 15 or 20 years ago, imaginative-me thought it was cool, technician-me who has experience in things electrical and mechanical said likely possible, but would require waaaaaay too much power to do so. Technician-me was right. There's just no free lunches, they taught me that in technical college almost 40 years ago and it's still true. |
|
Quoted: If you're willing to take the time, the two videos explain the fundamentals. Engine is not critical, any exhaust dumped into the apporpriate sized "thunderstorm generator" system will do. Only requirement from the engine is the heat from the exhaust to start the catalyst and vacuum to draw in the air and create the cavitation bubbles. They are demonstrating with just a gas engine, there is no electrical generator components, just the retrofitting of the "thunderstorm generator" components. The UV bulb that ionizes the water where the air is drawn in is powered by an outlet in the building. There is a stone air diffuser, I think they are just in the discovery/proof of concept phase and will continue to define how to create the most efficient sized cavitation bubbles. The "thunderstorm" name is in reference to the two opposing vortex passing each other, each in their own tube, one hot (exhaust) and one cold (intake), aka how a thunderstorm generates, which is a part of the fundamental operating principal. The key is the ionized cavitation bubbles that form plasmoids when collapsed. These plasmoids are purportedly a collapsed bubble in the form of a toroid that can self maintain, and essentially consume the exhaust molecules, stripping them into an atomic level and reconstruct them into different elements (oxygen) on the other side (gasp.. the word zero point to rumored to be mentioned during this process). As to how, watch the vid a few posts up, I can follow loosely, but don't have the patients/comprehension to fully absorb to properly understand and try to reproduce similar tech at my work bench. I just think it would be kick ass if they are onto something real. View Quote It transmutes carbon into oxygen? Yea... I am assuming you don't believe the Earth is flat, right? Well, ignoring all of those pictures from space and satellites, and stuff, people have been navigating around the Earth for centuries using the global model of the Earth. Private pilots, sailors, militaries from all countries, shipping companies, airlines, you name it, all use that global model and they arrive where they are supposed to be when they expect to be there and after traveling the distance predicted by the global model. So, if someone comes up and starts claiming that the Earth is actually flat, how do you deal with that? Literally millions of observations from countless travelers over centuries has shown the Earth to be round. Plus you throw in all the astronomy, the models of the solar system which work exceedingly well, and the satellites, pictures from space, pictures from high altitude weather balloons and there is no doubt that the Earth is round. But there someone is, on Youtube, with some complex experiment making all kinds of claims that his one experiment proves the Earth is flat... or banana shaped, or whatever. As if some one experiment, which no one else can repeat, can make us accept a Flat Earth model that completely fails to explain anything about navigation, or astronomy, the day/night cycle, satellites, or where those pictures of a round Earth come from. This is essentially what this guy is doing. You can't transmute elements like that. If you could then it would happen all the time in nature. It would be a feature of our universe that everything would exploit. Same thing for free energy. If it was possible then we would see it all the time. But we don't see it anywhere, except in that one guy's Youtube video. And that means for us to accept that this guy is on to something would mean we have to dismiss pretty much all of the science which explains and predicts, perfectly, the physical world we see. Now, if his experiments were repeatable, by multiple independent people then we would be on to something. Many Nobel prizes would be awarded to scientists who researched this new phenomenon. Trillions of dollars would go to the company/group who managed to patent practical uses for this marvelous invention. If there were anything to it the CEO of Shell would call an immediate board meeting and shout "Fuck the Oil Wells! Put everything into developing this!" But there isn't anything to it. This is either a scientific scam or it's some idiot convinced he is on to something when he clearly isn't. My belief is that it is a scam. What you do is come up with some idea like free energy from Cheese-Whiz or from the cat/jelly/bread paradox, whatever. Then you come up with some plausible sounding technobabble to support the idea. It helps to know some science so that your BS is just accurate enough to fool the people, like me, without any real training in physics. Make up some videos and a website, and sell your idea to gullible investors. And then, instead of spending the money on hookers and blow, which would be illegal, you actually set up labs, hire a couple of people, pay yourself a nice salary, and start working on the idea. You probably know it's all bullshit but you can build devices that look good and make videos, using stage magic, to make it seem that you are getting results. Publish your fake results as successes, collect more money from investors and repeat the process. Hint that there is a big government/big oil/big whatever cover up to lure in the conspiracy minded investors. You can likely stretch that scam out for a decade or three and when people finally stop donating to your money pit you just close up shop and announce that you failed to develop the technology. In short, it's bullshit and not worth your time. But the cat/bread/jelly thing does have potential. Anyone want to give me some money to work on the idea? I already have a cat and bread, there might even be jelly in the refrigerator. