User Panel
Quoted:
Yup, he knows WAY TO MUCH SHIT to ever be in real trouble IMHO. WAY TOO MUCH KNOWLEDGE of people in political power..........he is about as safe as I would be with a division of Marines defending me from a group of five armed toddlers. View Quote Rhodes, Podesta and few others tho, they seem to be the keys that would unlock all of this, and they are not being touched. |
|
Quoted:
As I stated, if you're trying to tie "unmasking" to a criminal violation (and excluding any other reasons) then you're doing it wrong. Read what I posted previously for a list of valid reasons to "unmask". View Quote This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. |
|
Quoted:
Our government doesn't have a right (4th amendment) to unmask names in search of anything they can dream up i.e collusion. This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Problem with the whole unmasking is that as soon as an admin unmasked and discerned that there was nothing there all that info should have been destroyed..and it wasn't ..it was spread far and wide and leaked on purpose.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Our government doesn't have a right (4th amendment) to unmask names in search of anything they can dream up i.e collusion. This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. |
|
Quoted:
Problem with the whole unmasking is that as soon as an admin unmasked and discerned that there was nothing there all that info should have been destroyed..and it wasn't ..it was spread far and wide and leaked on purpose.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Our government doesn't have a right (4th amendment) to unmask names in search of anything they can dream up i.e collusion. This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Our government doesn't have a right (4th amendment) to unmask names in search of anything they can dream up i.e collusion. This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. |
|
Quoted:
Then they should take action on the Russian side View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Our government doesn't have a right (4th amendment) to unmask names in search of anything they can dream up i.e collusion. This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. |
|
|
Yeah but It's hella hard to sell State secrets that are on an actual state department server farm.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Considering the willingness of people to "leak" innuendo and suspicion, why, pray tell, would any reasonable person think that those same people, given any actual evidence of wrongdoing, WOULDN'T leak it immediately? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
I wouldn't bet on State server farms being more than marginally more secure than what was compromised. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
I wouldn't bet on State server farms being more than marginally more secure than what was compromised. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
She is an expert on cybersecurity. She said so in the debates. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
At least Clinton's setup had the "security through obscurity" thing going on... So we had to get very, very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is a huge problem. I have a son—he’s 10 years old. He has computers. He is so good with these computers. It’s unbelievable. The security aspect of cyber is very, very tough. And maybe, it's hardly doable. But I will say, we are not doing the job we should be doing. But that’s true throughout our whole governmental society. We have so many things that we have to do better, Lester. And certainly cyber is one of them. |
|
|
Quoted:
Both candidates were terrible on the issue. Here's Trump's elegant comment about "the cyber": View Quote End result? DNC hacked. Hillary hacked. RNC not hacked despite attempt. |
|
Quoted:
The difference is that Trump comes from the business world where you hire experts to handle things you don't know about. Hillary comes from corrupt Arkansas politics, where you hire shitty people like Platte River Networks or Crowdstrike to manage things because you can control them. End result? DNC hacked. Hillary hacked. RNC not hacked despite attempt. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Both candidates were terrible on the issue. Here's Trump's elegant comment about "the cyber": End result? DNC hacked. Hillary hacked. RNC not hacked despite attempt. |
|
|
Quoted:
The difference is that Trump comes from the business world where you hire experts to handle things you don't know about. Hillary comes from corrupt Arkansas politics, where you hire shitty people like Platte River Networks or Crowdstrike to manage things because you can control them. End result? DNC hacked. Hillary hacked. RNC not hacked despite attempt. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Both candidates were terrible on the issue. Here's Trump's elegant comment about "the cyber": End result? DNC hacked. Hillary hacked. RNC not hacked despite attempt. |
|
Quoted:
The RNC was hacked. View Quote "Top intelligence officials indicated on Tuesday that the GOP was also a Russian hacking target but that none of the information obtained was leaked." http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/comey-republicans-hacked-russia/ |
|
Quoted:
Wrong. "Top intelligence officials indicated on Tuesday that the GOP was also a Russian hacking target but that none of the information obtained was leaked." http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/comey-republicans-hacked-russia/ View Quote |
|
Quoted: View Quote "James B. Comey, told lawmakers at a Senate hearing on Tuesday that Russian hackers had penetrated the Republican National Committee’s computer records, but he called it a “limited penetration of old R.N.C.” computer systems that were “no longer in use.”" https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/10/us/politics/russia-hack-hearing-clapper-rogers-brennan.html?mcubz=1&_r=0 |
|
Quoted:
