User Panel
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
[Deleted]
|
|
"Republic, I like the sound of the word. It means people can live free, talk free, go or come, buy or sell, be drunk or sober however they choose." John Wayne
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: I keep hearing that things are going to be different later in the summer. I'm not yet convinced that isn't some kind of hopeful thinking. What is going to happen later in the summer that will give ukraine the ability to do what they can't do now? And, when? View Quote Its largely based on the fact that Ukraine will have greatly expanded their forces and integrated more western systems into their formations. Even then I think we will largely see the same back and forth we have been seeing for the last month or so. Russia will make gains in the Donnass while Ukraine infiltrates and forces the Russians to fall back in South and up North. I dont believe we will see any culminating battle that decides the war, but more of return to artillery and small unit actions of the last 6th years. |
|
"George said "TAX? Fuck that, I THE FUCKING MAN!" Then took a bunch of shots of the whiskey he made himself and shot King George in the goddamned face." -RustedAce
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: 11 minute video of Russians running and hiding from their ammo depot going off from the Ukrainian Tochka-u ballistic missile at Krasny Luch. Sort of like a fireworks factory explosion, but with mlrs rockets. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdGA88Eo8vs View Quote Do they have overhead video of that ammo dump going up? |
|
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: I keep hearing that things are going to be different later in the summer. I'm not yet convinced that isn't some kind of hopeful thinking. What is going to happen later in the summer that will give ukraine the ability to do what they can't do now? And, when? View Quote Have thousands of troops with 6-8 weeks of training, and others with training on weapons that are still making their way to the battle. Learning how to use the new equipment well enough that they can make accurate strikes with it. |
|
World ain't what it seems, is it Gunny?
|
what to make of this?
|
|
|
|
|
And then, he arrives at the last item on his bucket list...
|
Originally Posted By TTTSNB: what to make of this?
View Quote What do you mean? nothing special really, russians know if they fuck with any nato member that article 5 will be upheld and there will be hell to pay. nothing new at all. |
|
Only God will judge me.
|
another documentary of the helo flights into the mariupol steel plant. balls of steel amongst those men.
??????? ? ?????????. ????????? ??????? ???????????? ?????? "?????" ?? ??? ?? ? ???????? ????????? |
|
Only God will judge me.
|
This is the aftermath of the attack on the ammo dump in Krasni Luch
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OLXefP60ToU&t=38s |
|
|
Originally Posted By TTTSNB: what to make of this?
View Quote Lithuania is in the right and the us is just saying they've got their back for enforcing what Russia agreed to? |
|
|
Originally Posted By BobRoberts: Its largely based on the fact that Ukraine will have greatly expanded their forces and integrated more western systems into their formations. Even then I think we will largely see the same back and forth we have been seeing for the last month or so. Russia will make gains in the Donnass while Ukraine infiltrates and forces the Russians to fall back in South and up North. I dont believe we will see any culminating battle that decides the war, but more of return to artillery and small unit actions of the last 6th years. View Quote Won't they be running out of manpower? Manpower isn't a resource they have without limits. |
|
|
|
|
“If by chance you were to ask me which ornaments I would desire above all others in my house, I would reply, without much pause for reflection, arms and books.”