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: It transmutes carbon into oxygen? You can't transmute elements like that. My belief is that it is a scam. In short, it's bullshit and not worth your time. View Quote My believe is you need more of an open mind. It very well appears that it can transmute elements and may very well be worth your time if you're interested in this field of tech. Here's a link to a peer reviewed Nature report from January 2024 that is conducting experiments of the same principles as the Thunderstorm generator. LINK Bob Greenyer is mentioned as part of the study, Bob is the guy doing metallurgy studies of the interior of the first Thunderstorm Generator (Thor), his YouTube vids regarding these studies can be found with my OP (Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project). The test setup is a simple, a heated water center pipe with a cold water outer jacket pipe. The cold pipe is continuously fed reverse osmosis tap water and pulsed to produce cavitation/nano bubbles over the heated circulating hot pipe. The hot and cold water flow in opposite directions (like the TS gen). It sure sounds like they confirmed the process of nuclear reaction from simple imploding bubbles, specifically the transmutation of elements into others. Here are some excerpts from the article I found interesting.
Hope more studies continue to come out to corroborate their findings. Seems they observed excess heat (nuclear reaction), found isotopes of neon, O2, CO2 and heavy water, plus significant percentages of carbon, oxygen and chlorine, all from tap water... Whole lot of folks tossing opinions to the contrary of their findings, anyone a bit curious about this??? edit: add bullet |
|
Simpsons - In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics Also, give it a rest dude |
|
Quoted: My believe is you need more of an open mind. It very well appears that it can transmute elements and may very well be worth your time if you're interested in this field of tech. Here's a link to a peer reviewed Nature report from January 2024 that is conducting experiments of the same principles as the Thunderstorm generator. LINK Bob Greenyer is mentioned as part of the study, Bob is the guy doing metallurgy studies of the interior of the first Thunderstorm Generator (Thor), his YouTube vids regarding these studies can be found with my OP (Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project). The test setup is a simple, a heated water center pipe with a cold water outer jacket pipe. The cold pipe is continuously fed reverse osmosis tap water and pulsed to produce cavitation/nano bubbles over the heated circulating hot pipe. The hot and cold water flow in opposite directions (like the TS gen). It sure sounds like they confirmed the process of nuclear reaction from simple imploding bubbles, specifically the transmutation of elements into others. Here are some excerpts from the article I found interesting.
Hope more studies continue to come out to corroborate their findings. Seems they observed excess heat (nuclear reaction), found isotopes of neon, O2, CO2 and heavy water, plus significant percentages of carbon, oxygen and chlorine, all from tap water... Whole lot of folks tossing opinions to the contrary of their findings, anyone a bit curious about this??? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It transmutes carbon into oxygen? You can't transmute elements like that. My belief is that it is a scam. In short, it's bullshit and not worth your time. My believe is you need more of an open mind. It very well appears that it can transmute elements and may very well be worth your time if you're interested in this field of tech. Here's a link to a peer reviewed Nature report from January 2024 that is conducting experiments of the same principles as the Thunderstorm generator. LINK Bob Greenyer is mentioned as part of the study, Bob is the guy doing metallurgy studies of the interior of the first Thunderstorm Generator (Thor), his YouTube vids regarding these studies can be found with my OP (Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project). The test setup is a simple, a heated water center pipe with a cold water outer jacket pipe. The cold pipe is continuously fed reverse osmosis tap water and pulsed to produce cavitation/nano bubbles over the heated circulating hot pipe. The hot and cold water flow in opposite directions (like the TS gen). It sure sounds like they confirmed the process of nuclear reaction from simple imploding bubbles, specifically the transmutation of elements into others. Here are some excerpts from the article I found interesting.
