User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 1:34:06 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bought in cash, probably by drug dealers. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Extorris dealt with the same sort of guys in NYC, and he said that in his experience, most of them weren't actually stolen. Surprisingly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 1:44:09 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wonder what percentage of the bikes are stolen. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 1:44:32 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wonder what percentage of the bikes are stolen. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 1:55:31 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Did he ram the cop and the cop become attached or did the cop grab the handle bar? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 2:14:29 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're 100% correct. Police departments need to bring themselves into 21st century case law and understand that USSC case Mullenix v. Luna allows them shoot criminals fleeing at high speed in motor vehicles, as they present an ongoing danger to the motoring public. Less grab on. More gunshot to back of head as they put it in drive/step on the gas. You have no Constitutional right to flee arrest and endanger innocent people as you do so. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Yeah that was less "drug the officer" than the cop refused to believe he couldn't stop the vehicle by holding it. Good bust when they catch the ass hat but damn don't step in front of or grab onto moving vehicles. Not everyone respects your authority. Police departments need to bring themselves into 21st century case law and understand that USSC case Mullenix v. Luna allows them shoot criminals fleeing at high speed in motor vehicles, as they present an ongoing danger to the motoring public. Less grab on. More gunshot to back of head as they put it in drive/step on the gas. You have no Constitutional right to flee arrest and endanger innocent people as you do so. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 2:33:01 PM EDT
[#6]
I would just like to say WaKanDa For Eva
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 5:25:35 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're 100% correct. Police departments need to bring themselves into 21st century case law and understand that USSC case Mullenix v. Luna allows them shoot criminals fleeing at high speed in motor vehicles, as they present an ongoing danger to the motoring public. Less grab on. More gunshot to back of head as they put it in drive/step on the gas. You have no Constitutional right to flee arrest and endanger innocent people as you do so. They recently indicted one of their officers for shooting a suspect running from him, looking back over his shoulder, with a pistol in his hand... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 5:38:20 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Dirt bikes and atvs should be legal to ride on the streets. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 5:52:05 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A different article I read said that the cop tried to grab him after he clipped a car. And that they arrested someone else at the scene. Could RICO be applied in a case like this? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Did he ram the cop and the cop become attached or did the cop grab the handle bar? Could RICO be applied in a case like this? Authoritarians gonna authoritarian I reckon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 7:23:10 PM EDT
[#10]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 7:29:02 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're 100% correct. Police departments need to bring themselves into 21st century case law and understand that USSC case Mullenix v. Luna allows them shoot criminals fleeing at high speed in motor vehicles, as they present an ongoing danger to the motoring public. Less grab on. More gunshot to back of head as they put it in drive/step on the gas. You have no Constitutional right to flee arrest and endanger innocent people as you do so. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Yeah that was less "drug the officer" than the cop refused to believe he couldn't stop the vehicle by holding it. Good bust when they catch the ass hat but damn don't step in front of or grab onto moving vehicles. Not everyone respects your authority. Police departments need to bring themselves into 21st century case law and understand that USSC case Mullenix v. Luna allows them shoot criminals fleeing at high speed in motor vehicles, as they present an ongoing danger to the motoring public. Less grab on. More gunshot to back of head as they put it in drive/step on the gas. You have no Constitutional right to flee arrest and endanger innocent people as you do so. 1) The opinion of the court was that the officer did no use deadly force as he was trying to force the vehicle to a stop by shooting it, not the driver. 2) The case was about whether the officer had qualified immunity, not whether he was to be held criminally liable for shooting the fleeing suspect. 3) Shooting at an ATV, a fast, agile vehicle, in dense traffic, is just asking to miss and hit a bystander. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 7:50:47 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Lol RICO? For reckless driving????? What the fuck is wrong with you? First, we have a guy proposing that reckless drivers be executed on sight, now you want to throw the full weight of the federal gov at them and lock them up for 20-Life? Bwahahahahahaha Authoritarians gonna authoritarian I reckon. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 7:53:11 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
1). Cop is a moron. Don't jump onto a moving vehicle. You're not the star of an action movie. You're going to get hurt. 2). The idiot on the ATV does indeed need prosecution, along with all his cohorts causing trouble with their reckless behavior. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 7:56:09 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOh, he aimed for that cop.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 7:56:10 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're 100% correct. Police departments need to bring themselves into 21st century case law and understand that USSC case Mullenix v. Luna allows them shoot criminals fleeing at high speed in motor vehicles, as they present an ongoing danger to the motoring public. Less grab on. More gunshot to back of head as they put it in drive/step on the gas. You have no Constitutional right to flee arrest and endanger innocent people as you do so. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 8:50:07 PM EDT
[#16]
ATV rider arrested after hitting police van in downtown Nashville
One of the ATV riders was arrested today for a hit and run involving a police van. He had weed and pills on him when arrested, but didn't have a motorcycle license. And, sorry, ARFCOM, no mention of the ATV having been stolen. If it been, I'm sure they wold have mentioned it and any charges related to possession of a stolen motor vehicle. 
