User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 5:15:36 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
google dark skinned Muslim we're weak, and white women stray just to dilute their genes I'm no 88er, I don't care, I won't see it, but it's true, actually had a lily white stripper crying in my arms saying she wanted a mixed race baby. 
Well they say strippers are crazy. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 5:20:38 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We will have evolved into two separate species. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/312702/download--1--198572.JPGhttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/312702/download--2--198574.JPG |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 5:24:22 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There is no genetic advantage to being taller than we are now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 5:27:16 PM EDT
[#4]
That's impossible. Race is merely a social construct, and if discrete populations can exist in wildy divergent environments for over 50,000 years with no measurable physical or neurological differences obviously 1,000 years isn't going to do anything.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 5:31:52 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's impossible. Race is merely a social construct, and if discrete populations can exist in wildy divergent environments for over 50,000 years with no measurable physical or neurological differences obviously 1,000 years isn't going to do anything.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 5:41:12 PM EDT
[#6]
in a mere 1000 years, humans will look pretty much the same. Or fitter, I suspect we will have the obesity shit beat by then via gene manipulation.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 5:46:19 PM EDT
[#7]
The observers
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 5:48:36 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There is no genetic advantage to being taller than we are now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 9:50:46 PM EDT
[#9]
In 1880 the average American male was 5’7’’. Today, he’s 5’10’’. In colonial times the ceilings were lower to save on energy, but the height wasn't much shorter than today. The height varies per region the person comes from. Colonial solders were 3" taller than British Marines. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 10:02:56 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 10:12:22 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Evolution requires a selective force. What force will that be in humans? We haven't changed in thousands of years, just better diet and less selective pressures. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 10:13:49 PM EDT
[#12]
1000 Years?
Three possibilities for big change. 1) We advance technologically to the point where we control our genes. 2) Most humans die off in a world wide catastrophe, and the survivors have to live like hunter gatherers, which would select out most of us (you know, like me and my bad eyesight, or people who need medication to live, or have weak immune systems and only survived childhood because of anti-biotics, or anyone who didn't die of a disease because of vaccinations, etc). 3) Something really bad will happen and we'll all go extinct. If we keep bumping along like we are, meh, I doubt there will be big changes. Are we really much different (biologically) from the people 1,000 years ago? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 10:23:37 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
According to the research, we will also have feminine faces http://www.faceresearch.org/students/masculinity and also Study: Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Quote HistoryQuoted:
According to the research, we will also have feminine faces The participants in the Perrett et al. study were then shown pairs of masculinised and femininised versions of the same faces and were asked to indicate which version was more attractive. For female faces, both male and female participants demonstrated very strong preferences for the femininised versions of the faces. Intriguingly, however, both male and female participants also preferred the femininised male faces to the masculinised ones. So in both male and female faces, exaggerated feminine characteristics are attractive. and also Study: Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. eta ok I just went and looked and the first link mentions this. Men probably prefer feminine men because they arent competition when the females want to breed. Just my guess. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2017 10:29:21 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