Hope more studies continue to come out to corroborate their findings. Seems they observed excess heat (nuclear reaction), found isotopes of neon, O2, CO2 and heavy water, plus significant percentages of carbon, oxygen and chlorine, all from tap water... Whole lot of folks tossing opinions to the contrary of their findings, anyone a bit curious about this??? Attached File |
|
, I drop a Nature study backing up the tech and the best you can come up with is one liners and gifs.. do better GD. Thoughts on the Nature study?
Edit: typo |
|
View Quote giggle |
|
View Quote |
|
|
|
Live Q&A today with Malcolm Bendall and Bob Greenyer if curious, or what to get your BP up, depending on your point of view . From the beginning Malcolm noted that patent applications have been submitted on their further developed designs.
The real Tesla logo? - Follow up Q&A |
|
Quoted: I generally find that people who use terms like transmutation, transubstantiation, and transmogrify are trying to baffle you with bullshit. Simpler terms convey the same idea of change, substitution, and alteration. Ugh. Speekum big words. Confuse poor Oog. Oog smell shit. Oog see brown. Oog assume is shit. View Quote Try "cold fusion", because that's exactly what they are claiming. |
|
|
Quoted: My believe is you need more of an open mind. It very well appears that it can transmute elements and may very well be worth your time if you're interested in this field of tech. Here's a link to a peer reviewed Nature report from January 2024 that is conducting experiments of the same principles as the Thunderstorm generator. LINK Bob Greenyer is mentioned as part of the study, Bob is the guy doing metallurgy studies of the interior of the first Thunderstorm Generator (Thor), his YouTube vids regarding these studies can be found with my OP (Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project). The test setup is a simple, a heated water center pipe with a cold water outer jacket pipe. The cold pipe is continuously fed reverse osmosis tap water and pulsed to produce cavitation/nano bubbles over the heated circulating hot pipe. The hot and cold water flow in opposite directions (like the TS gen). It sure sounds like they confirmed the process of nuclear reaction from simple imploding bubbles, specifically the transmutation of elements into others. Here are some excerpts from the article I found interesting.
Hope more studies continue to come out to corroborate their findings. Seems they observed excess heat (nuclear reaction), found isotopes of neon, O2, CO2 and heavy water, plus significant percentages of carbon, oxygen and chlorine, all from tap water... Whole lot of folks tossing opinions to the contrary of their findings, anyone a bit curious about this??? edit: add bullet View Quote How should I put this... I do feel the need to always be right. To accomplish this I change my opinion when facts indicate I was previously mistaken. That does happen quite often and I don't get emotionally attached to pet ideas which prove to be false. And I would love to be mistaken in this case. So many of humanity's problems would be solved if we had clean and nearly limitless energy. I really, really hope that I am wrong here. That being said, I hold out about as much hope for this being even a partial solution to the energy problem as I do for the Hydrino. Personally I think a variation on Asimov's electron pump holds more hope, and that was intended to be fiction. Hmmm... Maybe I'll start a company to research the electron pump, anyone have some spare money to get me started? |
|
|
Quoted: I expect nothing less from 90%+ of GD who thumb through the thread. Only can hope to have a meaningful conversation with those that take time to look further into the content. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Jesus fucking christ... I expect nothing less from 90%+ of GD who thumb through the thread. Only can hope to have a meaningful conversation with those that take time to look further into the content. He’s not wrong. It’s retarded. Internal combustion sources take a hydrocarbon fuel and add in an oxidizer (literally, oxygen) to produce heat, combustion byproducts (mainly CO2 and H2O) and convert some of the heat and pressure into mechanical energy. If something is converting all that CO2 to O2, what is happening to the carbon in that equation? Where is it getting energy to drive the splitting of CO2 (because even with a catalyst, that’s an energy consuming reaction)? |
|
Quoted: And I would love to be mistaken in this case. So many of humanity's problems would be solved if we had clean and nearly limitless energy. I really, really hope that I am wrong here. View Quote Every Sci-Fi show has some magical source of lots of energy. Hyperdrives, dilithium crystals, antimatter, naquada, zero point sources. It's the only way to create that kind of story line. Lots of people and politicians have fallen under the spell of such magical thinking in believing that "science" can actually make these kinds of things, that they're "on the horizon" somehow to solve our problems. In doing so they dismiss the options that actually work in our actual world, not a fantasy world. |
|