Bad quote on my part. I don't know why I quoted fake new anyways. I'll say 12 Hail Pepes as penance. "James B. Comey, told lawmakers at a Senate hearing on Tuesday that Russian hackers had penetrated the Republican National Committee’s computer records, but he called it a “limited penetration of old R.N.C.” computer systems that were “no longer in use.”" https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/10/us/politics/russia-hack-hearing-clapper-rogers-brennan.html?mcubz=1&_r=0 View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Okay. Hillary and the DNC did dumb things. Trump can't even speak a coherent sentence about the topic. We'll call it a draw. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Okay. Hillary and the DNC did dumb things. Trump can't even speak a coherent sentence about the topic. We'll call it a draw. Trump:
I was elected by the citizens of Pittsburg not Paris. |
|
Quoted:
We're not playing "meaning of is", are we? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Nope. Just pointing out that the RNC had better security, despite Hillary's "expertise" on cyber security. And by "expertise" I mean she memorized a talking point from a staffer on a subject she knew exactly zero about. Server clothes and all that. Trump didn't memorize a talking point, which means he's stupid, or something. I mean, he built a billion dollar empire, married a supermodel, and then became the first non-politician to win the Presidency, but he's Drumpf. Trust me. Not smart like Anderson Cooper. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I generally don't advise making declarative statements involving cyber security based on an adversary force compromising the wrong thing. View Quote YOU'RE NOT MY SUPERVISOR! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Our government doesn't have a right (4th amendment) to unmask names in search of anything they can dream up i.e collusion. This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. |
|
Quoted:
What should they have done? Maybe throw out a bunch of spies and take their compounds? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Our government doesn't have a right (4th amendment) to unmask names in search of anything they can dream up i.e collusion. This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. Better yet, what action did they take? They did nothing, I will assume that means it wasn't a big deal. Yet, they leaked it harming a citizen with info that as assumed showed they didn't do anything wrong. That's what you call purely political. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Current RNC servers and email accounts? Not defunct email acciunts? Link? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The RNC was hacked. Not defunct email acciunts? Link? This was late summer last year I heard him say this.........if I am remembering it correctly. |
|
Quoted:
Current RNC servers and email accounts? Not defunct email acciunts? Link? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Citizens discussions should be off limits. If there's wrong doing they should take action against the non-citizen wrong doers. It's not rocket surgery. Better yet, what action did they take? They did nothing, I will assume that means it wasn't a big deal. Yet, they leaked it harming a citizen with info that as assumed showed they didn't do anything wrong. That's what you call purely political. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Our government doesn't have a right (4th amendment) to unmask names in search of anything they can dream up i.e collusion. This is dangerous for a political party to coerce the intelligence agencies to unmask names based on accusations and innuendos. Better yet, what action did they take? They did nothing, I will assume that means it wasn't a big deal. Yet, they leaked it harming a citizen with info that as assumed showed they didn't do anything wrong. That's what you call purely political. The Rosenbergs were citizens FWIW. |
|
Where can we hire on to carry Hillery's, Pedesta's, and the DNC's water?
Can we get paid more for a LOTTA POSTS??? Like multiples per hour... Can we tag team? Is GARGLING an add on??? Does Hajabi know all about this? Do you have to be an 'Intelelectual Gineus'? |
|
|
Quoted:
And now there's one on the unmasking as well. Lot of buttholes puckering at the DNC right about now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Gosh there couldn't possibly be incriminating information on old computers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's above in happycinic's post where he proved me right. |
|
Quoted:
The Russians also breached several systems used by state-level Republican groups. Weird none of that ended up spread by the View Quote |
|
Quoted:
That's because Russia was not the leaker, Seth Rich was. Russia probably did also get the information, as did everyone else due to the shit security, but the Russians would likely have kept anything they got for blackmail purposes. No one has yet to come up with a plausible reason why the Russians would have wanted Trump over Hillary. The Russians have been in collusion with the American left since Stalin. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The Russians also breached several systems used by state-level Republican groups. Weird none of that ended up spread by the |
|
Quoted:
That's because Russia was not the leaker, Seth Rich was. Russia probably did also get the information, as did everyone else due to the shit security, but the Russians would likely have kept anything they got for blackmail purposes. No one has yet to come up with a plausible reason why the Russians would have wanted Trump over Hillary. The Russians have been in collusion with the American left since Stalin. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Maybe because they weren't doing anything corrupt View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Maybe because they weren't doing anything corrupt View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The Russians also breached several systems used by state-level Republican groups. Weird none of that ended up spread by the ETA: Maybe the RNC gunned down all the various Republican Seth Rich clones... |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.