Baldassare Castiglione |
Originally Posted By devildog93: Won't they be running out of manpower? Manpower isn't a resource they have without limits. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By devildog93: Originally Posted By BobRoberts: Its largely based on the fact that Ukraine will have greatly expanded their forces and integrated more western systems into their formations. Even then I think we will largely see the same back and forth we have been seeing for the last month or so. Russia will make gains in the Donnass while Ukraine infiltrates and forces the Russians to fall back in South and up North. I dont believe we will see any culminating battle that decides the war, but more of return to artillery and small unit actions of the last 6th years. Won't they be running out of manpower? Manpower isn't a resource they have without limits. The Ukrainians? No, their population could probably support an army of at least 5 million, assuming there was a full mobilization. France in WW1 had a similar population as Ukraine and had an army larger than that, even if you exclude soldiers from the colonies. By the end of the war France had lost over a million soldiers and was still able to function as a nation. |
|
|
Originally Posted By GySgt_D:
View Quote That didn't look like a loitering munition to me. It looked like a regular UAS that was carrying a warhead and dove right into the target on command. There are several airframes that look just like that one so it's hard to say which one it is. While it seems to have been effective with a flammable target, one has to wonder if using a potential ISR asset as a pseudo-cruise missile is an effective use of the platform. Evidently they thought it was. I wonder if that plant was making diesel that all the rooskie vehicles/tanks/etc are using. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Bluegrasshopper: It's a $10k Chinese cargo drone that you can buy off Alibaba.com https://s.alicdn.com/@sc04/kf/H7879ac93ad4340aeb9cdad646e2f97d4S.jpg_300x300.jpg Sorry, Dupe View Quote these cheap drones are gonna be hell on air defense systems. so many decoys, so many will be shot down empty, easy to knock down but impossible to discriminate or catch them all. bet this one was detected, but was ignored due to its size. |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: I keep hearing that things are going to be different later in the summer. I'm not yet convinced that isn't some kind of hopeful thinking. What is going to happen later in the summer that will give ukraine the ability to do what they can't do now? And, when? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By stone-age: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Ukraine has said weeks before that they expected to withdraw from Severodonetsk if need be and use the high ground across the river to shell the Russians. The offensives so far have been exploitation of Russian weak areas, where it has forced them to move what they have to various regions to plug up the gaps that are being exploited by Ukraine. I would not expect any real major offensives to take back land until later this summer. The above doesn't exactly seem rosy for the Russians. I keep hearing that things are going to be different later in the summer. I'm not yet convinced that isn't some kind of hopeful thinking. What is going to happen later in the summer that will give ukraine the ability to do what they can't do now? And, when? Time to actually broardly fielding the more complex systems was longer than I expected. The training of the trianers here in was at least 3+ weeks and than those trianers have to go back and train the operators. I know not many Ukrainians speak english or know the western alphabet so could be difficult take longer than expected. |
|
Membership thanks to ml2150! Thanks buddy !
Membership thanks to Retgarr ! Thanks buddy ! |
A little different perspective, when war gets personal.
https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/world-championships-ukrainian-mykhailo-romanchuk-pleads-to-maintain-ban-on-russia/?fbclid=IwAR35WvpLC5ibgPtX3H5TnaozGrrAcIKw9p6G4nJ3lprCJVxrWCbRA6V2hmw |
|
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: They are saying it could be this: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FV2bPbOXEAECN3K?format=jpg&name=900x900 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FV2c42ZWQAAb4H7?format=png&name=small Chinese made, and long range. Expendable and can reach far apparently. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Originally Posted By planemaker: That didn't look like a loitering munition to me. It looked like a regular UAS that was carrying a warhead and dove right into the target on command. There are several airframes that look just like that one so it's hard to say which one it is. While it seems to have been effective with a flammable target, one has to wonder if using a potential ISR asset as a pseudo-cruise missile is an effective use of the platform. Evidently they thought it was. I wonder if that plant was making diesel that all the rooskie vehicles/tanks/etc are using. They are saying it could be this: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FV2bPbOXEAECN3K?format=jpg&name=900x900 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FV2c42ZWQAAb4H7?format=png&name=small Chinese made, and long range. Expendable and can reach far apparently. How big is it? It doesn't really look that large. I suppose if it can carry a 10lb explosive, that's good enough. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Bluegrasshopper: It's a $10k Chinese cargo drone that you can buy off Alibaba.com https://s.alicdn.com/@sc04/kf/H7879ac93ad4340aeb9cdad646e2f97d4S.jpg_300x300.jpg Sorry, Dupe View Quote Well, that cargo got delivered. I hope Ukraine bought a bunch of these. I'm sure Putin called Xi a while ago to stop drone sales. Anyone know the max weight for payload/package this thing can deliver? |
|
|
