User Panel
|
|
|
Quoted: That's like asking a jinn to make you the ruler of the universe without understanding how large the universe is. If your handheld device could actually receive that much information in a month, you'd likely be dead in a week from the RF radiation you were absorbing. (Very rough guesstimate by a Liberal Arts major.) View Quote |
|
Somebody has been busy cranking out the AI generated Nancy Pelosi porn.
|
|
Quoted: That’s a lot of porn. View Quote Quoted: that's a lot of porn View Quote Damn, not even 10 seconds! |
|
Looks like Verizon's programmers really should have a check on that data value to throw an error if it is excessively out of bounds.
If you saturated a 1GbE connection at 100% continuously for 30 days, you would move 324,000GB of data. So basically, somewhere in their system, they should have a check that says "If (value of data used) is greater than 350,000 (just being generous here), throw a flag and figure out what's going on, because it simply isn't possible for the average consumer cell-connected device to move that much data in a month". This whole thing is the real-life example of this programmer joke... A software QA engineer walks into a bar, and orders a beer. 2 beers. 0 beers. 999999 beers. A lizard. -1 beers. zlkflksflli beers. The first real customer walks into the bar and asks where the bathroom is. The bar explodes, killing everyone. |
|
Its possible to pull the data records and add up everything for the period.
Previous role was supporting cellular clients. |
|
Is it possible OP's account at Verizon had a bit flip from a cosmic ray?
The Universe is Hostile to Computers |
|
They probably tried to correct an overstated usage amount and subtracted too much and had and underflow on an unsigned eight byte (sixty four bit) integer. Their software apparently didnt check for underflows. Lol.
|
|
Quoted: Congratulations OP. You have run out of numbers. Or really, Verizon has run of out numbers. Just a guess... Looks like Verizon is using signed 64-bit integers here, and the largest number that you can express as a signed 64-bit integer (using 'two's complement') is (2^63)-1, which is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807, or 0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. I'm betting that the number shown there is the "number of megabytes divided by 1,000" to equal gigabytes (as was previously posted), and then they rounded from 9,223,372,036,854,775.807 to 9,223,372,036,854,776.0 Somewhere in Verizon's systems, your usage was likely overwritten by a bunch of 1's (63 of them, to be precise), which the system then interpreted as a signed 64-bit integer, and then divided by 1,000 to turn it into "gigabytes of usage". And then, their programmers forgot to have a use case of "it is physically impossible to use this much data" for showing data usage, and for cutting off a customer's data. View Quote An interesting side thought: why are they even using signed integers? That implies it's possible for a customer to have negative usage. |
|
Must have been midcap porn.
The bigger the girls, the more bytes you use OP. |
|
Quoted: Is it possible OP's account at Verizon had a bit flip from a cosmic ray? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaZ_RSt0KP8 View Quote That’s what this is for… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory |
|
OP's data usage was entered by this guy.
I Got Don Music To Repeatedly Hit His Head On His Piano |
|
That's a pretty good deal, Got a Shit load o' datas for only 10 bucks.
I think you won the internet this month. |
|
Quoted: Is it possible OP's account at Verizon had a bit flip from a cosmic ray? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaZ_RSt0KP8 View Quote |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Is it possible OP's account at Verizon had a bit flip from a cosmic ray? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaZ_RSt0KP8 A friend at Yahoo back in the day could watch the sunrise via ECC correctable error logging once their data centers were dense enough. |
|
Quoted: An interesting side thought: why are they even using signed integers? That implies it's possible for a customer to have negative usage. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Congratulations OP. You have run out of numbers. Or really, Verizon has run of out numbers. Just a guess... Looks like Verizon is using signed 64-bit integers here, and the largest number that you can express as a signed 64-bit integer (using 'two's complement') is (2^63)-1, which is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807, or 0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. I'm betting that the number shown there is the "number of megabytes divided by 1,000" to equal gigabytes (as was previously posted), and then they rounded from 9,223,372,036,854,775.807 to 9,223,372,036,854,776.0 Somewhere in Verizon's systems, your usage was likely overwritten by a bunch of 1's (63 of them, to be precise), which the system then interpreted as a signed 64-bit integer, and then divided by 1,000 to turn it into "gigabytes of usage". And then, their programmers forgot to have a use case of "it is physically impossible to use this much data" for showing data usage, and for cutting off a customer's data. An interesting side thought: why are they even using signed integers? That implies it's possible for a customer to have negative usage. Do they pay for negative usage at the same rate they charge? |
|
Quoted: Congratulations OP. You have run out of numbers. Or really, Verizon has run of out numbers. Just a guess... Looks like Verizon is using signed 64-bit integers here, and the largest number that you can express as a signed 64-bit integer (using 'two's complement') is (2^63)-1, which is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807, or 0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. I'm betting that the number shown there is the "number of megabytes divided by 1,000" to equal gigabytes (as was previously posted), and then they rounded from 9,223,372,036,854,775.807 to 9,223,372,036,854,776.0 Somewhere in Verizon's systems, your usage was likely overwritten by a bunch of 1's (63 of them, to be precise), which the system then interpreted as a signed 64-bit integer, and then divided by 1,000 to turn it into "gigabytes of usage". And then, their programmers forgot to have a use case of "it is physically impossible to use this much data" for showing data usage, and for cutting off a customer's data. View Quote check out the big brain on brad Seriously how the hell did you figure that out... |
|
3.55 billion gb/s. That’s the highest speed I’ve ever seen! Didn’t know 5g was this fast. I’m rocking 500 gb/s on my cable internet at home. Amazing what cellular technology can do these days.