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WZTV) — Metro Police said they have arrested the biker who struck a police van during a massive swarm of ATV and dirt bike riders driving recklessly on Saturday.
Quintin Whitman, 32, is jailed in Metro on charges of reckless driving, two counts possession of a controlled substance and driving without a license. According to a police affidavit, Whitman was part of the dozens of riders recklessly driving four-wheelers and dirt bikes. Riders were seen doing wheelies and driving in and out of traffic and going the wrong way along lower Broadway. "They failed to drive with due care and had no regard for the safety of other motorists on the roadway," the police affidavit said. As a result, police said Whitman struck a police van. Police said Whitman doesn't have a valid motorcycle license. He was also found with amphetamine pills and marijuana. the affidavit said. Police said Whitman did not have a prescription for the amphetamine, which is a schedule II controlled substance. Meanwhile, Metro Police are still searching for the ATV rider who dragged a police officer down Broadway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:07:47 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We should kill people for traffic offenses? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:13:47 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryLOL that cop is retarded. Playing in traffic like that is a good way to get paralyzed or dead.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:13:59 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Oh, he aimed for that cop. Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:19:00 PM EDT
[#20]
GD calls cops fat and lazy.
Cop tries to police and GD calls him stupid and they all profess how the job should be done. So many experts with so few balls to sign up and try it out in real life 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:19:57 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That ATV/dirt bike gang crap in urban areas looks like a prequel to a Mad Max film. There needs to be a shoot on sight order for that bullshit. Same goes for the hippies who do the "Critical Mass" bicycling things. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:20:36 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
GD calls cops fat and lazy. Cop tries to police and GD calls him stupid and they all profess how the job should be done. So many experts with so few balls to sign up and try it out in real life That shit was explained to most of us when we were 5. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:22:17 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Uh, were we watching the same video? Cop is running along side the cars, atv guy cuts between the cars and they met in the middle. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:22:37 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You don't have to be an expert in law enforcement tactics to know that playing in traffic is a stupid idea. That shit was explained to most of us when we were 5. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:26:11 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're 100% correct. Police departments need to bring themselves into 21st century case law and understand that USSC case Mullenix v. Luna allows them shoot criminals fleeing at high speed in motor vehicles, as they present an ongoing danger to the motoring public. Less grab on. More gunshot to back of head as they put it in drive/step on the gas. You have no Constitutional right to flee arrest and endanger innocent people as you do so. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:29:22 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looks deliberate to me. ATV rider slows down and it looks like he's watching the cop before he speeds up and hits him. At the very least, the cop didn't jump on or in front of the ATV, like some idiots will try to claim. https://i.imgur.com/Qa3WSm2.gif Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Uh, were we watching the same video? Cop is running along side the cars, atv guy cuts between the cars and they met in the middle. https://i.imgur.com/Qa3WSm2.gif |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:34:24 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What if I told you that the job often requires us to be in traffic. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
You don't have to be an expert in law enforcement tactics to know that playing in traffic is a stupid idea. That shit was explained to most of us when we were 5. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:35:40 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I guarantee your job doesn't require you to become a human meat shield to stop a fleeing ATV. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You don't have to be an expert in law enforcement tactics to know that playing in traffic is a stupid idea. That shit was explained to most of us when we were 5. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:38:34 PM EDT
[#29]
Utterly embarrassing for the city... and 2 minutes from my front door.
Get those ferals under control. Kill a few. I don't give a shit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:39:09 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why you no like head and spine injuries? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You don't have to be an expert in law enforcement tactics to know that playing in traffic is a stupid idea. That shit was explained to most of us when we were 5. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:40:35 PM EDT
[#31]
Sometimes, it's just not worth the effort lol.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:53:31 PM EDT
[#32]
Needs Benny Hill music.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 9:58:33 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fleeing at high speed in a vehicle has been ruled a violent crime by SCOTUS. Sykes v. United States, 2011 Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: We should kill people for traffic offenses? 1). It was deemed a violent felony for the purposes of the Armed Career Criminals Act only. 2). That same definition was considered unconstitutionally vague in Johnson v US |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:01:26 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You all keep twisting these cases to mean something they don't. 1). It was deemed a violent felony for the purposes of the Armed Career Criminals Act only. 2). That same definition was considered unconstitutionally vague in Johnson v US Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: We should kill people for traffic offenses? 1). It was deemed a violent felony for the purposes of the Armed Career Criminals Act only. 2). That same definition was considered unconstitutionally vague in Johnson v US |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:04:16 PM EDT
[#35]
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes, Mr. Policeman.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
