Yes, holy wall of text, come on people it isn't GD, this is legal forum. I assume lawyers learn to read and stuff at those fancy schools they go to.
Ok so background, I've been a GS 12 for 10+ years now (not a huge secret, I have actually met a couple other GS ARFcommers over the years in person, and I'm definitely not a glowie), no detrimental issues.
A federal job announcement for my exact job opened (public job announcement , so even though I'm an employee here already I can apply) in a new city(same agency, same job, same duties, slight pay bump, and not just locality) was published. I applied for my own job (same title/series, same agency, same duties, more pay) in a different location. I was informed I was not selected for the job and nobody gave me a reason. Despite the two times i reached out to the hiring official to inquire as to what I was missing(more education, better performance, rabbit in a hat and a 64 Impala etc). I applied for 8 locations and was not selected for any of them.
During the same hiring event I also put in for my same job, at my same location, and same duties. Literally I would only change my own name tape and get a slightly bigger paycheck, everything else would stay the same). I was informed that I would not be getting that job and another person would be getting hired off the street for the new position, but they would be getting the higher paying (but same authority/responsibility) position; this person would also require training to do the job at full performance level. Despite my having been successful for 4 years at this point. Person is qualified, can easily be taught the skills and tasks of the position, no question, I've seen the resume. Why? because I told them about the job and helped them tune resume in my off hours. Mind you, I have ZERO influence on hiring process; I'm simply tired of being expected to do 14 hours worth of work in 8 hours regularly, so I put in the work to locate people to apply.
I recently asked about the hiring process for the local position (literally only changing my name tape on the cubical ) with my manager recently and was informed that I was not selected for the vacant position because that would leave my current position empty, resulting in no gain of bodies. Instead the guy who I helped tune resume was recommended for hiring. I believe this is a violation of 5 USC 2302 (b) (4), and 5 USC 2303(b) (12) per definitions provided in 5 USC 2301. Prohibited Personnel Practices.
The other transfer positions I believe I was removed from hiring consideration due to the remark from my manager. "...we aren't going to allow a location with only one person in it to transfer to another location because that would leave a gap, if we hire more we MIGHT allow a transfer..." .
For perspective I'm an above average employee, not quite "walks on water" but definitely well above average. Every official rating period I have had has rated me as 3.4 /5 to 3.8 /5 . For scale (roughly 1/5 is "you unjustly beat minorities with a night stick on live cable news while yelling racial slurs, on multiple occasions; we are documenting this so you can be fired" 2/5 would be "you were observed on ONE occasion to beat a minority with a billy club while only saying racial slurs, we are going to send you to remedial training", and anything above 3-3.29 is "you are ok, keep it up", 3.3-3.49 is "good job, you are above average" and a small performance bonus, 3.5-4.0 is "hot danm, you are amazing", an actual performance bonus, 4.0+ is nearly unheard of, as in mother theresa, ghandi, and jesus rolled together wouldn't get a 4.5/5 ..)
I have the manager on tape saying "...we arn't going to allow a location with only one person in it to transfer to another location because that would leave a gap, if we hire more we MIGHT allow a transfer..." .