|
|
|
its a coding issue
2 lines of code were done poorly and the result was a decimal in the wrong place should be .9 |
|
Quoted: You need to X that one. Link it back here. View Quote
|
|
|
|
|
The whole nation of China use your account to download porn.
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You need to X that one. Link it back here.
|
|
Quoted: Congratulations OP. You have run out of numbers. Or really, Verizon has run of out numbers. Just a guess... Looks like Verizon is using signed 64-bit integers here, and the largest number that you can express as a signed 64-bit integer (using 'two's complement') is (2^63)-1, which is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807, or 0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. I'm betting that the number shown there is the "number of megabytes divided by 1,000" to equal gigabytes (as was previously posted), and then they rounded from 9,223,372,036,854,775.807 to 9,223,372,036,854,776.0 Somewhere in Verizon's systems, your usage was likely overwritten by a bunch of 1's (63 of them, to be precise), which the system then interpreted as a signed 64-bit integer, and then divided by 1,000 to turn it into "gigabytes of usage". And then, their programmers forgot to have a use case of "it is physically impossible to use this much data" for showing data usage, and for cutting off a customer's data. View Quote I had my Internet service disconnected for non-payment of a bill that wasn't due for two more weeks. I was told there would be a reconnection fee, which I outright refused. I went through multiple people before I found a reasonable person who understood that shutting me off on the 9th for not paying a bill that wasn't due until the 24th was absurd and waived the fee. Then I got to have the same conversations with other people for the exact same issue several months later. Again, someone finally waived the fee. Later in the year it happened a third time, and I just gave up and went with a different provider. |
|
Thank you, arfcom. I’m laughing so hard I’m crying. This is the best thread I’ve read in a long time. Please, keep this going.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Congratulations OP. You have run out of numbers. Or really, Verizon has run of out numbers. Just a guess... Looks like Verizon is using signed 64-bit integers here, and the largest number that you can express as a signed 64-bit integer (using 'two's complement') is (2^63)-1, which is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807, or 0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. I'm betting that the number shown there is the "number of megabytes divided by 1,000" to equal gigabytes (as was previously posted), and then they rounded from 9,223,372,036,854,775.807 to 9,223,372,036,854,776.0 Somewhere in Verizon's systems, your usage was likely overwritten by a bunch of 1's (63 of them, to be precise), which the system then interpreted as a signed 64-bit integer, and then divided by 1,000 to turn it into "gigabytes of usage". And then, their programmers forgot to have a use case of "it is physically impossible to use this much data" for showing data usage, and for cutting off a customer's data. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
This number is 668-million times the age of our universe.
Which is about how long OP is going to be on hold with Verizon. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: That's an impressive amount of porn brother Ice up Quoted: that's a lot of porn Quoted: That’s a lot of porn Quoted: That's a lot of porn. Quoted: Dude, lay off the porn. Quoted: That's ALL the porn. Quoted: That's a lot of porn. I mean, to be fair, that is a lot of porn |
|
poor guy can't post on the InterWEbs cuz he ain't got to mores daata
|
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.