Originally Posted By planemaker: How big is it? It doesn't really look that large. I suppose if it can carry a 10lb explosive, that's good enough. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By planemaker: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Originally Posted By planemaker: That didn't look like a loitering munition to me. It looked like a regular UAS that was carrying a warhead and dove right into the target on command. There are several airframes that look just like that one so it's hard to say which one it is. While it seems to have been effective with a flammable target, one has to wonder if using a potential ISR asset as a pseudo-cruise missile is an effective use of the platform. Evidently they thought it was. I wonder if that plant was making diesel that all the rooskie vehicles/tanks/etc are using. They are saying it could be this: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FV2bPbOXEAECN3K?format=jpg&name=900x900 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FV2c42ZWQAAb4H7?format=png&name=small Chinese made, and long range. Expendable and can reach far apparently. How big is it? It doesn't really look that large. I suppose if it can carry a 10lb explosive, that's good enough. I can't find the info, but apparently it went 100km behind enemy lines without being intercepted by advanced Russian air defense systems. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By devildog93: Won't they be running out of manpower? Manpower isn't a resource they have without limits. View Quote No, they will not run out of manpower any time soon. It’s training and equipping that is critical. Quick comparison is that Ukraine today has a population roughly equal to the UK in 1914 (~43 million). By end 1918 the UK fielded an army of 3.8 million men - this does NOT count Canadian, ANZAC, Indian troops - just the British Army raised from England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland. They had 2.3 million casualties from all causes prior to the end of the war, so the actual fielded force in total between 1914 and 1918 was well in excess of 5 million, from the same size population base as the Ukraine of today. War and logistics are very, very different today, of course. But the number of able men the Ukraine forces can mobilize is not a critical issue. The speed and effectiveness with which it can be done, and equipping them, is the issue. If Russia wants to put Ukraine down and eliminate Ukraine as a threat entirely, it is clear now they are looking at a long war and Russia may in fact need some whole-number multiple of 5 million men to do so over the next few years. Without going to a total-war footing, it’s Russia that is facing a manpower crisis. |
|
|
25kg +
|
|
|
Deckard “nobody wants to know the truth, nobody” Cobra Kai Johnny Lawrence “she’s hot and all those other things” Tucker Carlson 1/10/2018 “I used to be a liberatarian until Google”https://mobile.twitter.com/Henry_Gunn
|
Originally Posted By Bluegrasshopper: It's a $10k Chinese cargo drone that you can buy off Alibaba.com https://s.alicdn.com/@sc04/kf/H7879ac93ad4340aeb9cdad646e2f97d4S.jpg_300x300.jpg Sorry, Dupe View Quote Says 800km range and 50kg payload. Communications would be the limiting factor...wonder if this had a pre-programmed flight path. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Satellite-Connection-800km-long-range-Drone_62021900164.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.57c44146sJuEbB |
|
"the science" /duh si-ens/ noun: progressive postmodern religious dogma not based in tested hypothesis or facts used to advance an authoritative political ideology
|
Originally Posted By TTTSNB: what to make of this?
View Quote It means that Russia has been playing the “cornered nuclear superpower” angle for all it’s worth in hopes of bluffing/intimidating their way out of a catastrophic mistake. Fuck them. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Billy_Ringo: A little different perspective, when war gets personal. https://www.swimmingworldmagazine.com/news/world-championships-ukrainian-mykhailo-romanchuk-pleads-to-maintain-ban-on-russia/?fbclid=IwAR35WvpLC5ibgPtX3H5TnaozGrrAcIKw9p6G4nJ3lprCJVxrWCbRA6V2hmw View Quote |
|
"We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will always be prepared so we may always be free." Ronald Reagan 1984
"Mitch the democrat bitch" |
Looks like they can build it to your spec.
https://muginuav.en.alibaba.com/product/1600357079738-903768346/Mugin_5_Pro_5000mm_Carbon_Fiber_Uav_Platform_China_Flir_Mediacl_Autelrobotics_Uav.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.5a5325d36tzNdU |
|
|
Originally Posted By Fallen: The Ukrainians? No, their population could probably support an army of at least 5 million, assuming there was a full mobilization. France in WW1 had a similar population as Ukraine and had an army larger than that, even if you exclude soldiers from the colonies. By the end of the war France had lost over a million soldiers and was still able to function as a nation. View Quote Using France as a basis for a good armed force may be a poor, but apt example. Sure, they might conscript millions, but quality will suffer. |
|
|
Originally Posted By trapsh00ter99: Not seeing a 10k option, but this one is 100k and looks similar. Says 800km range and 50kg payload. Communications would be the limiting factor...wonder if this had a pre-programmed flight path. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Satellite-Connection-800km-long-range-Drone_62021900164.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.57c44146sJuEbB View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By trapsh00ter99: Originally Posted By Bluegrasshopper: It's a $10k Chinese cargo drone that you can buy off Alibaba.com https://s.alicdn.com/@sc04/kf/H7879ac93ad4340aeb9cdad646e2f97d4S.jpg_300x300.jpg Sorry, Dupe Says 800km range and 50kg payload. Communications would be the limiting factor...wonder if this had a pre-programmed flight path. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Satellite-Connection-800km-long-range-Drone_62021900164.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.57c44146sJuEbB If they can’t control via satellite, the most effective method would seem to be to launch from Ukraine on a pre-programmed flight path to the target, then have a covert operator near the target take over manual control for target recon and attack. It wouldn’t be worth it to just launch it to GPS coordinates and have it hit a lamp-post instead of a vulnerable part of the refinery. Operator then bugs out for the next target in a pre-planned list. |
|
|
Not really. How long do you have to train someone to shoot at AK out of a trench at Russians, while your NCO/FSO calls in artillery?