Quoted: How should I put this... I do feel the need to always be right. To accomplish this I change my opinion when facts indicate I was previously mistaken. That does happen quite often and I don't get emotionally attached to pet ideas which prove to be false. And I would love to be mistaken in this case. So many of humanity's problems would be solved if we had clean and nearly limitless energy. I really, really hope that I am wrong here. That being said, I hold out about as much hope for this being even a partial solution to the energy problem as I do for the Hydrino. Personally I think a variation on Asimov's electron pump holds more hope, and that was intended to be fiction. Hmmm... Maybe I'll start a company to research the electron pump, anyone have some spare money to get me started? View Quote 100% agree with your line of thinking, it took me 3/4 of a year of watching the progress from this effort (shout out to Spin Engineer) before willing to post about it on GD. Based on the currently publicity, videos of the device doing what they are claiming, ongoing independent testing, the Nature study linked above, I'm cautiously optimistic there might be something here (and if so, agree, awesome for humanity). I'll be the first to admit fault of being mislead if it turns out to be BS and debunked. The fundamentals of function have been associated with the same principals Tesla knew and was experimenting with (Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower), and even further back into ancient times with the Pyramids being used for energy production (if one is down with the believe that the Egyptians were not the ones to build them, but rather much earlier). Observing further into what the folks working with this are saying, the gov. new these principals/tech since the 50s (who's to confirm/deny, just passing along to paint the possible picture). Again, watch the vids and pages linked in the first pages if interested to get a better primer of what is said to be involved for theory of operation. Another recent interview that adds a bit more color on the subject. IMO, if tech like this is not snake oil, it'd be very unlikely to come from the gov. or industry, but rather a grass roots movement. https://youtu.be/XyVKTJYxmnc?si=Z6LA8f-RsPXl28x5&t=7253 Edit: changed link to direct time stamp |
|
Quoted: The fundamentals of function have been associated with the same principals Tesla knew and was experimenting with (Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower), and even further back into ancient times with the Pyramids being used for energy production (if one is down with the believe that the Egyptians were not the ones to build them, but rather much earlier). Observing further into what the folks working with this are saying, the gov. new these principals/tech since the 50s View Quote Damn, you hit the whole trifecta in one post |
|
Quoted: If something is converting all that CO2 to O2, what is happening to the carbon in that equation? Where is it getting energy to drive the splitting of CO2 (because even with a catalyst, that’s an energy consuming reaction)? View Quote Follow the link from the OP to get an idea of how they are claiming it works. The basic theory is that the molecules are deconstructed into free electron/protons in the toroidal plasmoid's electromagnet field at the zero point and then reconstructed into new molecules and elements on the other side. Don't shoot the messenger, watch the explanation vid and point out where you think they may be off base on their fundamentals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrlL2N1A4GE |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: 100% agree with your line of thinking, it took me 3/4 of a year of watching the progress from this effort (shout out to Spin Engineer) before willing to post about it on GD. Based on the currently publicity, videos of the device doing what they are claiming, ongoing independent testing, the Nature study linked above, I'm cautiously optimistic there might be something here (and if so, agree, awesome for humanity). I'll be the first to admit fault of being mislead if it turns out to be BS and debunked. The fundamentals of function have been associated with the same principals Tesla knew and was experimenting with (Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower), and even further back into ancient times with the Pyramids being used for energy production (if one is down with the believe that the Egyptians were not the ones to build them, but rather much earlier). Observing further into what the folks working with this are saying, the gov. new these principals/tech since the 50s (who's to confirm/deny, just passing along to paint the possible picture). Again, watch the vids and pages linked in the first pages if interested to get a better primer of what is said to be involved for theory of operation. Another recent interview that adds a bit more color on the subject. IMO, if tech like this is not snake oil, it'd be very unlikely to come from the gov. or industry, but rather a grass roots movement. https://youtu.be/XyVKTJYxmnc?si=Z6LA8f-RsPXl28x5&t=7253 Edit: changed link to direct time stamp View Quote |
|