MOUT is just grenading houses before you hose them with bullets. Not really hard, especially when you're fighting other conscripts. |
|
|
Originally Posted By last_crusader: Not really. How long do you have to train someone to shoot at AK out of a trench at Russians, while your NCO/FSO calls in artillery? MOUT is just grenading houses before you hose them with bullets. Not really hard, especially when you're fighting other conscripts. View Quote If you want them to be halfway decent at anything, two months. Add in some complicated missile systems and company operations, three plus. |
|
|
Originally Posted By trapsh00ter99: Not seeing a 10k option, but this one is 100k and looks similar. Says 800km range and 50kg payload. Communications would be the limiting factor...wonder if this had a pre-programmed flight path. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Satellite-Connection-800km-long-range-Drone_62021900164.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.57c44146sJuEbB View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By trapsh00ter99: Originally Posted By Bluegrasshopper: It's a $10k Chinese cargo drone that you can buy off Alibaba.com https://s.alicdn.com/@sc04/kf/H7879ac93ad4340aeb9cdad646e2f97d4S.jpg_300x300.jpg Sorry, Dupe Says 800km range and 50kg payload. Communications would be the limiting factor...wonder if this had a pre-programmed flight path. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Satellite-Connection-800km-long-range-Drone_62021900164.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.57c44146sJuEbB It most likely did. That way, it wouldn't be possible to jam the link. It's not like an oil refinery is mobile. As long as they can get good coordinates, it's pretty easy to set up a slow flying fixed-wing to dive to a very specific spot. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By trapsh00ter99: Not seeing a 10k option, but this one is 100k and looks similar. Says 800km range and 50kg payload. Communications would be the limiting factor...wonder if this had a pre-programmed flight path. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Satellite-Connection-800km-long-range-Drone_62021900164.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.57c44146sJuEbB View Quote |
|
How come every time there is a shooting, they want to take away the guns from the people who didn't do it?
|
Originally Posted By devildog93: Using France as a basis for a good armed force may be a poor, but apt example. Sure, they might conscript millions, but quality will suffer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By devildog93: Originally Posted By Fallen: The Ukrainians? No, their population could probably support an army of at least 5 million, assuming there was a full mobilization. France in WW1 had a similar population as Ukraine and had an army larger than that, even if you exclude soldiers from the colonies. By the end of the war France had lost over a million soldiers and was still able to function as a nation. Using France as a basis for a good armed force may be a poor, but apt example. Sure, they might conscript millions, but quality will suffer. WW1 era France and UK are terrible comparisons to modern Ukraine. They were both economic and industrial powerhouses with large colonial empires to draw from. Neither had their general population flee the country like Ukraine has. UKR has no hope winning a drawn out war. Just a matter of how many die on both sides and how much territory changes hands. Any thoughts of retaking the 2014 borders are fantasy. |
|
|
Originally Posted By vahog: The well-proven method is to dig out their lend-lease C-47s and fly them into Koenigsberg, dropping candy to the children as they wave to them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By vahog: Originally Posted By stgdz: So how are the Russians going to get supplies to kalingrad when the winter comes? The well-proven method is to dig out their lend-lease C-47s and fly them into Koenigsberg, dropping candy to the children as they wave to them. They have an awfully nice sea port |
|
"We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will always be prepared so we may always be free." Ronald Reagan 1984
"Mitch the democrat bitch" |
Originally Posted By Nodak_Cruffler: WW1 era France and UK are terrible comparisons to modern Ukraine. They were both economic and industrial powerhouses with large colonial empires to draw from. Neither had their general population flee the country like Ukraine has. UKR has no hope winning a drawn out war. Just a matter of how many die on both sides and how much territory changes hands. Any thoughts of retaking the 2014 borders are fantasy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Nodak_Cruffler: Originally Posted By devildog93: Originally Posted By Fallen: The Ukrainians? No, their population could probably support an army of at least 5 million, assuming there was a full mobilization. France in WW1 had a similar population as Ukraine and had an army larger than that, even if you exclude soldiers from the colonies. By the end of the war France had lost over a million soldiers and was still able to function as a nation. Using France as a basis for a good armed force may be a poor, but apt example. Sure, they might conscript millions, but quality will suffer. WW1 era France and UK are terrible comparisons to modern Ukraine. They were both economic and industrial powerhouses with large colonial empires to draw from. Neither had their general population flee the country like Ukraine has. UKR has no hope winning a drawn out war. Just a matter of how many die on both sides and how much territory changes hands. Any thoughts of retaking the 2014 borders are fantasy. Ukraine's not facing Germany either. Russia has the same problems with industrial capacity shrinking and little ability to produce new heavy weapons. At least Ukraine is able to get arms from international sources. Population isn't a factor until you get to the point of millions of deaths. A long drawn out war doesn't favor either side. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Nodak_Cruffler: WW1 era France and UK are terrible comparisons to modern Ukraine. They were both economic and industrial powerhouses with large colonial empires to draw from. Neither had their general population flee the country like Ukraine has. UKR has no hope winning a drawn out war. Just a matter of how many die on both sides and how much territory changes hands. Any thoughts of retaking the 2014 borders are fantasy. View Quote Them being industrial detracts from your argument since it means some of their potential soldiers were working in industry. Ukraines elderly, young and female fled, the men were banned from leaving and largely complied. 200,000 ukrainian men working abroad returned to the country. They are now training through a backlog of volunteers and are now working with Europeans to start basic training camps in Poland to try and work through the wait list. Russia will have to mobilize if they are to outlast Ukraine, and that carries risks for them politically. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AROKIE: What do you mean? nothing special really, russians know if they fuck with any nato member that article 5 will be upheld and there will be hell to pay. nothing new at all. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AROKIE: Originally Posted By TTTSNB: what to make of this?
What do you mean? nothing special really, russians know if they fuck with any nato member that article 5 will be upheld and there will be hell to pay. nothing new at all. |
|
"I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world." John 16:33
|
Originally Posted By Fallen: Ukraine's not facing Germany either. Russia has the same problems with industrial capacity shrinking and little ability to produce new heavy weapons. At least Ukraine is able to get arms from international sources. Population isn't a factor until you get to the point of millions of deaths. A long drawn out war doesn't favor either side. View Quote Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Them being industrial detracts from your argument since it means some of their potential soldiers were working in industry. Ukraines elderly, young and female fled, the men were banned from leaving and largely complied. 200,000 ukrainian men working abroad returned to the country. They are now training through a backlog of volunteers and are now working with Europeans to start basic training camps in Poland to try and work through the wait list. Russia will have to mobilize if they are to outlast Ukraine, and that carries risks for them politically. View Quote All I'm saying is just because you have 5 million military aged men does not mean you can field 5 million soldiers, even on rotation. Like it or not, Russia is better able to sustain a grinding war. Ukraine needs to find a way to peace before the West gets tired of a money pit and their people get tired of dying with no gain. The last decade or so indicates to me that their uniting behind Zelensky is temporary. He's done far better than anyone expected, but if you continue the WW1 comparison remember that nearly every country saw radical change in government during or immediately after the war. |
|
|
World ain't what it seems, is it Gunny?