Quoted: We have provided a lot of discussion regarding why the "transmutation" of the elements doesn't obey all known laws of enthalpies of formation, the methods for measuring the exhaust are insufficient, etc... YOU will not admit they are wrong because you are either trolling or your brain is addicted to the idea of "disruptive" technologies. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: We have provided a lot of discussion regarding why the "transmutation" of the elements doesn't obey all known laws of enthalpies of formation, the methods for measuring the exhaust are insufficient, etc... YOU will not admit they are wrong because you are either trolling or your brain is addicted to the idea of "disruptive" technologies. I'm cautiously optimistic that they are in fact not wrong. Wouldn't it be slick if books would need to be revised for new fundamentals? Based on the conclusions of the researchers within the Nature study, it seems that they are puzzled as much as yourself as to how they obtained the results they observed. This needs further basic research. Since the chances of getting all the present conclusion is so remote, particularly the presence of 22Ne without 20Ne or 21Ne, this work may lead to a new research topic in nuclear science and energy technology if true. |
|
Quoted: I'm cautiously optimistic that they are in fact not wrong. Wouldn't it be slick if books would need to be revised for new fundamentals? Based on the conclusions of the researchers within the Nature study, it seems that they are puzzled as much as yourself as to how they obtained the results they observed. View Quote |
|
Quoted: My believe is you need more of an open mind. It very well appears that it can transmute elements and may very well be worth your time if you're interested in this field of tech. Here's a link to a peer reviewed Nature report from January 2024 that is conducting experiments of the same principles as the Thunderstorm generator. LINK Bob Greenyer is mentioned as part of the study, Bob is the guy doing metallurgy studies of the interior of the first Thunderstorm Generator (Thor), his YouTube vids regarding these studies can be found with my OP (Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project). The test setup is a simple, a heated water center pipe with a cold water outer jacket pipe. The cold pipe is continuously fed reverse osmosis tap water and pulsed to produce cavitation/nano bubbles over the heated circulating hot pipe. The hot and cold water flow in opposite directions (like the TS gen). It sure sounds like they confirmed the process of nuclear reaction from simple imploding bubbles, specifically the transmutation of elements into others. Here are some excerpts from the article I found interesting.
Hope more studies continue to come out to corroborate their findings. Seems they observed excess heat (nuclear reaction), found isotopes of neon, O2, CO2 and heavy water, plus significant percentages of carbon, oxygen and chlorine, all from tap water... Whole lot of folks tossing opinions to the contrary of their findings, anyone a bit curious about this??? edit: add bullet View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It transmutes carbon into oxygen? You can't transmute elements like that. My belief is that it is a scam. In short, it's bullshit and not worth your time. My believe is you need more of an open mind. It very well appears that it can transmute elements and may very well be worth your time if you're interested in this field of tech. Here's a link to a peer reviewed Nature report from January 2024 that is conducting experiments of the same principles as the Thunderstorm generator. LINK Bob Greenyer is mentioned as part of the study, Bob is the guy doing metallurgy studies of the interior of the first Thunderstorm Generator (Thor), his YouTube vids regarding these studies can be found with my OP (Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project). The test setup is a simple, a heated water center pipe with a cold water outer jacket pipe. The cold pipe is continuously fed reverse osmosis tap water and pulsed to produce cavitation/nano bubbles over the heated circulating hot pipe. The hot and cold water flow in opposite directions (like the TS gen). It sure sounds like they confirmed the process of nuclear reaction from simple imploding bubbles, specifically the transmutation of elements into others. Here are some excerpts from the article I found interesting.
Hope more studies continue to come out to corroborate their findings. Seems they observed excess heat (nuclear reaction), found isotopes of neon, O2, CO2 and heavy water, plus significant percentages of carbon, oxygen and chlorine, all from tap water... Whole lot of folks tossing opinions to the contrary of their findings, anyone a bit curious about this??? edit: add bullet Very good! Just Transmute tap water into Gold and Plutonium. Why the controversy? Notice how You said “wouldn’t be slick if…”. Notice how the quote you posted says “If True” That’s how you know someone is selling you fantasy. Imagine how unstable nature would be, if atoms were splitting apart and transmuting all the time? |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.