|
Originally Posted By Nodak_Cruffler: All I'm saying is just because you have 5 million military aged men does not mean you can field 5 million soldiers, even on rotation. Like it or not, Russia is better able to sustain a grinding war. Ukraine needs to find a way to peace before the West gets tired of a money pit and their people get tired of dying with no gain. The last decade or so indicates to me that their uniting behind Zelensky is temporary. He's done far better than anyone expected, but if you continue the WW1 comparison remember that nearly every country saw radical change in government during or immediately after the war. View Quote This is not a patriotic war in the eyes of the younger Russians. They have their eyes open and know what is going on. I know there is a strong opposition to this thing and it would seem that internal strife is on the horizon. |
|
Let us never forget, government has no resources of its own. Government can only give to us what it has previously taken from us.
|
Originally Posted By Capta: If they can’t control via satellite, the most effective method would seem to be to launch from Ukraine on a pre-programmed flight path to the target, then have a covert operator near the target take over manual control for target recon and attack. It wouldn’t be worth it to just launch it to GPS coordinates and have it hit a lamp-post instead of a vulnerable part of the refinery. Operator then bugs out for the next target in a pre-planned list. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Capta: Originally Posted By trapsh00ter99: Originally Posted By Bluegrasshopper: It's a $10k Chinese cargo drone that you can buy off Alibaba.com https://s.alicdn.com/@sc04/kf/H7879ac93ad4340aeb9cdad646e2f97d4S.jpg_300x300.jpg Sorry, Dupe Says 800km range and 50kg payload. Communications would be the limiting factor...wonder if this had a pre-programmed flight path. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Satellite-Connection-800km-long-range-Drone_62021900164.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.57c44146sJuEbB If they can’t control via satellite, the most effective method would seem to be to launch from Ukraine on a pre-programmed flight path to the target, then have a covert operator near the target take over manual control for target recon and attack. It wouldn’t be worth it to just launch it to GPS coordinates and have it hit a lamp-post instead of a vulnerable part of the refinery. Operator then bugs out for the next target in a pre-planned list. Ukraine just bought a satellite already in space for tactical and surveillance use.. so there's that |
|
Only God will judge me.
|
Originally Posted By vahog: The well-proven method is to dig out their lend-lease C-47s and fly them into Koenigsberg, dropping candy to the children as they wave to them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By vahog: Originally Posted By stgdz: So how are the Russians going to get supplies to kalingrad when the winter comes? The well-proven method is to dig out their lend-lease C-47s and fly them into Koenigsberg, dropping candy to the children as they wave to them. I saw what you did there. |
|
Only God will judge me.
|
Originally Posted By agillig: Do they REALLY know that and believe it? I tend to think most of Europe will find a way to weasle out of it, and with Biden at the helm in the US... I can see people saying things like "Lithuania isn't worth World War 3" or whatever. Article 5 is great...until no one decides they're interested in getting involved. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By agillig: Originally Posted By AROKIE: Originally Posted By TTTSNB: what to make of this?
What do you mean? nothing special really, russians know if they fuck with any nato member that article 5 will be upheld and there will be hell to pay. nothing new at all. I don't know where your getting that and how you can think that..but article 5 is not an "option" for nato members...there is no getting out of it like you say. It's thr backbone of NATO. And it won't be broke. |
|
Only God will judge me.
|
Originally Posted By AROKIE: Ukraine just bought a satellite already in space for tactical and surveillance use.. so there's that View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AROKIE: Originally Posted By Capta: Originally Posted By trapsh00ter99: Originally Posted By Bluegrasshopper: It's a $10k Chinese cargo drone that you can buy off Alibaba.com https://s.alicdn.com/@sc04/kf/H7879ac93ad4340aeb9cdad646e2f97d4S.jpg_300x300.jpg Sorry, Dupe Says 800km range and 50kg payload. Communications would be the limiting factor...wonder if this had a pre-programmed flight path. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Satellite-Connection-800km-long-range-Drone_62021900164.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.57c44146sJuEbB If they can’t control via satellite, the most effective method would seem to be to launch from Ukraine on a pre-programmed flight path to the target, then have a covert operator near the target take over manual control for target recon and attack. It wouldn’t be worth it to just launch it to GPS coordinates and have it hit a lamp-post instead of a vulnerable part of the refinery. Operator then bugs out for the next target in a pre-planned list. Ukraine just bought a satellite already in space for tactical and surveillance use.. so there's that Weapons have gotten so good that targeting for fixed points on the ground does not require terminal refinement. |
|
In the real world off-campus, good marksmanship trumps good will.
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.